Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) | FED |
| Emergent BioSolutions | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This was a phase 2 parallel-group age- and gender-matched open label study in healthy adults 18-65 years of age to assess the safety and immunogenicity of an alum-adjuvanted chikungunya virus-like particle vaccine (PXVX0317; CHIKV VLP vaccine) in prior recipients of other alphavirus vaccines versus alphavirus naïve controls.
It is currently unknown whether prior exposure to heterologous alphaviruses will enhance or interfere with immune responses to chikungunya virus (CHIKV) exposure or vaccination. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the chikungunya vaccine candidate PXVX0317 when administered to prior recipients of experimental alphavirus vaccines versus alphavirus naïve gender- and age-matched controls.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prior Alpha | Experimental | All study participants received the same Investigational Product according to the same schedule. Participants were prior recipients of experimental alphavirus vaccines. |
|
| Control: Naïve Alpha | Active Comparator | All study participants received the same Investigational Product according to the same schedule. The alphavirus vaccine naïve participants will serve as controls for determining the effect of pre-existing alphavirus immunity on vaccine safety and immunogenicity. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chikungunya | Biological | Virus Like Particle |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With 4-fold Rise in Anti-CHIKV Neutralizing Antibody Response | Seroconversion, defined as a 4-fold or greater rise in neutralizing antibody against chikungunya virus, as determined by luciferase-based assay (NT80), induced by PXVX0317. PXVX0317 was administered to prior alphavirus vaccine recipients versus gender- and age-matched controls. | Day 22 (21 days after vaccination) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-CHIKV Neutralizing Antibody Response | Evaluation of Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-CHIKV neutralizing antibodies, determined by luciferase-based assay (NT80), in prior alphavirus vaccine recipients versus alphavirus-naïve controls. | Day 1, 8, 22, 29, 57, 182 |
| Percentage of Participants With 4-fold Rise in Anti-CHIKV Neutralizing Antibody Response |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| James McCarty, MD | Emergent BioSolutions | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases | Fort Deterick | Maryland | 21702 | United States | ||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39954701 | Derived | Hamer MJ, McCarty JM, Pierson BC, Regules JA, Mendy J, Sanborn AD, Gardner CL, Haller JM, Gregory MK, Liggett DL, Glass PJ, Ghosh N, Royalty Tredo S, Warfield KL, Burke CW, Lee C, Saunders D, Bedell L, Richardson JS. Safety and immunogenicity of an adjuvanted chikungunya virus virus-like particle (CHIKV VLP) vaccine in previous recipients of other alphavirus vaccines versus alphavirus vaccine-naive controls: an open-label, parallel-group, age-matched, sex-matched, phase 2 randomised controlled study. Lancet Microbe. 2025 Apr;6(4):101000. doi: 10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.101000. Epub 2025 Feb 12. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants were recruited from two US sites, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) Clinical Trials Center (CTC) and US Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Disease (USAMRIID) immunization clinic.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Experimental : Prior Alpha | All study participants received the same Investigational Product according to the same schedule. Subjects were prior recipients of experimental alphavirus vaccines. |
| FG001 | Control: Naive Alpha | All study participants received the same Investigational Product according to the same schedule. The alphavirus vaccine naïve subjects served as controls. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Experimental : Prior Alpha | All study participants received the same Investigational Product according to the same schedule. Subjects were prior recipients of experimental alphavirus vaccines. |
| BG001 | Control: Naive Alpha |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With 4-fold Rise in Anti-CHIKV Neutralizing Antibody Response | Seroconversion, defined as a 4-fold or greater rise in neutralizing antibody against chikungunya virus, as determined by luciferase-based assay (NT80), induced by PXVX0317. PXVX0317 was administered to prior alphavirus vaccine recipients versus gender- and age-matched controls. | Immunogenicity evaluable population | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Day 22 (21 days after vaccination) |
|
Local and systemic post-injection solicited events were collected through Day 8. Unsolicited adverse events were collected through Day 29. Serious adverse events and adverse events leading to withdrawal were collected through Day 183 end of study visit.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Experimental : Prior Alpha | All study participants received the same Investigational Product according to the same schedule. Subjects were prior recipients of experimental alphavirus vaccines. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 24.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injection site pain | General disorders | MedDRA 24.1 | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical Information | Bavarian Nordic | 1-844-422-8274 | medical.information_NA@bavarian-nordic.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jan 25, 2021 | Aug 6, 2024 | Prot_002.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 1, 2021 | Aug 6, 2024 | SAP_003.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Oct 10, 2019 | Jan 4, 2022 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D065632 | Chikungunya Fever |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018354 | Alphavirus Infections |
| D001102 | Arbovirus Infections |
| D000079426 | Vector Borne Diseases |
| D007239 | Infections |
Not provided
Not provided
Open Label Safety and Immunogenicity
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Evaluation of seroconversion rate of Anti-CHIKV neutralizing antibodies, determined by luciferase-based assay (NT80), in prior alphavirus vaccine recipients versus alphavirus-naïve controls. |
| Day 8, 29, 57, 182 |
| Percentage of Participants With Anti-CHIKV Neutralizing Antibody at or Above Selected Thresholds | Evaluation of Anti-CHIKV neutralizing antibody response, as determined by luciferase-based assay (NT80), via proportion of participants with titers of at least 40, 160 or 640 on Days 1, 8, 22, 29, 57 and 182. | Day 1, 8, 22, 29, 57, 182 |
| Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-CHIKV Total Antibody Response | Evaluation of Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-CHIKV total antibodies, determined by immunoassay (ELISA), in prior alphavirus vaccine recipients versus alphavirus-naïve controls. | Day 1, 22, 29 |
| Percentage of Participants With 4-fold Rise in Anti-CHIKV Total Antibody Response | Evaluation of seroconversion rate of Anti-CHIKV total antibodies, determined by immunoassay, on Days 22 and 29, where seroconversion was a 4-fold rise in titer over baseline. | Day 22, 29 |
| Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-VEEV Neutralizing Antibody Response | Evaluation of Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-VEEV neutralizing antibodies, determined by Plaque-Reduction Neutralization Test (PRNT80), in prior alphavirus vaccine recipients versus alphavirus-naïve controls | Day 1, 22, 29 |
| Number of Participants With Anti-CHIKV Total Antibody Titers of at Least 40,160 or 640 | Evaluation of Anti-CHIKV total antibody titer, as determined by immunoassay (ELISA), via proportion of participants with titers of at least 40, 160 or 640 on Days 1, 22, and 29. | Days 1, 22, and 29 |
| Percentage of Participants With 4-fold Rise in Anti-VEEV Neutralizing Antibody Response | Evaluation of seroconversion rate of anti-VEEV neutralizing antibodies on Days 22 and 29 as determined by Plaque-Reduction Neutralization Test (PRNT80), where seroconversion is a 4-fold rise in titer over baseline. | Day 22 and 29 |
| Percentage of Participants With Anti-VEEV PRNT Neutralizing Activity at or Above Selected Thresholds | Evaluation of Anti-VEEV neutralizing antibody response, as determined by Plaque-Reduction Neutralization Test (PRNT80), via proportion of participants with titers of at least 40, 160 or 640 on Days 1, 22 and 29. | Day 1, 22, 29 |
| Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-VEEV Total Antibody Response | Evaluation of Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-VEEV total antibody as determined by an immunoassay (ELISA) in prior alphavirus vaccine recipients versus alphavirus-naïve controls. | Day 1, 22, 29 |
| Percentage of Participants With 4-fold Rise in Total ELISA IgG Antibody Against VEEV | Evaluation of seroconversion rate of Anti-VEEV total antibody, as determined by immunoassay (ELISA), on Days 22 and 29, where seroconversion is a 4-fold rise in titer over baseline. | Day 22, 29 |
| Number of Participants With Anti-VEEV Total Antibody Titers of at Least 40,160 or 640 | Evaluation of Anti-VEEV total antibody titer, as determined by immunoassay (ELISA), via proportion of participants with titers of at least 40, 160, or 640 on Days 1, 22, and 29. | Days 1, 22, and 29 |
| Walter Reed Army Institute of Research |
| Silver Spring |
| Maryland |
| 20910 |
| United States |
All study participants received the same Investigational Product according to the same schedule. The alphavirus vaccine naïve subjects serves as controls.
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Height | Mean | Standard Deviation | cm |
|
| Weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | Kg |
|
| BMI | Mean | Standard Deviation | Kg/m^2 |
|
| Time Since Prior Alphavirus Vaccine | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
All study participants received the same Investigational Product according to the same schedule. The alphavirus vaccine naïve participants serve as controls. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-CHIKV Neutralizing Antibody Response | Evaluation of Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-CHIKV neutralizing antibodies, determined by luciferase-based assay (NT80), in prior alphavirus vaccine recipients versus alphavirus-naïve controls. | Immunogenicity evaluable population | Posted | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | titers | Day 1, 8, 22, 29, 57, 182 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With 4-fold Rise in Anti-CHIKV Neutralizing Antibody Response | Evaluation of seroconversion rate of Anti-CHIKV neutralizing antibodies, determined by luciferase-based assay (NT80), in prior alphavirus vaccine recipients versus alphavirus-naïve controls. | Immunogenicity evaluable population. 11 alphavirus naïve subjects were unable to attend their scheduled visit at Day 29; 10 of those subjects also missed their Day 57 visit. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Day 8, 29, 57, 182 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Anti-CHIKV Neutralizing Antibody at or Above Selected Thresholds | Evaluation of Anti-CHIKV neutralizing antibody response, as determined by luciferase-based assay (NT80), via proportion of participants with titers of at least 40, 160 or 640 on Days 1, 8, 22, 29, 57 and 182. | Immunogenicity evaluable population. 11 alphavirus naïve participants were unable to attend their scheduled visit at Day 29; 10 of those participants also missed their Day 57 visit. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Day 1, 8, 22, 29, 57, 182 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-CHIKV Total Antibody Response | Evaluation of Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-CHIKV total antibodies, determined by immunoassay (ELISA), in prior alphavirus vaccine recipients versus alphavirus-naïve controls. | Immunogenicity evaluable population | Posted | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | titers | Day 1, 22, 29 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With 4-fold Rise in Anti-CHIKV Total Antibody Response | Evaluation of seroconversion rate of Anti-CHIKV total antibodies, determined by immunoassay, on Days 22 and 29, where seroconversion was a 4-fold rise in titer over baseline. | Immunogenicity evaluable population. 11 alphavirus naïve participants were unable to attend their scheduled visit at Day 29. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Day 22, 29 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-VEEV Neutralizing Antibody Response | Evaluation of Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-VEEV neutralizing antibodies, determined by Plaque-Reduction Neutralization Test (PRNT80), in prior alphavirus vaccine recipients versus alphavirus-naïve controls | Immunogenicity evaluable population | Posted | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | titers | Day 1, 22, 29 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Anti-CHIKV Total Antibody Titers of at Least 40,160 or 640 | Evaluation of Anti-CHIKV total antibody titer, as determined by immunoassay (ELISA), via proportion of participants with titers of at least 40, 160 or 640 on Days 1, 22, and 29. | Immunogenicity evaluable population. 11 alphavirus naive participants were unable to attend their scheduled visit at Day 29. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Days 1, 22, and 29 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With 4-fold Rise in Anti-VEEV Neutralizing Antibody Response | Evaluation of seroconversion rate of anti-VEEV neutralizing antibodies on Days 22 and 29 as determined by Plaque-Reduction Neutralization Test (PRNT80), where seroconversion is a 4-fold rise in titer over baseline. | Immunogenicity evaluable population. 11 alphavirus naïve participants were unable to attend their scheduled visit at Day 29. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Day 22 and 29 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Anti-VEEV PRNT Neutralizing Activity at or Above Selected Thresholds | Evaluation of Anti-VEEV neutralizing antibody response, as determined by Plaque-Reduction Neutralization Test (PRNT80), via proportion of participants with titers of at least 40, 160 or 640 on Days 1, 22 and 29. | Immunogenicity evaluable population. 11 alphavirus naïve participants were unable to attend their scheduled visit at Day 29. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Day 1, 22, 29 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-VEEV Total Antibody Response | Evaluation of Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-VEEV total antibody as determined by an immunoassay (ELISA) in prior alphavirus vaccine recipients versus alphavirus-naïve controls. | Immunogenicity evaluable population. 11 alphavirus naïve participants were unable to attend their scheduled visit at Day 29. | Posted | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | titers | Day 1, 22, 29 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With 4-fold Rise in Total ELISA IgG Antibody Against VEEV | Evaluation of seroconversion rate of Anti-VEEV total antibody, as determined by immunoassay (ELISA), on Days 22 and 29, where seroconversion is a 4-fold rise in titer over baseline. | Immunogenicity evaluable population. 11 alphavirus naïve participants were unable to attend their scheduled visit at Day 29. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Day 22, 29 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Anti-VEEV Total Antibody Titers of at Least 40,160 or 640 | Evaluation of Anti-VEEV total antibody titer, as determined by immunoassay (ELISA), via proportion of participants with titers of at least 40, 160, or 640 on Days 1, 22, and 29. | Immunogenicity evaluable population. 11 alphavirus naive participants were unable to attend their scheduled visit at Day 29. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Days 1, 22, and 29 |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 30 |
| 0 |
| 30 |
| 17 |
| 30 |
| EG001 | Control: Naive Alpha | All study participants received the same Investigational Product according to the same schedule. The alphavirus vaccine naïve subjects serves as controls. | 0 | 30 | 1 | 30 | 17 | 30 |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA 24.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Malaise | General disorders | MedDRA 24.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 24.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 24.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 24.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D000096724 |
| Mosquito-Borne Diseases |
| D014777 | Virus Diseases |
| D014036 | Togaviridae Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
| Day 22 |
|
| Day 29 |
|
| Day 57 |
|
| Day 182 |
|
| Superiority |
| Day 8: Geometric mean ratio (prior alpha group over naïve alpha group) and 95% confidence interval | ANOVA | P-values were based on an ANOVA model with log10-transformed titer as the dependent variable and study arm, age, and gender as predictors. | 0.0019 | GMR (Prior Alpha / Naïve Alpha) | 3.11 | 2-Sided | 95 | 1.55 | 6.23 | Differences in least squares means from the ANOVA model were back-transformed and reported as geometric mean ratios with 95% confidence intervals. | Superiority |
| Day 22: Geometric mean ratio (prior alpha group over naïve alpha group) and 95% confidence interval | ANOVA | P-values were based on an ANOVA model with log10-transformed titer as the dependent variable and study arm, age, and gender as predictors. | 0.6223 | GMR (Prior Alpha / Naïve Alpha) | 0.88 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.54 | 1.46 | Differences in least squares means from the ANOVA model were back-transformed and reported as geometric mean ratios with 95% confidence intervals. | Superiority |
| Day 29: Geometric mean ratio (prior alpha group over naïve alpha group) and 95% confidence interval | ANOVA | 0.6444 | P-values were based on an ANOVA model with log10-transformed titer as the dependent variable and study arm, age, and gender as predictors. | GMR (Prior Alpha / Naïve Alpha) | 0.88 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.50 | 1.55 | Differences in least squares means from the ANOVA model were back-transformed and reported as geometric mean ratios with 95% confidence intervals. | Superiority |
| Day 57: Geometric mean ratio (prior alpha group over naïve alpha group) and 95% confidence interval | ANOVA | 0.6198 | P-values were based on an ANOVA model with log10-transformed titer as the dependent variable and study arm, age, and gender as predictors. | GMR (Prior Alpha / Naïve Alpha) | 0.89 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.57 | 1.41 | Differences in least squares means from the ANOVA model were back-transformed and reported as geometric mean ratios with 95% confidence intervals. | Superiority |
| Day 182: Geometric mean ratio (prior alpha group over naïve alpha group) and 95% confidence interval | ANOVA | 0.6451 | P-values were based on an ANOVA model with log10-transformed titer as the dependent variable and study arm, age, and gender as predictors. | GMR (Prior Alpha / Naïve Alpha) | 0.89 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.55 | 1.45 | Differences in least squares means from the ANOVA model were back-transformed and reported as geometric mean ratios with 95% confidence intervals. | Superiority |
| Day 29 |
|
|
| Day 57 |
|
|
| Day 182 |
|
|
Day 29.
Note: A subject has a 4-fold rise at a visit if they achieve a titer at that visit that is at least 4-fold higher than their Day 1 titer.
| 1.0000 |
| Superiority |
| Fisher Exact | Day 57. Note: A subject has a 4-fold rise at a visit if they achieve a titer at that visit that is at least 4-fold higher than their Day 1 titer. | 1.0000 | Superiority |
| Fisher Exact | Day 182. Note: A subject has a 4-fold rise at a visit if they achieve a titer at that visit that is at least 4-fold higher than their Day 1 titer. | 0.1124 | Superiority |
| Day 1 (Titer >=160) |
|
|
| Day 1 (Titer >=640) |
|
|
| Day 8 (Titer >=40) |
|
|
| Day 8 (Titer >=160) |
|
|
| Day 8 (Titer >=640) |
|
|
| Day 22 (Titer >=40) |
|
|
| Day 22 (Titer >=160) |
|
|
| Day 22 (Titer >=640) |
|
|
| Day 29 (Titer >=40) |
|
|
| Day 29 (Titer >=160) |
|
|
| Day 29 (Titer >=640) |
|
|
| Day 57 (Titer >=40) |
|
|
| Day 57 (Titer >=160) |
|
|
| Day 57 (Titer >=640) |
|
|
| Day 182 (Titer >=40) |
|
|
| Day 182 (Titer >=160) |
|
|
| Day 182 (Titer >=640) |
|
|
| Fisher Exact |
| >0.9999 |
| Superiority |
| Null hypothesis for analysis of percentage of subjects with Anti-Chikungunya neutralizing activity at or above selected thresholds by time point. Day 1: Subjects with Titer >=640 | Fisher Exact | 1.0000 | Superiority |
| Null hypothesis for analysis of percentage of subjects with Anti-Chikungunya neutralizing activity at or above selected thresholds by time point. Day 8 : Subjects with Titer >=40 | Fisher Exact | 0.0257 | Superiority |
| Null hypothesis for analysis of percentage of subjects with Anti-Chikungunya neutralizing activity at or above selected thresholds by time point Day 8: Subjects with Titer >=160 | Fisher Exact | 0.0370 | Superiority |
| Null hypothesis for analysis of percentage of subjects with Anti-Chikungunya neutralizing activity at or above selected thresholds by time point. Day 8: Subjects with Titer >=640 | Fisher Exact | 0.1806 | Superiority |
| Null hypothesis for analysis of percentage of subjects with Anti-Chikungunya neutralizing activity at or above selected thresholds by time point. Day 22: Subjects with Titer >=40 | Fisher Exact | 1.0000 | Superiority |
| Null hypothesis for analysis of percentage of subjects with Anti-Chikungunya neutralizing activity at or above selected thresholds by time point Day 22: Subjects with Titer >=160 | Fisher Exact | 1.0000 | Superiority |
| Null hypothesis for analysis of percentage of subjects with Anti-Chikungunya neutralizing activity at or above selected thresholds by time point Day 22: Subjects with Titer >=640 | Fisher Exact | 0.0797 | Superiority |
| Null hypothesis for analysis of percentage of subjects with Anti-Chikungunya neutralizing activity at or above selected thresholds by time point. Day 29: Subject with Titer >=40 | Fisher Exact | 1.0000 | Superiority |
| Null hypothesis for analysis of percentage of subjects with Anti-Chikungunya neutralizing activity at or above selected thresholds by time point. Day 29: Subject with Titer >=160 | Fisher Exact | 1.0000 | Superiority |
| Null hypothesis for analysis of percentage of subjects with Anti-Chikungunya neutralizing activity at or above selected thresholds by time point. Day 29: Subject with Titer >= 640 | Fisher Exact | 0.1284 | Superiority |
| Null hypothesis for analysis of percentage of subjects with Anti-Chikungunya neutralizing activity at or above selected thresholds by time point. Day 57: Subject with Titer >= 40 | Fisher Exact | 1.0000 | Superiority |
| Null hypothesis for analysis of percentage of subjects with Anti-Chikungunya neutralizing activity at or above selected thresholds by time point. Day 57: Subject with Titer>=160 | Fisher Exact | 0.6411 | Superiority |
| Null hypothesis for analysis of percentage of subjects with Anti-Chikungunya neutralizing activity at or above selected thresholds by time point. Day 57: Subject with Titer>=640 | Fisher Exact | 0.5382 | Superiority |
| Null hypothesis for analysis of percentage of subjects with Anti-Chikungunya neutralizing activity at or above selected thresholds by time point. Day 182: Subject with Titer >= 40 | Fisher Exact | 0.4915 | Superiority |
| Null hypothesis for analysis of percentage of subjects with Anti-Chikungunya neutralizing activity at or above selected thresholds by time point. Day 182: Subject with Titer >= 160 | Fisher Exact | >0.9999 | Superiority |
| Null hypothesis for analysis of percentage of subjects with Anti-Chikungunya neutralizing activity at or above selected thresholds by time point. Day 182: Subject with Titer >= 640 | Fisher Exact | 0.5520 | Superiority |
| Day 22 |
|
|
| Day 29 |
|
|
| Day 22: Geometric mean ratio (prior alpha group over naïve alpha group) and 95% confidence interval | ANOVA | 0.0088 | P-values were based on an ANOVA model with log10-transformed titer as the dependent variable and study arm, age, and gender as predictors. | GMR (Prior Alpha / Naïve Alpha) | 1.83 | 2-Sided | 95 | 1.17 | 2.86 | Differences in least squares means from the ANOVA model were back-transformed and reported as geometric mean ratios with 95% confidence intervals. | Superiority |
| Day 29: Geometric mean ratio (prior alpha group over naïve alpha group) and 95% confidence interval | ANOVA | 0.0475 | P-values were based on an ANOVA model with log10-transformed titer as the dependent variable and study arm, age, and gender as predictors. | GMR (Prior Alpha / Naïve Alpha) | 1.68 | 2-Sided | 95 | 1.01 | 2.82 | Differences in least squares means from the ANOVA model were back-transformed and reported as geometric mean ratios with 95% confidence intervals. | Superiority |
| Day 29 |
|
|
Day 29.
Note: A subject has a 4-fold rise at a visit if they achieve a titer at that visit that is at least 4-fold higher than their Day 1 titer.
| 1.00 |
| Superiority |
| Day 22 |
|
|
| Day 29 |
|
|
| Day 22: Geometric mean ratio (prior alpha group over naïve alpha group) and 95% confidence interval | P-values were based on an ANOVA model with log10-transformed titer as the dependent variable and study arm, age, and gender as predictors. P-value = NE NE = Not estimable due to lack of response. | GMR (Prior Alpha / Naïve Alpha) | 47.34 | 2-Sided | Differences in least squares means from the ANOVA model were back-transformed and reported as geometric mean ratios with 95% confidence intervals. 95% CI [NE,NE] NE = Not estimable due to lack of response. | Superiority |
| Day 29: Geometric mean ratio (prior alpha group over naïve alpha group) and 95% confidence interval | P-values were based on an ANOVA model with log10-transformed titer as the dependent variable and study arm, age, and gender as predictors. P-value = NE NE = Not estimable due to lack of response. | GMR (Prior Alpha / Naïve Alpha) | 55.74 | 2-Sided | Differences in least squares means from the ANOVA model were back-transformed and reported as geometric mean ratios with 95% confidence intervals. 95% CI [NE,NE] NE = Not estimable due to lack of response. | Superiority |
| Day 1 Titers >=160 |
|
|
| Day 1 Titers >=640 |
|
|
| Day 22 Titers >=40 |
|
|
| Day 22 Titers >=160 |
|
|
| Day 22 Titers >=640 |
|
|
| Day 29 Titers >=40 |
|
|
| Day 29 Titers >=160 |
|
|
| Day 29 Titers >=640 |
|
|
| Day 29 |
|
|
Day 29. Note: A subject has a 4-fold rise at a visit if they achieve a titer at that visit that is at least 4-fold higher than their Day 1 titer. |
| 1.0000 |
| Superiority |
| Day 1 (Titer >=160) |
|
|
| Day 1 (Titer >=640) |
|
|
| Day 22 (Titer >=40) |
|
|
| Day 22 (Titer >=160) |
|
|
| Day 22 (Titer >=640) |
|
|
| Day 29 (Titer >=40) |
|
|
| Day 29 (Titer >=160) |
|
|
| Day 29 (Titer >=640) |
|
|
| Fisher Exact |
| <0.0001 |
| Superiority |
| Null hypothesis for analysis of percentage of subjects with Anti-VEEV PRNT neutralizing activity at or above selected thresholds by time point. Day 1: Subject with Titer >= 640 | Fisher Exact | <0.0001 | Superiority |
| Null hypothesis for analysis of percentage of subjects with Anti-VEEV PRNT neutralizing activity at or above selected thresholds by time point. Day 22: Subject with Titer >= 40 | Fisher Exact | <0.0001 | Superiority |
| Null hypothesis for analysis of percentage of subjects with Anti-VEEV PRNT neutralizing activity at or above selected thresholds by time point. Day 22: Subject with Titer >= 160 | Fisher Exact | <0.0001 | Superiority |
| Null hypothesis for analysis of percentage of subjects with Anti-VEEV PRNT neutralizing activity at or above selected thresholds by time point. Day 22: Subject with Titer >=640 | Fisher Exact | <0.0001 | Superiority |
| Null hypothesis for analysis of percentage of subjects with Anti-VEEV PRNT neutralizing activity at or above selected thresholds by time point. Day 29: Subject with Titer >= 40 | Fisher Exact | <0.0001 | Superiority |
| Null hypothesis for analysis of percentage of subjects with Anti-VEEV PRNT neutralizing activity at or above selected thresholds by time point. Day 29: Subjects with Titer >= 160 | Fisher Exact | <0.0001 | Superiority |
| Null hypothesis for analysis of percentage of subjects with Anti-VEEV PRNT neutralizing activity at or above selected thresholds by time point. Day 29 : Subjects with Titer >=640 | Fisher Exact | <0.0001 | Superiority |
| Day 22 |
|
|
| Day 29 |
|
|
| Day 22: Geometric mean ratio (prior alpha group over naïve alpha group) and 95% confidence interval | ANOVA | <0.0001 | P-values were based on an ANOVA model with log10-transformed titer as the dependent variable and study arm, age, and gender as predictors. | GMR (Prior Alpha / Naïve Alpha) | 172.51 | 2-Sided | 95 | 106.60 | 279.19 | Differences in least squares means from the ANOVA model were back-transformed and reported as geometric mean ratios with 95% confidence intervals. | Superiority |
| Day 29: Geometric mean ratio (prior alpha group over naive alpha group) and 95% confidence interval | ANOVA | <0.0001 | P-values were based on an ANOVA model with log10-transformed titer as the dependent variable and study arm, age, and gender as predictors. | GMR (Prior Alpha / Naïve Alpha) | 118.45 | 2-Sided | 95 | 61.76 | 227.16 | Differences in least squares means from the ANOVA model were back-transformed and reported as geometric mean ratios with 95% confidence intervals. | Superiority |
| Day 29 |
|
|
Day 29 Note: A subject has a 4-fold rise at a visit if they achieve a titer at that visit that is at least 4-fold higher than their Day 1 titer. |
| <0.0001 |
| Superiority |
| Day 1 Titers >=160 |
|
|
| Day 1 Titers >=640 |
|
|
| Day 22 Titers >=40 |
|
|
| Day 22 Titers >=160 |
|
|
| Day 22 Titers >=640 |
|
|
| Day 29 Titers >=40 |
|
|
| Day 29 Titers >=160 |
|
|
| Day 29 Titers >=640 |
|
|