Erector Spinea Plane Block Versus Peritoneal Block Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Erector Spinea Plane Block Versus Peritoneal Block Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
The aim of this study is to detect weather peritoneal block or erector spinae plane block will provide the most ideal analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Peritoneal block by instillation of local anesthetic into the peritoneal cavity will act by blocking the free afferent nerve endings in the peritoneum and the systemic absorption of local anesthetic from the peritoneal cavity may also play a part in reduced pain.
On the other hand ,the erector spinae plane block is a novel analgesic technique that provide both visceral and somatic analgesia due to its communication with the paravertebral space. Local anesthetic mixture of lidocaine , magnesium sulphate and epinephrine will be used for both techniques.
The pain that a patient feels after laparoscopic cholecystectomy results from three different and clinically separate components: somatic pain due to trocar insertion sites , visceral pain due to surgical dissection and tissue handling at the gall bladder bed, and shoulder pain due to retention of carbon dioxide in the abdomen, which irritates the phrenic nerve and diaphragm. Ineffective treatment of post laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain may delay recovery and mandate inpatient admission and therapy and increase the cost of such care.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the analgesic effect of Erector spinea plane block in comparison with peritoneal block for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Serum level of cortisol as a stress biomarker ,perioperative primary hemodynamics ,visual analogue scale , patient request for rescue analgesia and occurrence of side effects are the parameters for comparison between both techniques. Each patient will be followed up for 24 hours postoperatively.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: