Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Wake Forest University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study's main research question will be investigating whether or not there is a significant difference in Prepulse Inhibition (PPI) as well as startle response probability and magnitude between contact and noncontact youth sports players. The study team will test these questions using a controlled laboratory scenario in which the presentation of startle stimuli can be observed, measured, and quantified in order to compare the results between the two sample populations. During preliminary testing, the study team can predict that there will be no significant differences between contact sports players and noncontact sports players in their startle reactivity and level of exhibited PPI. Based on previous literature, the study team hypothesizes that those in the contact sports group will experience greater startle reactivity and less PPI than those in the noncontact sports group when they are tested at the end of their sports season. Using this information, the present study will allow for additional understanding of the neurological and physiological behaviors associated with subconcussive head impacts.
This study will assess and determine whether prepulse inhibition in youth contact sports players and non-contact sports players, both before and after a sports season, will significantly differ. Measures will include the startle magnitude, startle probability, reaction time, and accuracy of tone detection responses.
Our main research question will be investigating whether or not there is a significant difference in PPI, as well as startle response probability and magnitude between contact and noncontact youth sports players. The study team will test these questions using a controlled laboratory scenario in which the presentation of startle stimuli can be observed, measured, and quantified in order to compare the results between the two sample populations. During preliminary testing, the study team can predict that there will be no significant differences between contact sports players and noncontact sports players in their startle reactivity and level of exhibited PPI. Based on previous literature, the study team hypothesizes that those in the contact sports group will experience greater startle reactivity and less PPI than those in the noncontact sports group when they are tested at the end of their sports season. Using this information, the present study will allow for additional understanding of the neurological and physiological behaviors associated with subconcussive head impacts.
This study will assess and determine whether prepulse inhibition in youth contact sports players and non-contact sports players, both before and after a sports season, will significantly differ. Measures will include the startle magnitude, startle probability, reaction time, and accuracy of tone detection responses.
The current study is a case-control study, examining the contact sports players as the testing sample and the noncontact sports players as the control sample.
Participants will arrive and hear an introduction of the study.
Participants (and their parent/guardian if under the age of 18) will read and sign an informed consent and/or informed assent form.
Participants will complete a series of questionnaires prior to electrode placement.
Participants will have three electrodes placed on the skin.
The procedure of the study will be thoroughly explained to the participants. They will be instructed to wear headphones that will deliver the acoustic startle stimuli and to remain as still and quiet as possible during the startle blocks.
After the testing block, the electrodes will be removed from the participant's skin.
Participants will be thoroughly debriefed on the aims of the current study.
This study will take place in the MRI suite of Wake Forest Baptist Health. A single room within the suite will be designated for the PPI testing, in order to control for external noise factors.
After the consent process, subjects will be asked to fill out a brief health history questionnaire. This is for the purpose of determining the subject's eligibility to participate in the study. Subjects will also be asked to complete an STAI form, and this will be used later during data analysis.
This study will last approximately one hour. The introduction and consent process will take about 10 minutes. The questionnaire process is expected to take about 10 minutes. The application of sensors should take about 10 minutes. The testing process, including the explanation of both startle blocks, should last about 20 minutes. The sensor removal and debriefing process will last about 10 minutes.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contact sports players | Athletes who engage in contact sports, football for example. Participation in this study will involve listening to sudden, very brief bursts of noise (startle blocks) and tones, and responding with a keypress to certain tones. Electromyogram (EMG) will measure the electrical activity generated from movement of the orbicularis oculi muscle during the startle blocks. | ||
| Non-contact sports players | Athletes who engage in non-contact sports, swimming for example.Participation in this study will involve listening to sudden, very brief bursts of noise (startle blocks) and tones, and responding with a keypress to certain tones. Electromyogram (EMG) will measure the electrical activity generated from movement of the orbicularis oculi muscle during the startle blocks. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Startle Magnitute | collected from each participant's raw EMG data | baseline |
| Startle Magnitute | collected from each participant's raw EMG data | startle test up to 1 hr from baseline |
| Startle Probability | collected from each participant's raw EMG data | baseline |
| Startle Probability | collected from each participant's raw EMG data | startle test up to 1 hr from baseline |
| Percentage of Prepulse Inhibition | collected from each participant's raw EMG data | baseline test |
| Percentage of Prepulse Inhibition | collected from each participant's raw EMG data | startle test up to 1 hr from baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Reaction Time | data collected from applicable subject's response pad | baseline test |
| Reaction Time | data collected from applicable subject's response pad |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
• Participants are specifically recruited for this study due to their involvement on a sports team that may or may not expose them to head impacts.
Exclusion Criteria:
• Subjects on psychostimulant, antidepressant, or anxiolytic medications, as well as subjects who have experienced hearing loss, will not be eligible to participate.
Not provided
Not provided
Participants who participate on a sports team who range in age from 13 to 19.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Blumenthal | Wake Forest University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wake Forest University | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27109 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26283146 | Background | Blumenthal TD. Presidential Address 2014: The more-or-less interrupting effects of the startle response. Psychophysiology. 2015 Nov;52(11):1417-31. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12506. Epub 2015 Aug 18. | |
| 25234706 | Background | Blumenthal TD, Reynolds JZ, Spence TE. Support for the interruption and protection hypotheses of prepulse inhibition of startle: evidence from a modified Attention Network Test. Psychophysiology. 2015 Mar;52(3):397-406. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12334. Epub 2014 Sep 19. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012021 | Reflex, Abnormal |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| startle test up to 1 hr from baseline |
| Accuracy Measures | data collected from applicable subject's response pad | baseline test |
| Accuracy Measures | data collected from applicable subject's response pad | startle test up to 1 hr from baseline |
| 25532594 | Background | Washington JR, Blumenthal TD. Effects of a startle stimulus on response speed and inhibition in a go/no-go task. Psychophysiology. 2015 Jun;52(6):745-53. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12400. Epub 2014 Dec 23. |
| 18702584 | Background | Jepma M, Wagenmakers EJ, Band GP, Nieuwenhuis S. The effects of accessory stimuli on information processing: evidence from electrophysiology and a diffusion model analysis. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 May;21(5):847-64. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21063. |
| 15804447 | Background | Thorne GL, Dawson ME, Schell AM. Attention and prepulse inhibition: the effects of task-relevant, irrelevant, and no-task conditions. Int J Psychophysiol. 2005 May;56(2):121-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2004.11.006. Epub 2005 Jan 21. |