Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Update to clinical strategy - COVID impact
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
ProMAS is a prospective post-marketing, single-arm study to assess performance and safety of the Alfapump® system in the treatment of patients with malignant ascites. The study aims to enroll 40 patients in up to 8 sites in Europe.
The Prospective Malignant Ascites Alfapump® study is a single-arm, prospective study to evaluate the performance and safety of the Alfapump® system in the treatment of patients with malignant ascites. The Alfapump® system is a fully implantable programmable pump, able to move ascitic fluid from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder via 2 catheters. The Alfapump® has obtained CE (Conformité Européenne) mark approval for the indication of malignant ascites. The primary objective of the study is to assess the performance of the system to remove ascites. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the Alfapump® in the treatment of malignant ascites for a total follow-up period of 9 months, and to evaluate quality of life (QoL) by reduction or elimination of paracentesis requirement. Furthermore the study includes an exploratory scientific objective as to feasibility to obtain 'liquid biopsy' samples suitable for analysis in a non-invasive way after Alfapump® implantation. 40 patients with malignant ascites will be enrolled in up to 8 sites in Europe (Belgium, United Kingdom, Switzerland). Specific sub-analysis of data from patients with gynecological (ovarian) cancer is planned.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| alfapump system | Device | active implantable device for treatment of malignant ascites |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly therapeutic paracentesis frequency up to 3 months | Monthly therapeutic paracentesis frequency up to 3 months compared to the baseline therapeutic paracentesis frequency. The monthly therapeutic paracentesis frequency up to 3 months is defined as the average rate of therapeutic paracenteses during month 1, 2 and 3 post-implantation. Baseline therapeutic paracentesis frequency is defined as the average rate of therapeutic paracentesis in the 3 months prior to pump implantation. | 3 months post-implantation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly therapeutic paracentesis frequency up to 6 months | Monthly therapeutic paracentesis frequency up to 6 months compared to the baseline therapeutic paracentesis frequency. The monthly therapeutic paracentesis frequency at 6 months is defined as the average rate of therapeutic paracenteses during months 1 to 6 Baseline therapeutic paracentesis frequency is defined as the average rate of therapeutic paracentesis in the 3 months prior to pump implantation. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Exploratory outcome- liquid biopsies | Incidence of successful acquisition of ascitic fluid samples appropriate for oncological analysis via Alfapump® function | 2-days, 7-days, 3-months, 6-months and 9-months post implant |
| Exploratory outcome - anticancer treatment |
Inclusion Criteria:
6.Subject has a life expectancy of ≥3 months as assessed by the treating physician, and is receiving or intended to receive anticancer therapy.
7.Subject has the ability to comply with study procedures, including all follow-up visits at implanting centre when required, and ability to perform subject-required system tasks (charging). A subject with a caregiver who can comply with the study procedures and to perform the tasks required for appropriate pump function is allowed as well.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Investigators will be asked to enrol subjects meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria .This study population is highly palliating with overall limited prognosis and significant comorbidities and possibly reduced performance status. Subjects must be under the care of an oncologist specialised in their disease. In the case of hepatic involvement, a hepatologist, and in the case of ovarian or breast cancer a gynaecologic oncologist accustomed to managing subjects with advanced malignancy. Subjects will be enrolled into the trial from the clinical practices of the investigators. Suitable subjects will undergo screening, including detailed medical history, paracentesis history and blood tests, to ensure compliance with study inclusion / exclusion criteria.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Christina Fotopoulou, Prof, MD | Imperial Hospital, London, UK | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hammersmith Hospital | London | W120HS | United Kingdom |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20633946 | Background | European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2010 Sep;53(3):397-417. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.05.004. Epub 2010 Jun 1. No abstract available. | |
| 15740535 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
No individual participant data will be shared with other researchers
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 6 months post-implantation |
| Safety outcome: free survival | Therapeutic paracentesis free survival after Alfapump® implantation | Time (days) to first paracentesis after implantation through 270 days post implantation |
| Efficacy outcome- Assessment of changes in Quality of Life | Changes in Quality of life after Alfapump® implantation, measured with validated EORTC cancer related Quality of life Questionnaire-CR29 (ColoRectal 29 questions) in subjects with colorectal malignancy. | at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up compared to baseline |
| Efficacy outcome- Assessment of changes in Quality of Life | Changes in Quality of life after Alfapump® implantation assessed with validated FACIT-AI 5Ascites Index) ascites related quality of life questionnaire in all subjects enrolled in the study. | at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up compared to baseline |
| Efficacy outcome- Assessment of changes in Quality of Life | Changes in Quality of life after Alfapump® implantation, measured with validated EORTC-cancer related Quality of life questionnaire-OV28 (OVarian 28 questions), in subjects with a gynaecological malignancy. | at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up compared to baseline |
| Nutritional status outcome | Change in nutritional status assessed by Psoas muscle measurement | at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up compared to baseline |
| Nutritional status outcome | Change in nutritional status assessed by changes in serum Zinc | at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up compared to baseline |
| Nutritional status outcome | Change in nutritional status assessed by changes in serum pre-albumin | at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up compared to baseline |
| Nutritional status outcome | Change in nutritional status assessed by changes in serum phosphate | at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up compared to baseline |
| Nutritional status outcome | Change in nutritional status assessed by changes in serum potassium | at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up compared to baseline |
| Nutritional status outcome | Change in nutritional status assessed by changes in serum albumin | at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up compared to baseline |
| Pump performance | Total Monthly volume of ascitic fluid removed (sum of volumes removed during each month via either Alfapump® and via therapeutic paracentesis) | at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up |
| Pump performance outcome - pump survival | Pump survival through study completion, up to 270 days post-pump implantation | Time (days) from implantation until explantation due to technical causes through study completion up to 270 days post-pump implantation |
| Pump performance outcome - pump survival | Pump survival through study completion, up to 270 days post-implantation | Time (days) from implantation until first exchange due to technical causes through study completion up to 270 days post-pump implantation |
| Pump performance outcome | Frequency of hospitalisations following Alfapump® implantation through study completion up to 270 days post-pump implantation | through study completion up to 270 days post-pump implantation |
| Pump performance outcome | Duration of hospitalisations following Alfapump® implantation through study completion up to 270 days post-pump implantation | throug study completion up to to 270 days post-pump implantation |
| Safety outcome - subject survival | Subject overall survival after Alfapump® implantation through study completion up to 270 days post-pump implantation | Time (days) until exitus through study completion up to 270 days post-pump implantation |
| Safety outcome- Bladder metastasis: Freedom from metastatic bladder wall infiltration | Freedom from metastatic bladder wall infiltration as assessed by cystoscopy | at 6-month follow-up |
| Safety outcome- Worsening of renal function | Incidence of subjects suffering Renal function deterioration, defined as a rise in serum creatinine of ≥50% or ≥0.3mg/dl . | at 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up compared to baseline |
| Safety outcome- Incidence of device related infection | Incidence of Device-related infections following pump-implantation | at 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up |
| Safety outcome- Incidence of Procedure related events | Incidence of Procedure related adverse events | At 1 month follow-up. |
| Safety outcome- Incidence of Device related events | Incidence of any Device-related adverse events | at 3-month, 6-month and 9-month follow-up |
| Device failure | Incidence of device failure resulting in re-intervention (Revision, exchange or explantation) through study completion up to 270 days post-pump implantation | Through study completion up to 270 days post-pump implantation |
Incidence of Initiation of new / change to existing anticancer treatment through study completion up to 270 days post-pump implantation |
| Time (days) to event through study completion up to 270 days post-pump implantation |
| Pache I, Bilodeau M. Severe haemorrhage following abdominal paracentesis for ascites in patients with liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Mar 1;21(5):525-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02387.x. |
| 16185942 | Background | Lin CH, Shih FY, Ma MH, Chiang WC, Yang CW, Ko PC. Should bleeding tendency deter abdominal paracentesis? Dig Liver Dis. 2005 Dec;37(12):946-51. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2005.07.009. Epub 2005 Sep 26. |
| 3360270 | Background | Gines P, Tito L, Arroyo V, Planas R, Panes J, Viver J, Torres M, Humbert P, Rimola A, Llach J, et al. Randomized comparative study of therapeutic paracentesis with and without intravenous albumin in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 1988 Jun;94(6):1493-502. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(88)90691-9. |
| 7516361 | Background | Sola R, Vila MC, Andreu M, Oliver MI, Coll S, Gana J, Ledesma S, Gines P, Jimenez W, Arroyo V. Total paracentesis with dextran 40 vs diuretics in the treatment of ascites in cirrhosis: a randomized controlled study. J Hepatol. 1994 Feb;20(2):282-8. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(05)80070-4. |
| 8831595 | Background | Gines A, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Monescillo A, Vila C, Domenech E, Abecasis R, Angeli P, Ruiz-Del-Arbol L, Planas R, Sola R, Gines P, Terg R, Inglada L, Vaque P, Salerno F, Vargas V, Clemente G, Quer JC, Jimenez W, Arroyo V, Rodes J. Randomized trial comparing albumin, dextran 70, and polygeline in cirrhotic patients with ascites treated by paracentesis. Gastroenterology. 1996 Oct;111(4):1002-10. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(96)70068-9. |
| Background | MEDDEV 2.12-1, rev 7, Guidelines on a medical device vigilance system. |
| 29395458 | Background | Bureau C, Adebayo D, de Rieu MC, Elkrief L, Valla D, Peck-Radosavljevic M, McCune A, Abbadi R, Vargas V, Simon-Talero M, Cordoba J, Angeli P, Rosi S, MacDonald S, Malago M, Stepanova M, Younossi ZM, Trepte C, Watson R, Borisenko O, Sun S, Inhaber N, Jalan R. Corrigendum to "Alfapump(R) system vs. large volume paracentesis for refractory ascites: A multicenter randomized controlled study" [J Hepatol 67 (2017) 940-949]. J Hepatol. 2018 Mar;68(3):630. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.12.017. Epub 2018 Feb 1. No abstract available. |
| 28940225 | Background | Stirnimann G, Berg T, Spahr L, Zeuzem S, McPherson S, Lammert F, Storni F, Banz V, Babatz J, Vargas V, Geier A, Stallmach A, Engelmann C, Trepte C, Capel J, De Gottardi A. Treatment of refractory ascites with an automated low-flow ascites pump in patients with cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Nov;46(10):981-991. doi: 10.1111/apt.14331. Epub 2017 Sep 21. |
| 28422306 | Background | Lai JC, Covinsky KE, Dodge JL, Boscardin WJ, Segev DL, Roberts JP, Feng S. Development of a novel frailty index to predict mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology. 2017 Aug;66(2):564-574. doi: 10.1002/hep.29219. Epub 2017 Jun 28. |
| 31281536 | Background | Chang L, Ni J, Zhu Y, Pang B, Graham P, Zhang H, Li Y. Liquid biopsy in ovarian cancer: recent advances in circulating extracellular vesicle detection for early diagnosis and monitoring progression. Theranostics. 2019 May 31;9(14):4130-4140. doi: 10.7150/thno.34692. eCollection 2019. |
| 30181785 | Background | Palmirotta R, Lovero D, Cafforio P, Felici C, Mannavola F, Pelle E, Quaresmini D, Tucci M, Silvestris F. Liquid biopsy of cancer: a multimodal diagnostic tool in clinical oncology. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2018 Aug 29;10:1758835918794630. doi: 10.1177/1758835918794630. eCollection 2018. |
| 28753534 | Background | Giannopoulou L, Kasimir-Bauer S, Lianidou ES. Liquid biopsy in ovarian cancer: recent advances on circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Jan 26;56(2):186-197. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0019. |