Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Umbulizer in Patients Requiring Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation
Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Umbulizer in Patients Requiring Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation
Randomized, control crossover study comparing Umbulizer's efficacy to traditional mechanical ventilators
Mechanical ventilators cost tens of thousands of dollars, rendering them difficult for low and middle income countries to procure. Given chronic shortages of these devices in places like Pakistan, patients are often ventilated manually with Ambu Bags for hours or days. This method is not suitable for long term ventilation and is extremely life threatening.
Umbulizer seeks to reduce preventable deaths due to ventilator scarcity by providing a reliable alternative. The device is accurate, low-cost, and portable, and is an ideal solution for treating patients with respiratory diseases in low-resource settings. The primary objective of this study is to test efficacy and determine non-inferiority of this device in comparison to ventilation provided by traditional ventilators. Secondary objectives of this study include:
Inclusion Criteria:
1) Patients needing mechanical ventilation
Exclusion Criteria: