Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation primed with continous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), on top of a standard robot-assisted training (RAT) on improving the upper limb motor functions of stroke survivors and to explore potential sensorimotor neuroplasticity with electroencephalography (EEG).
Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) delivered to the affected primary motor cortex (M1) appears to enhance the brain response to rehabilitative intervention in patients with stroke. However, its clinical utility is highly affected by the response variability. New evidence has reported that preceding iTBS with a priming session of continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), may stabilize and even boost the facilitatory effect of iTBS on the stimulated M1, via metaplasticity. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of iTBS primed with cTBS, on top of a standard robot-assisted training (RAT) on improving the upper limb motor functions of patients with chronic stroke and to explore potential sensorimotor neuroplasticity with electroencephalography (EEG). A three-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be performed with an estimated total of 36 patients with subacute or chronic stroke. All participants will be randomly allocated to receive 10-session intervention of different TBS protocols (i.e., cTBS+iTBS, sham cTBS+iTBS and sham cTBS+sham iTBS), delivered for 3-5 sessions per week, lasting for 2-3 weeks. All participants will receive a 60-minute standard RAT after each stimulation session. Primary outcome will be Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity scores (FMA-UE). Secondary outcomes will be Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), kinematic outcomes generated during RAT as well as and EEG.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| cTBS + iTBS, in addition to robot-assisted training | Experimental | Participants will receive 10-session intervention of priming iTBS protocol (cTBS followed by iTBS, with an interval of 10 minutes). The stimulation will be delivered 3-5 sessions per week, lasting for 2-3 weeks. Participants will receive a 60-minute standard robot-assisted training after each stimulation session. |
|
| Sham cTBS + iTBS, in addition to robot-assisted training | Active Comparator | Participants will receive 10-session intervention of non-primed, standard iTBS (sham cTBS followed by iTBS, with an interval of 10 minutes). The stimulation will be delivered 3-5 sessions per week, lasting for 2-3 weeks. Participants will receive a 60-minute standard robot-assisted training after each stimulation session. |
|
| Sham cTBS + sham iTBS, in addition to robot-assisted training | Sham Comparator | Participants will receive 10-session intervention of sham stimulation (sham cTBS followed by sham iTBS, with an interval of 10 minutes). The stimulation will be delivered 3-5 sessions per week, lasting for 2-3 weeks. Participants will receive a 60-minute standard robot-assisted training after each stimulation session. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Theta burst stimulation (TBS) | Device | Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is a potent form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Standard 600-pulse intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) can enhance the corticomotor excitability, whereas standard 600-pulse continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) can suppress the corticomotor excitability. Sham stimulation uses an extreme low stimulation intensity which will not influence with corticomotor excitability. In the present study, real stimulation will be delivered in an intensity of 70% individual resting motor threshold while sham stimulation will be delivered in an intensity of 20% individual resting motor threshold. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity scores (FMA-UE) | FMA-UE is a standard upper limb motor impairment assessment for stroke survivors. FMA-UE assesses voluntary movement, reflex activity, grasp and coordination. | Baseline |
| Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity scores (FMA-UE) | FMA-UE is a standard upper limb motor impairment assessment for stroke survivors. FMA-UE assesses voluntary movement, reflex activity, grasp and coordination. | 1 week |
| Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity scores (FMA-UE) | FMA-UE is a standard upper limb motor impairment assessment for stroke survivors. FMA-UE assesses voluntary movement, reflex activity, grasp and coordination. | 2 weeks |
| Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity scores (FMA-UE) | FMA-UE is a standard upper limb motor impairment assessment for stroke survivors. FMA-UE assesses voluntary movement, reflex activity, grasp and coordination. | 2 weeks after the completion of training |
| Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) | ARAT is a standard upper limb functional performance assessment for stroke survivors. ARAT assesses a patient's ability to handle objects differing in size, weight and shape. ARAT consists of 19 items grouped into four subscales: grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement. | Baseline |
| Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) | ARAT is a standard upper limb functional performance assessment for stroke survivors. ARAT assesses a patient's ability to handle objects differing in size, weight and shape. ARAT consists of 19 items grouped into four subscales: grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sensorimotor event-related desynchronization | Electroencephalographical assessment for cortical activation induced by movement and mirror visual feedback-based observation of movement | Baseline |
| Sensorimotor event-related desynchronization |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences | Hong Kong | Hong Kong |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35317611 | Derived | Zhang JJ, Bai Z, Fong KNK. Priming Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation for Hemiparetic Upper Limb After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Stroke. 2022 Jul;53(7):2171-2181. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037870. Epub 2022 Mar 23. | |
| 32152174 | Derived | Zhang JJ, Fong KNK. Effects of priming intermittent theta burst stimulation on upper limb motor recovery after stroke: study protocol for a proof-of-concept randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 8;10(3):e035348. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035348. |
Not provided
Not provided
The data will be shared for research purpose upon reasonable request.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050781 | Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055909 | Magnetic Field Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Robot-assisted training | Behavioral | Fourier M2 upper limb rehabilitation robot (Fourier Intelligence Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China), will be used for upper limb proximal joints training. Fourier M2 upper limb rehab robot is an end-effector robot-assisted device. The device targets (1) flexion and extension of shoulder joint, (2) flexion and extension of elbow, (3) internal and external rotation of shoulder joint, and (4) abduction and adduction of shoulder joint, supported by tailored interactive TV games in the device. HandyRehab hand robot (Zunosaki Company Ltd., Hong Kong SAR) will be used for upper limb distal joints training. It is an exoskeleton over the hand which provides power-driven extension and grasping force to the fingers and thumb in order to assist the patient to open and close the paretic hand by means of surface electromyography-triggered from the signals through the forearm extensors and flexors. |
|
| 1 week |
| Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) | ARAT is a standard upper limb functional performance assessment for stroke survivors. ARAT assesses a patient's ability to handle objects differing in size, weight and shape. ARAT consists of 19 items grouped into four subscales: grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement. | 2 week |
| Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) | ARAT is a standard upper limb functional performance assessment for stroke survivors. ARAT assesses a patient's ability to handle objects differing in size, weight and shape. ARAT consists of 19 items grouped into four subscales: grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement. | 2 weeks after the completion of training |
Electroencephalographical assessment for cortical activation induced by movement and mirror visual feedback-based observation of movement
| 2 weeks |
| Mean velocity | Mean velocity is a quantified assessment for movement efficiency during robot-assisted training with Fourier M2 device. | Baseline |
| Mean velocity | Mean velocity is a quantified assessment for movement efficiency during robot-assisted training with Fourier M2 device. | 2 weeks |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |