Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
42 patients were treated either with E-CTG (N=20) or SCAF (N=22). The recordings included clinician-based (recession depth, recession width, probing depth, clinical attachment level, keratinized tissue width, tissue thickness, clinical attachment gain (CAG), root coverage (RC), keratinized tissue change (KTC)) and patient-based (wound healing index (WHI), dentine hypersensitivity (DH), tissue appearance, patient expectations and aesthetics) parameters that were taken at baseline, T1 (sixth week), T2 (sixth month) and T3 (first year).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| E-CTG | Active Comparator | Envelope connective tissue graft |
|
| SCAF | Active Comparator | Semilunar connective tissue graft |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E-CTG | Procedure | Envelope connective tissue graft |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| recession depth | Distance between CEJ and GM | baseline |
| recession depth | Distance between CEJ and GM | 6 weeks |
| recession depth | Distance between CEJ and GM | 6 months |
| recession depth | Distance between CEJ and GM | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| recession width | horizontal distance between two borders of recession at CEJ level | baseline |
| recession width | horizontal distance between two borders of recession at CEJ level |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35394710 | Derived | Evginer MS, Olgun E, Parlak HM, Dolgun AB, Keceli HG. Comparison of two techniques in gingival recession treatment: A randomized one-year clinical follow-up study. Dent Med Probl. 2022 Jan-Mar;59(1):121-130. doi: 10.17219/dmp/137621. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005889 | Gingival Recession |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005882 | Gingival Diseases |
| D010510 | Periodontal Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 6 weeks |
| recession width | horizontal distance between two borders of recession at CEJ level | 6 months |
| recession width | horizontal distance between two borders of recession at CEJ level | 12 months |
| probing depth | distance between GM and base of gingival sulcus | baseline |
| probing depth | distance between GM and base of gingival sulcus | 6 weeks |
| probing depth | distance between GM and base of gingival sulcus | 6 months |
| probing depth | distance between GM and base of gingival sulcus | 12 months |
| clinical attachment level | distance between CEJ and base of gingival sulcus | baseline |
| clinical attachment level | distance between CEJ and base of gingival sulcus | 6 weeks |
| clinical attachment level | distance between CEJ and base of gingival sulcus | 6 months |
| clinical attachment level | distance between CEJ and base of gingival sulcus | 12 months |
| keratinized tissue width | distance between GM and MGJ | baseline |
| keratinized tissue width | distance between GM and MGJ | 6 weeks |
| keratinized tissue width | distance between GM and MGJ | 6 months |
| keratinized tissue width | distance between GM and MGJ | 12 months |
| D055093 |
| Periodontal Atrophy |