Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University Ghent | OTHER |
| Het Lezerscollectief | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Research has demonstrated the positive effects of bibliotherapy (the use of reading in the treatment of patients), such as increased self-awareness, increased empathy, hope and decreased negativity. At Ghent University Hospital, 20 students from the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences were selected to be trained as readers by 'The Readers Collective', a Flemish Organization inspired by The Reader. Those students will read to patients with acute leukemia or to patients with a solid tumors in an advanced stage, using the "read aloud" method. Eight to ten reading sessions of approximately half an hour will be organized in a 1: 1 relationship between student and patient during a period of six months. The primary aim of study is to determine the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention by the patients as well as the students. Secondary aims are exploring the impact of the reading sessions on the professional development of the students and on the emotional well-being and quality of life of cancer patients. Assessment will be based upon questionnaires (as a basis for the in-depth interviews), diary notes, and in-depth interviews.
Bibliotherapy has been defined in different ways, but fundamentally means helping people through the use of books. In clinical contexts, it often refers to psychological self-help interventions that use treatment books [1]. However, other reading therapies exist, such as reading to patients during their treatment. Studies have demonstrated the positive effects of the use of reading in the treatment of patients such as increased self-awareness, empathy and hope and less negativity. The Reader, a British national charity, is the pioneer of a specific literature-based intervention i.e. shared reading. This approach is different from many reading therapies because it emphasizes on (1) reading aloud so that the book is a live presence and not an object of study (as is the case in educational settings) or a subject of chat (as in a book club) and on (2) literature (poetry and fiction) and its role in offering a model of human thinking and feeling. In the model of The Reader, small groups (2-12 people) come together weekly, to read novels, short stories and poetry together aloud. The target groups of The Reader are very diverse such as ordinary library visitors, vulnerable youth, rehabilitation groups in psychiatric hospitals, groups in prisons, prevention groups for stress and burnout, growth groups, personal etc.
This project, however, is unique in different ways. First, reading sessions will be organized in the hospital setting in a 1:1 relationship, as opposed to in small groups. Second, we will asses the possible impact of the intervention on emotional wellbeing and quality of life of patients with cancer, as well as on the student's professional development. This will be done by means of questionnaires (not as a quantitative study, but as a basis for the in-depth interview), diary notes, and an in-depth interview (student and patient separately and once together) .
The primary aim of this project is to assess the acceptability of this intervention. Specifically, this study seeks feedback on how well the reading sessions are received by the patients and the students. Secondly, we will assess if the sessions meet the needs of patients in their coping with cancer and help students in their professional development. To assess acceptability, in-depth interviews will be used and participants will be asked about their opinions regarding the reading sessions. We chose this particular interview type because it grants the interviewer flexibility to follow up with relevant questions and probes to gather richer information. The interviews will be recorded for transcription and analysis.
A call for participation for this study was made to students in Medicine and Health Sciences of Ghent University at a lecture of Jane Davis, the founder of The Reader. Students could submit their application; in total more than 50 applications were received. Three physicians (Dr. Helewaut, Dr. Pype and Dr. Kerre) independently scored the applications on the basis of motivation, background and age.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bibliotherapy | Experimental | Students will read to patients receiving active treatment using the "read aloud" method. This will be performed in a 1: 1 relationship for half an hour for 8-10 times during a period of six months. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bibliotherapy | Behavioral | Students will read to patients during 30 minutes. They will read aloud and pause regularly to encourage patients to reflect on what is being read, on the thoughts the poem or book has stirred or on how the reading matter relates to their own lives. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptability of the intervention | In-depth interview will be used to seek feedback on how well the reading session are received by the patients and the students | Interviews after six months of the first reading session |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Impact of the intervention | Impact on Quality of Life measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life C30 questionnaire, score range 0-100, 100 is better score | Questionnaires: baseline, 12 weeks and six months; |
| Impact of intervention in student by the use of in-depth interviews |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility of the intervention: Feedback based upon in-depth interviews organised | Feedback based upon in-depth interviews organised | Interviews at 12 weeks after the first reading session |
| Feasibility of the intervention by looking at number of reading sessions per dyad |
Patients
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Students:
- Student of the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences of Ghent University
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Tessa Kerre, PhD | Department of Hematology, Ghent University Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Vibbeke Kruse, PhD | Department of Medical Oncology/ Cancer Center, Ghent University Hospital | Study Chair |
| Peter Pype, PhD | Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University | Study Chair |
| Fleur Helewaut | Clinical Skills Training Centre, Ghent University | Study Chair |
| Jan Raes | Founder, Het Lezerscollectief | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent | Ghent | Oost-Vlaanderen | 9000 | Belgium |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30035795 | Background | Malibiran R, Tariman JD, Amer K. Bibliotherapy: Appraisal of Evidence for Patients Diagnosed With Cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2018 Aug 1;22(4):377-380. doi: 10.1188/18.CJON.377-380. | |
| 19263586 | Background | Davis J. Enjoying and enduring: groups reading aloud for wellbeing. Lancet. 2009 Feb 28;373(9665):714-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60426-8. No abstract available. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001638 | Bibliotherapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
| D000359 | Aftercare |
| D003266 | Continuity of Patient Care |
| D005791 | Patient Care |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Impact on professional development of students in Medicine and Health Sciences by performing in-depth interviews |
| In-depth interviews at 12 weeks and after six months of the first reading session |
| Acceptability of the intervention | In-depth interview will be used to seek feedback on how well the reading session are received by the patients and the students | Interviews after 3 months of the first reading session |
| Effect on quality of life of patients | Effect of quality of life with the McGill Quality of Life Scale, range 0-10, higher score is better score | Questionnaires: baseline, 12 weeks and six months |
| Effect on mood of patients | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, range 0-21, higher score is worse score | Questionnaires: baseline, 12 weeks and six months |
| Effect on depression of patients | Patient Health Questionnaire-9, range 0-27, higher score is worse score | Questionnaires: baseline, 12 weeks and six months |
Number of reading sessions organized |
| Six months |
| Feasibility of the intervention measured with in-depth interviews | Feedback based upon in-depth interviews organised | Interviews after six months of the first reading session |
| 30545649 | Result | Korner A, Roberts N, Steele RJ, Brosseau DC, Rosberger Z. A randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of a self-administered psycho-educational intervention for patients with cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Apr;102(4):735-741. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 3. |
| 27941097 | Result | Billington J, Farrington G, Lampropoulou S, Lingwood J, Jones A, Ledson J, McDonnell K, Duirs N, Humphreys AL. A comparative study of cognitive behavioural therapy and shared reading for chronic pain. Med Humanit. 2017 Sep;43(3):155-165. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2016-011047. Epub 2016 Dec 9. |
| D013812 |
| Therapeutics |
| D011613 | Psychotherapy |
| D004191 | Behavioral Disciplines and Activities |