Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study was to examine the knowledge level regarding cardiovascular disease risk factors among participants of varying ages. Then to see if there was any type of previous education that led to greater knowledge levels.
This study used a survey tool that assessed the participants' method(s) of prior education regarding cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. Then the participant was asked eleven questions regarding CVD risk factors which tested their knowledge of those factors. Analysis was done to evaluate overall knowledge level of each group and compare the knowledge levels across age groups. Then analysis was done to see if any method(s) led to better knowledge level within and/or between age groups.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Children in grades 4 or 5 | Active Comparator | This group was comprised of participants that were in grades 4 or 5 in school. |
|
| Adolescents in grades 10 or 11 | Active Comparator | This group was comprised of participants that were in grades 10 or 11 in school. |
|
| College Age Participants | Active Comparator | This group was comprised of participants that were sophomores or juniors in college/university that were non-health career majors. |
|
| Cardiac Rehab Adults | Active Comparator | This group was comprised of participants that were adults over the age of 40 that had completed a phase II cardiac rehabilitation program. |
|
| General Adults | Active Comparator | This group was comprised of participants that were adults over the age of 40 that had never attended an outpatient cardiac rehabilitation program before. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Survey tool to assess CVD risk factor knowledge | Other | The survey tool was used to assess the participant's knowledge level and their previous methods of education regarding cardiovascular disease risk factors. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiovascular disease risk factor knowledge | How well did the participant know the risk factors for cardiovascular disease. This was determined by using a survey tool that was shown to have internal validity using Chronbach alpha score. The survey had 11 questions regarding CVD risk factors and asked the participant if they felt the statement was completely true, somewhat true, neutral, somewhat untrue, or completely untrue. Survey scores were determined out of 55 total points. | 10-15 minutes |
| Method(s) of education | What methods of education regarding CVD risk factors did the participant previously have. The participant was asked various methods of previous education. These included school for younger participants, cardiac rehab for that group, TV, media, Internet, community groups, health care provider, family member experience, or family member discussion. The were tabulated individually and then comparisons were made within and between groups for methods of education used. Then these were correlated to survey scores too. These comparisons were made with chi-square with post-hoc tests, MANOVAs, and unpaired t-tests. | 10-15 minutes |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32323174 | Derived | Bartlo P, Irion G, Voorhees J. Assessment of the Knowledge Level Regarding Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: Comparison Across Age Groups. J Community Health. 2020 Oct;45(5):1030-1037. doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00824-w. |
Not provided
Not provided
If other researchers would like to use data, non-identified results could be shared. Individual participant surveys would not be shared.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
There were five participant groups evaluated based on age groupings. These groups were compared within group and against each other.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided