Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The CP288 study is an investigation of a non-Conformité Européene marked stoma product which will be conducted in the UK, Italy, Netherlands, Germany, and Norway. The study will enroll up to 100 subjects. The study is a randomized, open-label, comparative study.
Enrolled participant with an ileostomy or colostomy with liquid output were randomized to test either the non-Conformité Européene marked investigational product or one of the five comparators Conformité Européene marked products first and then will be crossed over to receive the opposite intervention.
The participant will first be included in an information and inclusion visit (V0) and after signing all consent forms will complete three test visits (V1, V2, and V3). Each participant will be enrolled for 2 × 42±3 days in total for the entire investigation, thus for a maximum of 90 days.
The study is a randomised, controlled, open-label, comparative, cross-over, multicentre investigation with two test periods. The study was conducted in four different countries (UK, Germany, Italy, and Norway) with a total of six sites participating.
The study is now complete.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| The non-Conformité Européene marked product, a Conformité Européene marked product | Experimental | Participants first received the non-Conformité Européene marked investigational product for 42±3 days. Then there was a cross-over and the participants received one of the five Conformité Européene marked comparators products, which they used the following 42±3 days. |
|
| A Conformité Européene marked product, then the non-Conformité Européene marked product | Experimental | Participants first received one of the five Conformité Européene marked comparators products for 42±3 days. Then there was a cross-over and the participants received the non-Conformité Européene marked investigational products, which they used the following 42±3 days. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Conformité Européene marked product | Device | New Baseplate is not named at this point |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Max Itching Within a Week at Steady State | Participant were asked to rate their itching around the ostomy on a scale of 0-10 with 0= no itch ad 10= worst possible peristomal skin itch. The primary outcome measure was done on the Intended to Treat population. Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use. | Within a week at steady state |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Varying Frequency of Itching Skin in the Past 14 Days by End of Treatment | Participants were asked how often they had experienced itchy skin around their ostomy in the past 14 days by the end of treatment. The data was distributed into five categories: "None of the time", "A little of the time", Some of the time", A lot of the time", and "All of the time". The results are shown as the percentages of answers for that category out of a total of a 100% (comprising the total of all answers from all the categories). When adding the number for each of the five categories it sums up to 100. So the results are shown as "how many percentages are the answers from one category out of a total of 100% (all the answers)?". |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Has given informed consent to participate by signing the informed consent signature form.
Has an ileostomy or colostomy with liquid output (defined by a 6-7 on the Bristol Scale)
Currently using a flat product
Be at least 18 years of age and have full legal capacity
Have had their stoma for at least three months (90 days)
Can use a product with a max cut size of 40 mm
Has experienced leakage* under the baseplate at least three times within the last 14 days. *leakage defined as output seeping under the baseplate (Appendix 6 - Classification of leakage)
Has symptoms of peristomal skin complications or has peristomal skin complications defined by at least one of the below
Is able to handle the electronic diary (questionnaire/ photo) themselves.
Is able to handle (apply, remove, cut etc.) the product themselves
Is willing to not use barrier film or barrier cream during the investigation
Is willing and suitable (determined by Principal Investigator, or delegate) to use a flat custom cut one-piece open or a two-piece open product during the investigation.
Is willing to change the product (1pc) or baseplate (2pc) at least every fourth days.
Exclusion Criteria:
Is currently receiving or have within the past 60 days received radio-and/or chemotherapy
- low doses chemotherapy (assessed by Principal Investigator) is allowed for indications other than cancer.
Is currently receiving or have within the past month received topical steroid treatment in the peristomal skin area, e.g. lotion or spray.
Is breastfeeding
Is pregnant (based on pregnancy test -urine)
Has known hypersensitivity towards any of the products used in the investigation
-
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nazarena Mazzarro, MD | Coloplast A/S | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ragene Saetre | Larvik | 3256 | Norway |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
79 recruited participants were randomized. Of those 7 participants were excluded as two participants wanted to be discontinued, one participant had device deficiency leading to an Adverse event, two participants had device deficiency not leading to an Adverse event, one participant had an adverse event, and one participant was discontinued due to other reasons.
So 72 participants constituted the intention to treat (ITT) population.
79 participants were recruited from six sites across four countries (UK, Germany, Italy, and Norway) and encompassed the safety population.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | The Non-Conformité Européene Marked Product, Then a Conformité Européene Marked Product | Participants first received the non-Conformité Européene marked investigational product for 42±3 days. Then there was a cross-over and the participants received one of the five Conformité Européene marked comparators products, which they used the following 42±3 days. |
| FG001 | A Conformité Européene Marked Product, Then the Non-Conformité Européene Marked Product | Participants first received one of the five Conformité Européene marked comparators products for 42±3 days. Then there was a cross-over and the participants received the non-Conformité Européene marked investigational products, which they used the following 42±3 days. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Intervention (42 +/- 3 Days) |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Second Intervention (42 +/- 3 Days) |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Total ITT Population Baseline Measures | Arm 1: Participants first received the non-Conformité Européene marked investigational product for 42±3 days. Then there was a cross-over and the participants received one of the five Conformité Européene marked comparators products, which they used the following 42±3 days. Arm 2: Participants first received one of the five Conformité Européene marked comparators products for 42±3 days. Then there was a cross-over and the participants received the non-Conformité Européene marked investigational products, which they used the following 42±3 days. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Max Itching Within a Week at Steady State | Participant were asked to rate their itching around the ostomy on a scale of 0-10 with 0= no itch ad 10= worst possible peristomal skin itch. The primary outcome measure was done on the Intended to Treat population. Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use. | The intention to treat population (full analysis set) was constituted by all randomized subjects with a valid informed consent who have been exposed to at least one product, and with valid information on at least one product with respect to the endpoints. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Within a week at steady state |
|
Each subject was enrolled for 2 x 42±3 days in total for the entire investigation, thus for a maximum of 90 days.
The relationship to the investigational or comparator product were collected. The Safety population constituted the subjects who have given informed consent and were 79 participants.
The participants in each arm represent an adverse event reported that was either: "Not related", "Unlikely related", "Possibly related", "Probably related", or "Definitely related", to the Non-Conformité Européene Marked Product or the Conformité Européene Marked product.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Non-Conformité Européene Marked Product | Product is not named at this point | 0 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ileus | Gastrointestinal disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment | Ileus: patient experienced severe pan in the stomach. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dental abscess | Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vice President, Medical Affairs | Coloplast | +45 4911 1111 | clinical-studies@coloplast.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 2, 2019 | Nov 8, 2021 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Conformité Européene marked competitor products | Device | The Conformité Européene marked competitor products are considered Standard of Care or products considered to be part of Standard of Care in coming years. |
|
| past 14 days by end of treatment |
| Max Pain Within a Week at Steady State | Participant were asked to rate their pain around the ostomy on a scale of 0-10 with 0= no pain ad 10= worst possible pain. Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use. | Within one week at steady state |
| Percentage of Participants With Varying Frequency of Pain in the Past 14 Days by End of Treatment | Participants were asked how often they had experienced pain around their ostomy in the past 14 days by the end of treatment. The data was distributed into five categories: "None of the time", "A little of the time", Some of the time", A lot of the time", and "All of the time". The results are shown as the percentages of answers for that category out of a total of a 100% (comprising the total of all answers from all the categories). When adding the number for each of the five categories it sums up to 100. So the results are shown as "how many percentages are the answers from one category out of a total of 100% (all the answers)?". | past 14 days by end of treatment |
| Max Burning Within a Week at Steady State | Participant were asked to rate burning around the ostomy on a scale of 0-10 with 0= no itch ad 10= worst possible burning sensation. Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use. | Within one week at steady state |
| Percentage of Participants With Varying Frequency of Burning in the Past 14 Days by End of Treatment | Participants were asked how often they had experienced a burning sensation around their ostomy in the past 14 days by the end of treatment. The data was distributed into five categories: "None of the time", "A little of the time", Some of the time", A lot of the time", and "All of the time". The results are shown as the percentages of answers for that category out of a total of a 100% (comprising the total of all answers from all the categories). When adding the number for each of the five categories it sums up to 100. So the results are shown as "how many percentages are the answers from one category out of a total of 100% (all the answers)?". | past 14 days by end of treatment |
| Bleeding Around the Ostomy at Each Baseplate Change at Steady State | Participant were asked if they had experienced bleeding around the ostomy within 1 week. Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use. | Within one week at steady state |
| Weeping Around the Ostomy at Each Baseplate Change at Steady State | Participant were asked if they had experienced weeping around the ostomy within 1 week. Steady state period of the treatment period begins after three weeks of product use. | Within one week at steady state |
| Ulcers Around the Ostomy at Each Baseplate Change at Steady State | Participant were asked if they had experienced ulcers around the ostomy within 1 week. Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use. | Within one week at steady state |
| Max Overall Physical Discomfort Within a Week Per Baseplate Change at Steady State | Participant were asked to rate their overall physical discomfort around the ostomy on a scale of 0-10 with 0= no discomfort/difficulty and 10= a lot of discomfort/difficulty. Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use. | Within one week at steady state |
| Max Overall Ability to Move Around Within a Week Per Baseplate Change at Steady State | Participant were asked to rate their overall ability to move around on a scale of 0-10 with 0= no discomfort/difficulty and 10= a lot of discomfort/difficulty. Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use. | Within one week at steady state |
| Max Overall Ability to Stick the Stoma Bag Adhesive to the Skin Within a Week Per Baseplate Change at Steady State | Participant were asked to rate the overall ability to stick the stoma bag adhesive to their skin since last change of product on a scale of 0-10 with 0= no discomfort/difficulty and 10= a lot of discomfort/difficulty. Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use. | Within one week at steady state |
| Discoloration Area (cm^2) Per Baseplate Change at Steady State | Participant were asked to take photos of their peristomal skin at each baseplate change. The discoloration area of the peristomal skin was determined using an algorithm. The algorithm estimated the area of the discolored skin (divided into three different zones). Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use. | 3 weeks |
| Intensity of Discolorated Area Scored Per Baseplate Change at Steady State After Three Weeks of Product Use | Photos of the peristomal skin was taken at each baseplate change. The intensity was determined with an overlay to the artificial intelligence algorithm. The overlay divided the area into ten different intensity intervals: "Intensity interval 1"=0-10 …., "Intensity interval 10"=91-100% redness. The score was then calculated as follows: 1*(Interval 1 measurement)..+ 10*(Interval 10 measurement). Thus, if the area was within the first interval (0-10% redness) it was multiplied with 1 or within Interval 10 it was multiplied with 10, resulting in a intensity score for the total area. If there is no discoloration the score is 0, and there is no theoretical maximum. A large score equals a high intensity on the skin. In the description of the endpoint (appendix. 1 in CIP), it was to be determined in the inner and outer zone per baseplate change at steady state. However, the algorithm only estimated a total intensity score; thus, the intensity will not be reported per inner and outer zone. | 3 weeks |
| Total Discoloration, Erosion, and Tissue Overgrowth (DET) Score by End of Treatment at Steady State | Participant were asked to take photos close to the stoma, which was then assessed by a sponsor or health care professionals. They determined the discoloration, erosion, and tissue overgrowth domain by scoring the area (0-3, with 3 being a large area affected), and severity (1-2, with 2 being the highest severity) affected by each domain. Each three domains contributes to the calculation of the total Discoloration, Erosion and Tissue overgrowth score (DET) going from a scale of 0 to 15 ("Normal skin" (DET=0), "Mild" (DET=2- 3), "Moderate" (DET=4- 6), and "Severe" (7-15)). Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use. | 3 weeks |
| Discoloration Item Score by End of Treatment at Steady State | Participant were asked to take photos close to the stoma, which was then assessed by a sponsor or health care professionals. Discoloration is a part of the discoloration, erosion, and tissue overgrowth (DET) score where all domains are assess to give a total DET score, with a min of 0 and max of 15. The discoloration domain was scored by area (0-3, with 3 being a large area affected), and severity (1-2, with 2 being the highest severity) affected and the scores were added together for a total discoloration score (with the max total score being 5). The area is assessed first and if this is 0 then the score for discoloration is 0, meaning the severity is not assessed. This means that the maximum score possible is 5 and the lowest score possible is 0 and the higher the score the more discolored skin. Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use | 3 weeks |
| Erosion Item Score by End of Treatment at Steady State | Participant were asked to take photos close to the stoma, which was then assessed by a sponsor or health care professionals. Erosion is a part of the discoloration, erosion, and tissue overgrowth (DET) score where all domains are assess to give a total DET score, with a min of 0 and max of 15.The erosion domain was determined by scoring the area (0-3, with 3 being a large area affected), and severity (1-2, with 2 being the highest severity) affected and then adding the scores together for a total score (with the max total score being 5). The area is assessed first and if this is 0 then the score for erosion is 0, meaning the severity is not assessed. This means that the maximum score possible is 5 and the lowest score possible is 0 and the higher the score the more eroded skin. Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use. | 3 weeks |
| Tissue Overgrowth Item Score by End of Treatment at Steady State | Participant were asked to take photos close to the stoma, which was then assessed by a sponsor or health care professionals. Tissue overgrowth is a part of the discoloration, erosion, and tissue overgrowth (DET) score where all domains are assess to give a total DET score, with a min of 0 and max of 15. The Tissue Overgrowth domain was assessed by scoring the area (0-3, with 3 being a large area affected), and severity (1-2, with 2 being the highest severity) affected and then adding the scores together for a total score (with the max total score being 5). The area is assessed first and if this is 0 then the score for tissue overgrowth is 0, meaning the severity is not assessed. This means that the maximum score possible is 5 and the lowest score possible is 0 and the higher the score the more tissue overgrowth. Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use. | 3 weeks |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Weight (kg) | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg |
|
| Height (cm) | Mean | Standard Deviation | cm |
|
| BMI (kg/cm^2) | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/cm^2 |
|
| Stoma age | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Type of stoma | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | Conformité Européene Marked Comparator Baseplate Change | The assessment was done after a baseplate change with one of the five Conformité Européene marked comparator products |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Varying Frequency of Itching Skin in the Past 14 Days by End of Treatment | Participants were asked how often they had experienced itchy skin around their ostomy in the past 14 days by the end of treatment. The data was distributed into five categories: "None of the time", "A little of the time", Some of the time", A lot of the time", and "All of the time". The results are shown as the percentages of answers for that category out of a total of a 100% (comprising the total of all answers from all the categories). When adding the number for each of the five categories it sums up to 100. So the results are shown as "how many percentages are the answers from one category out of a total of 100% (all the answers)?". | The intention to treat population (full analysis set) was constituted by all randomized subjects with a valid informed consent who have been exposed to at least one product, and with valid information on at least one product with respect to the endpoints. The Outcome Measure Data Table depict (seen below) the percentages of total from the statistical data model analyzing 67 participants with measurements in at least one of the arms/groups. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | past 14 days by end of treatment |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Max Pain Within a Week at Steady State | Participant were asked to rate their pain around the ostomy on a scale of 0-10 with 0= no pain ad 10= worst possible pain. Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use. | The intention to treat population (full analysis set) was constituted by all randomized subjects with a valid informed consent who have been exposed to at least one product, and with valid information on at least one product with respect to the endpoints. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Within one week at steady state |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Varying Frequency of Pain in the Past 14 Days by End of Treatment | Participants were asked how often they had experienced pain around their ostomy in the past 14 days by the end of treatment. The data was distributed into five categories: "None of the time", "A little of the time", Some of the time", A lot of the time", and "All of the time". The results are shown as the percentages of answers for that category out of a total of a 100% (comprising the total of all answers from all the categories). When adding the number for each of the five categories it sums up to 100. So the results are shown as "how many percentages are the answers from one category out of a total of 100% (all the answers)?". | The intention to treat population (full analysis set) was constituted by all randomized subjects with a valid informed consent who have been exposed to at least one product, and with valid information on at least one product with respect to the endpoints. The Outcome Measure Data Table depict (seen below) the percentages of total from the statistical data model analyzing 67 participants with measurements in at least one of the arms/groups. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | past 14 days by end of treatment |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Max Burning Within a Week at Steady State | Participant were asked to rate burning around the ostomy on a scale of 0-10 with 0= no itch ad 10= worst possible burning sensation. Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use. | The intention to treat population (full analysis set) was constituted by all randomized subjects with a valid informed consent who have been exposed to at least one product, and with valid information on at least one product with respect to the endpoints. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Within one week at steady state |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Varying Frequency of Burning in the Past 14 Days by End of Treatment | Participants were asked how often they had experienced a burning sensation around their ostomy in the past 14 days by the end of treatment. The data was distributed into five categories: "None of the time", "A little of the time", Some of the time", A lot of the time", and "All of the time". The results are shown as the percentages of answers for that category out of a total of a 100% (comprising the total of all answers from all the categories). When adding the number for each of the five categories it sums up to 100. So the results are shown as "how many percentages are the answers from one category out of a total of 100% (all the answers)?". | The intention to treat population (full analysis set) was constituted by all randomized subjects with a valid informed consent who have been exposed to at least one product, and with valid information on at least one product with respect to the endpoints. The Outcome Measure Data Table depict (seen below) the percentages of total from the statistical data model analyzing 67 participants with measurements in at least one of the arms/groups. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | past 14 days by end of treatment |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Bleeding Around the Ostomy at Each Baseplate Change at Steady State | Participant were asked if they had experienced bleeding around the ostomy within 1 week. Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use. | The intention to treat population (full analysis set) was constituted by all randomized subjects with a valid informed consent who have been exposed to at least one product, and with valid information on at least one product with respect to the endpoints. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Mean odds, marginal | Within one week at steady state |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Weeping Around the Ostomy at Each Baseplate Change at Steady State | Participant were asked if they had experienced weeping around the ostomy within 1 week. Steady state period of the treatment period begins after three weeks of product use. | The intention to treat population (full analysis set) was constituted by all randomized subjects with a valid informed consent who have been exposed to at least one product, and with valid information on at least one product with respect to the endpoints. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Mean odds, marginal | Within one week at steady state |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Ulcers Around the Ostomy at Each Baseplate Change at Steady State | Participant were asked if they had experienced ulcers around the ostomy within 1 week. Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use. | The intention to treat population (full analysis set) was constituted by all randomized subjects with a valid informed consent who have been exposed to at least one product, and with valid information on at least one product with respect to the endpoints. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Mean odds, marginal | Within one week at steady state |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Max Overall Physical Discomfort Within a Week Per Baseplate Change at Steady State | Participant were asked to rate their overall physical discomfort around the ostomy on a scale of 0-10 with 0= no discomfort/difficulty and 10= a lot of discomfort/difficulty. Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use. | The intention to treat population (full analysis set) was constituted by all randomized subjects with a valid informed consent who have been exposed to at least one product, and with valid information on at least one product with respect to the endpoints. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Within one week at steady state |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Max Overall Ability to Move Around Within a Week Per Baseplate Change at Steady State | Participant were asked to rate their overall ability to move around on a scale of 0-10 with 0= no discomfort/difficulty and 10= a lot of discomfort/difficulty. Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use. | The intention to treat population (full analysis set) was constituted by all randomized subjects with a valid informed consent who have been exposed to at least one product, and with valid information on at least one product with respect to the endpoints. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Within one week at steady state |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Max Overall Ability to Stick the Stoma Bag Adhesive to the Skin Within a Week Per Baseplate Change at Steady State | Participant were asked to rate the overall ability to stick the stoma bag adhesive to their skin since last change of product on a scale of 0-10 with 0= no discomfort/difficulty and 10= a lot of discomfort/difficulty. Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use. | The intention to treat population (full analysis set) was constituted by all randomized subjects with a valid informed consent who have been exposed to at least one product, and with valid information on at least one product with respect to the endpoints. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Within one week at steady state |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Discoloration Area (cm^2) Per Baseplate Change at Steady State | Participant were asked to take photos of their peristomal skin at each baseplate change. The discoloration area of the peristomal skin was determined using an algorithm. The algorithm estimated the area of the discolored skin (divided into three different zones). Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use. | The intention to treat population (full analysis set) was constituted by all randomized subjects with a valid informed consent who have been exposed to at least one product, and with valid information on at least one product with respect to the endpoints. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | cm^2 | 3 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Intensity of Discolorated Area Scored Per Baseplate Change at Steady State After Three Weeks of Product Use | Photos of the peristomal skin was taken at each baseplate change. The intensity was determined with an overlay to the artificial intelligence algorithm. The overlay divided the area into ten different intensity intervals: "Intensity interval 1"=0-10 …., "Intensity interval 10"=91-100% redness. The score was then calculated as follows: 1*(Interval 1 measurement)..+ 10*(Interval 10 measurement). Thus, if the area was within the first interval (0-10% redness) it was multiplied with 1 or within Interval 10 it was multiplied with 10, resulting in a intensity score for the total area. If there is no discoloration the score is 0, and there is no theoretical maximum. A large score equals a high intensity on the skin. In the description of the endpoint (appendix. 1 in CIP), it was to be determined in the inner and outer zone per baseplate change at steady state. However, the algorithm only estimated a total intensity score; thus, the intensity will not be reported per inner and outer zone. | The intention to treat population (full analysis set) was constituted by all randomized subjects with a valid informed consent who have been exposed to at least one product, and with valid information on at least one product with respect to the endpoints. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Total intensity area score (cm^2) | 3 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Total Discoloration, Erosion, and Tissue Overgrowth (DET) Score by End of Treatment at Steady State | Participant were asked to take photos close to the stoma, which was then assessed by a sponsor or health care professionals. They determined the discoloration, erosion, and tissue overgrowth domain by scoring the area (0-3, with 3 being a large area affected), and severity (1-2, with 2 being the highest severity) affected by each domain. Each three domains contributes to the calculation of the total Discoloration, Erosion and Tissue overgrowth score (DET) going from a scale of 0 to 15 ("Normal skin" (DET=0), "Mild" (DET=2- 3), "Moderate" (DET=4- 6), and "Severe" (7-15)). Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use. | The intention to treat population (full analysis set) was constituted by all randomized subjects with a valid informed consent who have been exposed to at least one product, and with valid information on at least one product with respect to the endpoints. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | 3 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Discoloration Item Score by End of Treatment at Steady State | Participant were asked to take photos close to the stoma, which was then assessed by a sponsor or health care professionals. Discoloration is a part of the discoloration, erosion, and tissue overgrowth (DET) score where all domains are assess to give a total DET score, with a min of 0 and max of 15. The discoloration domain was scored by area (0-3, with 3 being a large area affected), and severity (1-2, with 2 being the highest severity) affected and the scores were added together for a total discoloration score (with the max total score being 5). The area is assessed first and if this is 0 then the score for discoloration is 0, meaning the severity is not assessed. This means that the maximum score possible is 5 and the lowest score possible is 0 and the higher the score the more discolored skin. Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use | The intention to treat population (full analysis set) was constituted by all randomized subjects with a valid informed consent who have been exposed to at least one product, and with valid information on at least one product with respect to the endpoints. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | 3 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Erosion Item Score by End of Treatment at Steady State | Participant were asked to take photos close to the stoma, which was then assessed by a sponsor or health care professionals. Erosion is a part of the discoloration, erosion, and tissue overgrowth (DET) score where all domains are assess to give a total DET score, with a min of 0 and max of 15.The erosion domain was determined by scoring the area (0-3, with 3 being a large area affected), and severity (1-2, with 2 being the highest severity) affected and then adding the scores together for a total score (with the max total score being 5). The area is assessed first and if this is 0 then the score for erosion is 0, meaning the severity is not assessed. This means that the maximum score possible is 5 and the lowest score possible is 0 and the higher the score the more eroded skin. Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use. | The intention to treat population (full analysis set) was constituted by all randomized subjects with a valid informed consent who have been exposed to at least one product, and with valid information on at least one product with respect to the endpoints. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | 3 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Tissue Overgrowth Item Score by End of Treatment at Steady State | Participant were asked to take photos close to the stoma, which was then assessed by a sponsor or health care professionals. Tissue overgrowth is a part of the discoloration, erosion, and tissue overgrowth (DET) score where all domains are assess to give a total DET score, with a min of 0 and max of 15. The Tissue Overgrowth domain was assessed by scoring the area (0-3, with 3 being a large area affected), and severity (1-2, with 2 being the highest severity) affected and then adding the scores together for a total score (with the max total score being 5). The area is assessed first and if this is 0 then the score for tissue overgrowth is 0, meaning the severity is not assessed. This means that the maximum score possible is 5 and the lowest score possible is 0 and the higher the score the more tissue overgrowth. Steady state period of the treatment period began after three weeks of product use. | The intention to treat population (full analysis set) was constituted by all randomized subjects with a valid informed consent who have been exposed to at least one product, and with valid information on at least one product with respect to the endpoints. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | 3 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| 74 |
| 0 |
| 74 |
| 27 |
| 74 |
| EG001 | Conformité Européene Marked Products | 1-piece and 2-piece stoma devices already on the market. | 0 | 73 | 0 | 73 | 28 | 73 |
| EG002 | Total Safety Population | This arm/group constitutes the safety population | 0 | 79 | 5 | 79 | 43 | 79 |
|
| Exacerbated cystic fibrosis | Gastrointestinal disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Heart attack | Cardiac disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Guillain-barre syndrome | Immune system disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Feeding line infection | Infections and infestations | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hay fever | General disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Osteomyelitis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sinus pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Tiredness | Surgical and medical procedures | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrohea | Gastrointestinal disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Leakage and bleeding | Gastrointestinal disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Malaise | General disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bleeding from stoma | Gastrointestinal disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bowel obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Frequent watery stool | Gastrointestinal disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Output more liquid than normal | Gastrointestinal disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| One bladder at stoma | Gastrointestinal disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Swollen stoma | Gastrointestinal disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fever | Infections and infestations | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Painful/Sore Throat | Infections and infestations | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Excessive sweating | Infections and infestations | SOC code | Systematic Assessment | EXCESSIVE SWEATING (REPORTED FEELING HOT - TEMPERATURE 37.4 DEGREES CELSIUS) |
|
| Prexia (38.1 DEGREES C) | Infections and infestations | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Muscle cramps in legs | Nervous system disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Shoulder pain | Nervous system disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bleeding skin | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Blotchy skin around stoma | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Broken skin | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Burning around stoma | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Contact dermatitis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment | Allergic contact dermatitis |
|
| Cuts under stoma | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dark patches of skin around stoma | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dry/flaky skin around stoma | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Erosions/Ulcers | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Itching skin | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Redness | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Stinging | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin irritation | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin complication | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Leakage and skin irritation | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Oozing skin | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | SOC code | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Some of the time |
|
| A lot of the time |
|
| All of the time |
|
| Some of the time |
|
| A lot of the time |
|
| All of the time |
|
| Some of the time |
|
| A lot of the time |
|
| All of the time |
|