Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Closed by sponsor
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Neurolutions, Inc. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to assess whether the NeuroLutions Upper Extremity Rehabilitation System (known as IpsiHand) will help stroke patients regain strength and functional movements in their arm. The IpsiHand system involves using a hand robotic device that is controlled by brain waves, known as a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI). By using the device, participants will be harnessing brainwaves from the side of their brain not affected by stroke to control the robotic device on the hand that is weaker from the stroke.
This trial aims to assess the effectiveness of the NeuroLutions Upper Extremity Rehabilitation System, known as IpsiHand, on functional motor recovery and neuroplasticity for chronic stroke survivors with hemiparesis (N=27). The IpsiHand system involves a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) as a control for a robotic hand orthosis. Participants will complete 16-32 weeks of home therapy with the IpsiHand system.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| IpsiHand Treatment | Experimental | All participants will receive treatment with IpsiHand device |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IpsiHand Treatment | Device | The IpsiHand system utilizes a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) as a control for a robotic hand orthosis donned on the affected upper extremity as participants are guided through a rehabilitation program on a tablet. Participants will complete 16-32 weeks of home therapy with the IpsiHand system. Motor function of their impaired upper extremity will be evaluated at baseline, at 4-week intervals, and 3 months post no-device use, to track progress. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke for Upper Extremity | The Fugl-Meyer is a scale that measures capacity of the arm. There are 33 items that evaluate reflexes, active movement, grasp patterns, speed, and coordination of the arm and hand. Each item is scored from 0-2, with a maximum total score of 66. Higher scores indicate better performance. | Baseline through 3 months post no device use |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Action Research Arm Test | The ARAT is a scale that measures activity participation of the arm. There are 19 items that several types of grasps, grips, pinches, and gross movements of the arm and hand. Each item is scored from 0-3, with a maximum total score of 57. Higher scores indicate better performance. | Baseline through 3 months post no device use |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Diagnosis of stroke(s), with most recent stroke at least 6 months prior to study start (can be ischemic or hemorrhagic)
PROM: Full extension of digits 2 and 3 at MPs, PIPs, and DIPs
English speaking
Intact cognition to provide informed consent
Intact language skills to comprehend and follow directions
Experiencing difficulty performing ADLs with affected upper limb
Upper extremity Botox allowable, but not required
At study initiation, Botox injection will occur between 3-7 days prior to baseline measurement and initiation of device use
Repeat Botox injections must be completed at least 3 days prior to any administration of the outcome measures
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Joel Stein, MD | Columbia University | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28550098 | Background | Bundy DT, Souders L, Baranyai K, Leonard L, Schalk G, Coker R, Moran DW, Huskey T, Leuthardt EC. Contralesional Brain-Computer Interface Control of a Powered Exoskeleton for Motor Recovery in Chronic Stroke Survivors. Stroke. 2017 Jul;48(7):1908-1915. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016304. Epub 2017 May 26. | |
| 29761128 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| D010291 | Paresis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
An occupational therapist independent to the study will review and score 2 outcome measures (Fugl-Meyer and Action Research Arm Test). The study coordinator will randomize the order of the videos for each participant, so that the outcome assessor will not know which time point they are scoring. In other words, the video-outcome assessor will be blinded to the order of the assessments as they are scoring them but will not be blinded to the intervention as all participants will be receiving the same intervention.
Not provided
|
| Box and Block Test | The Box and Block Test measures the number of blocks a participant can pick up and place over a patrician in 1 minute. The number of blocks successfully moved are counted and a higher number indicates better performance. | Baseline through 3 months post no device use |
| Cervera MA, Soekadar SR, Ushiba J, Millan JDR, Liu M, Birbaumer N, Garipelli G. Brain-computer interfaces for post-stroke motor rehabilitation: a meta-analysis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2018 Mar 25;5(5):651-663. doi: 10.1002/acn3.544. eCollection 2018 May. |
| 24136129 | Background | Zeiler SR, Krakauer JW. The interaction between training and plasticity in the poststroke brain. Curr Opin Neurol. 2013 Dec;26(6):609-16. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000025. |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |