Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Comparing safety, pain, user experience, healthcare economic costs, work productivity, impairment and quality of life outcomes between Axoguard® Nerve Cap and neurectomy in the treatment of symptomatic neuromas in the foot or ankle. Study consists of 86 subjects randomized between the treatment groups followed for 12 months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| AxoGuard® Nerve Cap | Active Comparator | Porcine derived extracellular matrix (ECM) based Nerve Termination Device. Excision of symptomatic neuroma of the foot or ankle with placement of Axoguard Nerve Cap over the proximal stump of the nerve. |
|
| Standard Neurectomy | Active Comparator | Standard surgical treatment for symptomatic neuroma of the foot or ankle entailing neuroma excision (without placement of Axoguard Nerve Cap). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AxoGuard® Nerve Cap | Device | Entubulation of the nerve stump into the AxoGuard® Nerve Cap following surgical excision of symptomatic neuroma |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) For Pain Score at 12 Post-operative Months in Comparative Phase Subjects | The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) For Pain is a patient reported outcomes scale whereby the patient indicates his/her current pain level by making a mark on a continuous horizontal 10-centimeter (100 millimeter) line. The distance from the 0 millimeter to the patient's mark corresponds to the amount of pain the participant is currently experiencing. VAS for Pain data are recorded as the number of millimeters from the left of the line to the patients mark across the range of 0-100 millimeters, with 0 millimeter representing "no pain" and 100 millimeters representing "the worst pain imaginable". | 12 months |
| The Rate of Procedure- or Device-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Through 3 Months | The primary safety endpoint will compare the rate of SAEs related to the procedure or device between treatment groups. The rate of serious adverse events for a given timepoint is given as the number of participants with one or more events up to that timepoint out of the population at risk. | 3 months |
| The Rate of Procedure- or Device-related Adverse Events (AEs) or Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects (UADEs) Through 3 Months | The primary safety endpoint will compare the rate of procedure- or device-related AEs or UADEs between treatment groups. The rate of events or effects for a given timepoint is given as the number of participants with one or more events up to that timepoint out of the population at risk. | 3 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The Change From Baseline of Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Pain Behavior Scale Score at Month 12 | The Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) - Pain Related Measures is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors a patient's physical health and pain. The PROMIS - pain related measures include domains evaluating fatigue, pain intensity, paint interference, sleep Disturbance, and Pain Behavior. Short forms containing fixed sets of 4-10 items or questions are included for each domain. All PROMIS scores are presented as T-scores where the T-score is the standardized score with a mean of 50 (range 20-80) and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate more of the concept being measures where sometimes the concept is desirable (e.g., physical function) and sometimes this it is undesirable (e.g., fatigue). PROMIS instruments are scored using item-level calibrations based on response patterns by HealthMeasures Scoring Service. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria (Potential Subjects must):
Be able and willing to provide documented informed consent prior to the conduct of any study procedures;
Be an adult male or non-pregnant female ≥ 18 years of age;
Report baseline pain scores of >65mm on a 100mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at screening;
Have a documented diagnosis of symptomatic neuroma of at least one interdigital nerve in the foot which cannot be repaired to a distal nerve end;
Must have the of the following:
Must have at least 1:
Be candidates indicated for surgery to address a symptomatic neuroma;
Have sufficient healthy soft tissue available to adequately cover the Axoguard® Nerve Cap;
In the surgeon's opinion, be likely to achieve complete resection of the symptomatic neuroma and be able to undergo implantation with the Axoguard® Nerve Cap or complete the neurotomy procedure in the control group;
Be willing and able to comply with all aspects of the treatment and evaluation schedule over a 12-month duration.
Exclusion Criteria (Potential Subjects must not):
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Hope Podiatry Group | Los Angeles | California | 90063 | United States | ||
| Anastasia Medical Group |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | AxoGuard® Nerve Cap | Excision of symptomatic neuroma of the foot or ankle with placement of Axoguard Nerve Cap over the proximal stump of the nerve. |
| FG001 | Standard Neurectomy |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Mar 1, 2021 | Oct 29, 2024 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Standard Neurectomy | Procedure | Surgical excision of symptomatic neuroma |
|
| 12 months |
| Change in Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) General Foot Health Scale at 12 Post-operative Months Compared to Baseline. | The Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) measures foot health related to quality of life based on responsiveness in overall foot health status in 4 subscale areas (foot function, foot health, footwear and foot pain). The FHSQ is comprised of 13 questions. The questionnaire is self-administered. Subscale ratings are summed and the FHSQ score is reported as 0 (poorest state of foot health) to 100 (optimal foot health) with higher scores reflecting better foot health and quality of life. | 12 months |
| As-Prescribed Opioid Medication | Change from pre-operative baseline in quantity of pain medication prescribed via morphine milligram equivalent (MME) at 12 months Opioid pain medications prescribed were converted to morphine milligram equivalent (MME) where such conversions are available to summarize pain medications by quantity of use. | 12 Months |
| As-Taken Medication | Change from baseline in average daily quantity of pain medication taken via the Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) at 12 months. A daily pain medication log was provided to each participant to take home and complete each day and was collected at all visits. For opioid and non-opioid pain medications, the Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) Version III is a validated tool used to quantify the complexity and detriment of pain medication regimens. It calculates a single numeric value by combining medication detriment weights (ranging from 1.1 to 4.5) with dosage levels (scaled from 1 for subtherapeutic use to 4 for supratherapeutic use). A higher MQS score indicates greater potential medication detriment and/or dosage intensity. At 12 months, the study assessed changes from baseline in patients' average daily MQS scores. | 12 Months |
| Rate of Recurrence of Symptomatic Neuroma | Symptomatic neuroma recurrence was defined as:
Participants experiencing all three of the criteria were determined to have symptomatic neuroma recurrence. | 12 Months |
| Total Reported Pain From Baseline to 12 Months | Total pain experienced by participants over the course of study follow-up was calculated from the area under the curve (AUC) of daily pain log scores reported on a 0-10 numerical rating scale. An AUC value was calculated for each participant and normalized to the total possible AUC based on the number of log entries reported for that participant. The AUC scores are reported as a proportion of the total possible AUC (on a scale of 0-1) for a participant and difference in mean treatment group values tested by a t-test. | 12 Months |
| The Rate of Procedure- or Device-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Through 6 Months | The secondary safety endpoint will compare the rate of procedure- or device-related SAEs between treatment groups. The rate of serious adverse events for a given timepoint is given as the number of participants with one or more events up to that timepoint out of the population at risk. | 6 Months |
| The Rate of Procedure- or Device-related Adverse Events (AEs) or Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects (UADEs) Through 6 Months | The secondary safety endpoint will compare the rate of procedure- or device-related AEs or UADEs between treatment groups. The rate of events or effects for a given timepoint is given as the number of participants with one or more events up to that timepoint out of the population at risk. | 6 Months |
| The Rate of Procedure- or Device-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Through 9 Months | The secondary safety endpoint will compare the rate of procedure- or device-related SAEs between treatment groups. The rate of serious adverse events for a given timepoint is given as the number of participants with one or more events up to that timepoint out of the population at risk. | 9 Months |
| The Rate of Procedure- or Device-related Adverse Events (AEs) or Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects (UADEs) Through 9 Months | The secondary safety endpoint will compare the rate of procedure- or device-related AEs or UADEs between treatment groups. The rate of events or effects for a given timepoint is given as the number of participants with one or more events up to that timepoint out of the population at risk. | 9 Months |
| The Rate of Procedure- or Device-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Through 12 Months | The secondary safety endpoint will compare the rate of procedure- or device-related SAEs between treatment groups. The rate of serious adverse events for a given timepoint is given as the number of participants with one or more events up to that timepoint out of the population at risk. | 12 Months |
| The Rate of Procedure- or Device-related Adverse Events (AEs) or Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects (UADEs) Through 12 Months | The secondary safety endpoint will compare the rate of procedure- or device-related AEs or UADEs between treatment groups. The rate of events or effects for a given timepoint is given as the number of participants with one or more events up to that timepoint out of the population at risk. | 12 Months |
| Saint Augustine |
| Florida |
| 32080 |
| United States |
| EHI Clinical Research | Roswell | Georgia | 30076 | United States |
| Gateway Clinical Trials | O'Fallon | Illinois | 62269 | United States |
| OrthoIllinois | Rockford | Illinois | 61107 | United States |
| Foot and Ankle Center of Illinois | Springfield | Illinois | 62704 | United States |
| The Ohio State University | Columbus | Ohio | 43210 | United States |
| Austin Foot and Ankle Specialists | Austin | Texas | 78746 | United States |
| Complete Foot and Ankle Care of North Texas | Denton | Texas | 76210 | United States |
| JPS Health Network | Fort Worth | Texas | 76104 | United States |
| Foot & Ankle Institute | St. George | Utah | 84770 | United States |
Standard surgical treatment for symptomatic neuroma of the foot or ankle entailing neuroma excision (without placement of Axoguard Nerve Cap).
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, participants that completed at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy. Analysis was based on the treatment as received.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | AxoGuard® Nerve Cap | Excision of symptomatic neuroma of the foot or ankle with placement of Axoguard Nerve Cap over the proximal stump of the nerve. |
| BG001 | Standard Neurectomy | Standard surgical treatment for symptomatic neuroma of the foot or ankle entailing neuroma excision (without placement of Axoguard Nerve Cap). |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) For Pain Score at 12 Post-operative Months in Comparative Phase Subjects | The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) For Pain is a patient reported outcomes scale whereby the patient indicates his/her current pain level by making a mark on a continuous horizontal 10-centimeter (100 millimeter) line. The distance from the 0 millimeter to the patient's mark corresponds to the amount of pain the participant is currently experiencing. VAS for Pain data are recorded as the number of millimeters from the left of the line to the patients mark across the range of 0-100 millimeters, with 0 millimeter representing "no pain" and 100 millimeters representing "the worst pain imaginable". | Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, including all participants who were randomized, received the study device or underwent neurectomy, and completed at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy. Analysis is based on treatment as randomized. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Millimeters (mm) | 12 months |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | The Rate of Procedure- or Device-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Through 3 Months | The primary safety endpoint will compare the rate of SAEs related to the procedure or device between treatment groups. The rate of serious adverse events for a given timepoint is given as the number of participants with one or more events up to that timepoint out of the population at risk. | This is the safety population (SP) which includes all participants who had the study device inserted or underwent neurectomy. Analysis is based on treatment as received. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 3 months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | The Rate of Procedure- or Device-related Adverse Events (AEs) or Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects (UADEs) Through 3 Months | The primary safety endpoint will compare the rate of procedure- or device-related AEs or UADEs between treatment groups. The rate of events or effects for a given timepoint is given as the number of participants with one or more events up to that timepoint out of the population at risk. | This is the safety population (SP) which includes all participants who had the study device inserted or underwent neurectomy. Analysis is based on treatment as received. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 3 months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | The Change From Baseline of Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Pain Behavior Scale Score at Month 12 | The Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) - Pain Related Measures is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors a patient's physical health and pain. The PROMIS - pain related measures include domains evaluating fatigue, pain intensity, paint interference, sleep Disturbance, and Pain Behavior. Short forms containing fixed sets of 4-10 items or questions are included for each domain. All PROMIS scores are presented as T-scores where the T-score is the standardized score with a mean of 50 (range 20-80) and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate more of the concept being measures where sometimes the concept is desirable (e.g., physical function) and sometimes this it is undesirable (e.g., fatigue). PROMIS instruments are scored using item-level calibrations based on response patterns by HealthMeasures Scoring Service. | Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, participants that completed at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy. Analysis is based on the treatment as received. | Posted | Mean | Inter-Quartile Range | Pain Behavior Scale Score | 12 months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) General Foot Health Scale at 12 Post-operative Months Compared to Baseline. | The Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) measures foot health related to quality of life based on responsiveness in overall foot health status in 4 subscale areas (foot function, foot health, footwear and foot pain). The FHSQ is comprised of 13 questions. The questionnaire is self-administered. Subscale ratings are summed and the FHSQ score is reported as 0 (poorest state of foot health) to 100 (optimal foot health) with higher scores reflecting better foot health and quality of life. | Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, participants that completed at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy. Analysis is based on the treatment as received. | Posted | Mean | Inter-Quartile Range | FHSQ Score | 12 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | As-Prescribed Opioid Medication | Change from pre-operative baseline in quantity of pain medication prescribed via morphine milligram equivalent (MME) at 12 months Opioid pain medications prescribed were converted to morphine milligram equivalent (MME) where such conversions are available to summarize pain medications by quantity of use. | Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, participants that completed at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy. Analysis is based on the treatment as received. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | Morphine Milligram Equivalent | 12 Months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | As-Taken Medication | Change from baseline in average daily quantity of pain medication taken via the Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) at 12 months. A daily pain medication log was provided to each participant to take home and complete each day and was collected at all visits. For opioid and non-opioid pain medications, the Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) Version III is a validated tool used to quantify the complexity and detriment of pain medication regimens. It calculates a single numeric value by combining medication detriment weights (ranging from 1.1 to 4.5) with dosage levels (scaled from 1 for subtherapeutic use to 4 for supratherapeutic use). A higher MQS score indicates greater potential medication detriment and/or dosage intensity. At 12 months, the study assessed changes from baseline in patients' average daily MQS scores. | Analysis population derived from modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population participants that completed at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy and reported medications in diary. Analysis was based on the treatment as received | Posted | Mean | Inter-Quartile Range | MQS Units/Day | 12 Months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Rate of Recurrence of Symptomatic Neuroma | Symptomatic neuroma recurrence was defined as:
Participants experiencing all three of the criteria were determined to have symptomatic neuroma recurrence. | Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, participants that completed at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy. Analysis is based on the treatment as received. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 12 Months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Total Reported Pain From Baseline to 12 Months | Total pain experienced by participants over the course of study follow-up was calculated from the area under the curve (AUC) of daily pain log scores reported on a 0-10 numerical rating scale. An AUC value was calculated for each participant and normalized to the total possible AUC based on the number of log entries reported for that participant. The AUC scores are reported as a proportion of the total possible AUC (on a scale of 0-1) for a participant and difference in mean treatment group values tested by a t-test. | This is the per-protocol (PP) population which includes all participants in the mITT population who have an endpoint for the analysis in question and have experienced no conditions that may confound study outcomes, such as sustaining a foot injury during study follow-up. Analysis is based on the treatment as received. | Posted | Mean | Inter-Quartile Range | Proportion of Area Under Pain*Time Curve | 12 Months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | The Rate of Procedure- or Device-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Through 6 Months | The secondary safety endpoint will compare the rate of procedure- or device-related SAEs between treatment groups. The rate of serious adverse events for a given timepoint is given as the number of participants with one or more events up to that timepoint out of the population at risk. | This is the safety population (SP) which includes all participants who had the study device inserted or underwent neurectomy. Treatment assignment is based on treatment as received. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 6 Months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | The Rate of Procedure- or Device-related Adverse Events (AEs) or Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects (UADEs) Through 6 Months | The secondary safety endpoint will compare the rate of procedure- or device-related AEs or UADEs between treatment groups. The rate of events or effects for a given timepoint is given as the number of participants with one or more events up to that timepoint out of the population at risk. | This is the safety population (SP) which includes all participants who had the study device inserted or underwent neurectomy. Analysis is based on treatment as received. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 6 Months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | The Rate of Procedure- or Device-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Through 9 Months | The secondary safety endpoint will compare the rate of procedure- or device-related SAEs between treatment groups. The rate of serious adverse events for a given timepoint is given as the number of participants with one or more events up to that timepoint out of the population at risk. | This is the safety population (SP) which includes all participants who had the study device inserted or underwent neurectomy. Treatment assignment is based on treatment as received. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 9 Months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | The Rate of Procedure- or Device-related Adverse Events (AEs) or Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects (UADEs) Through 9 Months | The secondary safety endpoint will compare the rate of procedure- or device-related AEs or UADEs between treatment groups. The rate of events or effects for a given timepoint is given as the number of participants with one or more events up to that timepoint out of the population at risk. | This is the safety population (SP) which includes all participants who had the study device inserted or underwent neurectomy. Analysis is based on treatment as received. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 9 Months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | The Rate of Procedure- or Device-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Through 12 Months | The secondary safety endpoint will compare the rate of procedure- or device-related SAEs between treatment groups. The rate of serious adverse events for a given timepoint is given as the number of participants with one or more events up to that timepoint out of the population at risk. | This is the safety population (SP) which includes all participants who had the study device inserted or underwent neurectomy. Analysis is based on treatment as received. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 12 Months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | The Rate of Procedure- or Device-related Adverse Events (AEs) or Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects (UADEs) Through 12 Months | The secondary safety endpoint will compare the rate of procedure- or device-related AEs or UADEs between treatment groups. The rate of events or effects for a given timepoint is given as the number of participants with one or more events up to that timepoint out of the population at risk. | This is the safety population (SP) which includes all participants who had the study device inserted or underwent neurectomy. Analysis is based on treatment as received. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | AxoGuard® Nerve Cap | Excision of symptomatic neuroma of the foot or ankle with placement of Axoguard Nerve Cap over the proximal stump of the nerve. | 0 | 41 | 6 | 41 | 16 | 41 |
| EG001 | Standard Neurectomy | Standard surgical treatment for symptomatic neuroma of the foot or ankle entailing neuroma excision (without placement of Axoguard Nerve Cap). | 0 | 43 | 5 | 43 | 16 | 43 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment | Determined to be unrelated to treatment |
| |
| IMPAIRED HEALING | General disorders | Systematic Assessment | Anticipated risk of a surgical procedure |
| |
| APPENDICITIS | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment | Determined to be unrelated to treatment |
| |
| COVID-19 PNEUMONIA | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment | Determined to be unrelated to treatment |
| |
| POSTOPERATIVE WOUND INFECTION | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment | Determined to be unrelated to treatment |
| |
| FOOT FRACTURE | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment | Determined to be unrelated to treatment |
| |
| HIP FRACTURE | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment | Determined to be unrelated to treatment |
| |
| ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENT | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment | Determined to be unrelated to treatment |
| |
| NEUROMA | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Systematic Assessment | Determined to be unrelated to treatment |
| |
| CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment | Determined to be unrelated to treatment |
| |
| TRANSIENT ISCHAEMIC ATTACK | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment | Determined to be unrelated to treatment |
| |
| ABORTION SPONTANEOUS | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | Systematic Assessment | Determined to be unrelated to treatment |
| |
| SKIN ULCER | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment | Determined to be unrelated to treatment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GASTROOESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| IMPAIRED GASTRIC EMPTYING | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| NODULE | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| OEDEMA | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| PERIPHERAL SWELLING | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| CELLULITIS | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| POSTOPERATIVE WOUND INFECTION | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| SINUSITIS | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| FALL | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| INCISION SITE ERYTHEMA | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| INCISION SITE PAIN | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| INTENTIONAL MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL BY PATIENT | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENT | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| STRESS FRACTURE | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| VACCINATION COMPLICATION | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| WOUND DEHISCENCE | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| ARTHRALGIA | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| ARTHRITIS | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| BURSAL FLUID ACCUMULATION | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| METATARSALGIA | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| MUSCULOSKELETAL STIFFNESS | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| PAIN IN EXTREMITY | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| PLANTAR FASCIITIS | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| TENDONITIS | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| MALIGNANT MELANOMA | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| NEUROMA | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| SKIN PAPILLOMA | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| HYPOAESTHESIA | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| NERVE COMPRESSION | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| NEURALGIA | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| NEUROPATHY PERIPHERAL | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| PARAESTHESIA | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| EXCESSIVE GRANULATION TISSUE | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| INGROWING NAIL | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| SKIN ULCER | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSION | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| HYPERTENSION | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Each study site followed their standard post-operative care instructions. Variability in surgical technique for neurectomy procedures exists across study sites. The study considered sensory nerves in the foot and ankle and may be relevant to other nerve types and anatomic locations where symptomatic neuroma treatment is similar. Recurrence of neuroma was not diagnosed in the study, and additional follow-up may identify a recurrence of neuroma in some patients.
The Sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period of at least sixty days prior to submission for publication for sponsor to review and comment. The Sponsor may extend the embargo for an additional 60 days to allow for the filing of a patent application or taking such measures Sponsor deems appropriate to establish and preserve its proprietary rights.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stacy Arnold, VP of Product Development and Clinical Research | Axogen | 770-833-2570 | sarnold@axogeninc.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Dec 5, 2023 | Oct 29, 2024 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000070607 | Morton Neuroma |
| D059348 | Peripheral Nerve Injuries |
| D010523 | Peripheral Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D020196 | Trauma, Nervous System |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D037061 | Metatarsalgia |
| D005534 | Foot Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009437 | Neuralgia |
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
|
|
|
Standard surgical treatment for symptomatic neuroma of the foot or ankle entailing neuroma excision (without placement of Axoguard Nerve Cap).
|
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|