Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the present study is to develop, implement a planning tool for rare and complex visceral surgical procedures. With the successful implementation of the planning tool the study will contribute to the improvement of intraoperative processes and their outcome in low volume surgery and offer an alternative to continued centralization of surgical care especially in case of geographical or disease specific premises.
The quality of the intraoperative process is still a blind spot, when it comes to clinical surgical research in the operating room. In contrast to pre and postop process optimization with tools like the World Health Organization (WHO) checklist or the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol intraoperative processes tend to be poorly defined especially in rare and complex visceral surgery (e.g. esophageal, pancreatic rectal resection, sarcoma surgery, revisional bariatric surgery). This leads to delay, increased stress of the operating team and increased intraoperative mistakes and eventually increased complication rates. From previous investigations we know that step by step planning and briefing of the entire OR Team can reduce operative interruptions. With the development of a dedicated planning tool which allows to create and distribute step by step protocols for rare and complex visceral surgical procedures to the entire OR Team we hope to decrease delays and reduce OR time variance.
Objective: Development and implementation of a planning tool for rare and complex visceral surgical procedures.
Outcomes: Primary outcome: (delay/variability) operative times as defined as time from skin incision to skin closure
Secondary outcomes:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Patients in the interventional arm are operated after augmented planning of the procedure. The plan is prepared by the surgeon and made available to the study team a day prior to the procedure and on a screen in the OR during the procedure. The plan includes the current and next operative step, the used equipment and the approximate time used as well as the estimated time of when the procedure will end. |
|
| Control | No Intervention | In the control cases no particular planning and distribution of operative plan is performed. The standard preparation only includes the distribution of information on the desired positioning of the patient, necessary special equipment and the overall estimated OR time. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Augmented preoperative planning | Procedure | The study investigates the impact of augmented preoperative planning on OR time variance in complex and rare visceral surgical procedures. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| delay/variability of operative time | The primary outcome is the (delay/variability) of operative time as defined as time from skin incision to skin closure that will be recorded with the hospital OR planning program (Ismed Protect Data) and compared to preoperatively planned times. | 1 year, measured after every operation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Costs | Costs will be calculated as intraoperative delay compared to preoperative planning in minutes multiplied with the OR minute costs of the institution in addition to the average salaries per minute of the involved surgical staff. OR minute costs will be calculated by dividing the OR and anesthesia cost units through the overall operative time in the institution. The OR cost unit includes the personnel expenses for operating nurses and other staff (including cleaner and others) as well as maintenance costs (single use equipment, depreciation on buildings and running expenses like water and electricity etc. The cost unit anesthesia includes all expenses for personnel (doctors and nurses), depreciation for respirators and other devices as well as expandable materials. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Marco von Strauss und Torney, PD Dr. MD | University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Hospital Basel/Dep. of General and Visceral Surgery | Basel | Canton of Basel-City | 4031 | Switzerland |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A single centre randomized open label trial.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 1 year, calculated after every case once patient is dismissed |
| Level of stress | Level of stress of each operating team member will be assessed directly postoperatively with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) report (operated on an ipad for data collection). The VAS Scale will consist of a 0 (no stress) to 7 (maximum stress) item scale. | 1 year, measured during every operation |
| Number of intraoperative mistakes | Number of intraoperative mistakes will be recorded with a pedal button operated by the first assistant on the demand of the lead surgeon. | 1 year, measured during every operation and compiled after the operation is finished |
| Number and severity of intraoperative complications | Number and severity of intraoperative complications will be assessed directly postoperatively by the lead surgeon and or first assistant, audio video records are available for review purposes. Postoperative complications will be recorded after discharge on the basis of discharge summary and proceeding notes of the patient. | 1 year, measured during every operation and compiled after the operation |