Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Evaluate the use of Electromagnetic Muscle Stimulation for body contouring.
The safety and effectiveness of an Electromagnetic Muscle Stimulation device when used for abdominal and gluteal toning will be evaluated in this study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electromagnetic Muscle Stimulation Treatment Group - Abdomen | Experimental | The treatments are designed to evaluate muscle toning, firming and strengthening in the abdomen. |
|
| Electromagnetic Muscle Stimulation Group - Abdomen and Buttocks | Experimental | The treatments are designed to evaluate muscle toning, firming and strengthening in the abdomen and buttocks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The ZELTIQ EMS System | Device | The Zeltiq EMS device will be used to perform treatments for abdominal and gluteal toning. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Body Satisfaction Questionnaire From Baseline to 4-Week Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit | Measurement of participant's perception about body shape, assessed using the Body Satisfaction Questionnaire (BSQ)at the 4-Week post-treatment follow-up visit. The scale measures body image using a set of dichotomous items used to describe aspects of shape and appearance. The questionnaire has total score range from 10 to 50. An increase in score (when compared to baseline) reflects the participant's perceived improvement in appearance in the treated region(abdomen or buttocks). Questionnaire results were tabulated as the numerical change between mean baseline scores and scores recorded at the 4-week post-treatment follow-up visit. A positive change reflects an increase in the body satisfaction questionnaire total score. | Baseline, 4-week post-treatment follow-up visit |
| Number of Incidents of Device-Related Adverse Events | The incidence of device-related adverse events (AE) including device-related serious AEs will be tabulated. | AE information will be collected from the time of enrollment to the final follow-up visit at 12 weeks following the final treatment. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Reporting Improvement on the Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS) | Subject-graded improvement in the treated area using the Subject Global Aesthetic Scale (SGAIS) at the 4-Week follow-up visit. In this study, subjects completed the SGAIS questionnaire for each treated area (e.g. a abdomen-specific questionnaire and a buttocks-specific questionnaire) at the 4-week post-final follow-up visit. Subjects were asked to rate improvement in treated areas using the following 7 point scale: 3 = Very much improved, 2 = Much improved, 1 = Improved, 0 = No change, -1 = Worse, -2 = Much worse and -3 = Very much worse. Subjects who reported 'Very Much Improved,' 'Much Improved,' and 'Improved will be categorized as 'Improved'. Results were calculated as the percentage of subjects reporting "Improved". |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kerrie Jiang, NP | Zeltiq Aesthetics | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marina Plastic Surgery | Marina del Rey | California | 90292 | United States | ||
| Innovation Research Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33161584 | Result | Fabi S, Dover JS, Tanzi E, Bowes LE, Tsai Fu F, Odusan A. A 12-Week, Prospective, Non-Comparative, Non-Randomized Study of Magnetic Muscle Stimulation for Improvement of Body Satisfaction With the Abdomen and Buttocks. Lasers Surg Med. 2021 Jan;53(1):79-88. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23348. Epub 2020 Nov 8. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants received EMS therapy on abdomen and/or buttocks in 4 sessions over a 2-week period, with follow-up visits 4 and 12 wks post final treatment. Per-protocol Population included all treated participants followed for 4 wks post treatment, with weight change of no more than 5% of total body weight at the time of the 4-Wk post-treatment images compared to baseline (pre-treatment) images, and who completed 4 treatments. Per protocol, data presented here as planned/collected (all enrolled).
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | EMS Device Treatment Group | All enrolled participants treated with the EMS device. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Data presented here as planned and collected (all enrolled).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | EMS Device Treatment Group | All enrolled participants treated with the EMS device. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Body Satisfaction Questionnaire From Baseline to 4-Week Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit | Measurement of participant's perception about body shape, assessed using the Body Satisfaction Questionnaire (BSQ)at the 4-Week post-treatment follow-up visit. The scale measures body image using a set of dichotomous items used to describe aspects of shape and appearance. The questionnaire has total score range from 10 to 50. An increase in score (when compared to baseline) reflects the participant's perceived improvement in appearance in the treated region(abdomen or buttocks). Questionnaire results were tabulated as the numerical change between mean baseline scores and scores recorded at the 4-week post-treatment follow-up visit. A positive change reflects an increase in the body satisfaction questionnaire total score. | Per-protocol population. Participants with completed questionnaires specific to each body area treated. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Participants completed Questionnaire | Baseline, 4-week post-treatment follow-up visit |
|
Adverse event data was collected from the time of enrollment through the 12-week post-treatment follow-up visit, approximately 4 months.
Safety data is presented here as planned and collected per protocol, by the total As-Treated Population (defined as all treated participants regardless of weight change).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | EMS Device Treatment Group | All eligible subjects for whom informed consent is obtained were treated with the study device, an electromagnetic muscle stimulation device. Adverse event information was collected from the time of enrollment through the 12-week post-treatment follow-up visit. Per protocol 110 subjects were enrolled to have EMS treatments on the abdomen and/or buttocks in this single arm study. At no point in the conduct of the study were subjects assigned to a treatment group; the investigator determined the area(s) to be treated. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lymphoma | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Subject reported pain in the abdomen and other symptoms. Investigator referred subject to primary care physician. Subject diagnosed with lymphoma 18 days after treatment. Investigator determined the event as "not related to the study device. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elective surgery | Surgical and medical procedures | Non-systematic Assessment | Subject reported elective salivary gland surgery. |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lori Brandt, Director, Clinical Trial Management | Zeltiq Aesthetics | 925 621-7460 | lori.brandt@abbvie.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | May 10, 2019 | Nov 1, 2021 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 4-week post-treatment follow-up visit |
| Pleasanton |
| California |
| 94588 |
| United States |
| Cosmetic Laser Dermatology | San Diego | California | 92121 | United States |
| Bowes Dermatology by Riverchase | Miami | Florida | 33133 | United States |
| The Wall Center for Plastic Surgery | Shreveport | Louisiana | 71105 | United States |
| Capital Laser & Skin Care | Chevy Chase | Maryland | 20815 | United States |
| SkinCare Physicians of Chestnut Hill | Chestnut Hill | Massachusetts | 02467 | United States |
| EpiCentre Park Lane | Dallas | Texas | 75231 | United States |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| BMI | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m^2 |
|
| OG000 |
| EMS Device Treatment - Abdomen |
All eligible participants for whom informed consent is obtained will be treated on the abdomen with the study device, an electromagnetic muscle stimulation device. |
| OG001 | EMS Treatment - Buttocks | All eligible participants for whom informed consent is obtained will be treated on the buttocks with the study device, an electromagnetic muscle stimulation device. |
|
|
| Primary | Number of Incidents of Device-Related Adverse Events | The incidence of device-related adverse events (AE) including device-related serious AEs will be tabulated. | All participants enrolled in the study and treated with the EMS device were evaluated for adverse events throughout the study. Investigators determined if an AE was not related, possibly related, probably related or definitely related to the study device. Data is presented here as planned and collected per protocol, by the total As-Treated Population (defined as all treated participants regardless of weight change). | Posted | Number | Device-Related Adverse Events | AE information will be collected from the time of enrollment to the final follow-up visit at 12 weeks following the final treatment. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Reporting Improvement on the Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS) | Subject-graded improvement in the treated area using the Subject Global Aesthetic Scale (SGAIS) at the 4-Week follow-up visit. In this study, subjects completed the SGAIS questionnaire for each treated area (e.g. a abdomen-specific questionnaire and a buttocks-specific questionnaire) at the 4-week post-final follow-up visit. Subjects were asked to rate improvement in treated areas using the following 7 point scale: 3 = Very much improved, 2 = Much improved, 1 = Improved, 0 = No change, -1 = Worse, -2 = Much worse and -3 = Very much worse. Subjects who reported 'Very Much Improved,' 'Much Improved,' and 'Improved will be categorized as 'Improved'. Results were calculated as the percentage of subjects reporting "Improved". | Per-protocol population. Participants with completed questionnaires at the 4-week post treatment follow-up visit. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | 4-week post-treatment follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 110 |
| 1 |
| 110 |
| 11 |
| 110 |
|
|
| Uterine Fibroid | Reproductive system and breast disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pregnancy | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Coughing | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Cold (virus) | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Sprained ankle | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Menstrual Cycle Irregularity | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Soreness and discomfort in left chest | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Cramping in lower abdomen | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided