Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| TREAT-RA | Other Identifier | Alias Study Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a 24-month, prospective, non-interventional, multi-center study with primary aim to identify baseline characteristics of patients that predict response at 6 months of treatment. The study also aims to describe the treatment patterns of RA patients prescribed tofacitinib in a real-world setting and assess the effect of treatment on patient quality of life and physical function. Finally the study will assess the use of healthcare resources and costs in patients with RA treated with tofacitinib in Greece.
The planned recruitment period is 12 months. The planned observation period of each patient is 12 months. In this time period up to 4 visits will be documented.
The study will be reviewed and approved by the Central Regulatory Committee for NIS and IRB Board of each participating site
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Remission and Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Month 6 Assessed Using 28-Joint Disease Activity Score C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-4 CRP) | Remission is defined as DAS28-4 CRP less than (<) 2.6 and DAS28-4 CRP < 3.2 corresponds to LDA. DAS28-4 CRP is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). It includes components: tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count ((SJC) [both out of 28 evaluated joints], CRP milligram per liter (mg/l) and Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) recorded on 100 millimeter (mm) visual analogue scale (VAS) (scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity). DAS28-4 CRP is calculated as: 0.56 * square root (sqrt) (TJC) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC) + 0.36 * ln (CRP+1) + 0.014*PtGA + 0.96; where ln = natural logarithm. | Month 6 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Remission and LDA at Month 12 Assessed Using DAS28-4 CRP | Remission is defined as DAS28-4 CRP < 2.6 and DAS28-4 CRP < 3.2 corresponds to LDA. DAS28-4 CRP is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). It includes components: TJC and SJC assessed using 28 joints, CRP (mg/l) and PtGA recorded on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity). DAS28-4 CRP is calculated as: 0.56 * (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC28) + 0.36 * ln (CRP+1) + 0.014*PtGA + 0.96; where ln = natural logarithm. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Adult subjects with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis who start treatment with tofacitinib in usual clinical practice conditions in compliance with the label
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients meeting any of the following criteria will not be included in the study:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Adult patients presenting in outpatient clinics of Hospitals in Greece (secondary care)
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Pfizer CT.gov Call Center | Pfizer | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University General Hospital of Athens "Attikon" | Athens | Attica | 12462 | Greece | ||
| 251 Air Force Hospital of Athens |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here. | View source |
Not provided
Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants diagnosed with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis who initiated tofacitinib in real-world and in a non-interventional setting in Greece were observed in this study.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Tofacitinib | Participants with rheumatoid arthritis who were treated with tofacitinib in usual clinical practice conditions (outpatient clinics of hospitals) in compliance with the current approved summary of product characteristics (SmPC) were observed in this study. The recommended dosage was tofacitinib 5 milligrams (mg) tablet twice daily. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Full analysis set (FAS) population included participants who met the eligibility criteria, received at least one dose of tofacitinib and had at least one set of post-baseline measurements.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Tofacitinib | Participants with rheumatoid arthritis who were treated with tofacitinib in usual clinical practice conditions (outpatient clinics of hospitals) in compliance with the current approved SmPC were observed in this study. The recommended dosage was tofacitinib 5 mg tablet twice daily. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Remission and Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Month 6 Assessed Using 28-Joint Disease Activity Score C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-4 CRP) | Remission is defined as DAS28-4 CRP less than (<) 2.6 and DAS28-4 CRP < 3.2 corresponds to LDA. DAS28-4 CRP is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). It includes components: tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count ((SJC) [both out of 28 evaluated joints], CRP milligram per liter (mg/l) and Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) recorded on 100 millimeter (mm) visual analogue scale (VAS) (scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity). DAS28-4 CRP is calculated as: 0.56 * square root (sqrt) (TJC) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC) + 0.36 * ln (CRP+1) + 0.014*PtGA + 0.96; where ln = natural logarithm. | FAS population included participants who met the eligibility criteria, received at least one dose of tofacitinib and had at least one set of post-baseline measurements. Here, "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable and who contributed to data for this outcome measure. Missing components were imputed by carrying forward the last non-missing post-baseline value. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Month 6 |
12 months
Same event may appear as non-SAE and SAE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of tofacitinib.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Tofacitinib | Participants with rheumatoid arthritis who were treated with tofacitinib in usual clinical practice conditions (outpatient clinics of hospitals) in compliance with the current approved SmPC were observed in this study. The recommended dosage was tofacitinib 5 mg tablet twice daily. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal lymphadenopathy | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uveitis | Eye disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center | Pfizer Inc. | 1-800-718-1021 | ClinicalTrials.gov_Inquiries@pfizer.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jan 14, 2020 | Feb 1, 2024 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jan 28, 2020 | Feb 1, 2024 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001172 | Arthritis, Rheumatoid |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Month 12 |
| Change From Baseline in DAS28-4 (ESR) and DAS28-4 (CRP) | DAS28-4 CRP is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). It includes components: TJC and SJC both assessed using 28 joints, CRP (mg/l) and PtGA recorded recorded on VAS scores (mm). DAS28-4 CRP is calculated as: 0.56 * sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC28) + 0.36 * ln (CRP+1) + 0.014*PtGA + 0.96; where ln = natural logarithm. DAS28-4 CRP is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). It includes components: TJC and SJC both assessed using 28 joints, ESR using mm/ hour and PtGA in recorded on VAS (mm). DAS28-4 ESR is calculated as: 0.56*sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt (SJC28) + 0.70*In (ESR) + 0.014*PtGA where In = natural logarithm. The calculated range of DAS28-4 CRP and DAS 28-4 ESR is 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (maximal disease activity). A decrease from baseline in score indicates improvement of disease activity. | Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Months 3, 6 and 12 | HAQ-DI is a participant-reported assessment which assess the degree of difficulty a participant had experienced during the last week in 8 domains/categories of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2 to 3 items. Each item is scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Any activity requiring assistance from another individual or the use of an assistive device adjusts to a minimum score of 2 to represent a more limited functional status. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score ranges from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates least difficulty and 3 indicates extreme difficulty. | Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Number of Participants With Remission According to Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) <=3.3 at Months 3, 6, and 12 | Remission is defined as SDAI <=3.3. SDAI is a composite end point, calculated at each time point using the formula: as TJC + SJC both assessed using 28 joints + PtGA (assessed on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity) + Physician's Global Assessment of Health [PhGA] (assessed on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity)+ CRP (mg/dL). | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Number of Participants With Remission According to Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) <=2.8 at Months 3, 6, and 12 | Remission is defined as CDAI <=2.8. CDAI is a composite end point, calculated based on each time-point using TJC + SJC both assessed using 28 joints + PtGA (assessed on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity) + PhGA (assessed on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity). | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Number of Participants With Remission According to DAS28-4 ESR<2.6 at Months 3, 6, and 12 | DAS28-4 ESR is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). Components includes: TJC, SJC both assessed using 28 joints, ESR (mm/h) and PtGA (mm) (recorded on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher score indicates high disease activity). The calculation of DAS28-4 ESR is as follows: 0.56 * sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC28) + 0.70* In (ESR) + 0.014* (PtGA); where ln = natural logarithm. DAS28-4 (ESR) score of <2.6 indicates remission. | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Number of Participants With Remission According to DAS28-4 CRP <2.6 at Months 3, 6, and 12 | DAS28-4 CRP is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). Components includes: TJC, SJC both assessed using 28 joints, CRP (mg/l) and PtGA (mm) (recorded on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher score indicates high disease activity). The calculation of DAS28-4 CRP is as follows: 0.56 * sqrt (TJC) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC) + 0.36 * ln (CRP+1) + 0.014*PtGA + 0.96; where ln = natural logarithm. DAS28-4 (CRP) score of <2.6 indicates remission. | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Number of Participants With LDA According to SDAI <=11 at Months 3, 6, and 12 | LDA is defined as SDAI <=11. SDAI is a composite end point, calculated at each time point using the formula: as TJC + SJC (both assessed using 28 joints) + PtGA (assessed on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity) + PhGA (assessed on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity)+ CRP (mg/dL). | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Number of Participants With LDA According to CDAI <=10 at Months 3, 6, and 12 | LDA is defined as CDAI <=10. CDAI is a composite end point, calculated based on each time-point using TJC + SJC (both assessed using 28 joints) + PtGA (assessed on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity) + PhGA (assessed on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity. | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Number of Participants With LDA According to DAS28-4 ESR (<3.2) at Months 3, 6, and 12 | DAS28-4 ESR is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). Components includes: TJC, SJC (both assessed using 28 joints), ESR (mm/h) and PtGA (recorded on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher score indicates high disease activity). The calculation of DAS28-4 ESR is as follows: 0.56 * sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC28) + 0.70* In(ESR) + 0.014* (PtGA); where ln = natural logarithm. DAS28-4 (ESR) score of <3.2 indicates LDA. | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Number of Participants With LDA According to DAS28-4 CRP<=3.2 at Months 3, 6, and 12 | LDA is defined as DAS28-4(CRP) score of <3.2. DAS28-4 CRP is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). It includes components: TJC, SJC (both assessed using 28 joints), CRP (mg/l) and PtGA (mm) (recorded on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity). The calculation of DAS28-4 CRP is as follows: 0.56*sqrt (TJC) + 0.28*sqrt (SJC) + 0.36*ln (CRP+1) + 0.014*PtGA + 0.96; where ln = natural logarithm. DAS28-4 (CRP) score of <3.2 indicates LDA. | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving HAQ-DI Response at Months 3,6 and 12 | HAQ-DI is a participant-reported assessment which assess the degree of difficulty a participant had experienced during the last week in 8 domains/categories of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2 to 3 items. Each item is scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Any activity requiring assistance from another individual or the use of an assistive device adjusts to a minimum score of 2 to represent a more limited functional status. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score ranges from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates least difficulty and 3 indicates extreme difficulty. A HAQ-DI response is defined as a decrease from baseline of at least 0.22. | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life (EuroQol) -5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health State Profile at Months 3, 6 and 12 | EQ-5D is a standardized instrument used to measure quality of life. It is based on five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has three responses and the participant is asked to select the response that best describes them. The responses are scored 1-3 where 1 indicates no problems, 2 indicates some problems and 3 indicates unable to perform normal activities. The score (1 to 3), for each dimension is weighted based on United Kingdom (UK) data (Dolan et al 1995). An algorithm was applied to calculate the total EQ-5D health state score. Maximum and minimum score value were 1 and -0.6 respectively. Higher score indicates better health state. | Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Questionnaire Score at Months 3, 6 and 12 | FACIT-fatigue questionnaire score consists of 13 self-evaluated questions. Each question is scored from 0 to 4; the sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-fatigue score of 0 (maximum fatigue) to 52 (no fatigue). A higher score represents better participant status. | Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of Morning Stiffness at Day 1 and 2 of Months 3, 6 and 12 | The duration of morning stiffness is determined by asking the following questions: "Over the last 2 days, when did you wake in the morning? Over the last 2 days, when were you able to resume your normal activities without stiffness?". Time elapsed when participant woke up in morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes. | Baseline, Day 1 and 2 of Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire at Months 3, 6 and 12 | WPAI: 6-item questionnaire & scores are derived for four domains:absenteeism, presenteeism,work productivity loss & activity impairment.Question (Q)2 asked participants to indicate number of hours missed due to health problems in past 7 days. Q4 asked participants to indicate number of hours they worked in past 7 days.Q5 asked participants the degree to which their health affected productivity while working in past 7 days,on scale ranging from 0-10, Where 0 = health problems had no effect on their work & 10=health problems completely prevented participant from working. Q6 asked participants to indicate the degree to which their health affected their regular activities in past 7 days.Absenteeism=(Q2/[Q2 + Q4])*100.Presenteeism=(Q5/10)*100.Work Production Loss={(Q2/[Q2 + Q4])+(1-[Q2/(Q2 + Q4))*(Q5/10 )]}*100.Activity Impairment=(Q6/10)*100.Each WPAI domain is expressed as impairment percentages ranging from 0 to 100,with higher numbers indicating greater impairment &less productivity. | Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction at Baseline and Month 12 | Participant's satisfaction with treatment was assessed on a 5-point scale (where 0 = very dissatisfied and 4 = very satisfied) in response to the question "How satisfied are you with the drugs you received for your arthritis during the last year?" | Baseline, Month 12 |
| Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) at Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12 | PtGA of Arthritis was measured using a VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity in response to the question "Considering all the way your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?". | Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) at Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12 | PhGA was measured using a VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity in response to how the physician assesses the participant's overall arthritis at the time of the visit. This is an evaluation based on the participant's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination, and should be independent of the PtGA of arthritis. | Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Number of Participants as Per Treatment Received | Number of participants who received tofacitinib as monotherapy,tofacitinib in combination therapy, tofacitinib switched from monotherapy to combination therapy, tofacitinib switched from combination therapy to monotherapy, tofacitinib in combination with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) then switched to tofacitinib monotherapy and tofacitinib in combination with DMARD then discontinued are presented in this outcome measure. | Up to 12 months |
| Median Number of Visits to Rheumatologist or Other Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Specialist Since Last Visit | The study consisted of 4 visits. Baseline (visit 1), Month 3 (visit 2), Month 6 (visit 3), Month 12 (final or close out visit). The number of visits to a rheumatologist or other RA specialist since the last visit were reported in this outcome measure. | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Number of Participants With Diagnostic Test Since Last Visit | The study consisted of 4 visits. Baseline (visit 1), Month 3 (visit 2), Month 6 (visit 3), Month 12 (final or close out visit). Number of participants who underwent the diagnostic tests since last visit including: whole blood cell (WBC), ESR/CRP, glucose, hepatic enzymes, urea, creatinine, lipid profile (total cholesterol [TC], low density lipoprotein [LDL], high density lipoprotein [HDL], triglycerides [TG]), X-rays, others are presented. | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Number of Participants According to the Type of Diagnostic Test | The study consisted of 4 visits. Baseline (visit 1), Month 3 (visit 2), Month 6 (visit 3), Month 12 (final or close out visit). Number of participants who underwent the diagnostic tests including: WBC, ESR/CRP, glucose, hepatic enzymes, urea, creatinine, lipid profile (TC,LDL,HDL,TG), X-rays, others summarized by visit are presented. | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Number of Diagnostic Tests Since Last Visit | The study consisted of 4 visits. Baseline (visit 1), Month 3 (visit 2), Month 6 (visit 3), Month 12 (final or close out visit). Diagnostic tests performed were as follow: WBC, ESR/CRP, glucose, hepatic enzymes, urea, creatinine, lipid profile (TC, LDL, HDL, TG), X-rays, others summarized by visit are presented. | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Number of Participants Hospitalized Since Last Visit | The study consisted of 4 visits. Baseline (visit 1), Month 3 (visit 2), Month 6 (visit 3), Month 12 (final or close out visit). Number of participants hospitalized since their last visit were reported in this outcome measure. | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Number of Participants Hospitalized in Daycare and Night Care Since Last Visit | The study consisted of 4 visits. Baseline (visit 1), Month 3 (visit 2), Month 6 (visit 3), Month 12 (final or close out visit). Number of participants hospitalized in daycare and nightcare since their last visit were reported in this outcome measure. | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Mean Number of Days Participants Were Hospitalized Since Last Visit | The study consisted of 4 visits. Baseline (visit 1), Month 3 (visit 2), Month 6 (visit 3), Month 12 (final or close out visit). Mean number of days participants were hospitalized since last visit were reported in this outcome measure. | Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Number of Participants According to Reason for Hospitalization Since Last Visit | The study consisted of 4 visits. Baseline (visit 1), Month 3 (visit 2), Month 6 (visit 3), Month 12 (final or close out visit). Number of participants according to reason for hospitalization: polyarthritis, RA and pericarditis, RA flare, and right knee arthroplasty due to osteoarthritis since their last visit is presented in this outcome measure. | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| Athens |
| 11525 |
| Greece |
| General Hospital of Athens Gennimatas | Athens | Greece |
| Ippokrateio General Hospital of Athens | Athens | Greece |
| Laiko General Hospital of Athens | Athens | Greece |
| Naval Hospital of Athens | Athens | Greece |
| Nearchou 18 | Crete | Greece |
| Univerisity General Hospital of Heraklion | Heraklion | Greece |
| University General Hospital of Ioannina | Ioannina | 45500 | Greece |
| KAT General Hospital of Attica | Kfisia | Greece |
| Univerisity General Hospital of Larisa | Larissa | 41110 | Greece |
| Univerisity General Hospital of Larisa | Larissa | Greece |
| University General Hospital of Patras | Pátrai | 26500 | Greece |
| Agios Andreas General Hospital of Patra | Pátrai | Greece |
| Euromedica General Clinic of Thessaloniki | Thessaloniki | Greece |
| Euromedica Kyanous Stavros General Clinic | Thessaloniki | Greece |
| General Hospital of Thessaloniki Ippokrateio | Thessaloniki | Greece |
| Asklipieio General Hospital of Voula | Voula | Greece |
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Physician Decision |
|
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Remission and LDA at Month 12 Assessed Using DAS28-4 CRP | Remission is defined as DAS28-4 CRP < 2.6 and DAS28-4 CRP < 3.2 corresponds to LDA. DAS28-4 CRP is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). It includes components: TJC and SJC assessed using 28 joints, CRP (mg/l) and PtGA recorded on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity). DAS28-4 CRP is calculated as: 0.56 * (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC28) + 0.36 * ln (CRP+1) + 0.014*PtGA + 0.96; where ln = natural logarithm. | FAS population included participants who met the eligibility criteria, received at least one dose of tofacitinib and had at least one set of post-baseline measurements. Here, "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable and who contributed to data for this outcome measure. Missing components were imputed by carrying forward the last non-missing post-baseline value. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in DAS28-4 (ESR) and DAS28-4 (CRP) | DAS28-4 CRP is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). It includes components: TJC and SJC both assessed using 28 joints, CRP (mg/l) and PtGA recorded recorded on VAS scores (mm). DAS28-4 CRP is calculated as: 0.56 * sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC28) + 0.36 * ln (CRP+1) + 0.014*PtGA + 0.96; where ln = natural logarithm. DAS28-4 CRP is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). It includes components: TJC and SJC both assessed using 28 joints, ESR using mm/ hour and PtGA in recorded on VAS (mm). DAS28-4 ESR is calculated as: 0.56*sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt (SJC28) + 0.70*In (ESR) + 0.014*PtGA where In = natural logarithm. The calculated range of DAS28-4 CRP and DAS 28-4 ESR is 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (maximal disease activity). A decrease from baseline in score indicates improvement of disease activity. | FAS population was analyzed. "Number of Participants analyzed" signifies number of participant evaluable for this outcome measure. All participants reported under "Number of Participants Analyzed" contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points. Missing components were imputed by carrying forward the last non-missing post-baseline value. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Months 3, 6 and 12 | HAQ-DI is a participant-reported assessment which assess the degree of difficulty a participant had experienced during the last week in 8 domains/categories of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2 to 3 items. Each item is scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Any activity requiring assistance from another individual or the use of an assistive device adjusts to a minimum score of 2 to represent a more limited functional status. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score ranges from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates least difficulty and 3 indicates extreme difficulty. | FAS population was analyzed. "Number of Participants analyzed" signifies number of participant evaluable for this outcome measure. All participants reported under "Number of Participants Analyzed" contributed data to table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points. If one or two domains had missing data, score was calculated as: sum of non-missing domain scores/number of non-missing domains. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Remission According to Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) <=3.3 at Months 3, 6, and 12 | Remission is defined as SDAI <=3.3. SDAI is a composite end point, calculated at each time point using the formula: as TJC + SJC both assessed using 28 joints + PtGA (assessed on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity) + Physician's Global Assessment of Health [PhGA] (assessed on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity)+ CRP (mg/dL). | FAS population was analyzed. "Number of Participants analyzed" signifies number of participant evaluable for this outcome measure. All participants reported under "Number of Participants Analyzed" contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants with SDAI at specified time points. No imputation was applied for missing values in any visit. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Remission According to Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) <=2.8 at Months 3, 6, and 12 | Remission is defined as CDAI <=2.8. CDAI is a composite end point, calculated based on each time-point using TJC + SJC both assessed using 28 joints + PtGA (assessed on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity) + PhGA (assessed on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity). | FAS population included participants who met the eligibility criteria, received at least one dose of tofacitinib and had at least one set of post-baseline measurements. All participants reported under "Number of Participants Analyzed" contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants with CDAI at specified time points. No imputation was applied for missing values in any visit. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Remission According to DAS28-4 ESR<2.6 at Months 3, 6, and 12 | DAS28-4 ESR is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). Components includes: TJC, SJC both assessed using 28 joints, ESR (mm/h) and PtGA (mm) (recorded on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher score indicates high disease activity). The calculation of DAS28-4 ESR is as follows: 0.56 * sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC28) + 0.70* In (ESR) + 0.014* (PtGA); where ln = natural logarithm. DAS28-4 (ESR) score of <2.6 indicates remission. | FAS population was analyzed. "Number of Participants analyzed" signifies number of participant evaluable for this outcome measure. All participants reported under "Number of Participants Analyzed" contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants with DAS 28-4 (ESR) at specified time points. No imputation was applied for missing values in any visit. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Remission According to DAS28-4 CRP <2.6 at Months 3, 6, and 12 | DAS28-4 CRP is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). Components includes: TJC, SJC both assessed using 28 joints, CRP (mg/l) and PtGA (mm) (recorded on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher score indicates high disease activity). The calculation of DAS28-4 CRP is as follows: 0.56 * sqrt (TJC) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC) + 0.36 * ln (CRP+1) + 0.014*PtGA + 0.96; where ln = natural logarithm. DAS28-4 (CRP) score of <2.6 indicates remission. | FAS population was analyzed. "Number of Participants analyzed" signifies number of participant evaluable for this outcome measure. All participants reported under "Number of Participants Analyzed" contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants with DAS28-4 (CRP) at specified time points. No imputation was applied for missing values in any visit. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With LDA According to SDAI <=11 at Months 3, 6, and 12 | LDA is defined as SDAI <=11. SDAI is a composite end point, calculated at each time point using the formula: as TJC + SJC (both assessed using 28 joints) + PtGA (assessed on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity) + PhGA (assessed on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity)+ CRP (mg/dL). | FAS population was analyzed. "Number of Participants analyzed" signifies number of participant evaluable for this outcome measure. All participants reported under "Number of Participants Analyzed" contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants with SDAI at specified time points. No imputation was applied for missing values in any visit. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With LDA According to CDAI <=10 at Months 3, 6, and 12 | LDA is defined as CDAI <=10. CDAI is a composite end point, calculated based on each time-point using TJC + SJC (both assessed using 28 joints) + PtGA (assessed on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity) + PhGA (assessed on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity. | FAS population included participants who met the eligibility criteria, received at least one dose of tofacitinib and had at least one set of post-baseline measurements. All participants reported under "Number of Participants Analyzed" contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants with CDAI at specified time points. No imputation was applied for missing values in any visit. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With LDA According to DAS28-4 ESR (<3.2) at Months 3, 6, and 12 | DAS28-4 ESR is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). Components includes: TJC, SJC (both assessed using 28 joints), ESR (mm/h) and PtGA (recorded on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher score indicates high disease activity). The calculation of DAS28-4 ESR is as follows: 0.56 * sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28 * sqrt (SJC28) + 0.70* In(ESR) + 0.014* (PtGA); where ln = natural logarithm. DAS28-4 (ESR) score of <3.2 indicates LDA. | FAS population was analyzed. "Number of Participants analyzed" signifies number of participant evaluable for this outcome measure. All participants reported under "Number of Participants Analyzed" contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants with DAS 28-4 (ESR) at specified time points. No imputation was applied for missing values in any visit. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With LDA According to DAS28-4 CRP<=3.2 at Months 3, 6, and 12 | LDA is defined as DAS28-4(CRP) score of <3.2. DAS28-4 CRP is a composite endpoint, calculated using 4 variables (represented by '-4' in the name). It includes components: TJC, SJC (both assessed using 28 joints), CRP (mg/l) and PtGA (mm) (recorded on 100 mm VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity). The calculation of DAS28-4 CRP is as follows: 0.56*sqrt (TJC) + 0.28*sqrt (SJC) + 0.36*ln (CRP+1) + 0.014*PtGA + 0.96; where ln = natural logarithm. DAS28-4 (CRP) score of <3.2 indicates LDA. | FAS population was analyzed. "Number of Participants analyzed" signifies number of participant evaluable for this outcome measure. All participants reported under "Number of Participants Analyzed" contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants with DAS 28-4 (CRP) at specified time points. No imputation was applied for missing values in any visit. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving HAQ-DI Response at Months 3,6 and 12 | HAQ-DI is a participant-reported assessment which assess the degree of difficulty a participant had experienced during the last week in 8 domains/categories of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2 to 3 items. Each item is scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Any activity requiring assistance from another individual or the use of an assistive device adjusts to a minimum score of 2 to represent a more limited functional status. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score ranges from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates least difficulty and 3 indicates extreme difficulty. A HAQ-DI response is defined as a decrease from baseline of at least 0.22. | FAS population was analyzed. "Number of Participants analyzed" signifies number of participant evaluable for this outcome measure. All participants reported under "Number of Participants Analyzed" contributed data to table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points. If one or two domains had missing data, score was calculated as: sum of non-missing domain scores/number of non-missing domains. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life (EuroQol) -5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health State Profile at Months 3, 6 and 12 | EQ-5D is a standardized instrument used to measure quality of life. It is based on five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has three responses and the participant is asked to select the response that best describes them. The responses are scored 1-3 where 1 indicates no problems, 2 indicates some problems and 3 indicates unable to perform normal activities. The score (1 to 3), for each dimension is weighted based on United Kingdom (UK) data (Dolan et al 1995). An algorithm was applied to calculate the total EQ-5D health state score. Maximum and minimum score value were 1 and -0.6 respectively. Higher score indicates better health state. | FAS population was analyzed. "Number of Participants analyzed" signifies number of participant evaluable for this outcome measure. All participants reported under "Number of Participants Analyzed" contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants with EQ-5D score at specified time points. Missing weighted dimension scores were replaced by the mean of non-missing ones. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Questionnaire Score at Months 3, 6 and 12 | FACIT-fatigue questionnaire score consists of 13 self-evaluated questions. Each question is scored from 0 to 4; the sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-fatigue score of 0 (maximum fatigue) to 52 (no fatigue). A higher score represents better participant status. | FAS population was analyzed. All participants reported under "Number of Participants analyzed" =number of participant evaluable and contributed data to table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. "Number Analyzed"=number of participants evaluable at specified time points. If more than 50% of the items were non-missing, then score was prorated by multiplying the sum of the subscale by the number of items in the subscale, then dividing by the number of items actually answered. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of Morning Stiffness at Day 1 and 2 of Months 3, 6 and 12 | The duration of morning stiffness is determined by asking the following questions: "Over the last 2 days, when did you wake in the morning? Over the last 2 days, when were you able to resume your normal activities without stiffness?". Time elapsed when participant woke up in morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes. | FAS population was analyzed. "Number of Participants analyzed" signifies number of participant evaluable for this outcome measure. All participants reported under "Number of Participants Analyzed" contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants with morning stiffness evaluable at specified time points. No imputation was applied for missing values in any visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Minutes | Baseline, Day 1 and 2 of Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire at Months 3, 6 and 12 | WPAI: 6-item questionnaire & scores are derived for four domains:absenteeism, presenteeism,work productivity loss & activity impairment.Question (Q)2 asked participants to indicate number of hours missed due to health problems in past 7 days. Q4 asked participants to indicate number of hours they worked in past 7 days.Q5 asked participants the degree to which their health affected productivity while working in past 7 days,on scale ranging from 0-10, Where 0 = health problems had no effect on their work & 10=health problems completely prevented participant from working. Q6 asked participants to indicate the degree to which their health affected their regular activities in past 7 days.Absenteeism=(Q2/[Q2 + Q4])*100.Presenteeism=(Q5/10)*100.Work Production Loss={(Q2/[Q2 + Q4])+(1-[Q2/(Q2 + Q4))*(Q5/10 )]}*100.Activity Impairment=(Q6/10)*100.Each WPAI domain is expressed as impairment percentages ranging from 0 to 100,with higher numbers indicating greater impairment &less productivity. | FAS population included participants who met the eligibility criteria, received at least one dose of tofacitinib and had at least one set of post-baseline measurements. "Number of Participants analyzed" signifies number of participant evaluable for this outcome measure. All participants reported under "Number of Participants Analyzed" contributed data to table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, "Number Analyzed"= number of participants evaluable at specified time points. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percentage of impairment | Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Treatment Satisfaction at Baseline and Month 12 | Participant's satisfaction with treatment was assessed on a 5-point scale (where 0 = very dissatisfied and 4 = very satisfied) in response to the question "How satisfied are you with the drugs you received for your arthritis during the last year?" | FAS population included participants who met the eligibility criteria, received at least one dose of tofacitinib and had at least one set of post-baseline measurements. No imputation was applied for missing values in any visit. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Baseline, Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) at Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12 | PtGA of Arthritis was measured using a VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity in response to the question "Considering all the way your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?". | FAS population included participants who met the eligibility criteria, received at least one dose of tofacitinib and had at least one set of post-baseline measurements. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable with PtGA score at specified time points. No imputation was applied for missing values in any visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm | Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) at Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12 | PhGA was measured using a VAS scores ranging 0 [no disease activity] to 100 mm [maximum disease activity], higher scores=more disease activity in response to how the physician assesses the participant's overall arthritis at the time of the visit. This is an evaluation based on the participant's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination, and should be independent of the PtGA of arthritis. | FAS population included participants who met the eligibility criteria, received at least one dose of tofacitinib and had at least one set of post-baseline measurements. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable with PhGA score at specified time points. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm | Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants as Per Treatment Received | Number of participants who received tofacitinib as monotherapy,tofacitinib in combination therapy, tofacitinib switched from monotherapy to combination therapy, tofacitinib switched from combination therapy to monotherapy, tofacitinib in combination with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) then switched to tofacitinib monotherapy and tofacitinib in combination with DMARD then discontinued are presented in this outcome measure. | FAS population included participants who met the eligibility criteria, received at least one dose of tofacitinib and had at least one set of post-baseline measurements. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to 12 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Median Number of Visits to Rheumatologist or Other Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Specialist Since Last Visit | The study consisted of 4 visits. Baseline (visit 1), Month 3 (visit 2), Month 6 (visit 3), Month 12 (final or close out visit). The number of visits to a rheumatologist or other RA specialist since the last visit were reported in this outcome measure. | FAS population included participants who met the eligibility criteria, received at least one dose of tofacitinib and had at least one set of post-baseline measurements. All participants reported under "Number of Participants Analyzed" contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points. | Posted | Median | Full Range | Visits | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Diagnostic Test Since Last Visit | The study consisted of 4 visits. Baseline (visit 1), Month 3 (visit 2), Month 6 (visit 3), Month 12 (final or close out visit). Number of participants who underwent the diagnostic tests since last visit including: whole blood cell (WBC), ESR/CRP, glucose, hepatic enzymes, urea, creatinine, lipid profile (total cholesterol [TC], low density lipoprotein [LDL], high density lipoprotein [HDL], triglycerides [TG]), X-rays, others are presented. | FAS population included participants who met the eligibility criteria, received at least one dose of tofacitinib and had at least one set of post-baseline measurements. All participants reported under "Number of Participants Analyzed" contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants According to the Type of Diagnostic Test | The study consisted of 4 visits. Baseline (visit 1), Month 3 (visit 2), Month 6 (visit 3), Month 12 (final or close out visit). Number of participants who underwent the diagnostic tests including: WBC, ESR/CRP, glucose, hepatic enzymes, urea, creatinine, lipid profile (TC,LDL,HDL,TG), X-rays, others summarized by visit are presented. | FAS population included participants who met the eligibility criteria, received at least one dose of tofacitinib and had at least one set of post-baseline measurements. All participants reported under "Number of Participants Analyzed" contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Diagnostic Tests Since Last Visit | The study consisted of 4 visits. Baseline (visit 1), Month 3 (visit 2), Month 6 (visit 3), Month 12 (final or close out visit). Diagnostic tests performed were as follow: WBC, ESR/CRP, glucose, hepatic enzymes, urea, creatinine, lipid profile (TC, LDL, HDL, TG), X-rays, others summarized by visit are presented. | FAS population included participants who met the eligibility criteria, received at least one dose of tofacitinib and had at least one set of post-baseline measurements. All participants reported under "Number of Participants Analyzed" contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points. | Posted | Number | Diagnostic tests | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Hospitalized Since Last Visit | The study consisted of 4 visits. Baseline (visit 1), Month 3 (visit 2), Month 6 (visit 3), Month 12 (final or close out visit). Number of participants hospitalized since their last visit were reported in this outcome measure. | FAS population included participants who met the eligibility criteria, received at least one dose of tofacitinib and had at least one set of post-baseline measurements. All participants reported under "Number of Participants Analyzed" contributed data to the table; however, may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Hospitalized in Daycare and Night Care Since Last Visit | The study consisted of 4 visits. Baseline (visit 1), Month 3 (visit 2), Month 6 (visit 3), Month 12 (final or close out visit). Number of participants hospitalized in daycare and nightcare since their last visit were reported in this outcome measure. | FAS population included participants who met the eligibility criteria, received at least one dose of tofacitinib and had at least one set of post-baseline measurements. "Number of Participants analyzed" signifies number of participant evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Number of Days Participants Were Hospitalized Since Last Visit | The study consisted of 4 visits. Baseline (visit 1), Month 3 (visit 2), Month 6 (visit 3), Month 12 (final or close out visit). Mean number of days participants were hospitalized since last visit were reported in this outcome measure. | FAS population included participants who met the eligibility criteria, received at least one dose of tofacitinib and had at least one set of post-baseline measurements. "Number of Participants analyzed" signifies number of participant evaluable for this outcome measure. "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Days | Baseline, Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants According to Reason for Hospitalization Since Last Visit | The study consisted of 4 visits. Baseline (visit 1), Month 3 (visit 2), Month 6 (visit 3), Month 12 (final or close out visit). Number of participants according to reason for hospitalization: polyarthritis, RA and pericarditis, RA flare, and right knee arthroplasty due to osteoarthritis since their last visit is presented in this outcome measure. | FAS population included participants who met the eligibility criteria, received at least one dose of tofacitinib and had at least one set of post-baseline measurements. "Number of Participants analyzed" signifies number of participant evaluable for this outcome measure. "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable at specified time points. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| 2 |
| 198 |
| 24 |
| 198 |
| 52 |
| 198 |
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Cardiac arrest | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Condition aggravated | General disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Drug ineffective | General disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Haematotoxicity | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hepatotoxicity | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypersensitivity | Immune system disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Arthritis bacterial | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Epiglottitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Herpes zoster | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Herpes zoster disseminated | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Lower Respiratory Tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pasteurella infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Tooth abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Foot fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Polyarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Chronic kidney disease | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Renal impairment | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypoxia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Stomatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal discomfort | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastric ulcer | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Drug ineffective | General disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypertransaminasaemia | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Increased Aminotransferases | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypersensitivity | Immune system disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Bacterial pyelonephritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Bursitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Cystitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Helicobacter infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Lower Respiratory Tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Periodontitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Tooth abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Ankle fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Intentional product misuse | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Product dose omission in error | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Product dose omission issue | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Blood creatine phosphokinase increased | Investigations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Transaminases increased | Investigations | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dyslipidaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hepatic steatosis | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Greater trochanteric pain syndrome | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Neck pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Carpal tunnel syndrome | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Haemoglobinuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Prostatitis | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Endometrial hyperplasia | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Alopecia areata | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dermatitis allergic | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Worsening of already existing skin lesions | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA v25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publication until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
| D003240 |
| Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
|
| Change at Month 12: DAS28-4(CRP) |
|
|
| Change at Month 3: DAS 28-4 (ESR) |
|
|
| Change at Month 6:DAS 28-4 (ESR) |
|
|
| Change at Month 12: DAS 28-4 (ESR) |
|
|
|
| Change at Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Change at Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Change at Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Change at Month 12: Day 1 |
|
|
| Change at Month 3: Day 2 |
|
|
| Change at Month 6: Day 2 |
|
|
| Change at Month 12: Day 2 |
|
|
|
| Change in Absenteeism: Month 12 |
|
|
| Change in Presenteeism: Month 3 |
|
|
| Change in Presenteeism: Month 6 |
|
|
| Change in Presenteeism: Month 12 |
|
|
| Change in Work Production Loss: Month 3 |
|
|
| Change in Work Production Loss: Month 6 |
|
|
| Change in Work Production Loss: Month 12 |
|
|
| Change in Activity Impairment: Month 3 |
|
|
| Change in Activity Impairment: Month 6 |
|
|
| Change in Activity Impairment: Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Baseline: Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied |
|
|
| Baseline: Somewhat satisfied |
|
|
| Baseline: Very satisfied |
|
|
| Month 12: Very dissatisfied |
|
|
| Month 12: Somewhat dissatisfied |
|
|
| Month 12: Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied |
|
|
| Month 12: Somewhat satisfied |
|
|
| Month 12: Very satisfied |
|
|
|
| Month 6 |
|
|
| Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Month 6 |
|
|
| Month 12 |
|
|
| Tofacitinib Switched From Combination Therapy to Monotherapy |
|
| Tofacitinib in Combination with DMARD Then Switched to Tofacitinib Monotherapy |
|
| Tofacitinib in Combination with DMARD Then Discontinued |
|
|
| Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Month 12 |
|
|
|
| WBC- Month 12 |
|
|
| ESR- Month 3 |
|
|
| ESR- Month 6 |
|
|
| ESR- Month 12 |
|
|
| CRP- Month 3 |
|
|
| CRP- Month 6 |
|
|
| CRP- Month 12 |
|
|
| Glucose- Month 3 |
|
|
| Glucose- Month 6 |
|
|
| Glucose- Month 12 |
|
|
| Hepatic enzymes- Month 3 |
|
|
| Hepatic enzymes- Month 6 |
|
|
| Hepatic enzymes- Month 12 |
|
|
| Urea- Month 3 |
|
|
| Urea- Month 6 |
|
|
| Urea- Month 12 |
|
|
| Creatinine- Month 3 |
|
|
| Creatinine- Month 6 |
|
|
| Creatinine- Month 12 |
|
|
| Lipid profile (TC, LDL, HDL, TG)- Month 3 |
|
|
| Lipid profile (TC, LDL, HDL, TG)- Month 6 |
|
|
| Lipid profile (TC, LDL, HDL, TG)- Month 12 |
|
|
| X-rays- Month 3 |
|
|
| X-rays- Month 6 |
|
|
| X-rays- Month 12 |
|
|
| Others- Month 3 |
|
|
| Others- Month 6 |
|
|
| Others- Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Month 12 |
|
|
| Participants Hospitalized With Daycare: Month 12 |
|
|
| Participants Hospitalized With Overnight Stay: Month 3 |
|
|
| Participants Hospitalized With Overnight Stay: Month 6 |
|
| Participants Hospitalized With Overnight Stay: Month 12 |
|
|
| Month 12 |
|
| Polyarthritis: Month 12 |
|
|
| RA and Pericarditis: Month 3 |
|
|
| RA and Pericarditis: Month 6 |
|
| RA and Pericarditis: Month 12 |
|
|
| RA flare: Month 3 |
|
|
| RA flare: Month 6 |
|
| RA flare: Month 12 |
|
|
| Right knee arthroplasty due to Osteoarthritis: Month 3 |
|
|
| Right knee arthroplasty due to Osteoarthritis: Month 6 |
|
| Right knee arthroplasty due to Osteoarthritis: Month 12 |
|
|