Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this 5 study analysis was to compare the effect of bioavailable stannous fluoride (SnF2) dentifrices to assess enamel erosion protection in-situ using surface profilometry.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stannous Fluoride Dentifrice | Twice daily use |
| |
| Positive control dentifrice | Twice daily use |
| |
| Negative control dentifrice | Twice daily use |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stannous fluoride dentifrice | Drug | Stannous fluoride (0.454%) dentifrice |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from Baseline Surface profilometry | Enamel samples will be measured via profilometry after 10 days of study use. | 10 days |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This meta-analysis includes healthy adult male and females.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multiple P&G Investigation Clinical Sites | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45040 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Positive control dentifrice |
| Drug |
Positive control dentifrice containing potassium nitrate or arginine. |
|
| Negative control dentifrice | Drug | Negative control dentifrice containing either sodium fluoride (0.243%) or sodium monofluorophosphate (0.76%) |
|