Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Symbio, LLC | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To compare the safety and efficacy profile of PN40082 versus Restylane Silk Injectable Gel with 0.3% lidocaine (Restylane Silk) for lip augmentation in approximately 158 subjects.
The objective of the study is to compare the safety and efficacy profile of PN40082 versus Restylane Silk Injectable Gel with 0.3% lidocaine (Restylane Silk) for lip augmentation. Approximately 158 subjects will be randomized at approximately 7 sites in this is a double-blind, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical study of subjects seeking lip augmentation. Subjects meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized 1:1 to treatment with either PN40082 or Restylane Silk. The Evaluating Investigator will be blinded to the treatment. Injections of the study device will be performed by an unblinded Treating Investigator.
At each visit, the blinded Evaluating Investigator evaluations and subject evaluations of the treated areas will be performed and recorded. Visits and telephone contacts will occur at:
Visit 1 / Week 0 (Day 1) - baseline and treatment
Evaluations include:
Lip Fullness Grading Scale (LFGS) (Overall lip fullness considering both lips together, fullness of the upper lip and fullness of the lower lip) Perioral lines at rest severity scale (POL) (Overall perioral lines at rest severity considering both lips together, perioral lines at rest severity of the upper lip and perioral lines at rest severity of the lower lip) Patient Global Aesthetic Improvement (pGAI) Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement (iGAI) Safety will be assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) at all study visits
Other Safety Evaluations include:
Lip Function Lip Sensation
Other evaluations include:
Investigator Ease of Use Assessment Swelling Assessment Subject Satisfaction with Lips Assessment Subjects participation will be approximately 6 months and the study is estimated to last 20 months from first subject first visit to last subject last visit.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| PN40082 | Experimental | Test device: PN40082 (manufactured by Prollenium Medical Technologies) is a clear, colorless gel in 1.0 mL pre-filled syringes with 25 mg/mL of stabilized hyaluronic acid and lidocaine 0.3% w/w |
|
| Restylane Silk | Active Comparator | Restylane Silk (manufactured by Q-Med AB for Medicis - A Division of Valeant Pharmaceuticals Corporation North America, LLC ) is a clear, colorless gel in 1.0 mL pre-filled syringes formulated to a concentration of 20 mg/mL of stabilized hyaluronic acid and lidocaine 0.3% w/w. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PN40082 | Device | To provide a 1-point improvement in the lip fullness grading scale score of subjects with very thin or thin lips or subjects with Fitzpatrick IV, V or VI to improve the LFGS score by 1 for 1 or both lips |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Overall Lip Fullness Grading Scale | The Lip Fullness Grading Scale is a 5 point photonumeric rating scale with 0 being very thin lips (worse outcome) up to 4 being full lips (better outcome) | Visit 1 baseline to Visit 3 Month 2, 56 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Success Lip Fullness Grading Scale | Percent of subjects with Lip Fullness treatment success (responder: overall LFGS based on the Blinded Evaluating Investigator Assessment) at Visit 3/Month 2 where responder is defined as a subject with at least a 1-grade increase from baseline on the LFGS post augmentation The lip fullness grading scale is a 5 point photonumeric rating scale with 0 being very thin lips (worse outcome) to 4 being full lips (better outcome) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tennessee Clinical Research Center | Nashville | Tennessee | 37215 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | PN40082 | Test device: PN40082 (manufactured by Prollenium Medical Technologies) is a clear, colorless gel in 1.0 mL pre-filled syringes with 25 mg/mL of stabilized hyaluronic acid and lidocaine 0.3% w/w |
| FG001 | Restylane Silk | Restylane Silk (manufactured by Q-Med AB for Medicis - A Division of Valeant Pharmaceuticals Corporation North America, LLC ) is a clear, colorless gel in 1.0 mL pre-filled syringes formulated to a concentration of 20 mg/mL of stabilized hyaluronic acid and lidocaine 0.3% w/w. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | PN40082 | Test device: PN40082 (manufactured by Prollenium Medical Technologies) is a clear, colorless gel in 1.0 mL pre-filled syringes with 25 mg/mL of stabilized hyaluronic acid and lidocaine 0.3% w/w |
| BG001 | Restylane Silk |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Overall Lip Fullness Grading Scale | The Lip Fullness Grading Scale is a 5 point photonumeric rating scale with 0 being very thin lips (worse outcome) up to 4 being full lips (better outcome) | Per-Protocol population is all randomized subjects who met all inclusion/exclusion criteria; received study device, completed Visit 5 within the specified window; had LFGS score by the Blinded Evaluating Investigator at Visit 3/Month 2 within the specified visit window, and had no significant protocol violations that would affect the treatment evaluation. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Visit 1 baseline to Visit 3 Month 2, 56 days |
|
Each subject was monitored for the occurrence of AEs, including serious adverse events (SAEs), starting immediately after the subject has signed the informed consent form (ICF). Each subject was followed for safety monitoring until he/she was discharged from the study, up to 6 months. No Follow-up procedures related to pregnancy, AEs, or SAEs continued beyond the end of the study, 6 months.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | PN40082 | Test device: PN40082 (manufactured by Prollenium Medical Technologies) is a clear, colorless gel in 1.0 mL pre-filled syringes with 25 mg/mL of stabilized hyaluronic acid and lidocaine 0.3% w/w |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Detached Retina Right Eye | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injection Site Bruising | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
Due to blinded randomization, no men were randomized into the PN40082 group. Pooled analysis was provided to the FDA from previous studies to demonstrate safety in men.
Not enough subjects were randomized that required treatment of their perioral lines to demonstrate statistically non-inferiority.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director Clinical Affairs | Prollenium Medical Technologies | 1-905-508-1469 | clinicaltrials@prolleniumus.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Oct 2, 2018 | Jun 17, 2021 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | May 9, 2018 | Jun 17, 2021 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Double-blind, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical study
Not provided
Not provided
Only the unblinded treating investigator and unblinded assistant will be unblinded to the treatment. The remainder of study/site personnel remain blinded.
| Restylane Silk | Device | To provide a 1-point improvement in the lip fullness grading scale score of subjects with very thin or thin lips or subjects with Fitzpatrick IV, V or VI to improve the LFGS score by 1 for 1 or both lips |
|
| Visit 1 baseline to Visit 3 Month 2, 56 days |
| Treatment Success Perioral Lines Severity Scale | Percent of responders with Perioral Lines Treatment Success overall on the POL severity scale at Visit 4/Month 3 (defined as a subject demonstrating ≥ 1-point improvement, i.e., decrease in severity, from baseline. The Perioral Lines at rest severity scale is a 4 point rating scale with 0 = None, a mouth with no perioral lines (better outcome) to 3 = Severe, being a mouth with many deep lines or crevices (worse outcome) | Visit 1 baseline to Visit 4 Month 3, 84 days |
| Change From Baseline to Visit 4/Month 3 in Overall Lip Fullness Grading Scale | The lip fullness grading scale is a 5 point photonumeric rating scale with 0 being very thin lips (worse outcome) to 4 being full lips (better outcome) | Visit 1 baseline to Visit 4 Month 3, 84 days |
| Change From Baseline to Visit 5/Month 6 in Overall Lip Fullness Grading Scale | The lip fullness grading scale is a 5 point photonumeric rating scale with 0 being very thin lips (worse outcome) to 4 being full lips (better outcome) | Visit 1 baseline to Visit 5 Month 6, 168 days |
| Pregnancy |
|
Restylane Silk (manufactured by Q-Med AB for Medicis - A Division of Valeant Pharmaceuticals Corporation North America, LLC ) is a clear, colorless gel in 1.0 mL pre-filled syringes formulated to a concentration of 20 mg/mL of stabilized hyaluronic acid and lidocaine 0.3% w/w.
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | Restylane Silk | Restylane Silk (manufactured by Q-Med AB for Medicis - A Division of Valeant Pharmaceuticals Corporation North America, LLC ) is a clear, colorless gel in 1.0 mL pre-filled syringes formulated to a concentration of 20 mg/mL of stabilized hyaluronic acid and lidocaine 0.3% w/w. |
|
|
| Secondary | Treatment Success Lip Fullness Grading Scale | Percent of subjects with Lip Fullness treatment success (responder: overall LFGS based on the Blinded Evaluating Investigator Assessment) at Visit 3/Month 2 where responder is defined as a subject with at least a 1-grade increase from baseline on the LFGS post augmentation The lip fullness grading scale is a 5 point photonumeric rating scale with 0 being very thin lips (worse outcome) to 4 being full lips (better outcome) | Per-protocol population is all randomized subjects who met all inclusion/exclusion criteria; received study device, completed Visit 5 within the specified window; had LFGS score by the Blinded Evaluating Investigator at Visit 3/Month 2 within the specified visit window, and had no significant protocol violations that would affect the treatment evaluation | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Visit 1 baseline to Visit 3 Month 2, 56 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Treatment Success Perioral Lines Severity Scale | Percent of responders with Perioral Lines Treatment Success overall on the POL severity scale at Visit 4/Month 3 (defined as a subject demonstrating ≥ 1-point improvement, i.e., decrease in severity, from baseline. The Perioral Lines at rest severity scale is a 4 point rating scale with 0 = None, a mouth with no perioral lines (better outcome) to 3 = Severe, being a mouth with many deep lines or crevices (worse outcome) | Per Protocol population is all randomized subjects who met all inclusion/exclusion criteria; received study device, completed Visit 5 within the specified window; had LFGS score by the Blinded Evaluating Investigator at Visit 3/Month 2 within the specified visit window, and had no significant protocol violations that would affect the treatment evaluation. Of the per protocol population the subjects who had perioral injection at Visit 1 or Visit 2 and had POL assessed at Visit 4/Month 3 | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Visit 1 baseline to Visit 4 Month 3, 84 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Visit 4/Month 3 in Overall Lip Fullness Grading Scale | The lip fullness grading scale is a 5 point photonumeric rating scale with 0 being very thin lips (worse outcome) to 4 being full lips (better outcome) | Per-protocol population is all randomized subjects who met all inclusion/exclusion criteria; received study device, completed Visit 5 within the specified window; had LFGS score by the Blinded Evaluating Investigator at Visit 3/Month 2 within the specified visit window, and had no significant protocol violations that would affect the treatment evaluation | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Visit 1 baseline to Visit 4 Month 3, 84 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Visit 5/Month 6 in Overall Lip Fullness Grading Scale | The lip fullness grading scale is a 5 point photonumeric rating scale with 0 being very thin lips (worse outcome) to 4 being full lips (better outcome) | Per-protocol population is all randomized subjects who met all inclusion/exclusion criteria; received study device, completed Visit 5 within the specified window; had LFGS score by the Blinded Evaluating Investigator at Visit 3/Month 2 within the specified visit window, and had no significant protocol violations that would affect the treatment evaluation | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Visit 1 baseline to Visit 5 Month 6, 168 days |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 80 |
| 2 |
| 80 |
| 75 |
| 80 |
| EG001 | Restylane Silk | Restylane Silk (manufactured by Q-Med AB for Medicis - A Division of Valeant Pharmaceuticals Corporation North America, LLC ) is a clear, colorless gel in 1.0 mL pre-filled syringes formulated to a concentration of 20 mg/mL of stabilized hyaluronic acid and lidocaine 0.3% w/w. | 0 | 78 | 1 | 78 | 75 | 78 |
| Right Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Stage 2 | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Facial Paralysis | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection Site Erythema | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection Site Mass | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection Site Movement Impairment | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection Site Pain | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection Site Pruritus | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection Site Swelling | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Facial Asymmetry | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided