Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Medical University of Graz | OTHER |
| Unidata Geodesign | UNKNOWN |
| Bionorica SE | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Aim of this phase III trial is to investigate the efficacy and safety of dronabinol (orally administered tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)) as adjuvant therapy to first-line standard chemotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer for improvement of chemotherapy- and tumor-related symptoms applicated by individual titration up to the maximum tolerated dose.
Patients with pancreatic cancer suffer from multiple symptoms related to the tumor itself or induced by the chemotherapy. The available supportive therapy is still not able to relief all symptoms that are caused by the malignancy itself as well as by the antineoplastic therapy.
Additionally, anorexia and weight loss, that often result in increased morbidity and mortality in this patient population as well as in psycho-social burden and suffering in patients and their relatives, are unmet needs in pancreatic cancer patients.
Therapeutic approaches focus on treating the malignancy itself, additional nutritional support and physical examination might prevent patients from further side effects such as sarcopenia.
During the last decades a number of appetite-modulating drugs have been under clinical investigation. A number of studies focused on the endocannabinoid system, which is involved amongst others in appetite-modulating, antiemetic, analgesic and anti-inflammatory processes.
As dronabinol is already used as magistral formulation, its beneficial effect has often been observed in these patients in the clinical routine, especially in patients with therapy-refractory nausea and emesis. Due to its broad efficacy it might be of benefit for patients suffering from malignancy. Thus, investigators want to evaluate the efficacy of dronabinol in the improvement of chemotherapy-induced and tumor-related symptoms in advanced pancreatic patients during systemic first-line chemotherapy. However, data on optimal dosage are conflicting yet.
In detail, investigators want to study whether dronabinol has a positive influence on quality of life and whether symptoms caused by the tumor or by the chemotherapy itself might be palliated by dronabinol. Beneficial and potential harmful side effects and the personal perception of advanced pancreatic cancer patients will be documented.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dronabinol | Active Comparator | BX-1 contains 25 mg dronabinol/ml (2.5% delta-9-trans-tetrahydrocannabinol = THC), oral solution; three applications per day from 2.5 mg (3 x 1 droplet) up to 30 mg (3 x 12 droplets) |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Placebo: oral solution with cannabis flavor without active substance and otherwise identical to active comparator, three applications per day from 3 x 1 droplet up to 3 x 12 droplets |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dronabinol in Oral Dosage Form | Drug | Titration period for 4 weeks: titration according to tolerability from 2.5 mg (3 x 1 droplet) up to 30 mg (3 x 12 droplets) per day; dose increased by 2.5 mg (3 x 1 droplet) every other day Maintenance period for 12 weeks: individually tolerated maximum dose (up to 30 mg ≙ 3 x 12 droplets) at end of titration period will be continued for maintenance treatment Tapering period for 2 weeks: dose is decreased every other day by 5 mg (3 x 2 droplets) Safety follow-up: 4 weeks after end of treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Standardized area under the curve of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 symptom summary score over the on-treatment period. | The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is an integrated system for assessing the health-related quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients participating in international clinical trials. The validated QLQ-C30 summary score is calculated as mean score of the 13 of the 15 EORTC QLQ-C30 scales (v3.0), based on 27 of 30 items (the Financial Impact scale and Quality of Life score are not included). A high score for a symptom scale / item (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhoea) represents a high level of symptomatology / problems. A high score for a functional scale (physical functioning, role functioning, cognitive functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning) represents a high / healthy level of functioning. Scores for individual items: "Not at All" = 1 point, "A Little" = 2 points, "Quite a Bit" = 3 points, "Very Much" = 4 points. A linear transformation is used to standardize the raw score, so that overall scores range from 0 to 100. | Prior to treatment start until end of 16 weeks maintenance treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Standardized area under the curve of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 symptom summary score over the maintenance period | The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) is an integrated system for assessing the health-related quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients participating in international clinical trials. The validated QLQ-C30 summary score is calculated as mean score of items. A high score for a symptom scale / item (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhoea) represents a high level of symptomatology / problems. Scores for individual items: "Not at All" = 1 point, "A Little" = 2 points, "Quite a Bit" = 3 points, "Very Much" = 4 points. A linear transformation is used to standardize the raw score, so that overall scores range from 0 to 100. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Felix Keil, Prof.MD | Med. Dept. III, Hematolog and Oncology | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IIIrd Medical Department, Private Medical University Hospital Salzburg | Salzburg | State of Salzburg | 5020 | Austria | ||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28189366 | Background | van Amerongen G, Kanhai K, Baakman AC, Heuberger J, Klaassen E, Beumer TL, Strijers RLM, Killestein J, van Gerven J, Cohen A, Groeneveld GJ. Effects on Spasticity and Neuropathic Pain of an Oral Formulation of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol in Patients WithProgressive Multiple Sclerosis. Clin Ther. 2018 Sep;40(9):1467-1482. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.01.016. Epub 2017 Feb 9. | |
| 27407130 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Sponsor | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Placebo in Oral Dosage Form | Drug | Titration period for 4 weeks: titration according to tolerability from 3 x 1 droplet up to 3 x 12 droplets per day; dose increased by 3 x 1 droplet every other day Maintenance period for 12 weeks: individually tolerated maximum dose (up to 3 x 12 droplets) at end of titration period will be continued for maintenance treatment Tapering period for 2 weeks: dose is decreased every other day by 3 x 2 droplets Safety follow-up: 4 weeks after end of treatment |
|
| After 4 weeks of treatment until week 16 |
| Change of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 symptom summary score from baseline to summary score over the maintenance period | The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) is an integrated system for assessing the health-related quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients participating in international clinical trials. The validated QLQ-C30 summary score is calculated as mean score of items. A high score for a symptom scale / item (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhoea) represents a high level of symptomatology / problems. Scores for individual items: "Not at All" = 1 point, "A Little" = 2 points, "Quite a Bit" = 3 points, "Very Much" = 4 points. A linear transformation is used to standardize the raw score, so that overall scores range from 0 to 100. | From treatment start until week 16 |
| Symptom scales of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 | A high score for a symptom scale / item (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhoea) represents a high level of symptomatology / problems. Scores for individual items: "Not at All" = 1 point, "A Little" = 2 points, "Quite a Bit" = 3 points, "Very Much" = 4 points. A linear transformation is used to standardize the raw score, so that overall scores range from 0 to 100. | At baseline and 2-weekly until end of treatment at week 18 |
| Global quality of life of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 | The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) is an integrated system for assessing the health-related quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients participating in international clinical trials. The validated QLQ-C30 summary score is calculated as mean score of items. A high score for the global health status (overall health during the past week) and global QoL (overall quality of life during the past week) represents a high QoL. Scores: 1 - 7, 1 = very poor and 7 = excellent. A linear transformation is used to standardize the raw score, so that overall scores range from 0 to 100. | At baseline and 2-weekly until end of treatment at week 18 |
| Functional scales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 | The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) is an integrated system for assessing the health-related quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients participating in international clinical trials. A high score for a functional scale (physical functioning, role functioning, cognitive functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning) represents a high / healthy level of functioning. Scores for individual items: "Not at All" = 1 point, "A Little" = 2 points, "Quite a Bit" = 3 points, "Very Much" = 4 points. A linear transformation is used to standardize the raw score, so that overall scores range from 0 to 100. | At baseline and 2-weekly until end of treatment at week 18 |
| Mean change from baseline of the Glasgow Prognostic Score | Change of serum levels of the score-defining biomarkers C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin. Prognostic scores; 0 (CRP ≥ 10 mg/l), 1 (CRP > 10 mg/l and albumin ≥ 35 g/l), 2 CRP > 10 mg/l and albumin < 35g/l). Score 0 indicates good prognosis, score 1 intermediate prognosis and score 2 poor prognosis. | At baseline and at end of treatment at week 16 |
| Amount of concomitant medication taken | Special focus on antiemetic, psychotropic and pain medication | From baseline until end of treatment at week 18 |
| Mean time to critical weight-loss (5%) | Assessed with a standard scale | From baseline until end of treatment at week 16 |
| Mean changes from baseline for Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) parameter Lean body mass (LBM) | Mean change of Lean body mass (LBM = Fat free mass FFM) kg | At baseline and at end of treatment at week 16 |
| Mean changes from baseline for Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) parameter Total body water (TBW) | Mean change of Total body water (TBW) kg | At baseline and at end of treatment at week 16 |
| Mean changes from baseline for Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) parameter Fat mass (FM) | Mean change of Fat mass (FM) kg | At baseline and at end of treatment at week 16 |
| Mean changes from baseline for Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) parameter Body cell mass (BCM) | Mean change of Body cell mass (BCM) kg | At baseline and at end of treatment at week 16 |
| Mean changes from baseline for Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) parameter Extracellular mass (EM) | Mean change of Extracellular mass (ECM) kg | At baseline and at end of treatment at week 16 |
| Mean changes from baseline for Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) parameter Phase angle (PA) | Mean change of Phase angle (PA); Phase Angle has long been linked to nutritional status. This marker is fast becoming recognised as a global health marker in total body health assessment. A higher Phase Angle could mean an increase in muscle mass (body cell mass) or a decrease in fluid, either from recovery from infection or injury (a good thing!) or a decrease in fluid from dehydration (a bad thing!). A loss of fat could also increase Phase Angle. A lower Phase Angle could mean a loss of muscle mass (a bad thing), or an increase of fluid (rehydrating which is a good thing, or sign of inflammation or infection - a bad thing), or gaining fat (which could be a good or bad thing depending on your state of health). Phase Angle is a direct measurement, (not a calculation using equations) of the cell membrane. | At baseline and at end of treatment at week 16 |
| Mean changes from baseline for Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) parameter Resistance (Rz) | Mean change of Resistance (Rz), unit ohm; the resistance reflects the water or fluid in the body | At baseline and at end of treatment at week 16 |
| Mean changes from baseline for Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) parameter Reactance(Xc) | Mean change of Reactance (Xc), unit ohm; reactance reflects the body cell mass. | At baseline and at end of treatment at week 16 |
| Mean change from baseline of muscle strength | To assess physical strength of patient's handgrip strength will be measured prior and after study treatment using a hydraulic hand dynamometer; mean value of three consecutive measurements will be documented | At baseline and at end of treatment at week 16 |
| Proportion of patients not adhering to individual baseline chemotherapy regimen | Percentage of patients who do not receive full dose of planned chemotherapy regimen and/or within scheduled time frame (interruption or delay) | From baseline until end of treatment at week 18 |
| Chemotherapeutic dose intensity over the treatment period of 18 weeks | The total amount of applied chemotherapy over the study treatment phase is documented | From baseline until end of treatment at week 18 |
| Frequency and severity of (serious) adverse events (S)AE | Assessed with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE V5.0) | From baseline until safety visit at week 22 |
| Incidence of adverse drug reactions (ARs) | Frequency and severity of ARs | From baseline until safety visit at week 22 |
| Progression-free survival (PFS) | PFS in months; ; patients will be asked to agree on collection of data regarding PFS also after end of trial | From treatment start until the date of first documented progression or death from any cause assessed up to week 22 |
| Overall survival (OS) | OS in months; ; patients will be asked to agree on collection of data regarding PFS also after end of trial | From treatment start until death from any cause assessed up to week 22 |
| Hanusch Krankenhaus der Wiener Gebietskrankenkasse |
| Vienna |
| State of Vienna |
| 1140 |
| Austria |
| Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen GmbH, Abteilung für Innere Medizin IV | Wels | Upper Austria | 4600 | Austria |
| KABEG-Klinikum Klagenfurt am Woerthersee, Abteilung f. Anaesthesie u. Intensivmedizin | Klagenfurt | 9020 | Austria |
| LKH Hochsteiermark - Standort Leoben Abteilung für Innere Medizin und Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie | Leoben | 8700 | Austria |
| Krankenhaus d. Barmherzigen Brüder, Abt. f. Innere Medizin | Sankt Veit an der Glan | 9300 | Austria |
| Pyhrn-Eisenwurzen Klinikum Steyr, Interne Medizin II | Steyr | A-4400 | Austria |
| KH Zams, Innere Medizin, Internistische Onkologie u. Haematologie | Zams | 6511 | Austria |
| Universitätsmedizin Göttingen Abt. f. Gastroenterologie, gastrointestinale Onkologie u. Endokrinologie | Göttingen | 37075 | Germany |
| München Klinik Neuperlach | München | 81737 | Germany |
| Marienhospital Onkologie, Hämatologie, Palliativmedizin | Stuttgart | 07199 | Germany |
| Background |
| Davis MP. Cannabinoids for Symptom Management and Cancer Therapy: The Evidence. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Jul;14(7):915-22. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0094. |
| 16849753 | Background | Cannabis-In-Cachexia-Study-Group; Strasser F, Luftner D, Possinger K, Ernst G, Ruhstaller T, Meissner W, Ko YD, Schnelle M, Reif M, Cerny T. Comparison of orally administered cannabis extract and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in treating patients with cancer-related anorexia-cachexia syndrome: a multicenter, phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial from the Cannabis-In-Cachexia-Study-Group. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jul 20;24(21):3394-400. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.1847. |
| 28457056 | Background | Turgeman I, Bar-Sela G. Cannabis Use in Palliative Oncology: A Review of the Evidence for Popular Indications. Isr Med Assoc J. 2017 Feb;19(2):85-88. |
| 11786587 | Background | Jatoi A, Windschitl HE, Loprinzi CL, Sloan JA, Dakhil SR, Mailliard JA, Pundaleeka S, Kardinal CG, Fitch TR, Krook JE, Novotny PJ, Christensen B. Dronabinol versus megestrol acetate versus combination therapy for cancer-associated anorexia: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jan 15;20(2):567-73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.2.567. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014839 | Vomiting |
| D010190 | Pancreatic Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012817 | Signs and Symptoms, Digestive |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004701 | Endocrine Gland Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D010182 | Pancreatic Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013759 | Dronabinol |
| D004304 | Dosage Forms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002186 | Cannabinoids |
| D013729 | Terpenes |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D004364 | Pharmaceutical Preparations |
| D013678 | Technology, Pharmaceutical |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
Not provided
Not provided