Treatment success is a composite criterion defined in the protocol as condition improvement by Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) reported as "a little better", "much better" or "very much better" and absence of serious or severe related adverse events one year after implantation. As this definition of success was not restrictive enough, the Scientific Committee proposed a new definition for the treatment success for the statistical analysis, which was defined by PGI-I reported as "very much better" or "much better" and absence of any severe or serious or grade ≥ III of the Clavien-Dindo classification related adverse event one year after implantation.

Questionnaires from 522 patients were received and validated (scores and sub-scores were able to be calculated and dates were coherent with a follow-up visit at 8 weeks, 12, 24 or 36 months post-implatantion). The analyses were performed on the population with available data for PGI-I at the different study timepoints.

CST provides the means for documenting stress urinary incontinence. CST is considered "positive" if any leakage is noted with cough or valsava. The percentage of patients with negative test was calculated at baseline, at the post-operative visit and at one year.

The analyses were performed on the population with available data for CST (negative or postive result) at the different study timepoints.

Post-void residual (PVR) volume was collected pre- and post implant procedure up to 12 months. If the PVR volume was considered normal by the physician after the procedure, it was not necessary to collect this data at the subsequent follow-up visits.

The analyses were performed on the population with available data for PVR at the different study timepoints. PVRs at 8 weeks and 12 months post-implantation were not interpretable because of too many missing data.

The number of pads used per patient per day was collected. Patients were considered to be pad free if they reported never wearing pads or wear pads just for a sense of security.

The analyses were performed on the population with available data for pad use at the different study timepoints. Data obtained either by follow-up or by questionnaires were pooled.

The ICIQ-UI Short Form is a seft-administred questionnaire to evaluate the frequency, severity and impact on quality of life of urinary incontinence. Question 1 asked, "How often do you leak urine?" Subjects were instructed to select among "none" (0), "about once a week or less often" (1), "2 or 3 times a week" (2), "about once a day" (3), "several times a day" (4), and "all the time" (5). Question 2 asked, "How much urine do you usually leak (whether you wear protection or not)?" Patients responded with "none" (0), "a small amount" (2), "a moderate amount" (4) or "a large amount (6). Question 3 asked, "Overall, how much does leaking urine interfere with your everyday life?" Participants chose a number from 0 (not at all) to 10 (a great deal). Question 1, 2 and 3 are summed to compute the total ICIQ score.The total score range is then a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 21.

The analyses were performed on the population with available data for ICIQ-UI at the different study timepoints.

This non-validated questionnaire provides additional information concerning patient satisfaction. This survey consists of two questions: Question 1 "how satisfied are you with your surgery?". Among 5 point-scale (very satisfied, satisfied, not satisfied-not dissatisfied, dissatisfied and very dissatified), patient check the one items that best describes the subject satisfaction. We measured the percentage of patients who were very satisfied and satisfied. The patients answer the question "Do you recommend this operation to a friend?" by "yes" or "no". We measured the percentage of patients who answered "yes".

Questionnaires from 522 patients were received and validated (scores and sub-scores were able to be calculated and dates were coherent with a follow-up visit at 8 weeks, 12, 24 or 36 months post-implatantion). The analyses were performed on the population with available data for the Subject global statisfaction questionnaire at the different study timepoints.

The Incontinence quality of life questionnaire (I-QoL) is a validated survey questionnaire with 22 items that are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The I-QOL and its subcale scores are computed by adding each item response, subtracting the lowest possible score and diving that sum by the possible raw score range. The scores are then transformed to have a range from 0 (maximum problem) to 100 (no problem at all).

The analyses were performed on the population with available data for I-QoL at the different study timepoints.

The Pelvic organ/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire (PISQ-12) is a validated and reliable short form questionnaire including 12 questions that evaluates sexual function in heterosexual women with urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse. Reponses are graded on a 5-point Likert scale from "never" to "always". The scores were calculated at each assessment visit.

The analyses were performed on the population with available data for PISQ-12 at the different study timepoints.

PGI-I is a validated question that collects the patients' impression of improvement after the surgery. Among this 7 point-scale ("very much better", "much better", "a little better", "no change", "a little worse", "much worse" and "very much worse"), the patients are asked to check the one number that describes how their urinay tract condition is now, compared with how it's was before the surgery. The percentage of patients who describes "very much better" or "much better" or "little better" was measured.

Questionnaires from 522 patients were received and validated (scores and sub-scores were able to be calculated and dates were coherent with a follow-up visit at 8 weeks, 12, 24 or 36 months post-implatantion). The analyses were performed on the population with available data for PGI-I at the different study timepoints.

Treatment success is a composite criterion defined in the protocol as condition improvement by Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) reported as "a little better", "much better" or "very much better" and absence of serious or severe related Adverse Events (AEs) one year after implantation. As this definition of success was not restrictive enough, the Scientific Committee proposed a new definition for the treatment success for the statistical analysis, which was defined by PGI-I reported as "very much better" or "much better" and absence of any severe or serious or grade ≥ III of the Clavien-Dindo classification related AEs one year after implantation.

400 patients completed the study questionnaires at one year post-implantation but 3 PGI-I data were missing

PGI-I is one of the two outcome measures of the composite primary endpoint. It is a validated question that collects the patients' impression of improvement after the surgery. Among this 7 point-scale ("very much better", "much better", "a little better", "no change", "a little worse", "much worse" and "very much worse"), the patients are asked to check the one number that describes how their urinay tract condition is now, compared with how it's was before the surgery. The percentage of patients who describes "very much better" or "much better" or "little better" and the percentage of patients who describes "very much better" or "much better" were measured.

The analyses were performed on the population with available data for PGI-I at 12 months post-implantation.

Related Adverse Events (AEs) are one of the two outcome measures of the composite primary endpoint. All AEs related or judged related to the procedure or the device were reported. The percentage of patients without any severe or serious related AEs and the percentage of patients without any severe or serious or grade ≥ III of the Clavien-Dindo classification related AEs were measured.

The analyses were performed on the population with available data for PGI-I at 12 months post-implantation.