Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Federal Joint Committee | OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The multi-center GET.FEEDBACK.GP randomized controlled trial is designed based on patients' needs and preferences. In order to evaluate the effect of feedback in the broader setting of primary care, a total of 1076 primary care patients with elevated levels of depression (PHQ-9 score ≥ 10) will be randomized into three groups who either receive a) patient-targeted and physician-targeted feedback of depression screening results, b) a physician-targeted feedback of depression screening results only, or c) no feedback of screening results. The primary study outcome is depression severity after 6 months, secondary outcomes include the patients' behavior and cognitions after the screening, depression care according to German guideline recommendations and the health economic evaluation.
Major depression is one of the most significant clinical disorders. In primary care, every sixth patient suffers from increased depression level, which is associated with higher risk of suicide, increased risk of onset and progression of chronic physical conditions. Still, depression is under recognized and undertreated in primary care. Moreover, evidence regarding the efficacy of depression screening in primary care is insufficient to draw clear conclusions. Our previous mono-center depression screening trial in cardiac patients, provides first evidence that written patient-targeted feedback improves depression severity, encourages greater patient participation and engagement in mental health. To amplify these effects, the multi-center GET.FEEDBACK.GP randomized controlled trial is now designed based on patients' needs and preferences. In order to evaluate the effect of feedback in the broader setting of primary care, a total of 1076 primary care patients with elevated levels of depression (PHQ-9 score ≥ 10) will be randomized into three groups who either receive a) patient-targeted and physician-targeted feedback of depression screening results, b) a physician-targeted feedback of depression screening results only, or c) no feedback of screening results. The primary study outcome is depression severity after 6 months, secondary outcomes include the patients' behavior and cognitions after the screening, depression care according to German guideline recommendations and the health economic evaluation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| PATIENT-GP-FEEDBACK | Experimental | Using a randomized-controlled study design one third of the patients and their attending general practitioner will receive feedback after depression screening. The feedback for the patient contains the screening result, information about depression in general, guideline based treatment recommendations for patients and contact-information for treatment. The feedback for the general practitioner contains the screening result and guideline-based recommendations, i.e. to inform patients of their depression screening result. Nevertheless, in order to reflect routine clinical practice, the physicians will decide themselves whether or not to address depression during their consultation with the patient. |
|
| GP-FEEDBACK | Active Comparator | Using a randomized-controlled study design in one third of the cases only the attending general practitioner will receive feedback after depression screening. The feedback for the general practitioner contains the screening result and guideline-based recommendations, i.e. to inform patients of their depression screening result. Nevertheless, in order to reflect routine clinical practice, the physicians will decide themselves whether or not to address depression during their consultation with the patient. |
|
| NO-FEEDBACK | No Intervention | Using a randomized-controlled study design one third of the patients and their attending general practitioner will not receive any feedback. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient-targeted feedback | Other | The feedback for the patient contains the screening result, information about depression in general, guideline based treatment recommendations for patients and contact-information for treatment. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Depression severity (Questionnaire: Patient Health Questionnaire-9) | Level of depression severity six months after screening (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) | Six months after screening |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Depression severity (Questionnaire: Patient Health Questionnaire-9) | Level of depression severity one and twelve months after screening (Questionnaire: Patient Health Questionnaire-9) | One and twelve months after screening |
| Depression treatment |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Bernd Löwe, MD | Director of the Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Medical Center Heidelberg | Heidelberg | Baden-Würtenberg | 69120 | Germany | ||
| University Medical Center Tuebingen |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32958483 | Background | Kohlmann S, Lehmann M, Eisele M, Braunschneider LE, Marx G, Zapf A, Wegscheider K, Harter M, Konig HH, Gallinat J, Joos S, Resmark G, Schneider A, Allwang C, Szecsenyi J, Nikendei C, Schulz S, Brenk-Franz K, Scherer M, Lowe B. Depression screening using patient-targeted feedback in general practices: study protocol of the German multicentre GET.FEEDBACK.GP randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 21;10(9):e035973. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035973. | |
| 41621811 |
Not provided
Not provided
In accordance with the ethics approval of the Ethics Committee of the Hamburg Medical Association on April 8, 2019, (approval number PV6031) and the German Research Foundation guidelines for the handling of research data, deidentified data will be made available on request.
Data will become available six months after publication of the main findings. Data will be available for ten years after publication of the main findings.
Data can be requested by the principal investigators. Data use and request underly the publication policy of the multicentre GET.FEEBDACK.GP RCT.
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Nov 21, 2022 | Dec 6, 2022 | SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003863 | Depression |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| GP-targeted feedback | Other | The feedback for the general practitioner contains the screening result and guideline-based recommendations, i.e. to inform patients of their depression screening result. Nevertheless, in order to reflect routine clinical practice, the physicians will decide themselves whether or not to address depression during their consultation with the patient. |
|
Proportion of patients treated according to German Guideline based recommendations
| Six and twelve months after screening |
| Health economic Evaluation (Questionnaire: Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory) | Direct and indirect health costs (Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory) | Six and twelve months after screening |
| Quality-adjusted life years (Questionnaire: EuroQol-5D) | Quality-adjusted years of life and quality of life (EuroQol-5D) | Six and twelve months after screening |
| Anxiety (Questionnaire: Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) | Level of anxiety severity one, six and twelve months after screening | One, six and twelve months after screening |
| Somatic symptom severity (Questionnaire: Somatic Symptom Scale-8) | Level of somatic symptom severity one, six and twelve months after screening | One, six and twelve months after screening |
| Tübingen |
| Baden-Würtenberg |
| 72076 |
| Germany |
| Technical University of Munich - Medical Faculty | Munich | Bavaria | 80333 | Germany |
| University Medical Center Jena | Jena | Thuringia | 07743 | Germany |
| University Medical Center Hamburg | Hamburg | 20246 | Germany |
| Derived |
| Kreis LG, Konig HH, Kohlmann S, Lowe B, Scherer M, Brettschneider C. Cost-effectiveness of targeted feedback interventions after depression screening in primary care: health economic evaluation of the GET.FEEDBACK.GP trial. BJPsych Open. 2026 Feb 2;12(2):e52. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2025.10945. |
| 38432236 | Derived | Lowe B, Scherer M, Braunschneider LE, Marx G, Eisele M, Mallon T, Schneider A, Linde K, Allwang C, Joos S, Zipfel S, Schulz S, Rost L, Brenk-Franz K, Szecsenyi J, Nikendei C, Harter M, Gallinat J, Konig HH, Fierenz A, Vettorazzi E, Zapf A, Lehmann M, Kohlmann S. Clinical effectiveness of patient-targeted feedback following depression screening in general practice (GET.FEEDBACK.GP): an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicentre, three-arm, observer-blinded, randomised controlled trial in Germany. Lancet Psychiatry. 2024 Apr;11(4):262-273. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00035-X. Epub 2024 Feb 29. |