Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Analyze & Realize | NETWORK |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The main study objective is to evaluate the efficacy of IQP-AE-103 in reducing body weight in overweight and moderately obese subjects, in the context of an energy restricted diet. Further objectives are to evaluate the beneficial potential of IQP-AE-103 on waist circumference, blood pressure and blood glucose and lipid levels, quality of life, as well as its safety and tolerability
Overweight and obesity are defined as abnormal or excessive fat accumulation that may impair health. Obesity is a substantial public health problem throughout the world, with the prevalence increasing rapidly in numerous developing and developed nations. In 2014, about 13% of the world's adult populations were obese and 39% were overweight. The worldwide prevalence of obesity has more than doubled in over 30 years (WHO, 2016). Obesity and overweight pose major risks for serious diseases, such as dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease and stroke (Haslam & James 2005) and average life expectancy is reduced in obese people (Fontaine et al. 2003). Dietary fat plays a major role in the development of overeating and obesity (Bray et al. 2004); thus fat uptake should be a main target to reduce energy intake and achieve a loss of body weight (Svendsen & Tonstad, 2011). It has been shown that nutrients such as protein and fibre reduce lipid absorption (e.g. Chong et al., 2014; Hosomi et al., 2010; Tsujita et al., 2007). The main components of the IQP-AE-103 are okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) pod powder and inulin. Okra pod powder contains a combination of dietary fibre and protein, which may have an important role in fat binding (Kumar et al., 2013). Dehydrated powder derived from okra pod has further been shown to have substantial swelling capabilities when added to water (Bakre & Jaiyeaob, 2009), which can potentially provide satiety effects. Inulin is a fermentable fructan, derived from plants such as asparagus, garlic, leak, onion etc.
and serves as an important source of soluble dietary fibre (Jaundzeikare and Beitane, 2014), to further enhance the effect of fat binding. The efficacy of IQP-AE-103 in body weight reduction during intake of 12 weeks has been shown recently in a clinical trial with 108 overweight and moderately obese subjects (Uebelhack et al., 2019). The present study aims at a broader evaluation of the beneficial effects of IQP-AE-103 for use in weight management, including its impact on waist circumference, blood pressure and blood glucose and lipid levels as well as quality of life, in overweight and moderately obese subjects.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| IQP-AE-103 | Experimental | 2 capsules after 3 main meals per day (total 1980 mg) |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | 2 capsules after 3 main meals per day |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IQP-AE-103 | Dietary Supplement | 1980 mg |
| |
| Placebo |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Difference in body weight | Difference in body weight (kg) change after 24 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 24 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Difference in BMI | Difference in BMI change after 24 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 24 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Difference in change in waist circumference after 24 weeks weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 24 weeks |
| Difference in body weight (%) change after 24 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline |
Inclusion Criteria:
Men and women from 18 to 70 years old
Body mass index (BMI) 25 kg/m2 - 34.9 kg/m2
Having at least one of the following traits:
Desire to lose weight
Readiness and ability to complete the study, according to investigator's judgement following the screening interview
Accustomed to regular daily consumption of 3 main meals (breakfast, lunch, dinner)
Consistent and stable body weight in the last 3 months prior to V1 (less than 5% self-reported change)
Subject's agreement to comply with study procedures, in particular:
Women of childbearing potential:
Readiness not to participate in another clinical study during this study Participation is based upon written informed consent by the participant following written and oral information by the investigator regarding nature, purpose, consequences and possible risks of the clinical study.
Exclusion Criteria:
Known allergy or hypersensitivity to the components of the investigational product or source plants
Pathological electrocardiogram (ECG) at V1
History and/or presence of clinically significant condition/ disorder, which per investigator's judgement could interfere with the results of the study or the safety of the subject, e.g.:
Significant surgery within the last 6 months prior to V1 or planned within the study period:
History of eating disorders like bulimia, anorexia nervosa, binge-eating within the last 12 months prior to V1
Deviation of safety laboratory parameter(s) at V1 (excluding those stated in the inclusion criteria) that is:
Any electronic medical implant
Regular medication and/or supplementation and/or treatment within the last 3 months prior to V1 and during the study:
Self-reported smoking cessation within 6 months prior to V1 and/or during the study (regular smoking during the study at the same level as prior to the study is allowed)
Women of child-bearing potential: pregnancy or nursing
History of or current abuse of drugs, alcohol or medication
Participation in another study during the last 30 days prior to V1
Any other reason for exclusion as per investigator's judgment, e.g. insufficient compliance with study procedures
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ralf Uebelhack, MD | Analyze & Realize | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| analyze & realize GmbH | Berlin | 13467 | Germany |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30863632 | Background | Uebelhack R, Bongartz U, Seibt S, Bothe G, Chong PW, De Costa P, Wszelaki N. Double-Blind, Randomized, Three-Armed, Placebo-Controlled, Clinical Investigation to Evaluate the Benefit and Tolerability of Two Dosages of IQP-AE-103 in Reducing Body Weight in Overweight and Moderately Obese Subjects. J Obes. 2019 Feb 3;2019:3412952. doi: 10.1155/2019/3412952. eCollection 2019. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050177 | Overweight |
| D009765 | Obesity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D044343 | Overnutrition |
| D009748 | Nutrition Disorders |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D001835 | Body Weight |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Quadruple
| Dietary Supplement |
Placebo |
|
Difference in body weight (%) change after 24 weeks
| 24 weeks |
| Difference in body weight (kg) change after 16 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in body weight (kg) change after 16 weeks | 16 weeks |
| Difference in body weight (%) change after 16 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in body weight (%) change after 16 weeks | 16 weeks |
| Difference in BMI change after 16 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in BMI change after 16 weeks of IP intake, | 16 weeks |
| Difference in body fat mass (kg) change assessed per BIA after 24 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in body fat mass (kg) change assessed per BIA after 24 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 24 weeks |
| Difference in change in quality of life parameters assessed per IWQOL-LITE after 24 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in change in quality of life parameters assessed per IWQOL-LITE after 24 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 24 weeks |
| Difference in body fat mass (kg) change assessed per BIA after 16 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in body fat mass (kg) change assessed per BIA after 16 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 16 weeks |
| Difference in change in quality of life parameters assessed per IWQOL-LITE after 16 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in change in quality of life parameters assessed per IWQOL-LITE after 16 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 16 weeks |
| Difference in change in systolic blood pressure after 24 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in change in systolic blood pressure after 24 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 24 weeks |
| Difference in change in diastolic blood pressure after 24 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in change in diastolic blood pressure after 24 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 24 weeks |
| Difference in global evaluation of efficacy by subject and investigator at study end | Difference in global evaluation of efficacy by subject and investigator at study end | 24 weeks |
| Difference in evaluation of success with respect to the original goal/motivation of the subject to participate at study end | Difference in evaluation of success with respect to the original goal/motivation of the subject to participate at study end | 24 weeks |
| Difference in change in waist circumference after 16 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in change in waist circumference after 16 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 16 weeks |
| Difference in change in systolic blood pressure after 16 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in change in systolic blood pressure after 16 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 16 weeks |
| Difference in change in diastolic blood pressure after 16 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in change in diastolic blood pressure after 16 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 16 weeks |
| Difference in change in TG after 24 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in change in TG after 24 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 24 weeks |
| Difference in change in HDL-C after 24 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in change in HDL-C after 24 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 24 weeks |
| Difference in change in LDL-C after 24 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in change in LDL-C after 24 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 24 weeks |
| Difference in change in TC after 24 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in change in TC after 24 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 24 weeks |
| Difference in change in fasting blood glucose after 24 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in change in fasting blood glucose after 24 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 24 weeks |
| Difference in body weight (kg) change after 8 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in body weight (kg) change after 8 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 8 weeks |
| Difference in body weight (%) change after 8 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in body weight (%) change after 8 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 8 weeks |
| Difference in BMI change after 8 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in BMI change after 8 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 8 weeks |
| Difference in body fat mass (kg) change assessed per BIA after 8 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in body fat mass (kg) change assessed per BIA after 8 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 8 weeks |
| Difference in change in quality of life parameters assessed per IWQOL-LITE after 8 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in change in quality of life parameters assessed per IWQOL-LITE after 8 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 24 weeks |
| Difference in change in waist circumference after 8 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in change in waist circumference after 8 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 8 weeks |
| Difference in body weight (kg) change after 4 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in body weight (kg) change after 4 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 4 weeks |
| Difference in body weight (%) change after 4 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in body weight (%) change after 4 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 4 weeks |
| Difference in BMI change after 4 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in BMI change after 4 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 4 weeks |
| Difference in change in systolic blood pressure after 8 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in change in systolic blood pressure after 8 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 8 weeks |
| Difference in change in diastolic blood pressure after 8 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in change in diastolic blood pressure after 8 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 8 weeks |
| Difference in change in TG after 16 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in change in TG after 16 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 16 weeks |
| Difference in change in HDL-C after 16 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in change in HDL-C after 16 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 16 weeks |
| Difference in change in LDL-C after 16 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in change in LDL-C after 16 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 16 weeks |
| Difference in change in TC after 16 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in change in TC after 16 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 16 weeks |
| Difference in change in fasting blood glucose after 16 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in change in fasting blood glucose after 16 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 16 weeks |
| Difference in body fat mass (kg) change assessed per BIA after 4 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | Difference in body fat mass (kg) change assessed per BIA after 4 weeks of IP intake, in comparison to baseline | 4 weeks |
| D012816 |
| Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |