Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-004701-11 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Following analysis of open label extension (OLE) data from RMS phase 2 study (MS200527- 0086), it was determined that a change in active comparator warranted in phase 3 RMS comprised of trial MS200527-0073. Consequently, this trial terminated early.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of evobrutinib administered orally twice daily versus Interferon-beta-1a (Avonex®), once a week intramuscularly in participants with RMS.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evobrutinib + Avonex® matched Placebo | Experimental | Participants received active evobrutinib twice daily (BID) along with concomitant intramuscular (IM) injection of placebo matched to Avonex® once a week. Treatment period was planned to be of 96 weeks. |
|
| Avonex® + Evobrutinib matched Placebo | Active Comparator | Participants received IM injection of active Avonex® once a week along with concomitant placebo matched to evobrutinib BID. Treatment period was planned to be of 96 weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evobrutinib | Drug | Participants received evobrutinib twice daily (BID). |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) | The annualized relapse rate at 96 weeks was to be calculated based on qualified relapses. A qualifying relapse is the occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to MS. The relapse should be accompanied by an increase of 0.5 points or more on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), or 2 points increase on one of the Functional System Scores (FSS), or 1 point increase on at least two of the FSS. The increase in FSS scores must be related to the neurological symptoms which were reported as new or worsening. | At Week 96 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time to First Occurrence of 12-Week Confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression | EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that measures disability in participants with MS. EDSS progression is defined as an increase of 1 point or more from Baseline EDSS score when the Baseline score is 5.0 or less, and an increase of 0.5 points or more when the Baseline score is 5.5 or greater. Time to first occurrence of 12-week confirmed EDSS progression is defined as the time from randomization to the first EDSS progression event that was confirmed at a regularly scheduled visit at least 12 weeks later. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria: - Participants are diagnosed with RMS (relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis [RRMS] or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis [SPMS] with relapses) in accordance with 2017 Revised McDonald criteria (Thompson 2018) - Participants with one or more documented relapses within the 2 years before Screening with either: a. one relapse which occurred within the last year prior to randomization, OR b. the presence of at least 1 gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) T1 lesion within 6 months prior to randomization - Participants have Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 0 to 5.5 at Baseline. Participants with an EDSS score <= 2 at Screening are only eligible for participation if their disease duration (time since onset of symptoms) is no more than 10 years - Participants are neurologically stable for >= 30 days prior to both screening and baseline - Female participants must be neither pregnant nor breast-feeding and must lack child-bearing potential, as defined by either: post-menopausal or surgically sterile or use an effective method of contraception for the duration of the study - Participants have given written informed consent prior to any study-related procedure - Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply Exclusion Criteria: - Participants diagnosed with Progressive MS, in accordance with the 2017 Revised McDonald criteria as follows: a). Participants with Primary Progressive MS. b). Participants with secondary progressive MS without evidence of relapse.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Medical Responsible | Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Please Contact U.S. Medical Information | Rockland | Massachusetts | 02370 | United States | ||
| Please Contact the Communication Center |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Trial Awareness and Transparency website | View source |
| US Medical Information website, Medical Resources | View source |
Not provided
Per company policy, following approval of a new product or a new indication for an approved product in both the EU and the US, EMD Serono will share study protocols, anonymized patient level and study level data and redacted clinical study reports from clinical trials in patients with qualified scientific and medical researchers, upon request, as necessary for conducting legitimate research. Further information on how to request data can be found on our website https://www.emdgroup.com/en/research/our-approach-to-research-and-development/healthcare/clinical-trials/commitment-responsible-data-sharing.html
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study was to be conducted in 2 periods; double blind period and open label extension period. However, due to early termination of the study, the sponsor decided not to conduct the open label extension period.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Experimental: Evobrutinib + Avonex® Matched Placebo | Participants received active evobrutinib twice daily (BID) along with concomitant intramuscular (IM) injection of placebo matched to Avonex® once a week. Treatment period was planned to be of 96 weeks. |
| FG001 | Active Comparator: Avonex® + Evobrutinib Matched Placebo | Participants received IM injection of active Avonex® once a week along with concomitant placebo matched to evobrutinib BID. Treatment period was planned to be of 96 weeks. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Experimental: Evobrutinib + Avonex® Matched Placebo | Participants received active evobrutinib twice daily (BID) along with concomitant intramuscular (IM) injection of placebo matched to Avonex® once a week. Treatment period was planned to be of 96 weeks. |
| BG001 | Active Comparator: Avonex® + Evobrutinib Matched Placebo |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) | The annualized relapse rate at 96 weeks was to be calculated based on qualified relapses. A qualifying relapse is the occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to MS. The relapse should be accompanied by an increase of 0.5 points or more on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), or 2 points increase on one of the Functional System Scores (FSS), or 1 point increase on at least two of the FSS. The increase in FSS scores must be related to the neurological symptoms which were reported as new or worsening. | Following analysis of open label extension (OLE) data from RMS phase 2 study (MS200527- 0086), it was determined that a change in active comparator warranted in phase 3 RMS comprised of trial MS200527-0073. Consequently, this trial terminated early, therefore, it was decided as per Statistical Analysis Plan not to report the efficacy data for this study. | Posted | At Week 96 |
|
Baseline up to 235 days
SAF analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of any study intervention.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Experimental: Evobrutinib + Avonex® Matched Placebo | Participants received active evobrutinib twice daily (BID) along with concomitant intramuscular (IM) injection of placebo matched to Avonex® once a week. Treatment period was planned to be of 96 weeks. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neutrophil count decreased | Investigations | MedDRA 23.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
Following analysis of open label extension (OLE) data from RMS phase 2 study (MS200527- 0086), it was determined that a change in active comparator warranted in phase 3 RMS comprised of trial MS200527-0073. Consequently, this trial terminated early, therefore, it was decided as per Statistical Analysis Plan not to report the efficacy data for this study.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Communication Center | Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany | +49-6151-72-5200 | service@merckgroup.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Sep 5, 2019 | May 31, 2021 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | May 28, 2020 | May 31, 2021 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020529 | Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009103 | Multiple Sclerosis |
| D020278 | Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNS |
| D020274 | Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000632111 | evobrutinib |
| D000068556 | Interferon beta-1a |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016899 | Interferon-beta |
| D007370 | Interferon Type I |
| D007372 | Interferons |
| D016207 | Cytokines |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Avonex® | Drug | Participants received avonex® IM injection once a week. |
|
| Avonex® matched Placebo | Drug | Participants received IM injection of placebo matched to Avonex® once a week. |
|
| Evobrutinib matched Placebo | Drug | Participants received placebo matched to evobrutinib twice a day. |
|
| Baseline up to 96 weeks |
| Time to First Occurrence of 24-Week Confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression | EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that measures disability in participants with MS. EDSS progression is defined as an increase of 1 point or more from Baseline EDSS score when the Baseline score is 5.0 or less, and an increase of 0.5 points or more when the Baseline score is 5.5 or greater. Time to first occurrence of 24-week confirmed EDSS progression is defined as the time from randomization to the first EDSS progression event that was confirmed at a regularly scheduled visit at least 24 weeks later. | Baseline up to 96 weeks |
| Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) Short Form Score at Week 96 | The PROMIS PF Short Form is specific to measuring the physical function domain of MS patients, with each item on the form scored on a T-score metric. Higher scores indicate higher PF. Change from baseline at Week 96 is the difference between the PROMIS PF scores at 96 weeks and at baseline. | Baseline, Week 96 |
| Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) MS Fatigue Score at Week 96 | The PROMIS Fatigue Short Form is specific to measuring the fatigue domain of MS patients, with each item on the form scored on a T-score metric. Higher scores indicate higher fatigue. Change from baseline at Week 96 is the difference between the PROMIS Fatigue scores at 96 weeks and at baseline. | Baseline, Week 96 |
| Total Number of Gadolinium-Enhancing (Gd+) Time Constant 1 (T1) Lesions Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans at Week 24, 48, and 96 | Total number of Gd+ T1 lesions was to be assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). | At Week 24, 48 and 96 |
| Total Number of New or Enlarging Time Constant 2 (T2) Lesions Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans at Week 24, 48, and 96 | Total number of new or enlarging T2 lesions was to be assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). | At Week 24, 48 and 96 |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal relationship with this treatment. Therefore, an AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, regardless if it is considered related to the medicinal product. TEAE is an AE that started after study drug treatment; or if the event was continuous from baseline and was serious, related to study drug, or resulted in death, discontinuation, interruption or reduction of study therapy. TEAEs includes both serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. AESIs included liver AEs (possible drug induced, non-infectious, non-alcoholic and immune-mediated) infections (serious and opportunistic infections), lipase and amylase elevation, and seizure. | Baseline up to 235 days |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Based on Severity According to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (NCI-CTCAE v4.03) | TEAE is an AE that started after study drug treatment; or if the event was continuous from baseline and was serious, related to investigational medicinal product (IMP), or resulted in death, discontinuation, interruption or reduction of study therapy. Severity of TEAEs were graded using NCI-CTCAE v4.03 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 1= Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death. Number of participants with TEAEs based on severity were reported. | Baseline up to 235 days |
| Vital Signs: Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) | DBP and SBP were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest for the participants at indicated time points. | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
| Vital Signs: Pulse Rate | Pulse rate was measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest for the participants at indicated time points. | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
| Vital Signs: Respiratory Rate | Respiration rate was measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest for the participants at indicated time points. | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
| Vital Signs: Temperature | Temperature was measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest for the participants at indicated time points. | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
| Vital Signs: Weight | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
| Number of Participants With Abnormal Lab Values | The total number of participants with laboratory test abnormalities was assessed. Clinical laboratory tests included hematology, coagulation, biochemistry and urinalysis. | Baseline up to 235 days |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | ECG parameters included heart rhythm, heart rate, QRS intervals, QT intervals, RR intervals and corrected QT (QTc) intervals. | Baseline up to 235 days |
| Absolute Concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) A Level | Absolute concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) A was reported. | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
| Absolute Concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) E Level | Absolute concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) E was reported. | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
| Absolute Concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) G Level | Absolute concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) G was reported. | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
| Absolute Concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) M Level | Absolute concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) M was reported. | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
| Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (Ig) A Level | Change from baseline in immunoglobulin (Ig) A level was reported. | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
| Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (Ig) E Level | Change from baseline in immunoglobulin (Ig) E level was reported. | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
| Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (Ig) G Level | Change from baseline in immunoglobulin (Ig) G level was reported. | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
| Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (Ig) M Level | Change from baseline in immunoglobulin (Ig) M level was reported. | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
| Darmstadt |
| 64293 |
| Germany |
Participants received IM injection of active Avonex® once a week along with concomitant placebo matched to evobrutinib BID. Treatment period was planned to be of 96 weeks. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
Participants received active evobrutinib twice daily (BID) along with concomitant intramuscular (IM) injection of placebo matched to Avonex® once a week. Treatment period was planned to be of 96 weeks. |
| OG001 | Active Comparator: Avonex® + Evobrutinib Matched Placebo | Participants received IM injection of active Avonex® once a week along with concomitant placebo matched to evobrutinib BID. Treatment period was planned to be of 96 weeks. |
|
| Secondary | Time to First Occurrence of 12-Week Confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression | EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that measures disability in participants with MS. EDSS progression is defined as an increase of 1 point or more from Baseline EDSS score when the Baseline score is 5.0 or less, and an increase of 0.5 points or more when the Baseline score is 5.5 or greater. Time to first occurrence of 12-week confirmed EDSS progression is defined as the time from randomization to the first EDSS progression event that was confirmed at a regularly scheduled visit at least 12 weeks later. | Following analysis of open label extension (OLE) data from RMS phase 2 study (MS200527- 0086), it was determined that a change in active comparator warranted in phase 3 RMS comprised of trial MS200527-0073. Consequently, this trial terminated early, therefore, it was decided as per Statistical Analysis Plan not to report the efficacy data for this study. | Posted | Baseline up to 96 weeks |
|
|
| Secondary | Time to First Occurrence of 24-Week Confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression | EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that measures disability in participants with MS. EDSS progression is defined as an increase of 1 point or more from Baseline EDSS score when the Baseline score is 5.0 or less, and an increase of 0.5 points or more when the Baseline score is 5.5 or greater. Time to first occurrence of 24-week confirmed EDSS progression is defined as the time from randomization to the first EDSS progression event that was confirmed at a regularly scheduled visit at least 24 weeks later. | Following analysis of open label extension (OLE) data from RMS phase 2 study (MS200527- 0086), it was determined that a change in active comparator warranted in phase 3 RMS comprised of trial MS200527-0073. Consequently, this trial terminated early, therefore, it was decided as per Statistical Analysis Plan not to report the efficacy data for this study. | Posted | Baseline up to 96 weeks |
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) Short Form Score at Week 96 | The PROMIS PF Short Form is specific to measuring the physical function domain of MS patients, with each item on the form scored on a T-score metric. Higher scores indicate higher PF. Change from baseline at Week 96 is the difference between the PROMIS PF scores at 96 weeks and at baseline. | Following analysis of open label extension (OLE) data from RMS phase 2 study (MS200527- 0086), it was determined that a change in active comparator warranted in phase 3 RMS comprised of trial MS200527-0073. Consequently, this trial terminated early, therefore, it was decided as per Statistical Analysis Plan not to report the efficacy data for this study. | Posted | Baseline, Week 96 |
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) MS Fatigue Score at Week 96 | The PROMIS Fatigue Short Form is specific to measuring the fatigue domain of MS patients, with each item on the form scored on a T-score metric. Higher scores indicate higher fatigue. Change from baseline at Week 96 is the difference between the PROMIS Fatigue scores at 96 weeks and at baseline. | Following analysis of open label extension (OLE) data from RMS phase 2 study (MS200527- 0086), it was determined that a change in active comparator warranted in phase 3 RMS comprised of trial MS200527-0073. Consequently, this trial terminated early, therefore, it was decided as per Statistical Analysis Plan not to report the efficacy data for this study. | Posted | Baseline, Week 96 |
|
|
| Secondary | Total Number of Gadolinium-Enhancing (Gd+) Time Constant 1 (T1) Lesions Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans at Week 24, 48, and 96 | Total number of Gd+ T1 lesions was to be assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). | Following analysis of open label extension (OLE) data from RMS phase 2 study (MS200527- 0086), it was determined that a change in active comparator warranted in phase 3 RMS comprised of trial MS200527-0073. Consequently, this trial terminated early, therefore, it was decided as per Statistical Analysis Plan not to report the efficacy data for this study. | Posted | At Week 24, 48 and 96 |
|
|
| Secondary | Total Number of New or Enlarging Time Constant 2 (T2) Lesions Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans at Week 24, 48, and 96 | Total number of new or enlarging T2 lesions was to be assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). | Following analysis of open label extension (OLE) data from RMS phase 2 study (MS200527- 0086), it was determined that a change in active comparator warranted in phase 3 RMS comprised of trial MS200527-0073. Consequently, this trial terminated early, therefore, it was decided as per Statistical Analysis Plan not to report the efficacy data for this study. | Posted | At Week 24, 48 and 96 |
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal relationship with this treatment. Therefore, an AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, regardless if it is considered related to the medicinal product. TEAE is an AE that started after study drug treatment; or if the event was continuous from baseline and was serious, related to study drug, or resulted in death, discontinuation, interruption or reduction of study therapy. TEAEs includes both serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. AESIs included liver AEs (possible drug induced, non-infectious, non-alcoholic and immune-mediated) infections (serious and opportunistic infections), lipase and amylase elevation, and seizure. | Safety (SAF) analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of any study intervention. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline up to 235 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Based on Severity According to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (NCI-CTCAE v4.03) | TEAE is an AE that started after study drug treatment; or if the event was continuous from baseline and was serious, related to investigational medicinal product (IMP), or resulted in death, discontinuation, interruption or reduction of study therapy. Severity of TEAEs were graded using NCI-CTCAE v4.03 toxicity grades, as follows: Grade 1= Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death. Number of participants with TEAEs based on severity were reported. | SAF analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of any study intervention | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline up to 235 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Vital Signs: Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) | DBP and SBP were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest for the participants at indicated time points. | SAF analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of any study intervention. No summary analysis was done. Following analysis of OLE data from RMS phase 2 study (MS200527- 0086), it was determined that a change in active comparator warranted in phase 3 RMS comprised of trial MS200527-0073. Consequently, this trial terminated early. Therefore, participant wise data reported and number analyzed= specific participant evaluated in respective arm at specified timepoint. | Posted | Number | Millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Vital Signs: Pulse Rate | Pulse rate was measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest for the participants at indicated time points. | SAF analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of any study intervention. No summary analysis was done. Following analysis of OLE data from RMS phase 2 study (MS200527- 0086), it was determined that a change in active comparator warranted in phase 3 RMS comprised of trial MS200527-0073. Consequently, this trial terminated early. Therefore, participant wise data reported and number analyzed= specific participant evaluated in respective arm at specified timepoint. | Posted | Number | Beats per minute | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Vital Signs: Respiratory Rate | Respiration rate was measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest for the participants at indicated time points. | SAF analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of any study intervention. No summary analysis was done. Following analysis of OLE data from RMS phase 2 study (MS200527- 0086), it was determined that a change in active comparator warranted in phase 3 RMS comprised of trial MS200527-0073. Consequently, this trial terminated early. Therefore, participant wise data reported and number analyzed= specific participant evaluated in respective arm at specified timepoint. | Posted | Number | Breaths Per Minute | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Vital Signs: Temperature | Temperature was measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest for the participants at indicated time points. | SAF analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of any study intervention. No summary analysis was done. Following analysis of OLE data from RMS phase 2 study (MS200527- 0086), it was determined that a change in active comparator warranted in phase 3 RMS comprised of trial MS200527-0073. Consequently, this trial terminated early. Therefore, participant wise data reported and number analyzed= specific participant evaluated in respective arm at specified timepoint. | Posted | Number | Degree celsius | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Vital Signs: Weight | SAF analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of any study intervention. No summary analysis was done. Following analysis of OLE data from RMS phase 2 study (MS200527- 0086), it was determined that a change in active comparator warranted in phase 3 RMS comprised of trial MS200527-0073. Consequently, this trial terminated early. Therefore, participant wise data reported and number analyzed= specific participant evaluated in respective arm at specified timepoint. | Posted | Number | kilogram (kg) | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Abnormal Lab Values | The total number of participants with laboratory test abnormalities was assessed. Clinical laboratory tests included hematology, coagulation, biochemistry and urinalysis. | SAF analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of any study intervention. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline up to 235 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities | ECG parameters included heart rhythm, heart rate, QRS intervals, QT intervals, RR intervals and corrected QT (QTc) intervals. | SAF analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of any study intervention. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline up to 235 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Absolute Concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) A Level | Absolute concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) A was reported. | SAF analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of any study intervention. No summary analysis was done. Following analysis of OLE data from RMS phase 2 study (MS200527- 0086), it was determined that a change in active comparator warranted in phase 3 RMS comprised of trial MS200527-0073. Consequently, this trial terminated early. Therefore, participant wise data reported and number analyzed= specific participant evaluated in respective arm at specified timepoint. | Posted | Number | grams per liter (g/L) | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Absolute Concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) E Level | Absolute concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) E was reported. | SAF analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of any study intervention. No summary analysis was done. Following analysis of OLE data from RMS phase 2 study (MS200527- 0086), it was determined that a change in active comparator warranted in phase 3 RMS comprised of trial MS200527-0073. Consequently, this trial terminated early. Therefore, participant wise data reported and number analyzed= specific participant evaluated in respective arm at specified timepoint. | Posted | Number | International unit per milliliter(IU/mL) | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Absolute Concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) G Level | Absolute concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) G was reported. | SAF analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of any study intervention. No summary analysis was done. Following analysis of OLE data from RMS phase 2 study (MS200527- 0086), it was determined that a change in active comparator warranted in phase 3 RMS comprised of trial MS200527-0073. Consequently, this trial terminated early. Therefore, participant wise data reported and number analyzed= specific participant evaluated in respective arm at specified timepoint. | Posted | Number | grams per liter (g/L) | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Absolute Concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) M Level | Absolute concentrations of Immunoglobulin (Ig) M was reported. | SAF analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of any study intervention. No summary analysis was done. Following analysis of OLE data from RMS phase 2 study (MS200527- 0086), it was determined that a change in active comparator warranted in phase 3 RMS comprised of trial MS200527-0073. Consequently, this trial terminated early. Therefore, participant wise data reported and number analyzed= specific participant evaluated in respective arm at specified timepoint. | Posted | Number | grams per liter (g/L) | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (Ig) A Level | Change from baseline in immunoglobulin (Ig) A level was reported. | SAF analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of any study intervention. No summary analysis was done. Following analysis of OLE data from RMS phase 2 study (MS200527- 0086), it was determined that a change in active comparator warranted in phase 3 RMS comprised of trial MS200527-0073. Consequently, this trial terminated early. Therefore, participant wise data reported and number analyzed= specific participant evaluated in respective arm at specified timepoint. | Posted | Number | grams per liter (g/L) | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (Ig) E Level | Change from baseline in immunoglobulin (Ig) E level was reported. | SAF analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of any study intervention. No summary analysis was done. Following analysis of OLE data from RMS phase 2 study (MS200527- 0086), it was determined that a change in active comparator warranted in phase 3 RMS comprised of trial MS200527-0073. Consequently, this trial terminated early. Therefore, participant wise data reported and number analyzed= specific participant evaluated in respective arm at specified timepoint. | Posted | Number | International unit per milliliter(IU/mL) | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (Ig) G Level | Change from baseline in immunoglobulin (Ig) G level was reported. | SAF analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of any study intervention. No summary analysis was done. Following analysis of OLE data from RMS phase 2 study (MS200527- 0086), it was determined that a change in active comparator warranted in phase 3 RMS comprised of trial MS200527-0073. Consequently, this trial terminated early. Therefore, participant wise data reported and number analyzed= specific participant evaluated in respective arm at specified timepoint. | Posted | Number | grams per liter (g/L) | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (Ig) M Level | Change from baseline in immunoglobulin (Ig) M level was reported. | SAF analysis set included all participants who were administered any dose of any study intervention. No summary analysis was done. Following analysis of OLE data from RMS phase 2 study (MS200527- 0086), it was determined that a change in active comparator warranted in phase 3 RMS comprised of trial MS200527-0073. Consequently, this trial terminated early. Therefore, participant wise data reported and number analyzed= specific participant evaluated in respective arm at specified timepoint. | Posted | Number | grams per liter (g/L) | At Day 1, 83, 125 and 155 |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 2 |
| 0 |
| 2 |
| 2 |
| 2 |
| EG001 | Active Comparator: Avonex® + Evobrutinib Matched Placebo | Participants received IM injection of active Avonex® once a week along with concomitant placebo matched to evobrutinib BID. Treatment period was planned to be of 96 weeks. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Tension headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Drug eruption | General disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Influenza like illness | General disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain in jaw | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Paraesthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Tinea cruris | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Petechiae | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D003711 | Demyelinating Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| D036341 |
| Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins |
| D010455 | Peptides |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D001685 | Biological Factors |
| Participants with Serious TEAEs |
|
| Grade 3 |
|
| Grade 4 |
|
| Grade 5 |
|
| Participants 1 - DBP: Day 83 |
|
|
| Participants 1 - DBP: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participants 1 - DBP: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participants 1 - SBP: Day 1 |
|
|
| Participants 1 - SBP: Day 83 |
|
|
| Participants 1 - SBP: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participants 1 - SBP: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participants 2 - DBP: Day 1 |
|
|
| Participants 2 - DBP: Day 83 |
|
|
| Participants 2 - DBP: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participants 2 - DBP: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participants 2 - SBP: Day 1 |
|
|
| Participants 2 - SBP: Day 83 |
|
|
| Participants 2 - SBP: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participants 2 - SBP: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participant 3 - DBP: Day 1 |
|
|
| Participants 3 - DBP: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participants 3 - SBP: Day 1 |
|
|
| Participant 3 - SBP: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participants 1 - Pulse rate: Day 83 |
|
|
| Participants 1 - Pulse rate: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participants 1 - Pulse rate: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participants 2 - Pulse rate: Day 1 |
|
|
| Participants 2 - Pulse rate: Day 83 |
|
|
| Participants 2 - Pulse rate: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participants 2 - Pulse rate: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participant 3 - Pulse rate: Day 1 |
|
|
| Participants 3 - Pulse rate: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participants 1 - Respiratory rate: Day 83 |
|
|
| Participants 1 - Respiratory rate: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participants 1 - Respiratory rate: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participants 2 - Respiratory rate: Day 1 |
|
|
| Participants 2 - Respiratory rate: Day 83 |
|
|
| Participants 2 - Respiratory rate: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participants 2 - Respiratory rate: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participant 3 - Respiratory rate: Day 1 |
|
|
| Participants 3 - Respiratory rate: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participants 1: Day 83 |
|
|
| Participants 1: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participants 1: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participants 2: Day 1 |
|
|
| Participants 2: Day 83 |
|
|
| Participants 2: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participants 2: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participant 3: Day 1 |
|
|
| Participants 3: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participants 1: Day 83 |
|
|
| Participants 1: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participants 1: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participants 2: Day 1 |
|
|
| Participants 2: Day 83 |
|
|
| Participants 2: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participants 2: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participant 3: Day 1 |
|
|
| Participants 3: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participant 1: Day 83 |
|
|
| Participant 1: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participant 1: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 1 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 83 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participant 3: Day 1 |
|
|
| Participant 3: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participant 1: Day 83 |
|
|
| Participant 1: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participant 1: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 1 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 83 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participant 3: Day 1 |
|
|
| Participant 3: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participant 1: Day 83 |
|
|
| Participant 1: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participant 1: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 1 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 83 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participant 3: Day 1 |
|
|
| Participant 3: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participant 1: Day 83 |
|
|
| Participant 1: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participant 1: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 1 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 83 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participant 3: Day 1 |
|
|
| Participant 3: 125 |
|
|
| Participant 1: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participant 1: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 83 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participant 3: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participant 1: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participant 1: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 83 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participant 3: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participant 1: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participant 1: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 83 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participant 3: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participant 1: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participant 1: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 83 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 125 |
|
|
| Participant 2: Day 155 |
|
|
| Participant 3: Day 125 |
|
|