Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is one of the most common musculoskeletal diseases in clinic. It usually occurs in middle-aged people, especially women. An estimated lifetime risk for KOA is approximately 40% in men and 47% in women. KOA is a chronic disease which can lead to obvious pain, joint stiffness, limitation of activity and even disability, with significant associated costs and effects on society, health systems, and individuals. Tuina therapy has been used and showed effectiveness and safety for pain relief and disability for the patients with musculoskeletal disorders for years in China. Though it is regarded that the Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) Tuina therapy is similar to the modern manual therapies, the modalities of TCM tuina therapy are different and effect maybe equal to or more better than the modern manual therapy in clinic. However, little evidence exists that Tuina benefits the KOA. The investigators will do this in a randomized, parallel, active controlled study to observe whether TCM Tuina is more beneficial to KOA than the physical manual therapy, which has been considered an effective and standard care for KOA.
Patients will be randomly allocated to one of two groups. In the Chinese Tuina group (group CTG), patients will receive the traditional Chinese Tuina therapy (including rolling, grasping, scratching, pressing, acupressure or pushing) on the basis of KOA health education and home-exercise. Patients in the Physical Manual group (group PMG) will receive the modern physical manual therapy (including joint mobilization/manipulation, manual traction, soft tissue manipulations, passive stretching, range of motion and strength training) on the basis of KOA health education and home-exercise. Assessments will be conducted at baseline and 4 and 16 weeks after randomization.
It is expected that the interventions will alleviate the sufferings of the patient. The risks of participation are minimal. Occasionally, tuina can make people feel nauseous or experience a temporary increase in pain either during or after treatment. Rare side effects happen during and after Tuina or manual treatment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese Tuina group (CTG) | Experimental | The participants in CT group will receive the traditional Chinese Tuina therapy on the basis of KOA health education and home-exercise. |
|
| Physical Manual group (PMG) | Active Comparator | The participants in PM group will receive the modern physical manual therapy on the basis of KOA health education and home-exercise. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese Tuina therapy | Other |
This group receives 8 treatments over a 3 week period with a one week follow-up on site and a 3 month follow-up by mail, phone or email. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) | Self report measure of pain, stiffness, and physical function for people with knee osteoarthritis. | Change from baseline at 4 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) | Self report measure of pain, stiffness, and physical function for people with knee osteoarthritis. | Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 16 weeks |
| Change in Numeric Knee Pain Rating Scale |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Xiyou Wang | Beijing University of Chinese Medicine affiliated Dongzhimen Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dongzhimen hospital affiliated to Bejing University of Chinese Medicine | Beijing | Beijing Municipality | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40200237 | Derived | Ma P, Liu L, Li S, Cai M, Han S, Weng Z, Chen Q, Gao Y, Zhang L, Wu G, Yang X, Zhang Y, Li D, Liu C, Sun Y, Yan S, Wang X, Yu C. Comparative effectiveness of Tuina therapy versus manual physical therapy for knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2025 Apr 8;25(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12906-025-04850-w. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| D003240 | Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Two arms recruit and evaluate the participants at the same time, and the included participants have the equal opportunity to either the Chinese Tuina or physical manual therapy groups.
Not provided
Not provided
Participants are randomly divided into Chinese Tuina group and Physical Manual group at a ratio of 1:1, only knowing that they will receive the manual therapies. The assessor, data manager and statistician will not participate in the randomized process and the treatment and share any information with each other.
|
| Physical Manual therapy | Other |
This group receives 8 treatments over a 3 week period with a one week follow-up on site and a 3 month follow-up by mail, phone or email. |
|
Subjects will rate their worst knee pain in the last 24 hours using an 11 point numeric pain rating scale with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 representing " the worst pain imaginable". |
| Change from baseline at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 16 weeks |
| Change in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) | The Patient global assessment rating is a 11 point Numeric Rating Scale in which subjects will rate the degree to which their knee condition has changed from the time treatment was initiated to the present. The subject responds to the following query: "Please rate your overall knee's condition from the time you began treatment until now." using an 11 point numeric rating scale with 0 representing "A very great deal better" and 10 representing "A very great deal worse". | Change from baseline at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 16 weeks |
| Change in 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) | The SF-12 is a generic health-related quality of life measure. | Change from baseline at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 16 weeks |
| Change in 30 second time chair rise test | Subjects will be seated with their arms crossed in front of their chest. On the command "go" subjects will stand up and sit down for as many trials as they can in a 30 second period. | Change from baseline at 4 weeks |
| Change in Timed Up and Go Test Time | On the command "go" subjects will stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, return to the chair and sit down. The time it takes to complete this task will be recorded. | Change from baseline at 4 weeks |
| Change in One Leg Standing Test | One single-leg standing was assessed balance. Test required the subject to stand with arms by his/her side.Timing was started when the subject raised one foot off the ground. Timing was stopped if the subject displaced the weight-bearing foot, touched the suspended foot to the ground, used the suspended limb to support the weight-bearing limb, or reached the maximum balance time of 30 seconds. | Change from baseline at 4 weeks |
| OARSI Responder Criteria | Responder criteria included 1) greater than or equal to 50% improvement in WOMAC pain or WOMAC function and an absolute improvement of greater than or equal to 20, or 2) improvement in at least 2 of the following 3 scores: 20% improvement in pain and absolute change ≥ 10 on WOMAC pain score, 20% improvement in pain and absolute change ≥ 10 on WOMAC function score, or moderate or greater improvement (≤ 4) on a 15 point global rating of change scale | At weeks 4 after randomisation. |
| Blinding assessment | To test whether the participants are blinded successfully, all participants will be asked to guess which kind of treatment they received. | At weeks 4 after randomisation. |
| Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire | The credibility and expectancy of participants will be measured using the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire | About 5 min after the first treatment |
| Rescue medicine | Any use of pain-killers will be ascertained. | At weeks 4, 8 and 16 after randomisation. |
| Adverse events | Adverse Event Form | At weeks 4 after randomisation. |