Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study will be conducted in 2 phases (A and B) using two different groups of patients in order to prove that an early prescription of radiography using the Ottawa Ankle Rules by a nurse practitioner could shorten length of stay of a patient suffering from ankle trauma at the Hospital Center of Saint-Brieuc.
Ankle sprain is an injury very frequently encountered during consultation in hospitals emergency departments. Its mechanism may at times leads to fracture. The Ottawa Ankle Rules (OAR) provide guidelines to clinicians concerning the need to perform radiographic test to verify whether patients with ankle injuries are suffering from fracture. If all clinical and anamnestic criteria are negative in accordance with the OAR, the probability of a fracture being present is about 0% (IC 95%). OAR are validated for adults.
Actually, a meta-analysis has suggested that it may be beneficial to introduce a nurse-initiated radiographic test protocol as a standard practice in emergency departments. However this early prescription is not a standard of care in most of emergency departments in France.
The implementation of OAR decreases irradiation levels of patients and reduces medical expenses. In addition, it allows to reduce patient's duration of stay in already encumbered emergency departments, thus reducing also overcrowding, which is known to be a major factor of non quality of care in such departments.
The study will be conducted in 2 phases of 4 weeks each :
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase A | No Intervention | The first one (Phase A) will occur in the emergency department with the application of OAR only by the physicians (without changing the standard of care) during 4 weeks | |
| Phase B | Experimental | The second one (Phase B) will occur after the Phase A. Nurses will apply OAR according to the protocol. This phase will also lasts 4 weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OAR application by a nurse | Other | As per protocol, in the Phase B, nurses will be allowed to apply OAR which can lead to an early radiography prescription. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time spent in emergency departement | Difference of time spent in minutes in emergency department between Phase A group and Phase B group. | through study completion, between 2 and 3 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of x-rays | Difference of the percentage of x-rays between Phase A group and Phase B group. | through study completion, between 2 and 3 months |
| Time spent by nurse for patient care | Difference of the time spent by nurse for patient care between Phase A group and Phase B group. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Brieuc | Saint-Brieuc | 22027 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1554175 | Result | Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, McKnight RD, Nair RC, McDowell I, Worthington JR. A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 1992 Apr;21(4):384-90. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82656-3. | |
| 8433468 | Result | Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, McKnight RD, Nair RC, McDowell I, Reardon M, Stewart JP, Maloney J. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation. JAMA. 1993 Mar 3;269(9):1127-32. doi: 10.1001/jama.269.9.1127. |
Not provided
Not provided
All Individual Participant Data (anonymized) that underlie results in a publication
From the end of the study for 15 years.
Access through secure platform with personal username and password
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016512 | Ankle Injuries |
| D004630 | Emergencies |
| D003441 | Crowding |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007869 | Leg Injuries |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| through study completion, between 2 and 3 months |
| Comparaison of x-rays prescription between physicians and nurses | Difference of percentage of x-rays prescribed by nurses and physicians in Phase B group. | through study completion, between 2 and 3 months |
| Numbers of fractures identified by an x-ray requested by the physician in group B | For patients who have a fracture identified by an x-ray requested by the nurse or the physician : number of X-rays not requested by the nurse in the Phase B group. | through study completion, between 2 and 3 months |
| Numbers of fractures identified by an x-ray requested by a nurse in group B | For patients who have a fracture identified by an x-ray requested by the nurse or the physician : number of X-rays not requested by the physician. | through study completion, between 2 and 3 months |
| Other x-rays required | For patients whose x-ray was required, percentage of ankle x-ray performed while actually the trauma concerned the foot and not the ankle. | through study completion, between 2 and 3 months |
| Satisfaction rate of nurses | Satisfaction rate of nurses evaluated through a questionnaire with 5 questions. Tittle : Nurse's satisfaction survey
| through study completion, between 2 and 3 months |
| 7663253 | Result | Stiell I, Wells G, Laupacis A, Brison R, Verbeek R, Vandemheen K, Naylor CD. Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group. BMJ. 1995 Sep 2;311(7005):594-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7005.594. |
| 16436790 | Result | Fan J, Woolfrey K. The effect of triage-applied Ottawa Ankle Rules on the length of stay in a Canadian urgent care department: a randomized controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Feb;13(2):153-7. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.07.041. Epub 2006 Jan 25. |
| 27592083 | Result | Ho JK, Chau JP, Cheung NM. Effectiveness of emergency nurses' use of the Ottawa Ankle Rules to initiate radiographic tests on improving healthcare outcomes for patients with ankle injuries: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Nov;63:37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.08.016. Epub 2016 Aug 25. |
| 10818378 | Result | Allerston J, Justham D. Nurse practitioners and the Ottawa Ankle Rules: comparisons with medical staff in requesting X-rays for ankle injured patients. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2000 Apr;8(2):110-5. doi: 10.1054/aaen.2000.0103. |
| 10613941 | Result | Derlet RW, Richards JR. Overcrowding in the nation's emergency departments: complex causes and disturbing effects. Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Jan;35(1):63-8. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(00)70105-3. |
| 23953094 | Result | Lau LH, Kerr D, Law I, Ritchie P. Nurse practitioners treating ankle and foot injuries using the Ottawa Ankle Rules: a comparative study in the emergency department. Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2013 Aug;16(3):110-5. doi: 10.1016/j.aenj.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Jun 25. |
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D013037 | Spatial Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |