Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This clinical trial will look at scans of the hands and wrists taken from healthy control subjects (HCs) and from subjects with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Before each scan, subjects will be given an injection of Tc 99m tilmanocept to help the scan identify inflammation in the hand and wrist joints, which can be a part of the RA disease. Data from the scans will be used to calculate a number referred to as tilmanocept uptake value (or TUV) that is a measure of how much Tc 99m tilmanocept has located in the joints. The questions this trial aims to answer are:
This trial is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, single and repeated-dose study designed to evaluate the reliability and sensitivity of TUV assessments in healthy control subjects and subjects with active RA.
This study is stratified into 3 arms. The first 2 arms, consisting of [1] disease-free HCs and [2] clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment, respectively, are designed to evaluate the image re-image and/or test re-test (i.e., repeated dose) consistency of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals.
The third arm consists of clinically-diagnosed subjects with active RA who are candidates for initiation of, or change to, a new anti-TNFα bDMARD therapy. This arm is designed to assess the efficacy of TUVglobal as an early predictor of response to the new anti-TNFα bDMARD therapy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects free of inflammatory disease | Experimental | Arm 1 includes inflammatory-disease-free HCs. Arm 1 was designed to evaluate image/re-image consistency (repeatability and stability) of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals and to collect normative HC data. |
|
| RA subjects on stable therapy | Experimental | Arm 2 includes clinically-diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment. Arm 2 was designed to evaluate image/re-image and test re-test (i.e., repeated dose) consistency of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals. |
|
| RA subjects who are candidates for initiation of a new anti-TNFα therapy | Experimental | Arm 3 includes clinically-diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment who are candidates for initiation of, or change to, new anti-TNFα therapy. Arm 3 was designed to assess the efficacy of global TUVs, obtained before and after initiation of a new anti-TNFα therapy, to predict future clinical responsiveness to the new therapy. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tc 99m tilmanocept | Drug | Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV | The camera-specific precision of TUVjoint in subjects with active RA and Healthy Controls (HCs), which is described as the Root Mean Square Difference (RMSD) between the 15-minute planar images (referred to as A and B images at 60 and 180 minutes). The RMSD is calculated as the square root of the mean squared deviation from zero. | Day 0 tilmanocept injection followed by imaging at 60 minutes (60A) and 75 minutes (60B) and at 180 minutes (180A) and 195 minutes (180B). |
| Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship | The stability of the mean/variance relationship, which is assessed by comparing the Coefficient of Variation (CV) of TUVjoint and TUVglobal in subjects with active RA and in healthy control subjects at 60 and 180 minutes. | Day 0 tilmanocept injection followed by imaging at 60 minutes and 180 minutes. |
| Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy | The Kendall rank correlation of the change in global TUV from baseline to 5 weeks (ΔTUVglobal[5w]) and response to new anti-TNFα bDMARD therapy defined by the change from baseline of CDAI to 12 ± 1 weeks and 24 ± 1 weeks (ΔCDAI12w and ΔCDAI24w).• The Kendall rank correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and response to new anti-TNFα bDMARD therapy from baseline to 12 ± 1 weeks and 24 ± 1 weeks defined by ACR Response Criteria (ΔACR12w and ΔACR24w) | Imaging (60 minutes after tilmanocept injection) on Day 0 and at 5 weeks after new therapy initiation; Assessment of CDAI and ACR Response Criteria at 12 and 24 weeks after new therapy initiation. |
| Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV | Longitudinal (8-day) variation of TUV analyzed for each DAS28 joint, defined as the root mean square deviation (RMSD) and 95% confidence interval for the RMSD for each joint at Day 0 vs Day 8 | Imaging (60 minutes after tilmanocept injection) on Day 0 and Day 8 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint | The normal range of tilmanocept uptake values (TUVs) in hand and wrist joints of healthy control subjects, expressed as the mean and standard deviation. TUV is defined as the average pixel intensity of the region of interest (hand or wrist joint) divided by the average pixel intensity of the reference region (includes the region from one wrist region of interest diameter above the wrist region of interest down to the fingertips) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
ALL SUBJECTS:
The subject has provided written informed consent with HIPAA (Health Information Portability and Accountability Act) authorization before the initiation of any study-related procedures.
ARMS 1 and 2 (only): The subject has agreed to not engage in any diet, lifestyle, or medication changes until study completion.
HEALTHY CONTROL SUBJECTS
The subject is between 18 and 80 years of age at the time of consent.
The subject is deemed to be clinically free of any inflammatory disease(s) and has not experienced joint pain for at least 28 days prior to the consent date.
The subject is not currently on anti-inflammatory drugs (including NSAIDs) and has not taken anti-inflammatories for at least 28 days prior to the consent date.
For all ongoing concomitant medications, the subject has maintained a stable dose for at least 28 days prior to the consent date.
CLINICALLY DIAGNOSED ACTIVE RA SUBJECTS:
3. The subject is at least 18 years of age and was ≥ 18 years of age at the time of RA diagnosis.
4. The subject has moderate to severe RA as determined by the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Classification Criteria (score of ≥ 6/10).
5. The subject has a 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) of ≥ 3.2 (includes the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate [ESR] test and Visual Analog Scale [VAS]).
6. Subjects receiving traditional DMARDs must have been on therapy for ≥ 90 days and at a stable dose for ≥ 30 days prior to the first imaging visit (Day 0).
7. If the subject is receiving bDMARD or janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor therapy, they have been at a stable dose > 180 days prior to the first imaging visit (Day 0).
8. If the subject is receiving NSAIDs or oral corticosteroids, the dose has been stable for > 28 days prior to first imaging visit (Day 1). The corticosteroid dose must be ≤ 10 mg/day of prednisone or an equivalent steroid dose.
9. ARM 3 (only): The subject is receiving anti-rheumatic treatment and is a candidate for initiation of, or change to, a new anti-TNFα bDMARD treatment.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Blue, MD | Navidea Biopharmaceuticals | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Imaging Endpoints | Scottsdale | Arizona | 85258 | United States | ||
| Axis Clinical Trials |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Subjects Free of Inflammatory Disease | Arm 1 comprises disease-free HCs. Arm 1 was designed to evaluate image/re-image consistency (repeatability and stability) of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals and to collect normative HC data. TC99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Feb 2, 2021 | Mar 22, 2023 |
Not provided
Not provided
This is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, single and repeated-dose study designed to evaluate the reliability and sensitivity of TUV assessments in healthy controls and subjects with active RA.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Images obtained 60 minutes after tilmanocept injection on Day 0. |
| Qualitative Evaluations of SPECT/CT as an Indication of Bone Involvement Rather Than Localization Within the Synovial Space in the Hands and Wrists of Arm 2 Subjects | Percent of Arm 2 subjects who had SPECT/CT scans who were determined to have bone involvement rather than localization within the synovial space of the hands and wrists | A SPECT/CT scan was performed at approximately 210 minutes after the tilmanocept injection on Day 8 of the trial. |
| Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy) | The correlation of the TUVglobal[baseline] and response to new anti-TNFα bDMARD therapy defined by the change from baseline (CFB) of CDAI to 12 ± 1 weeks and 24 ± 1 weeks (ΔCDAI12w and ΔCDAI24w, respectively) and by ACR Response Criteria (ACR12w and ACR24w, respectively). | Images were obtained 60 minutes after tilmanocept injection on Day 0. New anti-TNFα therapy was initiated after completion of Day 0 procedures. CDAI and ACR were assessed on Day 0 and again 12 and 24 weeks after initiation of new anti-TNFα therapy. |
| Los Angeles |
| California |
| 90036 |
| United States |
| University of California San Francisco | San Francisco | California | 94110 | United States |
| Innovation Medical Research Center | Palmetto Bay | Florida | 33157 | United States |
| Physician Research Collaboration | Lincoln | Nebraska | 68516 | United States |
| University Hospitals | Cleveland | Ohio | 44106 | United States |
| Kettering Medical Center | Kettering | Ohio | 45429 | United States |
| Central States Research | Tulsa | Oklahoma | 74136 | United States |
| Altoona Center for Clinical Research | Duncansville | Pennsylvania | 16635 | United States |
| University of Pittsburgh Medical Center | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15213 | United States |
| FG001 | RA Subjects on Stable Therapy | Arm 2 comprises clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment. Arm 2 was designed to evaluate image/re-image and test re-test (i.e., repeat dose) consistency of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals. TC99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface. |
| FG002 | Candidates for Initiation of a New Anti-TNFα Therapy | Arm 3 comprises clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment who are candidates for initiation of, or change to, new anti-TNFα therapy. Arm 3 was designed to assess the efficacy of global TUVs, obtained before and after initiation of a new anti-TNFα therapy, to predict future clinical responsiveness to the new therapy. TC99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Subjects Free of Inflammatory Disease | Arm 1 comprised disease-free HCs. Arm 1 evaluated image/re-image consistency (repeatability and stability) of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals and collect normative HC data. Tc99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface. |
| BG001 | RA Subjects on Stable Therapy | Arm 2 comprised clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment. Arm 2 evaluated image/re-image and test re-test (i.e., repeat dose) consistency of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals. Tc99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface. |
| BG002 | RA Subjects Who Are Candidates for Initiation of a New Anti-TNFα Therapy | Arm 3 comprised clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment who were candidates for new anti-TNFα therapy. Arm 3 assessed the efficacy of global TUVs, obtained before and after initiation of a new anti-TNFα therapy, to predict future clinical responsiveness to the new therapy. Tc99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Arms 1 & 2: Assess Camera-specific Precision of TUV | The camera-specific precision of TUVjoint in subjects with active RA and Healthy Controls (HCs), which is described as the Root Mean Square Difference (RMSD) between the 15-minute planar images (referred to as A and B images at 60 and 180 minutes). The RMSD is calculated as the square root of the mean squared deviation from zero. | Planned interim analysis of first 15 subjects in Arms 1 and 2 | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Pixel intensity | Day 0 tilmanocept injection followed by imaging at 60 minutes (60A) and 75 minutes (60B) and at 180 minutes (180A) and 195 minutes (180B). |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Arms 1 and 2: Stability of the Mean/Variance Relationship | The stability of the mean/variance relationship, which is assessed by comparing the Coefficient of Variation (CV) of TUVjoint and TUVglobal in subjects with active RA and in healthy control subjects at 60 and 180 minutes. | Planned interim analysis of first 15 subjects in Arms 1 and 2 | Posted | Number | Coefficient of variation | Day 0 tilmanocept injection followed by imaging at 60 minutes and 180 minutes. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Arm 3: Correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and Response to Therapy | The Kendall rank correlation of the change in global TUV from baseline to 5 weeks (ΔTUVglobal[5w]) and response to new anti-TNFα bDMARD therapy defined by the change from baseline of CDAI to 12 ± 1 weeks and 24 ± 1 weeks (ΔCDAI12w and ΔCDAI24w).• The Kendall rank correlation of ΔTUVglobal[5w] and response to new anti-TNFα bDMARD therapy from baseline to 12 ± 1 weeks and 24 ± 1 weeks defined by ACR Response Criteria (ΔACR12w and ΔACR24w) | All Arm 3 subjects with data at the specified timepoint (Week 12 or Week 24) | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Kendall rank correlation | Imaging (60 minutes after tilmanocept injection) on Day 0 and at 5 weeks after new therapy initiation; Assessment of CDAI and ACR Response Criteria at 12 and 24 weeks after new therapy initiation. |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Longitudinal (8-day) Variation of TUV | Longitudinal (8-day) variation of TUV analyzed for each DAS28 joint, defined as the root mean square deviation (RMSD) and 95% confidence interval for the RMSD for each joint at Day 0 vs Day 8 | All Arm 2 subjects with evaluable images at Days 0 and 8 | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Pixel intensity | Imaging (60 minutes after tilmanocept injection) on Day 0 and Day 8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Arm 1 Normal Ranges of TUVjoint | The normal range of tilmanocept uptake values (TUVs) in hand and wrist joints of healthy control subjects, expressed as the mean and standard deviation. TUV is defined as the average pixel intensity of the region of interest (hand or wrist joint) divided by the average pixel intensity of the reference region (includes the region from one wrist region of interest diameter above the wrist region of interest down to the fingertips) | Healthy control subjects with evaluable scans. Unevaluable scans included those with poor hand placement/positioning and low signal (overlapping with background) in most of the fingers. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Pixel intensity | Images obtained 60 minutes after tilmanocept injection on Day 0. |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Qualitative Evaluations of SPECT/CT as an Indication of Bone Involvement Rather Than Localization Within the Synovial Space in the Hands and Wrists of Arm 2 Subjects | Percent of Arm 2 subjects who had SPECT/CT scans who were determined to have bone involvement rather than localization within the synovial space of the hands and wrists | All Arm 2 subjects who received SPECT/CT scan | Posted | Number | Percent of participants | A SPECT/CT scan was performed at approximately 210 minutes after the tilmanocept injection on Day 8 of the trial. |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Arm 3 (Correlation of TUVglobal[Baseline] and Response to Therapy) | The correlation of the TUVglobal[baseline] and response to new anti-TNFα bDMARD therapy defined by the change from baseline (CFB) of CDAI to 12 ± 1 weeks and 24 ± 1 weeks (ΔCDAI12w and ΔCDAI24w, respectively) and by ACR Response Criteria (ACR12w and ACR24w, respectively). | All Arm 3 subjects with data at the specified timepoint (Week 12 or Week 24) | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Kendall rank correlation | Images were obtained 60 minutes after tilmanocept injection on Day 0. New anti-TNFα therapy was initiated after completion of Day 0 procedures. CDAI and ACR were assessed on Day 0 and again 12 and 24 weeks after initiation of new anti-TNFα therapy. |
|
|
Untoward medical events beginning on Visit 2 (Day 0) until the final visit (variable per arm) were reported as adverse events. For subjects in Arms 1 and 2, the final visit (Visit 5) occurred on Day 8 to 12. For subjects in Arm 3, the final visit (Visit 9) occurred on Week 24 to 26.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Subjects Free of Inflammatory Disease | Arm 1 included inflammatory-disease-free HCs. Arm 1 evaluated image/re-image consistency (repeatability and stability) of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals and collect normative HC data. Tc99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface. | 0 | 44 | 0 | 44 | 0 | 44 |
| EG001 | RA Subjects on Stable Therapy | Arm 2 included clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment. Arm 2 evaluated image/re-image and test re-test (i.e., repeat dose) consistency of joint-specific and global TUVs across a variety of image acquisition intervals. Tc99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface. | 0 | 41 | 0 | 41 | 8 | 41 |
| EG002 | RA Subjects Who Are Candidates for Initiation of a New Anti-TNFα Therapy | Arm 3 included clinically diagnosed RA subjects on stable treatment who were candidates for new anti-TNFα therapy. Arm 3 assessed the efficacy of global TUVs, obtained before and after initiation of a new anti-TNFα therapy, to predict future clinical responsiveness to the new therapy. Tc99m-tilmanocept: Tilmanocept is a radiotracer that accumulates in macrophages by binding to a mannose binding receptor that resides on the surface. | 0 | 31 | 2 | 31 | 9 | 31 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute coronary syndrome | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoxia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vitreous floaters | Eye disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hordeolum | Eye disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest pain | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry eye | Eye disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection site bruising | General disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Corona virus infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyponatremia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle spasms | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depressed mood | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Knee arthroplasty | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute coronary syndrome | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 22.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chief Medical Officer | Navidea Biopharmaceuticals | 614-822-2320 | mrosol@navidea.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jul 6, 2021 | Mar 22, 2023 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001172 | Arthritis, Rheumatoid |
| D004194 | Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
| D003240 | Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C431884 | technetium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid-mannosyl-dextran |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Between 18 and 65 years |
|
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Left metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B |
|
| Left metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B |
|
| Left metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B |
|
| Left proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B |
|
| Left proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B |
|
| Left proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B |
|
| Left proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B |
|
| Left proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B |
|
| Left wrist, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B |
|
| Right metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B |
|
| Right metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B |
|
| Right metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B |
|
| Right metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B |
|
| Right metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B |
|
| Right proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B |
|
| Right proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B |
|
| Right proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B |
|
| Right proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B |
|
| Right proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B |
|
| Right wrist 5, RMSD of TUV at 60 min A vs 60 min B |
|
| Left metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B |
|
| Left metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B |
|
| Left metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B |
|
| Left metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B |
|
| Left metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B |
|
| Left proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B |
|
| Left proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B |
|
| Left proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B |
|
| Left proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B |
|
| Left proximal interphalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B |
|
| Left wrist, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B |
|
| Right metacarpophalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B |
|
| Right metacarpophalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B |
|
| Right metacarpophalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B |
|
| Right metacarpophalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B |
|
| Right metacarpophalangeal 5, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B |
|
| Right proximal interphalangeal 1, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B |
|
| Right proximal interphalangeal 2, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B |
|
| Right proximal interphalangeal 3, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B |
|
| Right proximal interphalangeal 4, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B |
|
| Right wrist, RMSD of TUV at 180 min A vs 180 min B |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|