Comparison Between Different Feeding Protocols and Existing Protocol for the Treatment of Acute Malnutrition (A Cluster Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)
Comparison Between Different Feeding Protocols and Existing Protocol for the Treatment of Acute Malnutrition (A Cluster Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)
Though malnutrition is prevalent worldwide but its situation is alarming in low- and middle-income countries. Pakistan has also been facing an alarming situation of prevailing severe malnutrition. Malnutrition in its any form costs a huge intolerable burden not only on national health care system, but also on social and economic fabric of the nation. The current management of severe malnutrition is based on World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines and protocols which has been evolved from expert opinions and observational studies. The principles of these protocols have emerged from emergency settings and converting these protocols for developing countries where severe malnutrition, a routine burden is a critical challenge. In the absence of standard protocols for the treatment of uncomplicated severe malnutrition in non-emergency settings it is important to test and optimize different approaches to treat severely acute malnutrition (SAM). It is hypothesized that by optimizing, adapting and implementing time oriented and resource intensive approaches, a huge burden of high cost of RUTF may be reduced. While RUTF may be utilized to treat SAM children in emergency settings, it is not a substitute of local household foods. Therefore, a pilot study has been conducted to compare the various treatment protocols for malnourished children. We specifically hypothesized that a reduced dose of RUTF for reduced duration, combined with age-appropriate food intake from locally available resources can treat uncomplicated SAM children cost effectively as compared to standard national Community Management of Acute Malnutrition (CMAM) protocol currently implemented in Punjab, Pakistan.
Malnutrition signifies to inadequacies, immoderations or imbalances in an individual's consumption of nutrients or energy. The word malnutrition covers both under and over-nutrition. Undernutrition manifest in two different ways acute and chronic malnutrition. The acute malnutrition includes wasting while chronic malnutrition includes stunting. The situation of malnutrition has been perplexed in Pakistan in recent years and according to National Nutrition Survey (2018) rates of wasting are alarmingly high. Also, Pakistan ranks at 2nd position for infant and child mortality. The standard treatment of uncomplicated SAM in Pakistan often utilizes prolonged use of therapeutic food (RUTF), and after discharge results in high rates of relapse(official data from department of Health doesn't support this statement, according to them there is low rate of relapse). The present pilot study was conducted with the objective to find cost effective treatment protocols for treatment of uncomplicated SAM children. The study was conducted at The Children's Hospital and Institute of Child Health, Lahore in Out Patient Therapeutic Program (OTP) of Preventive Pediatrics Department. The children diagnosed with SAM aged 6-59 months without any specific gender preference were recruited. Weight, height and MUAC were measured at the time of enrolment in the study and Weight for Height (WHZ), Weight for Age (WAZ), Height for Age (HAZ) standard deviation (SD) Z scores and weight velocity was calculated for baseline. For current pilot study SAM children were grouped into 3 clusters. First, 30 children were grouped in 1st cluster, next 30 in 2nd cluster and further next 30 in 3rd cluster. Children in 1st cluster were treated as per standard CMAM protocols. Children in this cluster were provided RUTF as per admission weight of child until they attain 11.5cm MUAC or >-3SD WHZ. The children in the 2nd group (1st intervention group) were initially provided RUTF until they attain MUAC 11cm. After this, children were provided 50% of their required daily calories intake by RUTF and 50% of the calories were provided by the home-based food. The children in the 3rd group (2nd intervention group) were initially provided RUTF until they attain MUAC 11 cm. After this, children were provided their 100% caloric requirement from home-based food along with micronutrients sachets (MMS). The discharge criteria for control group was according to the existing CMAM guidelines that is MUAC > 11.5 cm. The discharge criteria for 2nd & 3rd group was MUAC > 12.5 cm and WHZ > -2SD score. Follow-up home visits of all children were done according to a predefined protocol. During follow-up the control and intervention groups underwent weekly anthropometric measurements. Follow up of the study participants of each group was continued for one month. Growth rate, recovery rate, mortality rate, relapse frequency and duration of recovery were calculated for each group.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: