Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Edwards Lifesciences | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The IMPACT Registry represents a non-interventional, prospective, open-label, multicenter, international registry with a follow-up of 5 years that includes data of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with the Edwards INSPIRIS RESILIA Aortic Valve™. The IMPACT Registry will be performed in up to 25 participating sites across Germany, Austria and Switzerland. A minimum number of 500 patients (20 patients per center) will be enrolled. Patients will undergo follow-up visits at baseline, surgery, pre-discharge, year 1, year 3 and year 5.
The INSPIRIS RESILIA Aortic Valve™ is a stented tri-leaflet valve comprised of bovine pericardial tissue. The tissue is created by treating bovine pericardial tissue with Edwards Integrity Preservation. It incorporates a stable capping anticalcification process, which blocks residual aldehyde groups known to bind with calcium. Tissue preservation with glycerol allows the valve to be stored without a traditional liquid-based solution, such as glutaraldehyde. Therefore, valve is stored under dry packaging conditions and consequently does not require rinsing prior to implantation.
The novel tissue preservation technology significantly improves hemodynamic and anticalcification properties compared with the standard Perimount valve in an ovine model (Flameng et al., 2015). The RESILIA tissue has been studied in the COMMENCE trial: Two year data show that the NYHA class improved in 65.7% of patients, effective orifice area after implantation was 1.6 ± 0.5 cm2; mean gradient was 10.1 ± 4.3 mmHg; and paravalvular leak was none/trivial in 94.5% of patients (mild to moderate in 0.5%) (Puskas et al., 2017).
On the sizes 19 - 25 mm the INSPIRIS RESILIA Aortic Valve™ has been outfitted with the VFit technology, which incorporates two novel features designed for potential future valve-in-valve procedures: fluoroscopically visible size markers and an expandable cobalt chromium alloy band. No clinical data are available that evaluate the use of the INSPIRIS RESILIA Aortic Valve™ in patients to date.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAVR patients | patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) by usage of the INSPIRIS RESILIA Aortic valve™ |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INSPIRIS RESILIA Aortic Valve™ | Device | Collection of patient data from patients undergoing Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR) by usage of the INSPIRIS RESILIA aortic valve™ |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| All-cause mortality | All-cause mortality after 1 year will be investigated | after 1 year |
| All-cause mortality | All-cause mortality after 3 years will be investigated | after 3 years |
| All-cause mortality | All-cause mortality after 5 years will be investigated | after 5 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mortality | All cause, cardiac and valve-related mortality in the overall study population and in different patient subgroups at all timepoints: Chronic kidney disease, diabetes, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, inflammation | after 1 year |
| Mortality |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Maximum pressure gradient (Pmax) over time | Change in Pmax in mmHg as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch | after 1 year |
| Change in Maximum pressure gradient (Pmax) over time | Change in Pmax in mmHg as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Minimum of 500 patients (20 patients per center) undergoing Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR) using the INSPIRIS RESILIA aortic valve™ (all comers).
The required sample size was calculated using the online calculator at http://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm. It was estimated, from the COMMENCE Trial dataset (Puskas et al., 2017) that all-cause mortality is around 1.2% at year 1 and 2.0% at year 2.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Farhad Bakhtiary, Dr. med. | Helios Klinik Siegburg | Principal Investigator |
| Andreas Zierer, Prof. Dr. | Kepler University Hosiptal Linz and Hospital Wels-Grieskirchen | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Uniklinik für Herzchirurgie | Innsbruck | Austria | ||||
| Kepler Universitätsklinikum Linz |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29735584 | Background | Salaun E, Clavel MA, Rodes-Cabau J, Pibarot P. Bioprosthetic aortic valve durability in the era of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Heart. 2018 Aug;104(16):1323-1332. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311582. Epub 2018 May 7. | |
| 41787958 | Derived | Bakhtiary F, Benedikt P, Bonaros N, Borger M, Doss M, Feyrer R, Grunenfelder J, Owais T, Karimli S, Lam KY, Liebold A, Martens A, Massoudy P, Batashev I, Poling J, Scherner MP, Strauch J, Thielmann M, Votsch A, Walther T, Weber A, Wiesinger S, Eden M, Kammler J, Botta B, Trushina N, Vijayan A, Bramlage P, Zierer A. Three-Year Outcomes After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement With a Bioprosthetic Valve from the Multi-Centre IMPACT Registry. Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2026 Mar 12;41(3):ivag056. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivag056. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All cause, cardiac and valve-related mortality in the overall study population and in different patient subgroups at all timepoints: Chronic kidney disease, diabetes, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, inflammation
| after 3 years |
| Mortality | All cause, cardiac and valve-related mortality in the overall study population and in different patient subgroups at all timepoints: Chronic kidney disease, diabetes, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, inflammation | after 5 years |
| after 3 years |
| Change in Maximum pressure gradient (Pmax) over time | Change in Pmax in mmHg as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch | after 5 years |
| Change in mean pressure gradient (Pmean) over time | Change in Pmean in mmHg as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch | after 1 year |
| Change in mean pressure gradient (Pmean) over time | Change in Pmean in mmHg as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch | after 3 years |
| Change in mean pressure gradient (Pmean) over time | Change in Pmean in mmHg as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch | after 5 years |
| Change in velocity time integral (VTI) over time | Change in VTI as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch | after 1 year |
| Change in velocity time integral (VTI) over time | Change in VTI as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch | after 3 years |
| Change in velocity time integral (VTI) over time | Change in VTI as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch | after 5 years |
| Change in prostesis opening area (EOA) over time | Change in EOA in mm2 as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch | after 1 year |
| Change in prostesis opening area (EOA) over time | Change in EOA in mm2 as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch | after 3 years |
| Change in prostesis opening area (EOA) over time | Change in EOA in mm2 as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch | after 5 years |
| Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) over time | Change in LVEF in % as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch | after 1 year |
| Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) over time | Change in LVEF in % as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch | after 3 years |
| Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) over time | Change in LVEF in % as an indicator of patient prosthesis mismatch | after 5 years |
| Occurence of paravalvular leaks | Occurence of paravalvular leaks as an indicator of patient prostheis mismatch | after 1 year |
| Occurence of paravalvular leaks | Occurence of paravalvular leaks as an indicator of patient prostheis mismatch | after 3 years |
| Occurence of paravalvular leaks | Occurence of paravalvular leaks as an indicator of patient prostheis mismatch | after 5 years |
| Occurence of structural valve detioration (SVD) over time | SVD to be determined by imaging methods (e.g. Echocardiography) following Salaun et al. 2018 | after 1 year |
| Occurence of structural valve detioration (SVD) over time | SVD to be determined by imaging methods (e.g. Echocardiography) following Salaun et al. 2018 | after 3 years |
| Occurence of structural valve detioration (SVD) over time | SVD to be determined by imaging methods (e.g. Echocardiography) following Salaun et al. 2018 | after 5 years |
| Occurence of repeat procedures (valve-in-valve reoperation) | Any repeat procedures will be documented and assessed | after 1 year |
| Occurence of repeat procedures (valve-in-valve reoperation) | Any repeat procedures will be documented and assessed | after 3 years |
| Occurence of repeat procedures (valve-in-valve reoperation) | Any repeat procedures will be documented and assessed | after 5 years |
| New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class compared to baseline | NYHA class will be determined at follow-up visits | after 1 year |
| New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class compared to baseline | NYHA class will be determined at follow-up visits | after 3 years |
| New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class compared to baseline | NYHA class will be determined at follow-up visits | after 5 years |
| Freedom from valve-related rehospitalization | any valve related hospitalizations will be documented and assessed | after 1 year |
| Freedom from valve-related rehospitalization | any valve related hospitalizations will be documented and assessed | after 3 years |
| Freedom from valve-related rehospitalization | any valve related hospitalizations will be documented and assessed | after 5 years |
| Need for new pacemaker implant | Any occurence of new pacemaker implant (e. g. when the participant did not have a pacemaker at baseline) will be documented and assessed | after 1 year |
| Need for new pacemaker implant | Any occurence of new pacemaker implant (e. g. when the participant did not have a pacemaker at the preceding follow-up visit) will be documented and assessed | after 3 years |
| Need for new pacemaker implant | Any occurence of new pacemaker implant (e. g. when the participant did not have a pacemaker at the preceding follow-up visit) will be documented and assessed | after 5 years |
| Linz |
| 4021 |
| Austria |
| • Universitätsklinikum Salzburg, Herzchirurgie, Gefäßchirurgie und endovaskuläre Chirurgie | Salzburg | Austria |
| • Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Herz-, Gefäß- und Thoraxchirurgie | Wels | Austria |
| Klinikum Nürnberg | Nuremberg | Bavaria | 90471 | Germany |
| Klinikum Passau/Universität Regensburg | Passau | Bavaria | 94032 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Würzburg | Würzburg | Bavaria | 97080 | Germany |
| • Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Thorax-, Herz- und thorakale Gefässchirurgie | Frankfurt am Main | Hesse | 60590 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinik für Herzchirurgie | Oldenburg | Lower Saxony | 26133 | Germany |
| Uniklinik RWTH Aachen | Aachen | North Rhine-Westphalia | 52074 | Germany |
| Schüchtermann Klinik | Bad Rothenfelde | North Rhine-Westphalia | Germany |
| Herzzentrum Bergmannsheil | Bochum | North Rhine-Westphalia | 44789 | Germany |
| Klinik für Herzchirurgie UKD | Düsseldorf | North Rhine-Westphalia | 40225 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Essen | Essen | North Rhine-Westphalia | 45147 | Germany |
| • Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Thorax- und Kardiovaskuläre Chirurgie | Leipzig | Saxony | 04103 | Germany |
| BundeswehrKrankenhaus Klinik XVII und XVIII | Koblenz | 56072 | Germany |
| Helios Klinikum Siegburg | Siegburg | 53721 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Ulm | Ulm | 89091 | Germany |
| Helios Klinikum Wuppertal | Wuppertal | 42283 | Germany |
| Catharina Ziekenhuis, Catharina Hart- en Vaatcentrum | Eindhoven | Netherlands |
| HerzKlinik Hirslanden, Herz- und thorakale Gefässchirurgie | Zurich | Switzerland |
| HerzZentrum Hirslanden, Herz- und Gefässchirurgie | Zurich | Switzerland |
| 33766089 | Derived | Bakhtiary F, Ahmad AE, Autschbach R, Benedikt P, Bonaros N, Borger M, Dewald O, Feyrer R, Geissler HJ, Grunenfelder J, Lam KY, Leyh R, Liebold A, Czesla M, Mehdiani A, Pollari F, Salamate S, Strauch J, Votsch A, Weber A, Wendt D, Botta B, Bramlage P, Zierer A. Impact of pre-existing comorbidities on outcomes of patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement - rationale and design of the international IMPACT registry. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Mar 25;16(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01434-w. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided