Surgery Versus PhysiothErapist-leD Exercise for Traumatic Tears of the Rotator Cuff: a Multi-site Pilot and Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial (the SPeEDy Study)
Surgery Versus PhysiothErapist-leD Exercise for Traumatic Tears of the Rotator Cuff: a Multi-site Pilot and Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial (the SPeEDy Study)
The SPeEDy study is a parallel group, pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) with integrated Quintet Recruitment Intervention (QRI) and further qualitative interviews. The study hypothesis is: In adult patients diagnosed with traumatic tears of the rotator cuff, is it feasible to conduct a future, substantive, multi-site RCT to test the hypothesis that physiotherapist-led exercise is not inferior to surgical repair of the rotator cuff in terms of clinical outcomes but is more cost-effective.
Tears of the rotator cuff are a significant cause of shoulder pain. Rates of surgical repair have risen approximately 200% over the last 20 years across Europe and the USA. 9 189 repairs were undertaken in 2015/ 2016 in the NHS. The cost of surgery ranges from £2 897 to £5 593 meaning that direct NHS treatment costs alone are £26.6 to £51.4 million annually.
If a patient is suspected of having a traumatic rotator cuff tear, then guidance from the British Elbow and Shoulder Society and British Orthopaedic Association suggests this is a 'red flag' needing urgent surgical opinion. But, this guidance is open to question. Three randomised controlled trials (RCT) (n = 252) have been synthesised in a systematic review which concluded that surgery is not more effective than conservative care for rotator cuff tears. But, of the 252 patients included, only 40 (16%), were diagnosed with traumatic tears. Hence, there is a dearth of randomised evidence to inform decision-making.
Given uncertainty about the comparative effectiveness of surgery and considering the cost, risk, for example infection, there is an urgent need to carry out high-quality research in this area.
Research Question: In patients diagnosed with traumatic tears of the rotator cuff, is it feasible to conduct a future multicentre RCT to test the hypothesis that physiotherapist-led exercise is not inferior to surgical repair in terms of clinical outcomes but is more cost-effective.
Research Design: Two-arm, parallel group, pilot and feasibility RCT with nested Quintet Recruitment Intervention (QRI) and qualitative interviews.
Setting: Eight NHS hospitals.
Objectives:
Participants: Adults with traumatic tears of the rotator cuff, eligible for surgery.
Intervention/ control: Participants will be allocated on a 1:1 ratio, stratified by tear size to: 1) Structured and progressive physiotherapist-led exercise; 2) Surgical repair and usual post-operative rehabilitation.
Key feasibility outcomes: 1) Numbers of patients screened, eligible, approached, consenting, randomised, and accepting allocation; 2) Rate of retention and follow-up; 3) Feasibility of recruiting participating sites; 4) Participant satisfaction.
Key clinical outcomes: 1) Shoulder pain and function (Oxford Shoulder Score): Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) at baseline, three, and six months.
Health economic outcomes: Health care resource use and days lost from work over six-months.
Sample size: 76 participants.
Analysis: Analysis will focus on process outcomes (recruitment, retention, and treatment cross-over). Means and confidence intervals of clinical outcomes will be calculated only to inform the sample size calculation for the future main trial.
The QRI will use targeted methods including interviews with clinicians and patients, audio-recording of recruitment appointments and document review to understand and then develop an action plan to optimise recruitment and informed consent. Semi-structured qualitative interviews will explore treatment acceptability and the data will be analysed thematically.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: