Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not moving forward with the study at this time. No subject were consented or enrolled
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Baylor Research Institute | OTHER |
| University of Massachusetts, Worcester | OTHER |
| University of Florida | OTHER |
| AdventHealth |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To evaluate safety and efficacy
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the PowerSpiralâ„¢ Enteroscopy System, when used in subjects undergoing antegrade (per-oral) enteroscopy of the small bowel.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| PowerSpiral Enteroscopy System | Experimental | Subjects who have a medical indication for antegrade enteroscopy |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PowerSpiral Enteroscopy System | Device | Motorized spiral enteroscopy system |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of device related serious adverse events | The primary safety endpoint will compare the rate of device related serious adverse events (SAE) reported in this study to the rate of device related SAEs reported in medical literature for the Spirus Medical Endo-Ease Discoveryâ„¢ SB overtube | 7 days |
| Maximum depth of endoscope insertion | The primary efficacy endpoint will compare the maximum depth of enteroscope insertion for the study device to the maximum depth of enteroscope insertion data reported in medical literature for the Spirus Medical Endo-Ease Discoveryâ„¢ SB overtube. | Intraoperative |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Total procedure time | Measured from initial enteroscope introduction through the bite block to final enteroscope withdrawal through the bite block in minutes. | Intraoperative |
| Insertion time | Measured from the initial enteroscope introduction through the bite block to maximum depth of enteroscope insertion measured in minutes |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Daniel DeMarco, MD | Baylor Health Care System | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olympus Corporation of the Americas | Southborough | Massachusetts | 01772 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28652176 | Background | Baniya R, Upadhaya S, Subedi SC, Khan J, Sharma P, Mohammed TS, Bachuwa G, Jamil LH. Balloon enteroscopy versus spiral enteroscopy for small-bowel disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Dec;86(6):997-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.015. Epub 2017 Jun 23. | |
| 20861800 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| Rhode Island Hospital | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Intraoperative |
| Withdrawn time | Measured from maximum depth of enteroscope insertion excluding any time spent on therapeutic interventions, to final enteroscope withdrawal through bite block measured in minutes. | Intraoperative |
| Total enteroscopy rate | Percentage of subjects where the entire small intestine is intubated with the enteroscopy from pylorus to cecum. | Intraoperative |
| Diagnostic yield | Percentage of subjects where enteroscopy produces the findings required to establish diagnosis. | Intraoperative |
| Adverse events | SAEs regardless of relationship to study device and/or procedure, and non-SAEs related to study device and/or procedure | 7 days post-procedure |
| Device deficiencies | Number of device deficiencies during the enteroscopy procedure | Intraoperative |
| Buscaglia JM, Richards R, Wilkinson MN, Judah JR, Lam Y, Nagula S, Draganov PV. Diagnostic yield of spiral enteroscopy when performed for the evaluation of abnormal capsule endoscopy findings. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr;45(4):342-6. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181eeb74b. |
| 20619404 | Background | Khashab MA, Lennon AM, Dunbar KB, Singh VK, Chandrasekhara V, Giday S, Canto MI, Buscaglia JM, Kapoor S, Shin EJ, Kalloo AN, Okolo PI 3rd. A comparative evaluation of single-balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy for patients with mid-gut disorders. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Oct;72(4):766-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.04.043. Epub 2010 Jul 8. |
| 22704571 | Background | Akerman PA, Haniff M. Spiral enteroscopy: prime time or for the happy few? Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 Jun;26(3):293-301. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2012.03.008. |