Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is being conducted to evaluate in participants with diarrhea-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-D) the abdominal pain response to BOS-589 after 4 weeks of treatment and to evaluate the overall safety and tolerability of BOS-589 in the treatment of IBS-D during 4 weeks of treatment, relative to placebo (PBO).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| High dose of BOS-589 | Experimental | Participants will receive a high dose of BOS-589 orally twice a day (BID). |
|
| Low dose of BOS-589 | Experimental | Participants will receive a low dose of BOS-589 orally BID. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Participants will receive matching placebo orally BID. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOS-589 | Drug | oral tablets |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 24-hour Worst Abdominal Pain Scores (WAP) at Day 29 Compared to Baseline (Averaged Over the Week Prior to Each Respective Time Point) | To evaluate in participants with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) the abdominal pain response to BOS-589 after 4 weeks of treatment, relative to placebo. Throughout the 4 weeks of the double blind treatment phase, participants were asked to rate their WAP in the past 24 hours. The participant-reported WAP in the past 24 hours was recorded on a 0 to 10 scale, where 0 corresponded to no pain and 10 corresponded to worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. | Baseline; Day 29 |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Discontinuations Because of AEs, and Any Treatment-related Severe AEs | To evaluate the overall safety and tolerability of BOS-589 in the treatment of IBS-D during 4 weeks of treatment, relative to placebo. | Up to Day 43/end-of-study follow up visit |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Stool Consistency, Measured by the Daily Bristol Stool Form Score (BSFS) Most Representative Stool Consistency Scores at Day 29 Compared to Baseline (Averaged Over the Week Prior to Each Respective Time Point) | To evaluate the treatment effect of BOS-589 on defecation after 4 weeks, relative to placebo. Participants were asked to record daily stool consistency according to the BSFS most representative of the past 24 hours. The participant-reported BSFS consistency score was based on a 1 to 7 scale where 1 corresponded to a hard stool and 7 corresponded to watery diarrhea. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Participant meets the diagnosis of diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) subtype based on Rome IV diagnostic criteria within 3 months prior to randomization. On days when the participant experiences IBS symptoms
Recurrent abdominal pain occurring, on average, at least 1 day per week and associated with 2 or more of the following:
Over the week prior to randomization, the participant has
Participant must undergo or previously have undergone (a) an appropriate evaluation for their IBS symptoms, including an evaluation for organic/structural etiologies (if in the presence of alarm symptoms); and (b) age-appropriate screening for colorectal cancer, if applicable.
Participant is negative for serum tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin A antibody (tTG-IgA) plus has evidence of detectable serum IgA within the normal reference range.
Exclusion Criteria:
At the time of screening, participant has a diagnosis of an IBS subtype other than IBS-D, based on Rome IV criteria.
Participant has a history of inflammatory or immune-mediated gastrointestinal (GI) disorders including (but not limited to) inflammatory bowel disease (i.e., Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, microscopic colitis, and celiac disease).
Participant has had an episode of diverticulitis within 3 months prior to Screening.
Participant has a history of intestinal obstruction, stricture, toxic megacolon, GI perforation, fecal impaction, gastric banding, bariatric surgery, adhesions, ischemic colitis, or impaired intestinal circulation (e.g., aortoiliac occlusive disease).
Participant has any of the following surgical history:
Confirmed alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 2 upper limit of normal (ULN)
Confirmed total bilirubin > ULN, unless the participant has a documented history of Gilbert's syndrome
Evidence of active hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection or Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 or HIV-2 antibody positive
Evidence of HCV infection based on a positive HCV antibody screen (Participants who have been successfully treated for HCV are eligible if an undetectable HCV viral load at least 6 months after completion of treatment can be demonstrated.)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pinnacle Research Group | Anniston | Alabama | 36207 | United States | ||
| Clinical Research Associates |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
During the pretreatment phase, participants were evaluated for up to 5 weeks to assess eligibility. The pretreatment phase consisted of initial screening assessments and a run in period.
This study was conducted at 47 study centers in the United States.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | High Dose of BOS-589 | Randomized participants received a high dose of BOS-589 tablets orally twice a day (BID). |
| FG001 | Low Dose of BOS-589 | Randomized participants received a low dose of BOS-589 tablets orally BID. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Aug 12, 2019 | Apr 29, 2021 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo |
| Drug |
oral tablets |
|
| Baseline; Day 29 |
| Change in Stool Consistency, Measured by the Daily BSFS Worst (Loosest) Stool Consistency Scores at Day 29 Compared to Baseline (Averaged Over the Week Prior to Each Respective Time Point) | To evaluate the treatment effect of BOS-589 on defecation after 4 weeks, relative to placebo. Participants were asked to record daily stool consistency according to the BSFS worst stool consistency (defined as the loosest stool with the highest BSFS score) in the past 24 hours. The participant-reported BSFS consistency score was based on a 1 to 7 scale where 1 corresponded to a hard stool and 7 corresponded to watery diarrhea. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. | Baseline; Day 29 |
| Change in Stool Frequency, Measured by the Total Number of Spontaneous Bowel Movements in 24 Hours at Day 29 Compared to Baseline (Averaged Over the Week Prior to Each Respective Time Point) | To evaluate the treatment effect of BOS-589 on defecation after 4 weeks, relative to placebo. Participants were asked to record stool frequency based on the total number of spontaneous bowel movements in the past 24 hours. | Baseline; Day 29 |
| Changes in the Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Severity Score (IBS-SS) at Day 29 Compared to Baseline | To evaluate the treatment effect of BOS-589 on IBS-related signs and symptoms. Participants were asked to complete 5 questions regarding the severity of their IBS. Each of the 5 questions generated a maximum score of 100, leading to a total possible IBS-SS of 500. The IBS-SS scale ranges from 0 to 500. A higher score indicated greater severity. | Baseline; Day 29 |
| Change in the IBS Global Scale (IBS-GS) at Day 29 Compared to Baseline (Averaged Over the Week Prior to Each Respective Time Point) | To evaluate the treatment effect of BOS-589 on IBS related signs and symptoms. Participants were asked to record daily their overall diarrhea-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-D) global symptoms in the prior 24 hours. The participant-reported daily IBS-GS was based on a 0 to 4 scale where: 0 corresponded to no symptoms; 1 corresponded to mild symptoms; 2 corresponded to moderate symptoms; 3 corresponded to severe symptoms; and 4 corresponded to very severe symptoms. Higher scores indicated severe symptoms. | Baseline; Day 29 |
| Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for BOS-589 | To evaluate the steady state pharmacokinetics (PK) of BOS-589. | Day 1, Day 15 and Day 22 at pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose |
| Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) for BOS-589 | To evaluate the steady state PK of BOS-589. | Day 1, Day 15 and Day 22 at pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose |
| Area Under the Concentration-versus-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to 4 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-4) for BOS-589 | To evaluate the steady state PK of BOS-589. | Day 1, Day 15 and Day 22 at pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose |
| AUC From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t) for BOS-589 | To evaluate the steady state PK of BOS-589. | Day 1, Day 15 and Day 22 at pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose |
| Huntsville |
| Alabama |
| 35801 |
| United States |
| Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. - East Valley Family Physicians, PLC | Chandler | Arizona | 85224 | United States |
| Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. - Phoenix Southeast | Chandler | Arizona | 85224 | United States |
| Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. - Desert Clinical Research, LLC | Mesa | Arizona | 85018 | United States |
| Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. - Central Arizona Medical Associates, PC | Mesa | Arizona | 85213 | United States |
| Hope Research Institute LLC | Peoria | Arizona | 85381 | United States |
| Elite Clinical Studies | Phoenix | Arizona | 85018 | United States |
| Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. - Tatum Highlands Medical Associates, PLLC | Phoenix | Arizona | 85050 | United States |
| Hope Research Institute LLC | Phoenix | Arizona | 85206 | United States |
| Arkansas Gastroenterology | North Little Rock | Arkansas | 72117 | United States |
| Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. | Carlsbad | California | 95821 | United States |
| Paragon Rx Clinical, Inc. | Garden Grove | California | 92683 | United States |
| eStudySite | La Mesa | California | 91942 | United States |
| Grossmont Center For Clinical Research | La Mesa | California | 92008 | United States |
| Clinical Trials Research | Sacramento | California | 91942 | United States |
| Research and Education Inc | San Diego | California | 92105 | United States |
| Precision Research Institute | San Diego | California | 92114 | United States |
| Shahram Jacobs MD Inc | Sherman Oaks | California | 91403 | United States |
| Millennium ClinicalTrials | Thousand Oaks | California | 92840 | United States |
| Advanced Rx Clinical Research | Westminster | California | 91360 | United States |
| Chase Medical Research LLC | Waterbury | Connecticut | 06708 | United States |
| PAB Clinical Research-ClinEdge-PPDS | Brandon | Florida | 33511 | United States |
| Nature Coast Clinical Research LLC - ERN-PPDS | Inverness | Florida | 34452 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic | Jacksonville | Florida | 32224 | United States |
| Health Awareness Inc | Jupiter | Florida | 33458 | United States |
| Suncoast Research Group LLC - ERN-PPDS | Miami | Florida | 33135 | United States |
| Ormond Medical Arts Pharmaceutical | Ormond Beach | Florida | 32174 | United States |
| Precision Clinical Research, LLC | Sunrise | Florida | 33351 | United States |
| Northwest Clinical Trials-ClinEdge-PPDS | Boise | Idaho | 83704 | United States |
| Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. - Allaw | Evansville | Indiana | 47714 | United States |
| Boston Clinical Trials Inc | Boston | Massachusetts | 02131 | United States |
| West Michigan Clinical Research | Wyoming | Michigan | 49519 | United States |
| Sundance Clinical Research | St Louis | Missouri | 63141 | United States |
| Quality Clinical Research - ClinEdge - PPDS | Omaha | Nebraska | 68114 | United States |
| Albuquerque Clinical Trials Inc - BTC - PPDS | Albuquerque | New Mexico | 87102 | United States |
| NY Scientific | Brooklyn | New York | 11235 | United States |
| Peters Medical Research, LLC | High Point | North Carolina | 27262 | United States |
| PMG Research of Raleigh, LLC | Raleigh | North Carolina | 27609 | United States |
| Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. | Akron | Ohio | 44311 | United States |
| Hometown Urgent Care and Research | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45215 | United States |
| Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. | Columbus | Ohio | 45424 | United States |
| Hometown Urgent Care and Research | Dayton | Ohio | 43212 | United States |
| Founders Research Corporation | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19114 | United States |
| Preferred Primary Care Physicians | Uniontown | Pennsylvania | 15401 | United States |
| Safe Harbor Clinical Research | East Providence | Rhode Island | 02914 | United States |
| Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. | Anderson | South Carolina | 29621 | United States |
| Pledmont Research Partners LLC | Fort Mill | South Carolina | 29707 | United States |
| Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. | Greer | South Carolina | 29651 | United States |
| WR-ClinSearch, LLC | Chattanooga | Tennessee | 37909 | United States |
| New Phase Research & Development | Knoxville | Tennessee | 37421 | United States |
| L12 Clinical Research | Dallas | Texas | 75219 | United States |
| Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. | Dallas | Texas | 78209 | United States |
| Southwest Clinical Trials | Houston | Texas | 77074 | United States |
| Quality Research Inc. | San Antonio | Texas | 75234 | United States |
| Advanced Research Institute | Ogden | Utah | 84405 | United States |
| Blue Ridge Medical Research | Lynchburg | Virginia | 24502 | United States |
| Clinical Research Partners LLC | Richmond | Virginia | 23235 | United States |
| FG002 | Placebo | Randomized participants received matching placebo tablets orally BID. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | High Dose of BOS-589 | Randomized participants received a high dose of BOS-589 tablets orally BID. |
| BG001 | Low Dose of BOS-589 | Randomized participants received a low dose of BOS-589 tablets orally BID. |
| BG002 | Placebo | Randomized participants received matching placebo tablets orally BID. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | 24-hour Worst Abdominal Pain Scores (WAP) at Day 29 Compared to Baseline (Averaged Over the Week Prior to Each Respective Time Point) | To evaluate in participants with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) the abdominal pain response to BOS-589 after 4 weeks of treatment, relative to placebo. Throughout the 4 weeks of the double blind treatment phase, participants were asked to rate their WAP in the past 24 hours. The participant-reported WAP in the past 24 hours was recorded on a 0 to 10 scale, where 0 corresponded to no pain and 10 corresponded to worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. | The Intent to Treat (ITT) Analysis Set included all randomized participants. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies only the participants with available data that were analyzed for the outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Baseline; Day 29 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Discontinuations Because of AEs, and Any Treatment-related Severe AEs | To evaluate the overall safety and tolerability of BOS-589 in the treatment of IBS-D during 4 weeks of treatment, relative to placebo. | The Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. | Posted | Number | Participants | Up to Day 43/end-of-study follow up visit |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Stool Consistency, Measured by the Daily Bristol Stool Form Score (BSFS) Most Representative Stool Consistency Scores at Day 29 Compared to Baseline (Averaged Over the Week Prior to Each Respective Time Point) | To evaluate the treatment effect of BOS-589 on defecation after 4 weeks, relative to placebo. Participants were asked to record daily stool consistency according to the BSFS most representative of the past 24 hours. The participant-reported BSFS consistency score was based on a 1 to 7 scale where 1 corresponded to a hard stool and 7 corresponded to watery diarrhea. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. | The ITT Analysis Set included all randomized participants. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies only the participants with available data that were analyzed for the outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Baseline; Day 29 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Stool Consistency, Measured by the Daily BSFS Worst (Loosest) Stool Consistency Scores at Day 29 Compared to Baseline (Averaged Over the Week Prior to Each Respective Time Point) | To evaluate the treatment effect of BOS-589 on defecation after 4 weeks, relative to placebo. Participants were asked to record daily stool consistency according to the BSFS worst stool consistency (defined as the loosest stool with the highest BSFS score) in the past 24 hours. The participant-reported BSFS consistency score was based on a 1 to 7 scale where 1 corresponded to a hard stool and 7 corresponded to watery diarrhea. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. | The ITT Analysis Set included all randomized participants. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies only the participants with available data that were analyzed for the outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Baseline; Day 29 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Stool Frequency, Measured by the Total Number of Spontaneous Bowel Movements in 24 Hours at Day 29 Compared to Baseline (Averaged Over the Week Prior to Each Respective Time Point) | To evaluate the treatment effect of BOS-589 on defecation after 4 weeks, relative to placebo. Participants were asked to record stool frequency based on the total number of spontaneous bowel movements in the past 24 hours. | The ITT Analysis Set included all randomized participants. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies only the participants with available data that were analyzed for the outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Number of spontaneous bowel movements | Baseline; Day 29 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Changes in the Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Severity Score (IBS-SS) at Day 29 Compared to Baseline | To evaluate the treatment effect of BOS-589 on IBS-related signs and symptoms. Participants were asked to complete 5 questions regarding the severity of their IBS. Each of the 5 questions generated a maximum score of 100, leading to a total possible IBS-SS of 500. The IBS-SS scale ranges from 0 to 500. A higher score indicated greater severity. | The ITT Analysis Set included all randomized participants. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies only the participants with available data that were analyzed for the outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Baseline; Day 29 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in the IBS Global Scale (IBS-GS) at Day 29 Compared to Baseline (Averaged Over the Week Prior to Each Respective Time Point) | To evaluate the treatment effect of BOS-589 on IBS related signs and symptoms. Participants were asked to record daily their overall diarrhea-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-D) global symptoms in the prior 24 hours. The participant-reported daily IBS-GS was based on a 0 to 4 scale where: 0 corresponded to no symptoms; 1 corresponded to mild symptoms; 2 corresponded to moderate symptoms; 3 corresponded to severe symptoms; and 4 corresponded to very severe symptoms. Higher scores indicated severe symptoms. | The ITT Analysis Set included all randomized participants. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies only the participants with available data that were analyzed for the outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Baseline; Day 29 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for BOS-589 | To evaluate the steady state pharmacokinetics (PK) of BOS-589. | The PK population included all participants who took any amount of BOS-589 and had sufficient concentration time data to report at least a maximum concentration (Cmax). Here, number analyzed in each row signifies only the participants with available data that were analyzed for that day. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | pg/mL | Day 1, Day 15 and Day 22 at pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) for BOS-589 | To evaluate the steady state PK of BOS-589. | The PK population included all participants who took any amount of BOS-589 and had sufficient concentration time data to report at least a maximum concentration (Cmax). Here, number analyzed in each row signifies only the participants with available data that were analyzed for that day. | Posted | Median | Full Range | Hour | Day 1, Day 15 and Day 22 at pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Area Under the Concentration-versus-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to 4 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-4) for BOS-589 | To evaluate the steady state PK of BOS-589. | The PK population included all participants who took any amount of BOS-589 and had sufficient concentration time data to report at least a maximum concentration (Cmax). Here, number analyzed in each row signifies only the participants with available data that were analyzed for that day. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | h*pg/mL | Day 1, Day 15 and Day 22 at pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | AUC From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t) for BOS-589 | To evaluate the steady state PK of BOS-589. | The PK population included all participants who took any amount of BOS-589 and had sufficient concentration time data to report at least a maximum concentration (Cmax). Here, number analyzed in each row signifies only the participants with available data that were analyzed for that day. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | h*pg/mL | Day 1, Day 15 and Day 22 at pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose |
|
|
Up to Day 43/end-of-study follow up visit
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | High Dose of BOS-589 | Randomized participants received a high dose of BOS-589 tablets orally BID. | 0 | 43 | 0 | 43 | 23 | 43 |
| EG001 | Low Dose of BOS-589 | Randomized participants received a low dose of BOS-589 tablets orally BID. | 0 | 48 | 0 | 48 | 23 | 48 |
| EG002 | Placebo | Randomized participants received matching placebo tablets orally BID. | 0 | 42 | 0 | 42 | 15 | 42 |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis viral | Infections and infestations | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atypical pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vulvovaginal candidiasis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal distension | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Flatulence | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Food poisoning | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal discomfort | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal rigidity | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aphthous ulcer | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry mouth | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrointestinal sounds abnormal | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Toothache | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Migraine | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neuropathy peripheral | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Paraesthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ligament sprain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Post procedural contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tooth fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wound | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Flank pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle spasms | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal chest pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rhinorrhoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Throat irritation | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Catheter site bruise | General disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Catheter site pain | General disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ecchymosis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperhidrosis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Mental status changes | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Eye irritation | Eye disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood alkaline phosphatase increased | Investigations | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| C-reactive protein increased | Investigations | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Red blood cell sedimentation rate increased | Investigations | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pollakiuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA, Version 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Craig Basson | Boston Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | (617) 655-9681 | clinicaltrials@bostonpharmaceuticals.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Nov 12, 2020 | Apr 29, 2021 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D043183 | Irritable Bowel Syndrome |
| D003967 | Diarrhea |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003109 | Colonic Diseases, Functional |
| D003108 | Colonic Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D012817 | Signs and Symptoms, Digestive |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Statistical Analysis 2 | Mean Difference (Net) | 0.04 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.390 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.73 | 0.82 | Superiority |
| Statistical Analysis 3 | Mean Difference (Net) | -0.61 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.403 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.41 | 0.19 | Superiority |
| Statistical Analysis 4 | Mean Difference (Net) | 0.65 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.397 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.13 | 1.44 | Superiority |
|
| OG003 | Placebo | Randomized participants received matching placebo tablets orally BID. |
|
|
|
| OG003 | Placebo | Randomized participants received matching placebo tablets orally BID. |
|
|
|
| OG003 | Placebo | Randomized participants received matching placebo tablets orally BID. |
|
|
|
| OG003 | Placebo | Randomized participants received matching placebo tablets orally BID. |
|
|
|
| OG003 | Placebo | Randomized participants received matching placebo tablets orally BID. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|