Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a repetitive transcranial magnetic simulation (rTMS) protocol developed for managing pain and other related symptoms associated with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in cancer patients.
A total of 60 cancer patients who are aged 18 years or above and have persistent peripheral neuropathy for at least 3 months after completion of oxaliplatin-, paclitaxel-, or docetaxel-based chemotherapy will be recruited. After randomization, the experimental group (n = 30) will receive high-frequency rTMS, while the control group (n = 30) will receive sham rTMS. The rTMS will be delivered over M1 (hand representation) of dual hemispheres with 10 trains of 10 Hz pulses for 10 seconds, with a total of 1,000 pulses per hemisphere. The rTMS intensity will be set as 80% resting motor threshold and the interval between each train of pulses will be set as 50 seconds. The rTMS will be delivered as daily session for five consecutive days, followed by two fortnightly maintenance sessions during the follow-up period after the completion of five daily sessions. The rTMS will be delivered by designated physical therapists using "figure-of-8" shaped coil connected to an electromagnetic stimulator in the rehabilitation therapy room of the study hospitals in mainland China.
The research outcomes are feasibility (1. recruitment: i.e. the length of time spent on recruiting participants, the mean number of participants been recruited each month, and the proportion of eligible patients who are finally recruited in the study; 2. eligibility: the proportion of screened patients meeting the inclusion criteria; 3. retention and attrition rates: the proportion of recruited participants who complete the study or who drop out from the study with or without any reason; and 4. appropriateness of clinical outcome measures: the proportion of incomplete questionnaires and neurological tests, as well as the characteristics of the missing data.), acceptability (Chinese version of the Patients' Global Impression of Change [PGIC] scale), safety, and trend of improvement in pain, other related symptoms, and quality of life by rTMS in cancer patients with CIPN.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | Experimental | Real rTMS |
|
| Control group | Sham Comparator | Sham rTMS |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation | Device | The real rTMS will be delivered over M1 (hand representation) of dual hemispheres with 10 trains of 10 Hz pulses for 10 seconds, with a total of 1,000 pulses per hemisphere. The real rTMS intensity will be set as 80% resting motor threshold and the interval between each train of pulses will be set as 50 seconds. The real rTMS will be delivered as daily session for five consecutive days, followed by two fortnightly maintenance sessions during the follow-up period after the completion of five daily sessions. The real rTMS will be delivered by designated physical therapists using "figure-of-8" shaped coil. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Eligibility rate | The proportion of screened patients meeting the inclusion criteria. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year. |
| Recruitment time | The mean number of participants been recruited each month. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year. |
| Recruitment rate | The proportion of eligible patients who are finally recruited in the study. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year. |
| Retention/attrition rate | The proportion of recruited participants who complete the study or who drop out from the study with or without any reason. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year. |
| Appropriateness of clinical outcome measures | The proportion of incomplete questionnaires and neurological tests. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year. |
| Participants' perceived effectiveness | In this study, affective attitude and perceived effectiveness will be measured by using the Chinese version of the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale, a single-item 7-point numerical rating scale from 1 to 7 demonstrating participants' subjective perception of improvement and satisfaction after receiving the intervention (Hurst & Bolton, 2004). The PGIC scale has been recommended by the rTMS research guideline for pain (Klein et al., 2015). | Baseline up to 5 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain perception | The Chinese version of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) will be used to assess pain associated with CIPN. This instrument was developed and validated by Wang et al. (2009) for measuring severity (four scales) and interference (seven scales) of pain in cancer patients, which demonstrated good internal consistencies of both domains (Cronbach's α were 0.894 and 0.915, respectively). | Baseline up to 5 weeks |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Molassiotis, PhD | Contact | (852) 2766-6396 | alex.molasiotis@polyu.edu.hk | |
| Mian Wang, MN | Contact | (86) 151-0711-4663 | mian.wang@connect.polyu.hk |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Alex Molassiotis, PhD | School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation | Device | The sham rTMS of this study will be delivered with the same active coil angled 90-degree way from the scalp. The intensity of sham rTMS will be set at lowest stimulator output that can generate similar noise to the real rTMS. The sham rTMS will be delivered in the same manner and duration with real rTMS. |
|
| Neuropathic symptoms and signs | Total Neuropathy Score-nurse© (TNSn©) is a validated instrument to evaluate symptoms and signs associated with CIPN based on both patient-reported and clinician-assessed data including three symptom questions (distribution areas of numbness, tingling/paresthesias, and neuropathic pain) and testing of vibration and pinprick; each of the symptoms and signs is scored from 0 to 4, with higher score indicating worse condition (Smith, Cohen, Pett & Beck, 2010). | Baseline up to 5 weeks |
| Miscellaneous symptoms associated with CIPN | The Chinese version of Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (C-ESAS) validated by Dong et al. (2015) will be used to explore whether the intervention would bring any change in the concurrently reported symptoms among cancer patients including pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, sleep, well-being, shortness of breath, and potential miscellaneous symptoms that are not listed. Cronbach's α of the C-ESAS was 0.72, indicating an acceptable internal consistency. | Baseline up to 5 weeks |
| Health-related quality of life | Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General questionnaire (FACT-G), a widely used self-reported questionnaire measuring health-related quality-of-life (QoL) in cancer patients, will be used in this study. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity subscale (FACT/GOG-Ntx) will be used to measure the participants' CIPN specific quality of life in this study. It is an 11-item tool added to the FACT measurement system for assessing cancer patients' symptoms and interference induced by neuropathy, which includes sensory, motor, and hearing problems, as well as dysfunctions associated with neuropathy. Good psychometrical properties of the FACT/GOG-Ntx have been demonstrated. | Baseline up to 5 weeks |
| Adverse Effects | To determine the safety of rTMS in this population, participants will be asked to report any adverse effect occur during the study. The adverse effects, including the type, occurrence, and duration, will be recorded using a standard form. According to the guidelines (Klein et al., 2015; Rossi et al., 2009), the potential adverse effects associated with rTMS are transient seizures, headaches, transient hearing changes, local pain, neck pain, toothache, and paresthesia. These potential adverse effects will be listed in the standard form, and will be filled out by the designated therapists based on their observation and the participants' self-report after each treatment session. If any adverse effect occurs but is not listed in the form, the therapist will record the condition in the "Other" column. | Baseline up to 5 weeks |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided