Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| K01DA043652 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Emerging adults are a particularly vulnerable group for experiencing the immediate and potentially lifelong negative impacts of habitual cannabis use, and trends suggest that cannabis use disorder (CUD) will soon escalate in this population. The proposed research will combine clinical pharmacology, non-invasive brain stimulation, and neuroimaging techniques to establish the brain mechanisms of cannabinoid-impaired decision-making processes in emerging adults with CUD. Results from this project will inform CUD prevention/treatment efforts in this high-risk group and address a growing public health concern.
This mentored career development award (K01) will enable Dr. Michael J. Wesley to achieve his long-term goal of becoming an independent investigator with a clinical research program examining cannabis use disorder (CUD) in emerging adults, which is a current NIDA funding priority. Dr. Wesley is a new Assistant Professor at the University of Kentucky (UK) College of Medicine. The activities proposed in this award build on Dr. Wesley's background in neuroimaging and drug abuse research and will allow him to accomplish these specific short-term objectives: Become an expert in (1) clinical pharmacology and (2) non-invasive brain stimulation research, and enhance/develop his (3) knowledge of the responsible conduct of research, (4) skills for scientific communication and grant writing, and (5) ability to manage an independent research program. UK has numerous faculty and projects focused on drug abuse research and is an ideal environment for Dr. Wesley to successfully complete this award. Dr. Wesley has assembled a stellar mentoring team consisting of Dr. Josh Lile (Mentor), who runs a successful NIH-funded clinical pharmacology research program at UK and Drs. Mark George (Co-Mentor) and Colleen A. Hanlon of the Brain Stimulation Laboratory at the Medical University of South Carolina, Together they will guide and oversee Dr. Wesley's training in clinical pharmacology, brain stimulation, and scientific communication and grant writing. Dr. Wesley has proposed to engage in a series of formal classes, lab exchanges, and research seminars/meetings that will assist him in accomplishing the objectives of this award.
The proposed research project is novel, innovative, and rigorous. It will combine the acute administration of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main psychoactive ingredient in cannabis, with brain stimulation and neuroimaging to examine the role of the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and connected brain areas in drug-impaired decision-making processes. Specifically, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) will be used to raise or lower DLPFC functionality following the administration THC in randomized, double-blind, placebo- and sham-controlled experiments.
Aim 1 will test the hypotheses that excitatory TMS (raising DLPFC functionality) will attenuate the impairing effects of THC on study outcomes.
Aim 2 will test the hypotheses that inhibitory TMS (lowering DLPFC functionality) will enhance the impairing effects of THC on study outcomes.
Results from this project will improve the investigator's understanding of the mechanisms involved in cannabis-impaired decision-making, which will inform CUD management and address a growing public health concern.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Excitatory TMS | Experimental | Individuals assigned to this group will receive excitatory (real and sham) TMS in combination with 0, 10, and 30mg THC. |
|
| Inhibitory TMS | Experimental | Individuals assigned to this group will receive inhibitory (real and sham) TMS in combination with 0, 10, and 30mg THC. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo TMS Sham | Device | Individuals will receive placebo dose and sham TMS. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Alpha Learning Rate | In a Probabilistic Reinforcement Learning Choice (PRLC) task, two stimuli are presented and choosing either could result in a monetary reinforcer, but the reinforcement probabilities of the stimuli differ, and change throughout the task. Individuals attempt to optimize choices according to learned probabilities and track changing probabilities over time. PRLC performance allows mathematical modeling of trial-by-trial data under "real-world" uncertainty and yields computational parameters, such as the learning rate. Choice data were analyzed using a Rescorla-Wanger learning model with an alpha learning rate, beta inverse temperature, and perseveration global parameters. Model-derived learning rates are indicative of an individual's ability to learn from previous choice outcomes to update future decision-making. For this task, learning rates range from 0-1 with lower values indicative of more optimal learning. | Measure collected at 2 time points: Baseline (0HR) and Post TMS Administration (3HR) |
| Self-Report Subjective "High" | A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to measure the acute subjective effects of THC at varying doses (0mg, 10mg, 30mg). Responses are made for VAS items along a 100-unit scale anchored on the extremes by "Not At All" (0) and "Extremely" (100) with a higher score meaning more of the effect. Participants were instructed to select "Not At All" (0) for all baseline (0HR) measures. Post-TMS administration (real or sham), participant self-reported their subjective "high" on the VAS with higher values indicating a more intense sensation of "high". | Measured 2 times: Baseline (0HR) and 3 hours (3HR) after capsule administration on each drug condition (0mg, 10mg, 30mg) |
| Elasticity of Demand | Elasticity of Demand was measured by the Cannabis Purchase Task (CPT) where participants are asked how many "hits" of cannabis they would consume at 16 different price points in ascending order ($0-$140). Higher elasticity values indicate a greater sensitivity to changing price points resulting in a reduced demand for "hits" of THC at increasing price points. | Measured 2 times: Baseline (0HR) and Post-TMS (3HR) after THC administration on each drug condition (0mg, 10mg, 30mg). |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michael J Wesley, PhD | University of Kentucky | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neurobehavioral Systems Lab of the University of Kentucky College of Medicine | Lexington | Kentucky | 40507 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Forty young adults (N=40; n=20 per Experiment) aged 18-34 who report habitual cannabis use (20 or more days per month) or meet hazardous cannabis use criteria will complete the study. A 15% dropout rate is assumed. Subjects will be matched on sex, age and education. Enrollment will approximate the demographic proportions of Fayette County, KY. so we anticipate enrolling members mostly from those demographic categories.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Excitatory TMS | Combinations of active and placebo THC with real and sham excitatory TMS. Marinol: Individuals will receive 0, 10, 30mg of Marinol. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Individuals will receive real or sham excitatory TMS. |
| FG001 | Inhibitory TMS |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP_ICF | Yes | Yes | Yes | Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form | Oct 13, 2023 |
Not provided
Participants will be assigned to either excitatory or inhibitory TMS treatment arms. All individuals will receive multiple doses of oral THC (0, 10 and 30mg) and TMS (real or sham).
Not provided
Not provided
Functionality will be tested following combinations of THC and TMS will be tested in randomized, double-blind, placebo- and sham-controlled experiments.
| Marinol 10Mg Capsule TMS Sham | Drug | Individuals will receive 10mg dose and sham TMS. |
|
|
| Marinol 30Mg Capsule TMS Sham | Drug | Individuals will receive 30mg dose and sham TMS. |
|
|
| Placebo TMS Real | Device | Individuals will receive placebo and real TMS. |
|
|
| Marinol 10Mg Capsule TMS Real | Other | Individuals will receive10mg THC and real TMS. Intervention type: Other (combination device/drug intervention) |
|
|
| Marinol 30Mg Capsule TMS Real | Other | Individuals will receive 30mg THC and real TMS. Intervention type: Other (combination device/drug intervention) |
|
|
| Working Memory Performance | Working memory (WM), the ability to hold a finite amount of information for a set amount of time, is measured by the N-Back task. Here, participants were presented with a sequence of letters and must indicate when the letter currently being viewed matches the one from N steps earlier in the sequence. The load factor "N" is adjusted between 0, 1, and 2 to adjust the difficulty of the task (0-Back = no WM load, 1-Back = minimal WM load, 2-Back = greater WM load) where a higher score means better memory performance. Outcomes are reported as the Total Accuracy Percentage (Correct Choices/Total Choices) x 100% | Measured 2 times: Baseline (0HR) and Post-TMS (3HR) after THC administration on each drug condition (0mg, 10mg, 30mg). |
Combinations of active and placebo THC with real and sham inhibitory TMS. Marinol: Individuals will receive 0, 10, 30mg of Marinol. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Individuals will receive real and sham inhibitory TMS. |
| Training Session |
|
| 0mg Marinol Sham TMS |
|
| 0mg Marinol Real TMS |
|
| 10mg Marinol Sham TMS |
|
| 10mg Marinol Real TMS |
|
| 30mg Marinol Sham TMS |
|
| 30mg Marinol Real TMS |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Excitatory TMS | Combinations of THC and excitatory TMS. Marinol: Individuals will receive 0, 10, 30mg of Marinol. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Individuals will receive real and sham TMS |
| BG001 | Inhibitory TMS | Combinations of THC and inhibitory TMS. Marinol: Individuals will receive 0, 10, 30mg of Marinol. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Individuals will receive real and sham TMS |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Alpha Learning Rate | In a Probabilistic Reinforcement Learning Choice (PRLC) task, two stimuli are presented and choosing either could result in a monetary reinforcer, but the reinforcement probabilities of the stimuli differ, and change throughout the task. Individuals attempt to optimize choices according to learned probabilities and track changing probabilities over time. PRLC performance allows mathematical modeling of trial-by-trial data under "real-world" uncertainty and yields computational parameters, such as the learning rate. Choice data were analyzed using a Rescorla-Wanger learning model with an alpha learning rate, beta inverse temperature, and perseveration global parameters. Model-derived learning rates are indicative of an individual's ability to learn from previous choice outcomes to update future decision-making. For this task, learning rates range from 0-1 with lower values indicative of more optimal learning. | Of the 58 total participants assigned to the excitatory TMS condition, 15 individuals completed at least one experimental session. Of the 8 total participants assigned to the inhibitory TMS condition, 6 individuals completed at least one experimental session. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Alpha Coefficient | Measure collected at 2 time points: Baseline (0HR) and Post TMS Administration (3HR) |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Self-Report Subjective "High" | A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to measure the acute subjective effects of THC at varying doses (0mg, 10mg, 30mg). Responses are made for VAS items along a 100-unit scale anchored on the extremes by "Not At All" (0) and "Extremely" (100) with a higher score meaning more of the effect. Participants were instructed to select "Not At All" (0) for all baseline (0HR) measures. Post-TMS administration (real or sham), participant self-reported their subjective "high" on the VAS with higher values indicating a more intense sensation of "high". | Of the 58 participants assigned to the Excitatory TMS condition, as max of 14 participants had usable data from at least one experimental session. Of the 8 participants assigned to the Inhibitory TMS condition, as max of 4 participants had usable data from at least one experimental session. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a 100pt VAS scale | Measured 2 times: Baseline (0HR) and 3 hours (3HR) after capsule administration on each drug condition (0mg, 10mg, 30mg) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Elasticity of Demand | Elasticity of Demand was measured by the Cannabis Purchase Task (CPT) where participants are asked how many "hits" of cannabis they would consume at 16 different price points in ascending order ($0-$140). Higher elasticity values indicate a greater sensitivity to changing price points resulting in a reduced demand for "hits" of THC at increasing price points. | Of the 58 participants assigned to the excitatory TMS condition, 13 individuals had usable data from at least one experimental session. Of the 8 participants assigned to the excitatory TMS condition, 4 individuals had usable data from at least one experimental session. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | log(hits per dollar) | Measured 2 times: Baseline (0HR) and Post-TMS (3HR) after THC administration on each drug condition (0mg, 10mg, 30mg). |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Working Memory Performance | Working memory (WM), the ability to hold a finite amount of information for a set amount of time, is measured by the N-Back task. Here, participants were presented with a sequence of letters and must indicate when the letter currently being viewed matches the one from N steps earlier in the sequence. The load factor "N" is adjusted between 0, 1, and 2 to adjust the difficulty of the task (0-Back = no WM load, 1-Back = minimal WM load, 2-Back = greater WM load) where a higher score means better memory performance. Outcomes are reported as the Total Accuracy Percentage (Correct Choices/Total Choices) x 100% | Of the 58 participants assigned to the excitatory TMS condition, 14 individuals had usable data from at least one experimental session. Of the 8 participants assigned to the excitatory TMS condition, 4 individuals had usable data from at least one experimental session. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of correct choices | Measured 2 times: Baseline (0HR) and Post-TMS (3HR) after THC administration on each drug condition (0mg, 10mg, 30mg). |
|
1 day
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | 0mg Marinol | Marinol: Individuals will receive 0mg Marinol. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Individuals will receive either excitatory or inhibitory TMS. | 0 | 18 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 18 |
| EG001 | 10mg Marinol | Marinol: Individuals will receive 10mg Marinol. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Individuals will receive either excitatory or inhibitory TMS. | 0 | 17 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| EG002 | 30mg Marinol | Marinol: Individuals will receive 30mg Marinol. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Individuals will receive either excitatory or inhibitory TMS. | 1 | 17 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headaches | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment | The subject reported headaches attributed to the first experimental administration of TMS. Headaches are noted as potential side effects of TMS in the subject consent form, so this AE was anticipated. |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Michael J Wesley | University of Kentucky | 8593230579 | michael.wesley@uky.edu |
| Feb 2, 2024 |
| Prot_SAP_ICF_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019966 | Substance-Related Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D064419 | Chemically-Induced Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013759 | Dronabinol |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002186 | Cannabinoids |
| D013729 | Terpenes |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
Not provided
Not provided
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| 3HR 0mg Sham |
|
|
| Baseline 0mg Real |
|
|
| 3HR 0mg Real |
|
|
| Baseline 10mg Sham |
|
|
| 3HR 10mg Sham |
|
|
| Baseline 10mg Real |
|
|
| 3HR 10mg Real |
|
|
| Baseline 30mg Sham |
|
|
| 3HR 30mg Sham |
|
|
| Baseline 30mg Real |
|
|
| 3HR 30mg Real |
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| OG001 | Inhibitory TMS | Individuals assigned to this group will receive inhibitory (real and sham) TMS in combination with 0, 10, and 30mg THC. Placebo TMS Sham: Individuals will receive placebo dose and sham TMS. Marinol 10Mg Capsule TMS Sham: Individuals will receive 10mg dose and sham TMS. Marinol 30Mg Capsule TMS Sham: Individuals will receive 30mg dose and sham TMS. Placebo TMS Real: Individuals will receive placebo and real TMS. Marinol 10Mg Capsule TMS Real: Individuals will receive10mg THC and real TMS. Intervention type: Other (combination device/drug intervention) Marinol 30Mg Capsule TMS Real: Individuals will receive 30mg THC and real TMS. Intervention type: Other (combination device/drug intervention) |
|
|