Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This subject-masked, randomized, bilateral crossover study will compare the clinical performance and subjective acceptance of the somofilcon A 1 day soft contact lens with the nelfilcon A daily disposable lens when used on a daily wear, daily disposable basis.
This will be a randomized, subject-masked, crossover, bilateral study, controlled by cross-comparison. This will compare the clinical performance and subjective acceptance of the somofilcon A 1 day soft contact lens with the nelfilcon A daily disposable lens when used on a daily wear, daily disposable basis.
Subjects will use each lens type for a week in random sequence. Follow-up visits for each lens will be performed after one week of wear. Lenses will be worn on a daily wear, daily disposable wear schedule.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| somofilcon A, then nelfilcon A | Experimental | Subjects will bilaterally wear the somofilcon A lenses, then crossover to nelfilcon A lenses after one week of wear. Both lenses will be worn on a daily wear basis for one week. |
|
| nelfilcon A, then somofilcon A | Experimental | Subjects will bilaterally wear the nelfilcon A lenses, then crossover to somofilcon A lenses after one week of wear. Both lenses will be worn on a daily wear basis for one week. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| somofilcon A | Device | Contact Lens |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Subjective Comfort at Lens Dispensing | Subjective comfort at lens dispensing on scale 0-100 (0=Causes pain. Cannot be tolerated to 100=Excellent. Cannot be felt.). | Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense) |
| Subjective Comfort at Start of Day | Subjective comfort at start of day on scale 0-100 (0=Causes pain. Cannot be tolerated to 100=Excellent. Cannot be felt.). | 1 week |
| Subjective Comfort at End of Day | Subjective comfort at end of day on scale 0-100 (0=Causes pain. Cannot be tolerated to 100=Excellent. Cannot be felt.). | 1 week |
| Overall Subjective Comfort | Overall subjective comfort on scale 0-100 (0=Causes pain. Cannot be tolerated to 100=Excellent. Cannot be felt.). | Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense) |
| Overall Subjective Comfort | Overall subjective comfort on scale 0-100 (0=Causes pain. Cannot be tolerated to 100=Excellent. Cannot be felt.). | 1 week |
| Subjective Vision | Subjective Vision rated on scale 0-100 (0=unacceptable, lens cannot be worn to 100=excellent, unaware of an visual loss.) | Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense) |
| Subjective Vision | Subjective Vision rated on scale 0-100 (0=unacceptable, lens cannot be worn to 100=excellent, unaware of an visual loss.) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Biomicroscopy - Conjunctival Redness Score | Conjunctival redness - slit lamp biomicroscopy using Efron Grading Scale, 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe). | One Week |
| Biomicroscopy - Limbal Redness Score |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eurolens Research | Manchester | M13 9PL | United Kingdom |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Somofilcon A, Then Nelfilcon A | Subjects will bilaterally wear the somofilcon A lenses, then crossover to nelfilcon A lenses after one week of wear. Both lenses will be worn on a daily wear basis for one week. somofilcon A: Contact Lens nelfilcon A: Contact Lens |
| FG001 | Nelfilcon A, Then Somofilcon A | Subjects will bilaterally wear the nelfilcon A lenses, then crossover to somofilcon A lenses after one week of wear. Both lenses will be worn on a daily wear basis for one week. somofilcon A: Contact Lens nelfilcon A: Contact Lens |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Intervention |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Second Intervention |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Overall Study | Subjects were randomized to wear somofilcon A 1 day and nelfilcon A for one week in this cross-over study. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Subjective Comfort at Lens Dispensing | Subjective comfort at lens dispensing on scale 0-100 (0=Causes pain. Cannot be tolerated to 100=Excellent. Cannot be felt.). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense) |
|
From dispense up to 1 week on each study lens for a total of two weeks.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Somofilcon A | Subjects will bilaterally wear the somofilcon A lenses for 1 week. somofilcon A: Contact Lens |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterial conjunctivitis | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jose A. Vega, O.D., MSC., FAAO | CooperVision, Inc. | 9256213761 | javega@coopervision.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | May 6, 2019 | Oct 23, 2020 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012030 | Refractive Errors |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
This is a bilateral crossover study
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| nelfilcon A | Device | Contact Lens |
|
|
| 1 week |
Limbal redness - slit lamp biomicroscopy using Efron Grading Scale, 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
| One week |
| Biomicroscopy - Corneal Staining Score | Corneal staining - slit lamp biomicroscopy using Efron Grading Scale, 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe). | One week |
| Biomicroscopy - Conjunctival Staining Score | Conjunctival staining - slit lamp biomicroscopy using Efron Grading Scale, 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe). | One week |
| Biomicroscopy - Papillary Conjunctivitis Score | Papillary conjunctivitis- slit lamp biomicroscopy using Efron Grading Scale, 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe). | One week |
| Horizontal Centration - Lens Fit | Horizontal centration graded by -2 to 2 (-2= Extremely nasal, -1 slightly nasal, 0=optimum, 1=slightly temporal, 2=extremely temporal). | Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense) |
| Horizontal Centration - Lens Fit | Horizontal centration graded by -2 to 2 (-2= Extremely nasal, -1 slightly nasal, 0=optimum, 1=slightly temporal, 2=extremely temporal). | One Week |
| Vertical Centration Grade - Lens Fit | Vertical centration graded by -2 to 2 (-2= Extremely inferior, -1 slightly inferior, 0=optimum, 1=slightly superior, 2=extremely superior). | Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense) |
| Vertical Centration Grade - Lens Fit | Vertical centration graded by -2 to 2 (-2= Extremely inferior, -1 slightly inferior, 0=optimum, 1=slightly superior, 2=extremely superior). | One week |
| Corneal Coverage Grade | Corneal coverage graded by -2 to 2 (-2=extremely inadequate, -1=slightly inadequate, but acceptable, 0=optimum, 1=slightly excessive, but acceptable, 2=extremely excessive). | Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense) |
| Corneal Coverage Grade | Corneal coverage graded by -2 to 2 (-2=extremely inadequate, -1=slightly inadequate, but acceptable, 0=optimum, 1=slightly excessive, but acceptable, 2=extremely excessive). | One week |
| Post-Blink Movement Grade | Post-blink movement graded by -2 to 2 (-2=extremely inadequate, -1=slightly inadequate, but acceptable, 0=optimum, 1=slightly excessive, but acceptable, 2=extremely excessive). | Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense) |
| Post-Blink Movement Grade | Post-blink movement graded by -2 to 2 (-2=extremely inadequate, -1=slightly inadequate, but acceptable, 0=optimum, 1=slightly excessive, but acceptable, 2=extremely excessive). | 1 week |
| Ocular Redness Rating | Ocular redness rating rated on a scale 0-100 (0=extremely poor, intolerable levels of redness to 100 = excellent, no redness) | 1 week |
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Primary | Subjective Comfort at Start of Day | Subjective comfort at start of day on scale 0-100 (0=Causes pain. Cannot be tolerated to 100=Excellent. Cannot be felt.). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 week |
|
|
|
| Primary | Subjective Comfort at End of Day | Subjective comfort at end of day on scale 0-100 (0=Causes pain. Cannot be tolerated to 100=Excellent. Cannot be felt.). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 week |
|
|
|
| Primary | Overall Subjective Comfort | Overall subjective comfort on scale 0-100 (0=Causes pain. Cannot be tolerated to 100=Excellent. Cannot be felt.). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Overall Subjective Comfort | Overall subjective comfort on scale 0-100 (0=Causes pain. Cannot be tolerated to 100=Excellent. Cannot be felt.). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 week |
|
|
|
| Primary | Subjective Vision | Subjective Vision rated on scale 0-100 (0=unacceptable, lens cannot be worn to 100=excellent, unaware of an visual loss.) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Subjective Vision | Subjective Vision rated on scale 0-100 (0=unacceptable, lens cannot be worn to 100=excellent, unaware of an visual loss.) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 week |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Biomicroscopy - Conjunctival Redness Score | Conjunctival redness - slit lamp biomicroscopy using Efron Grading Scale, 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | One Week |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Biomicroscopy - Limbal Redness Score | Limbal redness - slit lamp biomicroscopy using Efron Grading Scale, 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | One week |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Biomicroscopy - Corneal Staining Score | Corneal staining - slit lamp biomicroscopy using Efron Grading Scale, 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | One week |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Biomicroscopy - Conjunctival Staining Score | Conjunctival staining - slit lamp biomicroscopy using Efron Grading Scale, 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | One week |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Biomicroscopy - Papillary Conjunctivitis Score | Papillary conjunctivitis- slit lamp biomicroscopy using Efron Grading Scale, 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | One week |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Horizontal Centration - Lens Fit | Horizontal centration graded by -2 to 2 (-2= Extremely nasal, -1 slightly nasal, 0=optimum, 1=slightly temporal, 2=extremely temporal). | Posted | Number | percentage of lenses | Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Horizontal Centration - Lens Fit | Horizontal centration graded by -2 to 2 (-2= Extremely nasal, -1 slightly nasal, 0=optimum, 1=slightly temporal, 2=extremely temporal). | Posted | Number | percentage of lenses | One Week | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Vertical Centration Grade - Lens Fit | Vertical centration graded by -2 to 2 (-2= Extremely inferior, -1 slightly inferior, 0=optimum, 1=slightly superior, 2=extremely superior). | Posted | Number | percentage of lenses | Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense) | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Vertical Centration Grade - Lens Fit | Vertical centration graded by -2 to 2 (-2= Extremely inferior, -1 slightly inferior, 0=optimum, 1=slightly superior, 2=extremely superior). | Posted | Number | percentage of lenses | One week | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Corneal Coverage Grade | Corneal coverage graded by -2 to 2 (-2=extremely inadequate, -1=slightly inadequate, but acceptable, 0=optimum, 1=slightly excessive, but acceptable, 2=extremely excessive). | Posted | Number | percentage of lenses | Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense) | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Corneal Coverage Grade | Corneal coverage graded by -2 to 2 (-2=extremely inadequate, -1=slightly inadequate, but acceptable, 0=optimum, 1=slightly excessive, but acceptable, 2=extremely excessive). | Posted | Number | percentage of lenses | One week | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Post-Blink Movement Grade | Post-blink movement graded by -2 to 2 (-2=extremely inadequate, -1=slightly inadequate, but acceptable, 0=optimum, 1=slightly excessive, but acceptable, 2=extremely excessive). | Posted | Number | percentage of lenses | Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense) | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Post-Blink Movement Grade | Post-blink movement graded by -2 to 2 (-2=extremely inadequate, -1=slightly inadequate, but acceptable, 0=optimum, 1=slightly excessive, but acceptable, 2=extremely excessive). | Posted | Number | percentage of lenses | 1 week | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Ocular Redness Rating | Ocular redness rating rated on a scale 0-100 (0=extremely poor, intolerable levels of redness to 100 = excellent, no redness) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 week |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 70 |
| 0 |
| 70 |
| 2 |
| 70 |
| EG001 | Nelfilcon A | Subjects will bilaterally wear the nelfilcon A lenses for 1 week. nelfilcon A: Contact Lens | 0 | 70 | 0 | 70 | 0 | 70 |
| Corneal Abrasion | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Optimum |
|
| Slightly temporal |
|
| Extremely temporal |
|
| Optimum |
|
| Slightly temporal |
|
| Extremely temporal |
|
| Optimum |
|
| Slightly superior |
|
| Extremely superior |
|
| Optimum |
|
| Slightly superior |
|
| Extremely superior |
|
| Optimum |
|
| Slightly excessive |
|
| Extremely excessive |
|
| Optimum |
|
| Slightly excessive |
|
| Extremely excessive |
|
| Optimum |
|
| Slightly Excessive |
|
| Extremely Excessive |
|
| Optimum |
|
| Slightly Excessive |
|
| Extremely Excessive |
|