Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCI-2018-03367 | Registry Identifier | CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program) | |
| 2018-0703 | Other Identifier | M D Anderson Cancer Center |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Cancer Institute (NCI) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This phase III trial studies how well hypofractionated radiation therapy works compared to the conventional one in treating patients with prostate cancer. Radiation therapy uses high energy beams to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Hypofractionated radiation therapy delivers higher doses of radiation therapy over a shorter period of time and may kill more tumor cells and have fewer side effects.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To assess the gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities in patients treated with hypo-fractionated postoperative radiotherapy relative to the conventional postoperative radiotherapy.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To report patient outcome to include local control, loco-regional control, distant metastases, biochemical progression-free survival, prostate-cancer specific survival (PCSS), time to salvage therapy.
Ia. To compare freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) and time to progression (TTP) with definition of post prostatectomy nadir + 2 ng/mL in both treatment arms.
II. To evaluate patient reported quality of life outcomes with hypo-fractionated compared to standard fractionated postoperative radiotherapy using validated surveys (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite [EPIC]-26, Short Form [SF]-12, EuroQol 5 dimensional [EQ-5D]) and use of erectile dysfunction medications/devices.
III. To compare patient reported GU symptoms using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5 (specifically GU symptoms) and quality of life reports with EPIC-26, SF-12, EQ-5D survey at end of radiation therapy (RT), 6, 12, 24 and up to 60 months from the end of radiation therapy.
IV. To compare patient reported GI symptoms using CTCAE version 5 (specifically GI symptoms) and quality of life reports with the EPIC-26 SF-12, EQ-5D survey at end of RT, 6, 12, 24, and up to 60 months from the end of radiation therapy.
V. To report health economics with cost and time based driven activity (TDABC) in delivering shorter hypofractionated courses of radiotherapy compared to standard course (indirect and direct cost).
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Patients undergo conventional radiation therapy daily over 7 weeks after standard of care surgery.
ARM II: Patients undergo hypofractionated radiation therapy over 4.5 weeks after standard of care surgery.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 3-6 months, and then every 6-12 months for up to 5 years.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm I (conventional radiation therapy) | Active Comparator | Patients undergo conventional radiation therapy daily over 7 weeks after standard of care surgery. |
|
| Arm II (hypofractionated radiation therapy) | Experimental | Patients undergo hypofractionated radiation therapy over 4.5 weeks after standard of care surgery. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy | Radiation | Undergo hypofractionated radiation therapy |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of >= grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity | Will be denoted as Tc and Te for conventional and hypo-fractionated arm respectively. | At 2 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Local control | Up to 5 years | |
| Loco-regional control | Up to 5 years | |
| Distant metastases |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Quynh-Nhu Nguyen | M.D. Anderson Cancer Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M D Anderson Cancer Center | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States | ||
| MD Anderson League City |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| M D Anderson Cancer Center | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Quality-of-Life Assessment | Other | Ancillary studies |
|
|
| Questionnaire Administration | Other | Ancillary studies |
|
| Radiation Therapy | Radiation | Undergo conventional radiation therapy |
|
|
| Up to 5 years |
| Biochemical progression-free survival | Will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test will be used to assess the differences in time-to-event outcomes between the two groups. Cox proportional hazards model will be fit to compare the two arms while accounting for other patient characteristics. | Up to 5 years |
| Prostate-cancer specific survival (PCSS) | Will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test will be used to assess the differences in time-to-event outcomes between the two groups. Cox proportional hazards model will be fit to compare the two arms while accounting for other patient characteristics. | Up to 5 years |
| Time to salvage therapy | Will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test will be used to assess the differences in time-to-event outcomes between the two groups. Cox proportional hazards model will be fit to compare the two arms while accounting for other patient characteristics. | Up to 5 years |
| Biochemical failure (FFBF) | Up to 5 years |
| Time to progression (TTP) | Will be defined as post prostatectomy nadir + 2 ng/mL in both treatment arms. Will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test will be used to assess the differences in time-to-event outcomes between the two groups. Cox proportional hazards model will be fit to compare the two arms while accounting for other patient characteristics. | Up to 5 years |
| Patient reported quality of life outcomes | Will evaluate patient reported quality of life outcomes with hypo-fractionated compared to standard fractionated postoperative radiotherapy using validated surveys (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite [EPIC]-26, Short Form [SF]-12) and use of erectile dysfunction medications/devices. Will be summarized using descriptive statistics by treatment arm and will be compared using two sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test as appropriate. | Up to 5 years |
| Patient reported GU symptoms | Will be assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5. Will be compared to quality of life reports with EPIC-26, SF-12, EQ-5D survey. Quality of life (QOL) data will be summarized using descriptive statistics by treatment arm and will be compared using two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test as appropriate. The generalized estimating equations (GEE) model will be fit to assess the change of GU or GI symptoms over time as well as treatment effect. | At end of radiation therapy (RT), 6, 12, 24 and up to 60 months from the end of RT |
| Patient reported GI symptoms | Will be assessed by CTCAE version 5. Will be compared to quality of life reports with EPIC-26, SF-12, EQ-5D survey. QOL data will be summarized using descriptive statistics by treatment arm and will be compared using two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test as appropriate. The GEE model will be fit to assess the change of GU or GI symptoms over time as well as treatment effect. | At end of RT, 6, 12, 24, and up to 60 months from the end of RT |
| Health economics | Will report health economics with cost and time based driven activity (TDABC) in delivering shorter hypofractionated courses of radiotherapy compared to standard course (indirect and direct cost). Will be summarized using descriptive statistics by treatment arm and will be compared using two sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test as appropriate. | Up to 5 years |
| League City |
| Texas |
| 77573 |
| United States |
| MD Anderson in Sugar Land | Sugar Land | Texas | 77478 | United States |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011471 | Prostatic Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005834 | Genital Neoplasms, Male |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D005832 | Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D011469 | Prostatic Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069473 | Radiation Dose Hypofractionation |
| D011827 | Radiation |
| D011878 | Radiotherapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019583 | Dose Fractionation, Radiation |
| D011879 | Radiotherapy Dosage |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D055585 | Physical Phenomena |
Not provided
Not provided