Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this study is to investigate the patient acceptability/preference of Respimat® compared with Handihaler® in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to demonstrate the superiority of Respimat®.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| (T1): 5μg tiotropium Respimat®, then (T2): 18μg tiotropium Handihaler® | Experimental | From Day 1 of Period 1 participants received Test treatment (T1): tiotropium Respimat® (Spiriva® Respimat®) 5 microgram (μg) once daily for a duration of 4 weeks, given as 2.5μg per puff, two puffs (2.5μg per puff) inhalation solution of tiotropium, orally via Respimat®. From Day 1 of Period 2 participants received comparator treatment(T2): tiotropium Handihaler® (Spiriva®) 18μg once daily for a duration of 4 weeks, inhalation powder tiotropium with 1 Handihaler® device. |
|
| (T2): 18μg tiotropium Handihaler®, then (T1): 5μg tiotropium Respimat® | Experimental | From Day 1 of Period 1 participants received comparator treatment (T2): tiotropium Handihaler® (Spiriva®) 18 microgram (μg) once daily for a duration of 4 weeks, inhalation powder tiotropium with 1 Handihaler® device. From Day 1 of Period 2 participants received Test treatment (T1): tiotropium Respimat® (Spiriva® Respimat®) 5 microgram (μg) once daily for a duration of 4 weeks, given as 2.5μg per puff, two puffs (2.5μg per puff) inhalation solution of tiotropium, orally via Respimat®. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiotropium Respimat® (T1) | Drug | inhalation solution |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Domain of the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) After 4 Weeks of Treatment | The score on the performance domain of the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) after 4 weeks of treatment is reported. The performance domain score is the sum of 7 questions (Q) within the domain (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q10 and Q11), the range for each question went from 1 to 7 the higher the better. The score was then transformed to a 0 (least) to 100 (most) point scale following ((Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4+Q5+Q10+Q11)/49)*100, the higher the better performance. The performance domain of PASAPQ) was analysed using Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM), with treatment and period as fixed effects, and patient as a random effect. Compound symmetry was used as a covariance structure for within-patient variation. | After 4 weeks of treatment (at week 4 and week 8) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| PASAPQ Total Score After 4 Weeks of Treatment | The total score on the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) after 4 weeks of treatment is reported. The Total score is the sum of 13 questions (Q1-Q13) and then transformed to a 0 (least) to 100 (most) point scale. This continuous secondary endpoint was analyzed using a similar MMRM model as for the primary endpoint. | After 4 weeks of treatment (at week 4 and week 8) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
All patients must have a diagnosis of COPD and must meet the following spirometric criteria at Visit 1 (Screening).
Male or female, age: ≥40 years of age
Patients must be current or ex-smokers with a smoking history of ≥ 10 pack years. (Patients who have never smoked cigarettes must be excluded).
Signed and dated written informed consent in accordance with International Council on Harmonization (ICH) ICH-GCP and local legislation prior to admission to the trial
Patients must be able to inhale medication from the Tiotropium Respimat® and Tiotropium HandiHaler®
Patients must be able to perform all study related procedures, and must be able to maintain records (patient diary) during the study period as required by the protocol
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital | Beijing | 100020 | China | |||
| China-Japan Friendship Hospital |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Related Info | View source |
Not provided
After the study is completed and the primary manuscript is accepted for publishing, researchers can use this following link https://www.mystudywindow.com/msw/datasharing to request access to the clinical study documents regarding this study, and upon a signed "Document Sharing Agreement".
Also, Researchers can use the following link https://www.mystudywindow.com/msw/datasharing to find information in order to request access to the clinical study data, for this and other listed studies, after the submission of a research proposal and according to the terms outlined in the website.
The data shared are the raw clinical study data sets.
After all regulatory activities are completed in the US and EU for the product and indication, and after the primary manuscript has been accepted for publication.
For study documents - upon signing of a 'Document Sharing Agreement'. For study data - 1. after the submission and approval of the research proposal (checks will be performed by both the independent review panel and the sponsor, including checking that the planned analysis does not compete with sponsor's publication plan); 2. and upon signing of a 'Data Sharing Agreement'.
All subjects were screened for eligibility prior to participation in the trial. Subjects attended a specialist site which ensured that they (the subjects) strictly met all inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria.
Subjects were not to be allocated to a treatment group if any of the entry criteria were violated.
This was a randomised, open-label, 2 -way cross-over design, to compare patient acceptability/preference of Tiotropium Respimat® (T1),with Tiotropium Handihaler® (T2) in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | (T1): 5μg Tiotropium Respimat®, Then (T2): 18μg Tiotropium Handihaler® | From Day 1 of Period 1 participants received Test treatment (T1): tiotropium Respimat® (Spiriva® Respimat®) 5 microgram (μg) once daily for a duration of 4 weeks, given as 2.5μg per puff, two puffs (2.5μg per puff) inhalation solution of tiotropium, orally via Respimat®. From Day 1 of Period 2 participants received comparator treatment(T2): tiotropium Handihaler® (Spiriva®) 18μg once daily for a duration of 4 weeks, inhalation powder tiotropium with 1 Handihaler® device. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Treatment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Mar 23, 2020 | Oct 21, 2022 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Tiotropium Handihaler® (T2) | Drug | Inhalation Powder |
|
| Percentage of Patients Indicating Preference at Week 8 | The percentage of patients indicating preference in the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) at week 8 is reported. The questionnaire PASAPQ is a two part questionnaire, in Part II of the PASAPQ the stand-alone question 15 (Q15) was asked for a response to indicate the preference for the trial device, it had three possible answers: "I prefer Respimat", "I prefer Handihaler", "No answer to this question " and "no preference". Chi-squared test was used to analyze proportion of patients indicating preference in the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) at week 8. | At Week 8. |
| Overall Satisfaction Question Score From PASAPQ After 4 Weeks of Treatment | The overall satisfaction question score in the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) at week 4 and 8 is reported (after 4 weeks of treatment). In Part I of the questionnaire PASAPQ: the Question 14 (Q14) asked for the overall satisfaction with the device used in the study. Q14 had Likert-type response options of 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied) and was then transformed to a 0 (least) to 100 (most) point scale (if a patient scored "x", the transfer to 0-100 scale was x/7*100). Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) was used to analyze the overall satisfaction question score, with treatment and period as fixed effects, and patient as a random effect. | At the end of 4 weeks of treatment |
| Score on Willingness to Continue at Week 8 | The score on willingness to continue in the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) at week 8 is reported. The PASAPQ is a two part questionnaire, in Part I of the questionnaire PASAPQ the Question 16 (Q16) asked for a response between 0 and 100 with 0 indicating not willing to continue using the trial device and 100 indicating definitely willingness to continue. Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) was used to analyze the score on willingness to continue, with treatment and period as fixed effects, and patient as a random effect. | At Week 8. |
| Beijing |
| 100029 |
| China |
| West China Hospital | Chengdu | 610041 | China |
| The First Afiliated Hospital, Sun Yet-sen University | Guangzhou | 510080 | China |
| First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University | Guangzhou | 510120 | China |
| Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine | Shanghai | 200025 | China |
| Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University | Shanghai | 200032 | China |
| The First Hospital of China Medical University | Shenyang | 110001 | China |
| FG001 | (T2): 18μg Tiotropium Handihaler®, Then (T1): 5μg Tiotropium Respimat® | From Day 1 of Period 1 participants received comparator treatment (T2): tiotropium Handihaler® (Spiriva®) 18 microgram (μg) once daily for a duration of 4 weeks, inhalation powder tiotropium with 1 Handihaler® device. From Day 1 of Period 2 participants received Test treatment (T1): tiotropium Respimat® (Spiriva® Respimat®) 5 microgram (μg) once daily for a duration of 4 weeks, given as 2.5μg per puff, two puffs (2.5μg per puff) inhalation solution of tiotropium, orally via Respimat®. |
|
| Treated |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Second Treatment |
|
|
Treated set (TS) is defined as all patients who were dispensed study medication and were documented to have at least one dose of investigational treatment.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | (T1): 5μg Tiotropium Respimat®, Then (T2): 18μg Tiotropium Handihaler® | From Day 1 of Period 1 participants received Test treatment (T1): tiotropium Respimat® (Spiriva® Respimat®) 5 microgram (μg) once daily for a duration of 4 weeks, given as 2.5μg per puff, two puffs (2.5μg per puff) inhalation solution of tiotropium, orally via Respimat®. From Day 1 of Period 2 participants received comparator treatment(T2): tiotropium Handihaler® (Spiriva®) 18μg once daily for a duration of 4 weeks, inhalation powder tiotropium with 1 Handihaler® device. |
| BG001 | (T2): 18μg Tiotropium Handihaler®, Then (T1): 5μg Tiotropium Respimat® | From Day 1 of Period 1 participants received comparator treatment (T2): tiotropium Handihaler® (Spiriva®) 18 microgram (μg) once daily for a duration of 4 weeks, inhalation powder tiotropium with 1 Handihaler® device. From Day 1 of Period 2 participants received Test treatment (T1): tiotropium Respimat® (Spiriva® Respimat®) 5 microgram (μg) once daily for a duration of 4 weeks, given as 2.5μg per puff, two puffs (2.5μg per puff) inhalation solution of tiotropium, orally via Respimat®. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Performance Domain of the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) After 4 Weeks of Treatment | The score on the performance domain of the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) after 4 weeks of treatment is reported. The performance domain score is the sum of 7 questions (Q) within the domain (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q10 and Q11), the range for each question went from 1 to 7 the higher the better. The score was then transformed to a 0 (least) to 100 (most) point scale following ((Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4+Q5+Q10+Q11)/49)*100, the higher the better performance. The performance domain of PASAPQ) was analysed using Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM), with treatment and period as fixed effects, and patient as a random effect. Compound symmetry was used as a covariance structure for within-patient variation. | Full analysis set (FAS) is defined as all patients who were randomized to treatment sequence and received at least one dose of one study drug and providing at least one PASAPQ score measurement. Only patients with no missing values were included for the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Scores on a scale | After 4 weeks of treatment (at week 4 and week 8) |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | PASAPQ Total Score After 4 Weeks of Treatment | The total score on the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) after 4 weeks of treatment is reported. The Total score is the sum of 13 questions (Q1-Q13) and then transformed to a 0 (least) to 100 (most) point scale. This continuous secondary endpoint was analyzed using a similar MMRM model as for the primary endpoint. | Full analysis set (FAS) is defined as all patients who were randomized to treatment sequence and received at least one dose of one study drug and providing at least one PASAPQ score measurement. Only participants with non-missing results were included in the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Scores on a scale | After 4 weeks of treatment (at week 4 and week 8) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients Indicating Preference at Week 8 | The percentage of patients indicating preference in the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) at week 8 is reported. The questionnaire PASAPQ is a two part questionnaire, in Part II of the PASAPQ the stand-alone question 15 (Q15) was asked for a response to indicate the preference for the trial device, it had three possible answers: "I prefer Respimat", "I prefer Handihaler", "No answer to this question " and "no preference". Chi-squared test was used to analyze proportion of patients indicating preference in the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) at week 8. | Full analysis set (FAS) is defined as all patients who were randomized to treatment sequence and received at least one dose of one study drug and providing at least one PASAPQ score measurement. | Posted | Number | Percentage | At Week 8. |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Overall Satisfaction Question Score From PASAPQ After 4 Weeks of Treatment | The overall satisfaction question score in the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) at week 4 and 8 is reported (after 4 weeks of treatment). In Part I of the questionnaire PASAPQ: the Question 14 (Q14) asked for the overall satisfaction with the device used in the study. Q14 had Likert-type response options of 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied) and was then transformed to a 0 (least) to 100 (most) point scale (if a patient scored "x", the transfer to 0-100 scale was x/7*100). Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) was used to analyze the overall satisfaction question score, with treatment and period as fixed effects, and patient as a random effect. | Full analysis set (FAS) is defined as all patients who were randomized to treatment sequence and received at least one dose of one study drug and providing at least one PASAPQ score measurement. Only participants with non-missing endpoints were included in the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | At the end of 4 weeks of treatment |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Score on Willingness to Continue at Week 8 | The score on willingness to continue in the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) at week 8 is reported. The PASAPQ is a two part questionnaire, in Part I of the questionnaire PASAPQ the Question 16 (Q16) asked for a response between 0 and 100 with 0 indicating not willing to continue using the trial device and 100 indicating definitely willingness to continue. Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) was used to analyze the score on willingness to continue, with treatment and period as fixed effects, and patient as a random effect. | Full analysis set (FAS) is defined as all patients who were randomized to treatment sequence and received at least one dose of one study drug and providing at least one PASAPQ score measurement. Only participants with non-missing results were included in the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Scores on a scale | At Week 8. |
|
From first treatment intake until 28 days after last treatment intake. Up to 56 days.
Treated set (TS) is defined as all patients who were dispensed study medication and were documented to have at least one dose of investigational treatment.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | (T1): 5μg Tiotropium Respimat® | Participants received Test treatment (T1): tiotropium Respimat® (Spiriva® Respimat®) 5 microgram (μg) once daily for a duration of 4 weeks, given as 2.5μg per puff, two puffs (2.5μg per puff) inhalation solution of tiotropium, orally via Respimat®. | 0 | 69 | 2 | 69 | 0 | 69 |
| EG001 | (T2): 18μg Tiotropium Handihaler® | Participants received comparator treatment (T2): tiotropium Handihaler® (Spiriva®) 18 microgram (μg) once daily for a duration of 4 weeks, inhalation powder tiotropium with 1 Handihaler® device. | 0 | 69 | 2 | 69 | 0 | 69 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foot deformity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 24.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intervertebral disc protrusion | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 24.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 24.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) acknowledges that investigators have the right to publish the study results. Investigators shall provide BI with a copy of any publication or presentation for review prior to any submission. Such review will be done with regard to proprietary information, information related to patentable inventions, medical, scientific, and statistical accuracy within 60 days. BI may request a delay of the publication in order to protect BI's intellectual property rights.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boehringer Ingelheim, Call Center | Boehringer Ingelheim | 1-800-243-0127 | clintriage.rdg@boehringer-ingelheim.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jul 14, 2021 | Oct 21, 2022 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D029424 | Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008173 | Lung Diseases, Obstructive |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D002908 | Chronic Disease |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
Participants received comparator treatment (T2): tiotropium Handihaler® (Spiriva®) 18 microgram (μg) once daily for a duration of 4 weeks, inhalation powder tiotropium with 1 Handihaler® device.
|
|
|
|
|
|