Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Tibial shaft fracture is a common injury worldwide. Their treatment, prognosis, and outcome are determined by the mechanism of injury, presence of communition, soft tissue injury and displacement. In developing countries, lack of education,socioeconomic backgrounds, delay in presentation and appropriate planning for surgery add further to complicate the situation and may end in delayed union, non-union, multiple surgeries and ultimate results in increased morbidity. This study was conducted to determine the outcome of open tibia shaft fracture treated with Ilizarov or AO External Fixator.
Tibial shaft fracture is a common injury worldwide. Their treatment, prognosis, and outcome are determined by the mechanism of injury, presence of communition, soft tissue injury and displacement. In developing countries, lack of education,socioeconomic backgrounds, delay in presentation and appropriate planning for surgery add further to complicate the situation and may end in delayed union, non-union, multiple surgeries and ultimate results in increased morbidity. This study was conducted to determine the outcome of open tibia shaft fracture treated with Ilizarov or AO External Fixator. It was retrospective Cohort study. Two groups were compared in terms of fracture healing, mechanism of injury, fracture classification, Participant's ambulation at discharge, New Injury Severity Score (NISS), duration of hospital stay, duration of fracture union, need for secondary procedures and complications. Investigators concluded that circular fixator application has favorable outcomes for Gustilo grade III open tibial shaft fractures as compared to uniplanar external fixator.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ilizarov circular frame | 46 participants with open tibia fracture Gustillo type III only |
| |
| Ex. Fix | 47 participants with open tibia fracture Gustillo type III only |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ilizarov circular frame and uni-planarexternal fixator | Procedure | both are types of external fixators, but one is circular frame and other is uni-planar frame |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| fracture healing | Radiographic union score (RUST) for tibial fractures was used. months later on non-union. | 6-9 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Union | Union was defined fracture healing after 6 months and delayed union after 9 | 6-9 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Participants with open tibia shaft fracture type III (A, B, C) as per Gustillo classification of open fractures stabilized with external fixation either circular or uniplanar external fixator were included
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Adult participants both genders presenting with open fracture of tibia specifically Gustillo type III (Severe injury).
Not allowed as per hospital policy
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013978 | Tibial Fractures |
| D005597 | Fractures, Open |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050723 | Fractures, Bone |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D007869 | Leg Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided