Randomized Trial Comparing Intravenous Iron Carboxymaltose, Intravenous Iron Isomaltoside and Oral Iron Sulphate for Postpartum Anemia
Randomized Trial Comparing Intravenous Iron Carboxymaltose, Intravenous Iron Isomaltoside and Oral Iron Sulphate for Postpartum Anemia
Anemia affects between 20 and 50 % of women in the postpartum period. It is associated with several adverse health consequences, such as impaired physical work capacity, deficits in cognitive function and mood, reduced immune function and reduced duration of breastfeeding. Postpartum anemia has also been shown to be a major risk factor for postpartum depression and to significantly disrupt maternal-infant interactions. Iron deficiency is the principal cause of anemia after delivery. Oral iron supplementation with ferrous sulfate has been considered the standard of care with blood transfusion reserved for more severe or symptomatic cases. In the last decade, two new intravenous iron compounds have been registered for clinical use: ferric carboxymaltose (Iroprem®) and iron isomaltoside (Monofer®). No study to date compared efficacy of iron carboxymaltose to iron isomaltoside for treatment of postpartum anemia.
The objective of the study is to compare efficacy of intravenous iron carboxymaltose to intravenous iron isomaltoside and oral iron sulphate for treatment of postpartum anemia.
RATIONALE Anemia affects between 20 and 50 % of women in the postpartum period. It is associated with several adverse health consequences, such as impaired physical work capacity, deficits in cognitive function and mood, reduced immune function and reduced duration of breastfeeding. Postpartum anemia has also been shown to be a major risk factor for postpartum depression and to significantly disrupt maternal-infant interactions.
Iron deficiency is the principal cause of anemia after delivery. Oral iron supplementation with ferrous sulfate has been considered the standard of care with blood transfusion reserved for more severe or symptomatic cases. However, efficacy of oral iron is limited by gastrointestinal side effects, patient non-adherence as well as prolonged time required to treat anemia and replenish body iron stores. Blood transfusion, on the other hand, is associated with several hazards, including transfusion of the wrong blood type, infection, anaphylaxis and lung injury.
In last decades, modern formulations of intravenous iron have emerged as safe and effective alternatives to oral iron supplementation for iron deficiency anemia management outside pregnancy. Several studies have also evaluated efficacy of intravenous iron preparations for treatment of postpartum anemia. Westad et al. reported no significant difference in hemoglobin levels at 4, 8 and 12 weeks postpartum in women receiving intravenous iron sucrose (Venofer®) compared to those receiving oral ferrous sulphate, whereas the total fatigue score was significantly improved in the intravenous iron supplementation group at weeks 4, 8 and 12. In addition, mean serum ferritin value after 4 weeks was significantly higher in the iron sucrose group. Several other authors came to similar conclusion, intravenous iron sucrose and oral ferrous sulphate were both effective in correcting peripartum anemia, although intravenous iron restored stores faster than oral iron.
In the last decade, two new intravenous iron compounds have been registered for clinical use: ferric carboxymaltose (Iroprem®) and iron isomaltoside (Monofer®). These treatments were designed to be administered in large doses by rapid intravenous injection. They have been demonstrated to be more efficacious than intravenous iron sucrose in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and in patients with chronic kidney disease. In the postpartum period, ferric carboxymaltose has been compared to oral iron supplements in four randomized trials. All reported a faster rise in hemoglobin levels compared to oral ferrous sulphate. Pfenninger et al. compared efficacy of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose with iron sucrose for the treatment of postpartum anemia in a retrospective cohort study. Both drugs offered rapid normalization of hemoglobin levels after delivery with no difference in mean daily hemoglobin increase between the groups up to 8 days after treatment. Only one randomized study to date compared intravenous ferric carboxylase to intravenous iron sucrose and oral ferrous sulphate for treatment of postpartum anemia. Radhod et al. found a significantly faster rise in hemoglobin and ferritin levels with ferric carboxylase compared to iron sucrose and ferrous sulphate in Indian women presenting with anemia after delivery. This study, like most randomized trials on efficacy of various iron treatments, focused solely on hematological biomarkers. However, iron deficiency, even without anemia, contributes significantly to fatigue experienced by women in the puerperium, and these women may benefit from iron supplementation as well. Data on patient reported outcomes associated with different iron treatments are, therefore, very much needed. Holm et al. compared the effects of single-dose intravenous iron isomaltoside to oral iron supplementation on physical fatigue in women after postpartum haemorrhage. They found significant reduction in fatigue within 12 weeks postpartum in women who received iron isomaltoside. Iron isomaltoside treatment was also associated with improved haematological and iron parameters compared to oral ferrous sulfate.
No study to date, however, compared efficacy of iron carboxymaltose to iron isomaltoside for treatment of postpartum anemia. The only head-to-head comparison between these two compounds merely examined economic aspects of each treatment, showing potential reduction of costs associated with the use of iron isomaltoside vs. iron carboxymaltose.
OBJECTIVE The objective of the study is to compare efficacy of intravenous iron carboxymaltose to intravenous iron isomaltoside and oral iron sulphate for treatment of postpartum anemia.
METHODS Single-center, randomized, open-label trial.
After signed informed consent patients will be allocated randomly in a 1:1:1 fashion into one of three groups:
The investigators will monitor blood pressure and record adverse events in all patients before and after administration of IV iron and ask all patients to report any untoward medical event at its onset.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: