Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1R21AG059942-01A1 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute on Aging (NIA) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Evaluates an intervention designed to improve everyday memory function, contrasting people receiving the intervention with a group that receives traditional memory strategy training.
This project seeks to develop and validate a novel approach to training everyday memory functioning in older adults. The approach (1) trains people to use simple but effective memory skills that have broad applicability in everyday life and (2) shapes a set of skills and habits of mind that will increase the likelihood of effective use of skills and memory aids. It is based on a metacognitive perspective on self-regulation in cognitively demanding situations and informed by recent theories about how suboptimal habit patterns can be altered. The approach has not yet been used in an everyday memory intervention in high-functioning, community-dwelling older adults. The proposed research validates ecological momentary assessment methods to get actual behavioral measures of forgetting in everyday life. It then uses these procedures in a randomized experiment that contrasts the everyday memory intervention group with a traditional memory-strategy training group. The hypothesis is that the everyday memory training intervention will reduce everyday memory errors and memory complaints, whereas the memory strategy training will alter strategy use and memory performance, with little cross-over effect. The hypothesized pattern will establish the explicit benefits of our everyday memory intervention procedures and demonstrate the limitation of standard memory training for that purpose.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Everyday Metacognitive Memory | Experimental | Training in techniques for managing memory demands in everyday life |
|
| Memory Strategy Control | Active Comparator | Trains the use of memory strategies for learning new associations and concepts |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Everyday Metacognitive Memory Intervention | Behavioral | Provides training in use of techniques and procedures to enhance proactive self-regulatory control over everyday memory demands, including strategies for learning information, planning for meeting everyday goals, and monitoring of efficacy of goal pursuit. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Everyday Memory Failures | Across the data collection period, participants audio recorded descriptions of their memory failures on a smartphone app. The audio recordings were transcribed and then cleaned and qualitatively coded so that the number of memory failures each participant reported during the data collection period could be counted. The data was qualitatively coded to ensure an accurate count of the number of memory failures per participant without counting duplicate events or accidental reports. Average daily number of reported memory failures from EMA & daily diaries is reported. | minimum 8 day period after training on app prior to posttest |
| Prospective Memory Lab Contacts | Number of successfully completed lab contacts (maximum of 4) | Two weeks prior to posttest |
| Prospective Memory Lab Contact Efficiency | median absolute time deviation (in minutes) from scheduled lab contact for completed contacts | Two weeks prior to posttest |
| Everyday Cognition Simulation Task: ATM Task (Number of Errors) | Computerized task to simulate use of an ATM machine. Measure: number of errors | posttest only |
| Czaja Everyday Cognition Simulation Task: Prescription Refill Task (Number of Errors) | Computerized task to simulate use of an automated telephone program to refill prescriptions. Measure: Number of errors | posttest only |
| Free Recall Test | Computerized task to present 30 concrete nouns, 6 from 5 taxonomic categories (Hultsch, Hertzog, Dixon, & Small, 1998) Measure is proportion of 30 words recalled |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| MFQ Memory Complaint (Frequency of Forgetting Scale) | Summative Likert scale measuring frequency of reported memory problems for specific types of problems Measure is average item Likert rating on a 1-7 scale. Higher score indicates fewer memory problems | pretest and posttest (approximately 1 month lag) |
| PBMI Specific Memory Self-Efficacy |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Christopher Hertzog, Ph.D | Georgia Institute of Technology | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adult Cognition Lab | Atlanta | Georgia | 30332 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20016124 | Background | Bailey H, Dunlosky J, Hertzog C. Metacognitive training at home: does it improve older adults' learning? Gerontology. 2010;56(4):414-20. doi: 10.1159/000266030. Epub 2009 Dec 11. | |
| 24577079 | Background | Bailey HR, Dunlosky J, Hertzog C. Does strategy training reduce age-related deficits in working memory? Gerontology. 2014;60(4):346-56. doi: 10.1159/000356699. Epub 2014 Feb 27. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study was converted to a completely on-line study due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Enrollment began in March of 2021.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Everyday Metacognitive Memory | Training in techniques for managing memory demands in everyday life Everyday Metacognitive Memory Intervention: Provides training in use of techniques and procedures to enhance proactive self-regulatory control over everyday memory demands, including strategies for learning information, planning for meeting everyday goals, and monitoring of efficacy of goal pursuit. |
| FG001 | Memory Strategy Control | Trains the use of memory strategies for learning new associations and concepts Memory Strategy Control Intervention: Trains use of standard mnemonic techniques such as imagery and sentence generation for learning new associations and organizational and distinctiveness-based strategies for learning sets of items (e.g., word lists). |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Adults ages 70-85 from greater Atlanta GA area meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Everyday Metacognitive Memory | Training in techniques for managing memory demands in everyday life Everyday Metacognitive Memory Intervention: Provides training in use of techniques and procedures to enhance proactive self-regulatory control over everyday memory demands, including strategies for learning information, planning for meeting everyday goals, and monitoring of efficacy of goal pursuit. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 1 non-response |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Everyday Memory Failures | Across the data collection period, participants audio recorded descriptions of their memory failures on a smartphone app. The audio recordings were transcribed and then cleaned and qualitatively coded so that the number of memory failures each participant reported during the data collection period could be counted. The data was qualitatively coded to ensure an accurate count of the number of memory failures per participant without counting duplicate events or accidental reports. Average daily number of reported memory failures from EMA & daily diaries is reported. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | average daily number memory failures/day | minimum 8 day period after training on app prior to posttest |
|
7 weeks
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Everyday Metacognitive Memory | Training in techniques for managing memory demands in everyday life Everyday Metacognitive Memory Intervention: Provides training in use of techniques and procedures to enhance proactive self-regulatory control over everyday memory demands, including strategies for learning information, planning for meeting everyday goals, and monitoring of efficacy of goal pursuit. |
Not provided
Not provided
We were forced to change the protocol to allow only remote participation from home given the COVID-19 pandemic. Adjusting assessment procedures took time and also forced us to reduce the scope of the intervention, especially one on one shaping of trained procedures, given constraints on available staff to coach participants with an accelerated testing schedule. Changes in assessment procedures led to some lost data through failed programs or participant errors in saving data.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Christopher Hertzog | Georgia Institute of Technology | 404-894-6774 | ch18@gatech.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Dec 7, 2022 | Dec 7, 2022 | Prot_001.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Dec 7, 2022 | Dec 7, 2022 | SAP_002.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Jun 24, 2021 | Dec 13, 2021 | ICF_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Memory Strategy Control Intervention | Behavioral | Trains use of standard mnemonic techniques such as imagery and sentence generation for learning new associations and organizational and distinctiveness-based strategies for learning sets of items (e.g., word lists). |
|
| pretest and posttest (approximately 1 month lag) |
| Associative Recall Test | Computerized task to present 40 concrete-concrete associatively unrelated noun pairs (Hertzog, Sinclair, & Dunlosky, 2010) Outcome is proportion of 40 words correctly recalled. | pretest and posttest (approximately 1 month lag) |
| Story Recall | gist recall of narrative story (total number of propositions (ideas) from story recalled) | posttest only |
| Everyday Cognition Simulation Task: ATM Task (Time in Seconds) | Computerized task to simulate use of an ATM machine. Measure: time to complete task (in seconds) | posttest only |
| Czaja Everyday Cognition Simulation Task: Prescription Refill Task (Time in Seconds) | Computerized task to simulate use of an automated telephone program to refill prescriptions. Measure: time to complete task (in seconds) | posttest only |
The Personal Beliefs about Memory Instruments (PBMI) Specific Memory Self-Efficacy measurement is a summative visual analog rating scale measuring self-rated memory aggregated over multiple specific types of memory. Outcomes scaled in average proportion of distance from left (0) to maximum of 1.00 (higher scores indicate greater memory self-efficacy). |
| pretest and posttest (approximately 1 month lag) |
| PBMI Memory Control | Summative visual analog rating scale measuring self-rated control over everyday. Outcome is scaled as average proportion of maximum endorsement (ranging from 0 to 1.0, with higher scores indicate greater perceived control) | pretest and posttest (approximately 1 month lag) |
| MCQ Internal Scale | Summative Likert scale obtaining self-rated frequency of use of internal mnemonic strategies in everyday life. Average Likert rating on 1-5 scale (higher scores indicate greater use of strategies) | pretest and posttest (approximately 1 month lag) |
| MCQ External | Summative Likert scale obtaining self-rated frequency of use of external memory aids. Outcome is scaled as average Likert rating on 1-5 scale. Higher score indicates greater use of external aids. | pretest and posttest (approximately 1 month lag) |
| 23978160 | Background | Bottiroli S, Cavallini E, Dunlosky J, Vecchi T, Hertzog C. The importance of training strategy adaptation: a learner-oriented approach for improving older adults' memory and transfer. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2013 Sep;19(3):205-18. doi: 10.1037/a0034078. Epub 2013 Aug 26. |
| 28609674 | Background | Bottiroli S, Cavallini E, Dunlosky J, Vecchi T, Hertzog C. Self-guided strategy-adaption training for older adults: Transfer effects to everyday tasks. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 Sep;72:91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 Jun 7. |
| 17565167 | Background | Dunlosky J, Cavallini E, Roth H, McGuire CL, Vecchi T, Hertzog C. Do self-monitoring interventions improve older adult learning? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Jun;62 Spec No 1:70-6. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.special_issue_1.70. |
| 11352207 | Background | Dunlosky J, Hertzog C. Measuring strategy production during associative learning: the relative utility of concurrent versus retrospective reports. Mem Cognit. 2001 Mar;29(2):247-53. doi: 10.3758/bf03194918. |
| Background | Dunlosky, J., Hertzog, C., Kennedy, M. R. T., & Thiede, K. W. (2005). The self-monitoring approach for effective learning. Cognitive Technology, 10, 4-11. |
| 12825781 | Background | Dunlosky J, Kubat-Silman AK, Hertzog C. Training monitoring skills improves older adults' self-paced associative learning. Psychol Aging. 2003 Jun;18(2):340-5. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.340. |
| 20377166 | Background | Hertzog C, McGuire CL, Horhota M, Jopp D. Does believing in "use it or lose it" relate to self-rated memory control, strategy use, and recall? Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2010;70(1):61-87. doi: 10.2190/AG.70.1.c. |
| 20604613 | Background | Hertzog C, Sinclair SM, Dunlosky J. Age differences in the monitoring of learning: cross-sectional evidence of spared resolution across the adult life span. Dev Psychol. 2010 Jul;46(4):939-48. doi: 10.1037/a0019812. |
| 24478539 | Background | Hertzog C, Dunlosky J. Metacognition in Later Adulthood: Spared Monitoring Can Benefit Older Adults' Self-regulation. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2011 Jun;20(3):167-173. doi: 10.1177/0963721411409026. |
| 25259780 | Background | Hertzog C, Lineweaver TT, Hines JC. Computerized assessment of age differences in memory beliefs. Percept Mot Skills. 2014 Oct;119(2):609-28. doi: 10.2466/03.10.PMS.119c23z4. Epub 2014 Sep 26. |
| 30739118 | Background | Hertzog C, Lustig E, Pearman A, Waris A. Behaviors and Strategies Supporting Everyday Memory in Older Adults. Gerontology. 2019;65(4):419-429. doi: 10.1159/000495910. Epub 2019 Feb 8. |
| Background | Lineweaver, T. T., & Hertzog, C. (1998). Adults' efficacy and control beliefs regarding memory and aging: Separating general from personal beliefs. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 5, 264-296. doi: 10.1076/anec.5.4.264.771 |
| BG001 | Memory Strategy Control | Trains the use of memory strategies for learning new associations and concepts Memory Strategy Control Intervention: Trains use of standard mnemonic techniques such as imagery and sentence generation for learning new associations and organizational and distinctiveness-based strategies for learning sets of items (e.g., word lists). |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Standard Deviation |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | 1 nonresponse | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | questionnaire self-report | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| AB5C Personality Scales | Big 5 personality facets. Scaled as average item Likert endorsement (1-7 scale). Higher scores indicate greater self-rated attribute (e.g., higher conscientiousness). | one participant did not complete the AB5C inventory | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Victoria Activity Scale | Augmented Victoria Activity Scale (total) Scaled as average Likert item response (1-7 scale; higher scores indicate more activity) | one nonresponse | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Pattern Comparison Test | Pattern Comparison Test is a measure of processing speed. Respondents are asked to quickly determine whether two stimuli are the same or different. A sum score reflecting the total number of correct responses is calculated for each respondent. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum possible score is 60. Higher scores reflect more correct responses. More correct responses indicate faster processing speed. | missing data due to program failure during remote administration | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale |
|
| Shipley Vocabulary Test | Shipley Vocabulary Test is a measure of vocabulary and is used as a measure of crystallized ability. Respondents are shown a word and asked to identify a synonym out of a list of options. A sum score reflecting the total number of correct responses is calculated for each respondent. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum possible score is 40. Higher scores reflect more correct responses. More correct responses indicate better crystallized ability. | missing data due to program failure during remote administration | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale |
|
| ETS Letter Sets Test | Educational Testing Services (ETS) Letter Sets Test is a measure of fluid intelligence. Each item has five sets of letters with four letters in each set. Four of the sets are alike in some way while one set is not alike. Respondents are asked to indicate which set does not belong in each item. A sum score reflecting the total number of correct responses is calculated for each respondent. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum possible score is 30. Higher scores reflect more correct responses. More correct responses indicate better fluid ability. | missing data due to program failure during remote administration | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale |
|
| Mobile Device Proficiency Questionnaire (MDPQ-16) | Self-report questionnaire focused on an individual's ability to perform different tasks with a mobile device. Sub-scales include: mobile device basics, communication, data and file storage, internet, calendar, entertainment, privacy, and troubleshooting and software management. The mean was calculated for each subscale and then summed to compute the total score. Higher scores indicate individuals can more easily use different functions of a mobile device. Sub-scale ranges 1 = Never tried, 5 = Very easily. The total score ranges from a minimum of 8 to a maximum of 40. | missing questionnaires | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Technology Experience Profile | Self-report questionnaire assessed the frequency with which people use different types of technology. The individual scales include: communication technology, computer technology, everyday technology, health technology, recreational technology, and transportation technology. The mean was calculated for each subscale and then were summed to compute the total score. Higher scores indicate individuals use different types of technology more frequently. Sub-scale ranges from 1 = Not sure what it is, 5 = Used frequently. The total score ranges from a minimum of 6 to a maximum of 30. | missing questionnaire | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| OG001 | Memory Strategy Control | Trains the use of memory strategies for learning new associations and concepts Memory Strategy Control Intervention: Trains use of standard mnemonic techniques such as imagery and sentence generation for learning new associations and organizational and distinctiveness-based strategies for learning sets of items (e.g., word lists). |
|
|
|
| Primary | Prospective Memory Lab Contacts | Number of successfully completed lab contacts (maximum of 4) | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | number of contacts | Two weeks prior to posttest |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Prospective Memory Lab Contact Efficiency | median absolute time deviation (in minutes) from scheduled lab contact for completed contacts | data only available for persons who successfully completed at least one laboratory contact | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | minutes | Two weeks prior to posttest |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Everyday Cognition Simulation Task: ATM Task (Number of Errors) | Computerized task to simulate use of an ATM machine. Measure: number of errors | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | number of errors | posttest only |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Czaja Everyday Cognition Simulation Task: Prescription Refill Task (Number of Errors) | Computerized task to simulate use of an automated telephone program to refill prescriptions. Measure: Number of errors | Missing data caused by program run-time errors aborting program without recording results for several participants (6 Everyday Metacognitive Memory; 5 Memory Strategy Control) | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | number of errors | posttest only |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Free Recall Test | Computerized task to present 30 concrete nouns, 6 from 5 taxonomic categories (Hultsch, Hertzog, Dixon, & Small, 1998) Measure is proportion of 30 words recalled | One missing case due to program failure when administering the test | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | proportion of words recalled | pretest and posttest (approximately 1 month lag) |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Associative Recall Test | Computerized task to present 40 concrete-concrete associatively unrelated noun pairs (Hertzog, Sinclair, & Dunlosky, 2010) Outcome is proportion of 40 words correctly recalled. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | proportion of words recalled | pretest and posttest (approximately 1 month lag) |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Story Recall | gist recall of narrative story (total number of propositions (ideas) from story recalled) | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | number of ideas recalled | posttest only |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Everyday Cognition Simulation Task: ATM Task (Time in Seconds) | Computerized task to simulate use of an ATM machine. Measure: time to complete task (in seconds) | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | seconds | posttest only |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Czaja Everyday Cognition Simulation Task: Prescription Refill Task (Time in Seconds) | Computerized task to simulate use of an automated telephone program to refill prescriptions. Measure: time to complete task (in seconds) | Missing data caused by program run-time errors aborting program without recording results for several participants (6 Everyday Metacognitive Memory; 5 Memory Strategy Control) | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | seconds | posttest only |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | MFQ Memory Complaint (Frequency of Forgetting Scale) | Summative Likert scale measuring frequency of reported memory problems for specific types of problems Measure is average item Likert rating on a 1-7 scale. Higher score indicates fewer memory problems | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | pretest and posttest (approximately 1 month lag) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | PBMI Specific Memory Self-Efficacy | The Personal Beliefs about Memory Instruments (PBMI) Specific Memory Self-Efficacy measurement is a summative visual analog rating scale measuring self-rated memory aggregated over multiple specific types of memory. Outcomes scaled in average proportion of distance from left (0) to maximum of 1.00 (higher scores indicate greater memory self-efficacy). | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | pretest and posttest (approximately 1 month lag) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | PBMI Memory Control | Summative visual analog rating scale measuring self-rated control over everyday. Outcome is scaled as average proportion of maximum endorsement (ranging from 0 to 1.0, with higher scores indicate greater perceived control) | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | pretest and posttest (approximately 1 month lag) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | MCQ Internal Scale | Summative Likert scale obtaining self-rated frequency of use of internal mnemonic strategies in everyday life. Average Likert rating on 1-5 scale (higher scores indicate greater use of strategies) | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | average units on a scale | pretest and posttest (approximately 1 month lag) |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | MCQ External | Summative Likert scale obtaining self-rated frequency of use of external memory aids. Outcome is scaled as average Likert rating on 1-5 scale. Higher score indicates greater use of external aids. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | average units on a scale | pretest and posttest (approximately 1 month lag) |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 30 |
| 0 |
| 30 |
| 0 |
| 30 |
| EG001 | Memory Strategy Control | Trains the use of memory strategies for learning new associations and concepts Memory Strategy Control Intervention: Trains use of standard mnemonic techniques such as imagery and sentence generation for learning new associations and organizational and distinctiveness-based strategies for learning sets of items (e.g., word lists). | 0 | 32 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 32 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|