The first two months of the investigator's project will be a baseline evaluation of the current decision making process about goals-of-care in a local ICU setting (Levis, Quebec). A PhD student will collect sociodemographic data (age, gender, education level, religion), observe and video record (or audio record) dyads of physicians and newly admitted elderly patients discussing goals-of-care.

The two following months will be an evaluation of the decision making process about goals-of-care in the same local ICU setting using only the decision aid without any training. A PhD student will collect sociodemographic data (age, gender, education level, religion), observe and video record (or audio record) new dyads of physicians and newly admitted elderly patients discussing goals-of-care, whether the physician chooses to use the context-adapted decision-aid or not.

This phase will be an evaluation of the decision making process about goals-of-care in the same local ICU setting after intensivists complete the training program and using the DA. A PhD student will collect sociodemographic data (age, gender, education level, religion), observe and video record (or audio record) new dyads of physicians and newly admitted elderly patients discussing goals-of-care using the context-adapted decision aid and the new skills learned in the training program.

One hour online training about shared-decision making about goals-of-care and best practices regarding goals-of-care discussions and decision-making. One hour debriefing in presence.

The OPTION scale (12 items) measures the extent that clinicians engage patients in shared decision making. For each item, a score 0 (The behaviour is not observed) to 4 (The behaviour is observed and executed to a high standard) is given. Adding each item's score will arrive at a number between 0 (minimum) and 48 (maximum). The OPTION scale will be measured by two observers rating audio- or video-recordings of goals-of-care discussions conducted by intensivists with their patients at the earliest possible time during the patients intensive care stay. These discussions will be held at the discretion of the attending intensivist when deemed appropriate. Most often these discussions are held at the time of patient admission (first 24 hours) or whenever the patient is capable of engaging in a goals of care discussion (eg., after the patient is extubated and weaned off mechanical ventilation).

This measure will be based on 7 of the 34 (ACCEPT) quality indicators that measure the quality of end-of-life communication and decision making: written information provided before discussion about goals of care, poor prognosis shared with patient during the discussion, verification with patient about prior discussions or written documents about the use of life-sustaining treatments, use of information by intensivist about about goals of care to support the decision, verification by the intensivist prior to the discussion of any written advanced directives in the patient's medical record, documentation of the goals of care discussed in medical record after discussion, goals of care documented in the medical chart after discussion consistent with patient's stated preferences. Indicators will be measured by two observers rating audio- or video-recordings. Score is the sum of the quality indicator items divided by the sum of highest possible values of these items on a scale 0% to 100%.

Each audio or video recording will be content analysed by a doctoral student and a research assistant using the R language Qualitative Data Analysis (RQDA) package for Qualitative Data Analysis. The aim of this content analysis will be to identify: 1) patients' most frequent incomprehension, concerns, questions and 2) clinicians' opportunities to improve their skills in goals-of-care discussions and decision making.