An Observational Study of Glycemic Control and Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Newly Initiating Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP1) Versus Basal Insulin in Routine Care Settings
An Observational Study of Glycemic Control and Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Newly Initiating Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP1) Versus Basal Insulin in Routine Care Settings
This study will compare hemoglobin a1c (HbA1c) and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes newly initiating a GLP1-receptor agonist or basal insulin.
The 2019 ADA-EASD clinical treatment guidelines recommend a GLP-1RA over basal insulin for patients with type 2 diabetes with suboptimal glycemic control despite metformin and a second-line glucose lowering agent. The basis of this recommendation is due to the side effect profiles of these two medications (i.e. reduced risk of hypoglycemia, some weight loss with GLP-1RA), convenience (once weekly injection) and the fact that the price of insulin has skyrocketed in recent years. Prior head-to-head randomized trials (EAGLE, LEAD 5) comparing select GLP-1RA and basal insulin have found mixed results. In EAGLE, adding either insulin glargine or liraglutide to patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes found no differences in the primary outcome (percentage of people reaching HbA1c < 7%). In LEAD 5, liraglutide was associated with a slightly greater HbA1c reduction than glargine, however the dose of insulin was approximately 50% less than the dose used in EAGLE. The objective of this observational study is to describe the comparative effectiveness and safety of newly initiating a GLP1RA versus basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes using metformin and another oral glucose lowering medicine.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
For A1c cohort only:
-HbA1c >12%