Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical application of the second-generation MCCG with higher image resolution and frame rate for upper gastrointestinal tract compared with the first-generation.
Magnetically controlled capsule gastroscopy (MCCG) has been widely used in clinical practice for gastric examination. However, there still exist blind spots under MCCG, particularly in the esophagus and duodenum. Although the anatomy of the esophagus and duodenum can be the main cause, MCCG still needs technical improvement. In addition, the gastric examination time under MCCG can be further optimized.
Therefore, a new-generation MCCG is developed with a higher frame rate improved from 0.5-2 to 0.5-8 frames per second, image resolution improved from 480 x 480 to 720 x 720, view angle improved from 140° to 150°, wireless anti-jamming technology is applied as a more effective and stable information transmission method.
This is a prospective, single-centered, blinded randomized controlled pilot study. Subjects receiving MCCG at Changhai Hospital will be randomly allocated into two groups with a ratio of 1:1 before the procedure, the first-generation or the second-generation MCCG. After passage through the esophagus, the gastric examination and transpyloric passage of the capsule is conducted under magnetic steering, and then examination is continued in the small bowel under intestinal peristalsis.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| The first-generation MCCG group | No Intervention | The patients swallowed the first-generation MCCG with a small amount of water in the left lateral decubitus position. Once the capsule reached the stomach after investigating the esophagus, it was lifted away from the posterior wall, rotated and advanced to the fundus and cardiac regions, and then to the gastric body, angulus, antrum and pylorus. After finishing the stomach examination twice, the endoscopist controlled the capsule to face the pylorus and drag it close to the pylorus. The capsule would enter the duodenal bulb and was held stationary to investigate the duodenal bulb using the "360-degree automatic scanning" mode. In the descending part of duodenum, the endoscopist tried to control the capsule to view the major papilla. After passing through the duodenum, the capsule started to complete the small-bowel examination with the "small-bowel mode". The magnetic steering time for passing through the pylorus was not allowed more than 15 min. | |
| The second-generation MCCG group | Experimental | All process in this study were the same except that the second-generation capsule (Ankon Navicam-2) was used in the experimental group. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| the second-generation MCCG | Device | Patients in the experimental group swallowed the second-generation MCCG (Ankon Navicam-2). |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Circumferential Visualization of the Z-line | Circumferential visualization of the Z-line is defined by quadrants as follows: less than 2 quadrants (< 50%) of the Z line observed; at least 2 quadrants (50%-75%) observed; at least 3 quadrants (>75%) observed; and entire Z line (100%) observed. | Through end of examination, up to 30 minutes |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Detection Rate of Duodenal Papilla | Detection rate of duodenal papilla means the percentage of patients with at least one image of duodenal papilla was obtained | up to 2 days after the examination |
| Gastric Examination Time (GET) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Changhai Hospital | Shanghai | 200433 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31981648 | Derived | Jiang B, Qian YY, Pan J, Jiang X, Wang YC, Zhu JH, Zou WB, Zhou W, Li ZS, Liao Z. Second-generation magnetically controlled capsule gastroscopy with improved image resolution and frame rate: a randomized controlled clinical trial (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jun;91(6):1379-1387. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.027. Epub 2020 Jan 22. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | The First-generation MCCG Group | The patients swallowed the first-generation MCCG with a small amount of water in the left lateral decubitus position. Once the capsule reached the stomach after investigating the esophagus, it was lifted away from the posterior wall, rotated and advanced to the fundus and cardiac regions, and then to the gastric body, angulus, antrum and pylorus. After finishing the stomach examination twice, the endoscopist controlled the capsule to face the pylorus and drag it close to the pylorus. The capsule would enter the duodenal bulb and was held stationary to investigate the duodenal bulb using the "360-degree automatic scanning" mode. In the descending part of duodenum, the endoscopist tried to control the capsule to view the major papilla. After passing through the duodenum, the capsule started to complete the small-bowel examination with the "small-bowel mode". The magnetic steering time for passing through the pylorus was not allowed more than 15 min. |
| FG001 | The Second-generation MCCG Group | All process in this study were the same except that the second-generation capsule (Ankon Navicam-2) was used in the experimental group. the second-generation MCCG: Patients in the experimental group swallowed the second-generation MCCG (Ankon Navicam-2). |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | The First-generation MCCG Group | The patients swallowed the first-generation MCCG with a small amount of water in the left lateral decubitus position. Once the capsule reached the stomach after investigating the esophagus, it was lifted away from the posterior wall, rotated and advanced to the fundus and cardiac regions, and then to the gastric body, angulus, antrum and pylorus. After finishing the stomach examination twice, the endoscopist controlled the capsule to face the pylorus and drag it close to the pylorus. The capsule would enter the duodenal bulb and was held stationary to investigate the duodenal bulb using the "360-degree automatic scanning" mode. In the descending part of duodenum, the endoscopist tried to control the capsule to view the major papilla. After passing through the duodenum, the capsule started to complete the small-bowel examination with the "small-bowel mode". The magnetic steering time for passing through the pylorus was not allowed more than 15 min. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Circumferential Visualization of the Z-line | Circumferential visualization of the Z-line is defined by quadrants as follows: less than 2 quadrants (< 50%) of the Z line observed; at least 2 quadrants (50%-75%) observed; at least 3 quadrants (>75%) observed; and entire Z line (100%) observed. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Through end of examination, up to 30 minutes |
|
2 weeks
capsule retention, aspiration of the capsule, severe choking cough and death.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | The First-generation MCCG Group | The patients swallowed the first-generation MCCG with a small amount of water in the left lateral decubitus position. Once the capsule reached the stomach after investigating the esophagus, it was lifted away from the posterior wall, rotated and advanced to the fundus and cardiac regions, and then to the gastric body, angulus, antrum and pylorus. After finishing the stomach examination twice, the endoscopist controlled the capsule to face the pylorus and drag it close to the pylorus. The capsule would enter the duodenal bulb and was held stationary to investigate the duodenal bulb using the "360-degree automatic scanning" mode. In the descending part of duodenum, the endoscopist tried to control the capsule to view the major papilla. After passing through the duodenum, the capsule started to complete the small-bowel examination with the "small-bowel mode". The magnetic steering time for passing through the pylorus was not allowed more than 15 min. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Investigator of Clinical Trials | Changhai Hospital | 15021569528 | 1372971347@qq.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 1, 2019 | Sep 13, 2020 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Record the time taken for endoscopist to finish the gastric examination for primary anatomical landmarks twice (cardia, fundus, body, angulus, antrum and pylorus).
| Through end of examination, up to 30 minutes |
| Manipulation Performance Score of the MCCG | The performance of maneuverability is assessed using a semi-quantitative score related to the fluency, stability and comfortableness for examination procedure. Fluency is mainly reflected on the response speed to operation and smoothness of video playing. Stability is about the ability of holding the position for a long enough time and the real-time viewing of all images. comfortableness is the operator's sensation about manipulative force and fatigue degree. Maneuverability score was defined as a total scale of 3 to 15 calculated by adding up each evaluation index score above, and each index was graded from 1 to 5, with 1 as the worst and 5 as the best. | up to 10 minutes after the examination |
| Image Quality Score (Mainly Focus on Clarity) | Assess Image quality grade ranged from 1 to 10 (1, the worst quality; 10, the quality of the best image captured by EGD). | up to 30 minutes after the examination |
| The Number of Images Captured for Esophagus and Z-line | The number of images captured by MCCG for esophagus and Z-line. | up to 30 minutes after the examination |
| Number of Participants With Lesions in Upper Gastrointestinal Tract | calculate the number of participants with lesions in different part of upper gastrointestinal tract (esophagus, stomach, duodenum, jejunoileum), and preliminarily evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the new-generation MCCG. | up to 2 days after the examination |
| Transit Time of MCCG in the Gastrointestinal Tract and Total Running Time | Assess the transit time of MCCG in the gastrointestinal tract (stomach and small bowel), and record the total running time from starts take images to ends. | up to 2 days after the examination |
| Cleansing Level Score of Z-line Area | The bubbles/saliva on the Z line area will be scored as follows: 0 = no bubbles/saliva on the Z line area;1 = a few bubbles/saliva on the Z line area; 2= increased amount of bubbles/saliva on the Z line area; 3 = severe bubbles/saliva on the Z line area. | Through end of examination, up to 30 minutes |
| The Incidence of Adverse Events (The Safety of MCCG) | The presence of adverse events within two weeks aftter swallowing MCCG will be recorded. | up to 2 weeks after the examination |
| Transit Time of MCCG in Esophagus | Assess the transit time of MCCG in esophagus from starts take images to ends. | up to 2 days after the examination |
| BG001 | The Second-generation MCCG Group | All process in this study were the same except that the second-generation capsule (Ankon Navicam-2) was used in the experimental group. the second-generation MCCG: Patients in the experimental group swallowed the second-generation MCCG (Ankon Navicam-2). |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Indication | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| History of abdominal surgery, smoking and drinking | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | The Second-generation MCCG Group | All process in this study were the same except that the second-generation capsule (Ankon Navicam-2) was used in the experimental group. the second-generation MCCG: Patients in the experimental group swallowed the second-generation MCCG (Ankon Navicam-2). |
|
|
| Secondary | Detection Rate of Duodenal Papilla | Detection rate of duodenal papilla means the percentage of patients with at least one image of duodenal papilla was obtained | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | up to 2 days after the examination |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Gastric Examination Time (GET) | Record the time taken for endoscopist to finish the gastric examination for primary anatomical landmarks twice (cardia, fundus, body, angulus, antrum and pylorus). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | minutes | Through end of examination, up to 30 minutes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Manipulation Performance Score of the MCCG | The performance of maneuverability is assessed using a semi-quantitative score related to the fluency, stability and comfortableness for examination procedure. Fluency is mainly reflected on the response speed to operation and smoothness of video playing. Stability is about the ability of holding the position for a long enough time and the real-time viewing of all images. comfortableness is the operator's sensation about manipulative force and fatigue degree. Maneuverability score was defined as a total scale of 3 to 15 calculated by adding up each evaluation index score above, and each index was graded from 1 to 5, with 1 as the worst and 5 as the best. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | up to 10 minutes after the examination |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Image Quality Score (Mainly Focus on Clarity) | Assess Image quality grade ranged from 1 to 10 (1, the worst quality; 10, the quality of the best image captured by EGD). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | up to 30 minutes after the examination |
|
|
|
| Secondary | The Number of Images Captured for Esophagus and Z-line | The number of images captured by MCCG for esophagus and Z-line. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | images | up to 30 minutes after the examination |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Lesions in Upper Gastrointestinal Tract | calculate the number of participants with lesions in different part of upper gastrointestinal tract (esophagus, stomach, duodenum, jejunoileum), and preliminarily evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the new-generation MCCG. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | up to 2 days after the examination |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Transit Time of MCCG in the Gastrointestinal Tract and Total Running Time | Assess the transit time of MCCG in the gastrointestinal tract (stomach and small bowel), and record the total running time from starts take images to ends. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | minutes | up to 2 days after the examination |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Cleansing Level Score of Z-line Area | The bubbles/saliva on the Z line area will be scored as follows: 0 = no bubbles/saliva on the Z line area;1 = a few bubbles/saliva on the Z line area; 2= increased amount of bubbles/saliva on the Z line area; 3 = severe bubbles/saliva on the Z line area. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Through end of examination, up to 30 minutes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | The Incidence of Adverse Events (The Safety of MCCG) | The presence of adverse events within two weeks aftter swallowing MCCG will be recorded. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | up to 2 weeks after the examination |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Transit Time of MCCG in Esophagus | Assess the transit time of MCCG in esophagus from starts take images to ends. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | seconds | up to 2 days after the examination |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 40 |
| 0 |
| 40 |
| 0 |
| 40 |
| EG001 | The Second-generation MCCG Group | All process in this study were the same except that the second-generation capsule (Ankon Navicam-2) was used in the experimental group. the second-generation MCCG: Patients in the experimental group swallowed the second-generation MCCG (Ankon Navicam-2). | 0 | 40 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 40 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Stability |
|
| Total score |
|
| normal |
|
| Total running time (min) |
|
| Increased amount of bubbles |
|
| Severe bubbles |
|