Aflibercept Plus Micropulse Laser Versus Aflibercept Monotherapy for Diabetic Macular Edema. One Year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
Aflibercept Plus Micropulse Laser Versus Aflibercept Monotherapy for Diabetic Macular Edema. One Year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
Purpose: To evaluate the role of adjuvent micropulse laser with Aflibercept injections in the management of treatment naïve centre involving DME, looking at decreased treatment burden and increased efficacy as outcomes.
Methods: This was a prospective, single centre, randomized trial that included 40 eyes (40 patients) with previously untreated centre involved DME. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either Aflibercept plus micropulse laser (group A) or Aflibercept monotherapy (group B).
Patients were randomly distributed in a 1:1 ratio between the two studied groups. Group A received 3 monthly injections of Aflibercept 2 mg/0.05 mL (Eylea; Bayer, Berlin, Germany) as a loading dose, followed one month later by one 577 nm yellow micropulse laser session with monthly PRN Aflibercept injections. Group B received 3 monthly injections of Aflibercept 2 mg/0.05 mL as a loading dose, followed by monthly PRN Aflibercept injections. Patients in both groups were assessed one month after the end of loading phase; At this point, group A received the micropulse laser session and started PRN Aflibercept injections, while group B started PRN Aflibercept injections without receiving the micropulse laser session. After that, both groups were followed for 12 months.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: