Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Difficulties in recruiting eligible participants
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Welsh Wound Innovation Centre | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This randomised study will assess whether Parafricta bootees, when used in addition to normal standard care, can reduce the incidence of heel PUs in patients at very high risk of skin breakdown. The participant group will be hospital inpatients at high risk of PUs (Waterlow score of 20 or more) who are bedbound and do not have existing heel PUs. The participants will be randomised to an intervention arm using Parafricta plus standard care, or a control arm of standard care only. The primary outcome is incidence of heel PUs at day 3. Secondary outcomes are incidence of PUs at day 14, length of stay, severity of PUs, patient acceptability of device, cost-effectiveness.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard care alone | No Intervention | Patients randomly allocated to standard care will be cared for on the appropriate mattress indicated for use in that participating centre according to local policy e.g. foam mattress or dynamic air mattress. Standard care may also include a mattress overlay or the use of a wedge or pillows to maintain the position of the participant, or pressure offloading boots on the foot if the need arises during the study period. | |
| Parafricta bootees plus standard care | Experimental | Patients randomly allocated to Parafricta plus standard care will be cared for on the appropriate mattress as above and care may possibly include a mattress overlay or the use of a wedge or pillows. Participants will in addition be issued with Parafricta bootees (one pair and up to two spare pairs). The patient and clinical staff and the patient's carers will be instructed in the use of Parafricta bootees, which are intended to be worn throughout the day and night and removed only for normal daily washing or examination of the patient's feet. Either the slip-on bootees or the Velco-closure bootees will be selected for the participant at the judgment of the clinical ward nurses. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parafricta bootees | Device | Parafricta bootees are a medical device designed to eliminate skin damage due to friction and shear. The basis of Parafricta bootees is a low friction material and bi-layer construction to make the material of the bootee slide on itself when movement of the foot would otherwise bring friction and shear to bear on the skin. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of heel pressure ulcers of EPUAP NPUAP/PPPIA Category 1 or above | Incidence of heel pressure ulcers of EPUAP NPUAP/PPPIA Category 1 or above on Visit 2 (Day 3), assessed by examination of digital images by two independent expert assessors who are blinded to the participants' allocated treatment. | Day 3 |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
The eligibility criteria for this study at the time of recruitment were:
Exclusion Criteria:
• Patients with a single or double lower limb amputation were not eligible to participate in the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Grace Carolan-Rees, Prof | Cedar, Cardiff & Vale University Health Board | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedar, Cardiff & Vale University Health Board | Cardiff | CF14 4UJ | United Kingdom |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003668 | Pressure Ulcer |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012883 | Skin Ulcer |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Assessment of the primary study outcome was by independent blinded assessment of digital photographic images, by assessors who did not undertake study visits and who were unaware of the participant's allocated treatment.
|