Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Due to the termination of the collaboration of ApiFix ltd. and the UMC Utrecht
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Apifix | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary aim of this study is to investigate the limited efficacy of these innovative surgical solutions in treatment of Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) in terms of maintaining reduction while maintaining spinal growth. The secondary aim is to compare both devices for these and other parameters as well as safety.
Rationale: EOS is a severe and potentially life-threatening disorder since a disturbance of spinal development leads to impaired development of the trunk, with cardio-respiratory failure as a result, often early in adult life. Several innovative solutions have been developed to treat growing children with severe EOS. The SDS device was developed internally at the dpt. of orthopedics at the UMC Utrecht, the Netherlands, the MID-C device was developed by the company ApiFix Ltd.
Objective: The primary aim of this study is to investigate the limited efficacy of these innovative surgical solutions in treatment of early onset scoliosis in terms of maintaining reduction while maintaining spinal growth. The secondary aim is to compare both devices for these and other parameters as well as safety.
Study design: A feasibility study using two prospective cohorts according to an open label randomized clinical trial (RCT) design. The study will be done in two tertiary referral centers (UMC Utrecht and Amsterdam UMC). Primary endpoints are maintenance of curve correction as well as complications. These data will be compared to a recently described cohort of patients that received a "standard treatment" (Magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR)). The same endpoints as well as secondary outcomes, will be compared between the two new treatments.
Study population: Children with idiopathic(-like) early onset scoliosis with an indication for a growing rod implant.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spring Distraction System | Experimental | The SDS device will be implanted during a scoliosis correction operation. |
|
| Minimal Invasive Deformity Correction system | Experimental | The MID-C device will be implanted during a scoliosis correction operation. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDS | Device | The SDS will be added to a traditional growing rod (TGR) of 4.5 or 5.5mm. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Limited-efficacy of SDS and MID-C in terms of curve correction maintenance: changes in cobb angle | changes in cobb angle on radiographs post-op and at 4 weeks, 3 months and 12 months follow-up (FU). A maximum of 5 degrees increase will be the threshold to define maintenance. | Until 1 year post-operative FU |
| Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events of SDS and MID-C | Reported treatment related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) per-operatively and at 4 weeks, 3 months and 12 months FU. | Until 1 year post-operative FU |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Limited-efficacy of SDS and MID-C in terms of spinal length | Changes in length of T1-T12, T1-S1 and the instrumented segment in mm on calibrated Anterior Posterior (AP) X-rays post-op and at 4 weeks, 3 months and 12 months FU. | Until 1 year post-operative FU |
| SDS vs. MID-C with respect to limited-efficacy in terms of curve correction maintenance |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Moyo C Kruyt, MD, PhD | UMC Utrecht | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amsterdam UMC | Amsterdam | North Holland | 1105 AZ | Netherlands | ||
| UMC Utrecht |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants will be randomized and assigned to either SDS or MID-C.
Not provided
Not provided
Participants are blinded to the medical device till the surgery. After the surgery participants are able to see which medical device is implanted on X-rays.
| MID-C | Device | The MID-C system consists of a unilateral one-way ratchet rod that is connected to the spine with polyaxial connectors |
|
changes in cobb angle on radiographs post-op and at 4 weeks, 3 months and 12 months FU. A maximum of 5 degrees increase will be the threshold to define maintenance. |
| Until 1 year post-operative FU |
| SDS vs. MID-C with respect to limited-efficacy in terms of spinal length | Changes in length of T1-T12, T1-S1 and the instrumented segment in mm on calibrated AP X-rays post-op and at 4 weeks, 3 months and 12 months FU. | Until 1 year post-operative FU |
| SDS vs. MID-C with respect to the incidence of Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events | Reported treatment related SAEs per-operatively and at 4 weeks, 3 months and 12 months FU. | Until 1 year post-operative FU |
| SDS vs. MID-C with respect to surgery time | Surgery time in minutes | Until 1 year post-operative FU |
| SDS vs. MID-C with respect to blood loss during surgery | blood loss in cc | Until 1 year post-operative FU |
| SDS vs. MID-C with respect to length of hospital stay | length of hospital stay in days | Until 1 year post-operative FU |
| SDS vs. MID-C with respect to recovery time | recovery time in minutes | Until 1 year post-operative FU |
| SDS vs. MID-C with respect to bone density | Bone density changes of the bypassed vertebrae on Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA)scan post-op and at 3 months en 12 months FU. | Until 1 year post-operative FU |
| SDS vs. MID-C with respect to Quality Of Life (QOL) on the Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaires (EOSQ-24) | Parent reported QOL and performance is assessed with the 24-item Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaires (EOSQ-24) pre-op and at 4 weeks, 3 months and 12 months FU. EOSQ-24 covers the following domains: Child's Health Related Quality of Life (16 items), Family Impact (2 items) and Satisfaction (2 items). | Until 1 year post-operative FU |
| SDS vs. MID-C with respect to flexibility of the spine | Flexibility and 3D rotation of the spine on dynamic echography (Scolioscan) | Until 1 year post-operative FU |
| SDS vs. MID-C with respect to 3D development of the spine | Apical Vertebral Rotation based on MRI | Until 1 year post-operative FU |
| SDS vs. MID-C with respect to patient appearance | sagittal balance on clinical photographs post-op and at 1 year FU | Until 1 year post-operative FU |
| Utrecht |
| 3584 CX |
| Netherlands |