Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Regional anesthesia and analgesia techniques are frequently used to provide pain control in pediatric surgical applications. The main advantages of these techniques include ease of application, good analgesic efficacy and low risk of complications (1). It reduces the need for parenteral opioids and increases the quality of postoperative pain control and the satisfaction of the patient and family (2). The aim of this study was to compare the contribution of TAP block and ESP block combined with sedation in pediatric surgery to anesthesia and analgesia during surgery without general anesthesia.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| transversus abdominis plane block | Active Comparator | Group 1 (n: 50): those who underwent TAP block after induction of propofol atropine and maintained with only 1 mg / kg / h propofol in anesthesia maintenance |
|
| erector spinae block | Active Comparator | Group 2 (n: 50): those who underwent ESP block after propofol atropine induction and maintained with only 1 mg / kg / h propofol in anesthesia maintenance |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound guided erector spinae block | Device | Group 2 (n: 50): those who underwent ESP block after propofol atropine induction and maintained with only 1 mg / kg / h propofol in anesthesia maintenance |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Visual analogue scale | effectiveness of erector spinae block on intraoperative anesthesia | 4 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ilke küpeli | Contact | +905555485632 | ilkeser2004@gmail.com | |
| ufuk kuyrukluyıldız | Contact | drufuk2001@gmail.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erzincan University | Erzincan | 24100 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30886130 | Result | Kot P, Rodriguez P, Granell M, Cano B, Rovira L, Morales J, Broseta A, Andres J. The erector spinae plane block: a narrative review. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Jun;72(3):209-220. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.19.00012. Epub 2019 Mar 19. | |
| 20857679 | Result | Tanaka M, Mori N, Murakami W, Tanaka N, Oku K, Hiramatsu R, Nakagawa M, Yasumoto K. [The effect of transversus abdominis plane block for pediatric patients receiving bone graft to the alveolar cleft]. Masui. 2010 Sep;59(9):1185-9. Japanese. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 27501016 | Result | Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451. |
| 29341379 | Result | Hernandez MA, Palazzi L, Lapalma J, Cravero J. Erector spinae plane block for inguinal hernia repair in preterm infants. Paediatr Anaesth. 2018 Mar;28(3):298-299. doi: 10.1111/pan.13325. Epub 2018 Jan 17. |
| 23252578 | Result | Stuart-Smith K. Hemiarthroplasty performed under transversus abdominis plane block in a patient with severe cardiorespiratory disease. Anaesthesia. 2013 Apr;68(4):417-20. doi: 10.1111/anae.12108. Epub 2012 Dec 17. |
| 27366540 | Result | Tekelioglu UY, Demirhan A, Sit M, Kurt AD, Bilgi M, Kocoglu H. Colostomy with Transversus Abdominis Plane Block. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2015 Dec;43(6):424-6. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2015.89410. Epub 2015 Dec 1. |