Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Critically ill patients with high-risk nutrition are often at risk of refeeding syndrome(RFS), that the incidence of RFS is as high as 30-50%. It is sure that patients with refeeding syndrome were treated with restrictive enteral nutrition, but the definition of refeeding syndrome is not uniform, and there is still a lack of awareness high-risk patients of RFS to receiving early empirical low-calorie feeding intervention. So, we designed the study which is divided into three stages. Firstly, the monitoring rate of RFS was reviewed to evaluate the incidence of RFS in general ICU. Secondly, the best diagnostic criteria of RFS were prospectively defined. Finally, on this basis, it is assessed whether early low-calorie feeding could improve prognosis in high-risk patients with RFS.
Stage 1: the monitoring rate of re-feeding syndrome in our department was reviewed to evaluate the incidence of re-feeding syndrome in severe patients,which is not described in detail; Stage 2:This part is a prospective observational study,divided into two group,that is, RFS group(their serum phosphate concentration decreased to below 0.87 mmol/L within 72 h after starting nutritional support and the biological variation needed to be greater than 30% decrease from any concentration previously recorded), which is divided into three sub-group(Group 1 that a drop of >0.16 mmol/L from any previous measurement, to below 0.65 mmol/L within 72 h after starting nutritional support, Group 2 that their serum phosphate concentration decreased to below 0.87 mmol/L within 72 h after starting nutritional support and the biological variation needed to be greater than 30% decrease from any concentration previously recorded, and Group 3 that their serum phosphate concentration decreased to below 0•32 mmol/L within 72 h after starting nutritional support.), and nRFS group(non-RFS that the serum phosphate do not up to the criteria). And the RFS group will be receiving the low-calorie feeding intervention, the nRFS group will be receiving the standard feeding according to the ASPEN guideline of 2016.
Stage 3: On this basis of stage 2, it is assessed whether early low-calorie feeding could improve prognosis in high-risk patients with RFS who was defined in NICE(National institute for the health and care excellence).The part of stage 3, divided into two groups that standard calorie feeding group and low calorie feeding group, aims to assess whether early low-calorie feeding could improve prognosis in high-risk patients with RFS.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| low calorie feeding group | Experimental | Enteral nutrition was fed at 10-20kcal/kg/d for the first three days before identifying the refeeding syndrome |
|
| standard calorie feeding group | Active Comparator | Enteral nutrition was fed at 500-750kcal/d for the first three days before identifying the refeeding syndrome |
|
| RFS group | No Intervention | The definition of RFS is that serum phosphate concentration decreased to below 0.87 mmol/L within 72 h after starting nutritional support and the biological variation needed to be greater than 30% decrease from any concentration previously recorded. And it is divided into three sub-group that is Group 1 that a drop of >0.16 mmol/L from any previous measurement, to below 0.65 mmol/L within 72 h after starting nutritional support, Group 2 that their serum phosphate concentration decreased to below 0.87 mmol/L within 72 h after starting nutritional support and the biological variation needed to be greater than 30% decrease from any concentration previously recorded, and Group 3 that their serum phosphate concentration decreased to below 0•32 mmol/L within 72 h after starting nutritional support. | |
| nRFS group | No Intervention | It is not up to the RFS definition |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| standard enteral nutrition | Dietary Supplement | Enteral nutrition was treated within 48 hours after ICU and the calories were 500-750kcal/d |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The best diagnostic criteria for refeeding syndrome | Evaluate the best timing for intervention according to the lowest and the decline of serum phosphate | 1 month mortality and the duration of mechanical ventilation |
| the incidence of refeeding syndrome | only according to serum phosphate standard | 3 day after treated with nutrition |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| duration of mechanical ventilation | The duration of mechanical ventilation in General ICU of our department in the same time admitted to ICU | 30 days |
| survival rate | including discharge from hospital and ICU |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| kongmiao lu, master | Contact | 18268061252 | lukongmiao123@163.com | |
| man huang, phD | Contact |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| man huang, phD | Second affiliated hospital, Zhejiang university school of medicine | Principal Investigator |
| yunlong wu, master | Second affiliated hospital, Zhejiang university school of medicine | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Second affiliated hospital, Zhejiang university school of medicine | Recruiting | Hangzhou | Zhejiang | 310052 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26597128 | Background | Doig GS, Simpson F, Heighes PT, Bellomo R, Chesher D, Caterson ID, Reade MC, Harrigan PW; Refeeding Syndrome Trial Investigators Group. Restricted versus continued standard caloric intake during the management of refeeding syndrome in critically ill adults: a randomised, parallel-group, multicentre, single-blind controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Dec;3(12):943-52. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00418-X. Epub 2015 Nov 18. | |
| 23315514 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Restricted versus continued standard caloric intake during the management of refeeding syndrome in critically ill adults | View source |
Not provided
One year after the article was published, and the opening lasted for one year
One year after the article was published, and the opening lasted for one year
any study about refeeding syndrome
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016638 | Critical Illness |
| D055677 | Refeeding Syndrome |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D044342 | Malnutrition |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| restricted enteral nutrition | Dietary Supplement | Enteral nutrition was treated within 48 hours after ICU and the calories were 10-20kcal/kg/d for 3 days |
|
| 28 days |
| occurrence of complications | including feeding intolerance, electrolyte disturbance | 7 days |
| Background |
| Rio A, Whelan K, Goff L, Reidlinger DP, Smeeton N. Occurrence of refeeding syndrome in adults started on artificial nutrition support: prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2013 Jan 11;3(1):e002173. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002173. |
| Occurrence of refeeding syndrome in adults started on artificial nutrition support | View source |
| D009748 | Nutrition Disorders |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |