Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Philips Healthcare | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study will determine if targeted (Magnetic Resonance (MR) / Ultrasound (US) fusion biopsy) plus conventional biopsy is superior to conventional biopsy alone in diagnosing subjects with prostate cancer.
The efficacy of targeting lesions for surgery may be limited by the visibility of a target during the procedure. The successful outcome of surgical intervention depends upon accurate device placement, which may be very challenging in certain settings, such as when a kidney tumor only is visible for a brief moment during the transient arterial phase of a contrast injection, and soon disappearing on dynamic imaging.
Historically, prostate cancer was diagnosed by digitally guided trans-rectal prostate biopsies. With PSA (Prostate Specific Antigen) screening and improvements in ultrasonography, trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy have become the standard of care to screen and diagnose localized prostate cancer. Standard US 12-14 core prostate biopsy is now common practice, detecting cancer in 27% to 44% of patients.
Prostate MR imaging at 3 Tesla magnet dramatically improves diagnostic utility dramatically but biopsies are difficult, time-consuming, and require specialized equipment, which increases the cost significantly.
To meet this challenge TRUS images are overlaid on a previously obtained prostate MRI, combined with an electromagnetic tracking system. The urologist then performs directed prostate biopsies at MR-identified targets in addition to the standard prostate biopsies.
This study will consist of comparison of the standard of care prostate biopsy with the protocol biopsy which consists of a US guided prostate biopsy and a MR/US fusion tracked prostate biopsy. Each patient will act as their own control.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Males with Prostate Cancer | Experimental | Each participant will receive standard of care prostate biopsy as well as a US guided prostate biopsy and a MR/TRUS Fusion Guided prostate biopsy guided prostate biopsy. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| prostate biopsy | Procedure | standard of care |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of Prostate Cancer | Incidence of diagnosing subjects with prostate cancer with MR visible lesions | Day 0 - day of procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of adverse events | the incidence of adverse events occurring after a targeted and ultrasound guided prostate biopsy | 1 month |
| Pirads score | The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) score classifies MRI lesions on a scale from 1 to 5, which reflects their level of suspicion from least to most. Higher score indicates more suspicion. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ardeshir Rastinehad, DO | Contact | 212-241-4812 | art.rastinehad@mountsinai.org | |
| Cynthia Knauer, RN, MS | Contact | 212-241-0751 | cynthia.knauer@mountsinai.org |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ardeshir Rastinehad, DO | Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai | Recruiting | New York | New York | 11101 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32956688 | Derived | Winoker JS, Wajswol E, Falagario U, Maritini A, Moshier E, Voutsinas N, Knauer CJ, Sfakianos JP, Lewis SC, Taouli BA, Rastinehad AR. Transperineal Versus Transrectal Targeted Biopsy With Use of Electromagnetically-tracked MR/US Fusion Guidance Platform for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. Urology. 2020 Dec;146:278-286. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.07.072. Epub 2020 Sep 18. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011469 | Prostatic Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005832 | Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| MR US Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy |
| Procedure |
Trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided fusion prostate biopsy, Transperineal Ultrasound guided fusion prostate biopsy |
|
|
| MR/TRUS Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy | Device | TRUS images are overlaid on a previously obtained prostate MRI, combined with an electromagnetic tracking system. The urologist then performs directed prostate biopsies at MR-identified targets in addition to the standard prostate biopsies. |
|
| 1 month |
| Gleason score | The Gleason Score ranges from 1-5 and describes how much the cancer from a biopsy looks like healthy tissue (lower score) or abnormal tissue (higher score). Sum of the gleason grade of the most predominant tumor pattern and a second gleason grade of the second most predominant pattern. Full score from 2 to 10, with higher score indicating more clinically significance. | 1 month |