Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-003065-95 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of bimekizumab administered subcutaneously (sc) compared to placebo in the treatment of subjects with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bimekizumab | Experimental | Subjects randomized to this arm will receive bimekizumab during the Double-Blind Treatment Period and the Maintenance Period. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Subjects randomized to this arm will receive placebo during the Double-Blind Treatment Period and receive bimekizumab during the Maintenance Period. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bimekizumab | Drug | Subjects will receive bimekizumab at pre-specified time-points. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 40% Response Criteria (ASAS40) Response at Week 16 | ASAS40 response was defined as relative improvements of at least 40% and absolute improvement of at least 2 units on a 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 is "not active" and 10 is "very active" in at least 3 of the 4 domains: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) assessed disease activity on a scale of 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], higher score=more disease activity, Pain assessment on a scale of 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain], higher score=more severity, Function (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)) assessed participant's level of ability on a scale of 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible], Inflammation (morning stiffness intensity and duration, mean of Q5 and Q6 of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) defined as 6 item questionnaire: measured disease activity on a scale of 0 [none] to 10 [severe], higher score=more disease activity) and no worsening at all in the remaining domain. | Week 16 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 40% Response Criteria (ASAS40) Response in TNFα Inhibitor-naïve Participants at Week 16 | ASAS40 response was defined as relative improvements of at least 40% and absolute improvement of at least 2 units on a 0 to 10 NRS, where 0 is "not active" and 10 is "very active" in at least 3 of the 4 domains: PGADA assessed disease activity on a scale of 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], higher score=more disease activity, Pain assessment on a scale of 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain], higher score=more severity, Function (BASFI) assessed participant's level of ability on a scale of 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible], Inflammation (morning stiffness intensity and duration, mean of Q5 and Q6 of BASDAI defined as 6 item questionnaire: measured disease activity on a scale of 0 [none] to 10 [severe], higher score=more disease activity) and no worsening at all in the remaining domain. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| UCB Cares | 001 844 599 2273 (UCB) | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As0011 50131 | Mesa | Arizona | 85210 | United States | ||
| As0011 50052 |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36649967 | Result | van der Heijde D, Deodhar A, Baraliakos X, Brown MA, Dobashi H, Dougados M, Elewaut D, Ellis AM, Fleurinck C, Gaffney K, Gensler LS, Haroon N, Magrey M, Maksymowych WP, Marten A, Massow U, Oortgiesen M, Poddubnyy D, Rudwaleit M, Shepherd-Smith J, Tomita T, Van den Bosch F, Vaux T, Xu H. Efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in axial spondyloarthritis: results of two parallel phase 3 randomised controlled trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Apr;82(4):515-526. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-223595. Epub 2023 Jan 17. | |
| 38599650 |
Not provided
Not provided
Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data and redacted trial documents which may include: analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a prespecified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal. This plan may change if the risk of re-identifying trial participants is determined to be too high after the trial is completed; in this case and to protect participants, individual patient-level data would not be made available.
Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion.
Qualified researchers may request access to anonymized IPD and redacted study documents which may include: raw datasets, analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, blank case report form, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a pre-specified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal.
The Participant Flow refers to the Randomized Set.
The study started to enroll study participants in April 2019 and concluded in August 2022.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo (up to Week 16) | Participants received placebo matched to bimekizumab 160 milligrams (mg) every 4 weeks (Q4W) subcutaneously until Week 16. |
| FG001 | Bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W (up to Week 16) |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Double-Blind Treatment Period:Weeks 1-16 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Feb 16, 2021 | Aug 29, 2024 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Other | Subjects will receive placebo at pre-specified time-points during the Double-Blind Treatment Period. |
|
|
| Week 16 |
| Percentage of Participants With Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 20% Response Criteria (ASAS20) Response at Week 16 | ASAS20 response was defined as relative improvements of at least 20% and absolute improvement of at least 1 unit on a 0 to 10 NRS, where 0 is "not active" and 10 is "very active" in at least 3 of the 4 domains: PGADA assessed disease activity on a scale of 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], higher score=more disease activity, Pain assessment on a scale of 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain], higher score=more severity, Function (BASFI) assessed participant's level of ability on a scale of 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible], Inflammation (morning stiffness intensity and duration, mean of Q5 and Q6 of BASDAI defined as 6 item questionnaire: measured disease activity on a scale of 0 [none] to 10 [severe], higher score=more disease activity) and no worsening at all in the remaining domain. | Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Total Score at Week 16 | BASDAI is a validated self-reported instrument, which consisted of 6 questions to measure the disease activity of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) from the participant's perspective. It measured the severity of fatigue, spinal and peripheral joint pain and swelling, enthesitis, and morning stiffness (both severity and duration). Each question was rated using a numerical rating scale from 0 (none) to 10 (very severe), higher score=high disease activity. The BASDAI score was calculated by computing the mean of questions 5 and 6 and adding it to the sum of questions 1 to 4. This score was then divided by 5. The total BASDAI score was ranged from 0=none to 10= very severe, where higher score indicated high disease activity. A negative value indicated improvement and a positive value indicated worsening. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Percentage of Participants With Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) Partial Remission (PR) at Week 16 | The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society partial remission was defined as a score of less than or equal to (<=) 2 units (on a scale of 0-10, where 0=no disease activity and 10=high disease activity) in each of the 4 domains. These 4 domains included: PGADA assessed disease activity on a scale of 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], higher score=more disease activity, Pain assessment on a scale of 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain], higher score=more severity, Function (BASFI) assessed participant's level of ability on a scale of 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible], Inflammation (morning stiffness intensity and duration, mean of Q5 and Q6 of BASDAI defined as 6 item questionnaire: measured disease activity on a scale of 0 [none] to 10 [severe], higher score=more disease activity). | Week 16 |
| Percentage of Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score Major Improvement (ASDAS-MI) at Week 16 | ASDAS-MI is achieved when there is a reduction (improvement) of greater than or equal to (>=) 2.0 in the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) relative to Baseline. ASDAS is calculated as the sum of the following components: 1) 0.121 × Total back pain (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Q2 result), 2) 0.058 × Duration of morning stiffness (BASDAI Q6 result), 3) 0.110 × Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA), 4) 0.073 × Peripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI Q3 result), 5) 0.579 × (natural logarithm of the C-reactive protein (CRP) [mg/L] + 1). Total back pain, PGADA, duration of morning stiffness, peripheral pain/swelling and fatigue are all assessed on a numerical scale (0 [no disease activity] to 10 [high disease activity] units). High ASDAS scores mean worse disease. If a participant achieves the ASDAS-MI it indicates a major improvement of their disease. | Week 16 |
| Percentage of Participants With Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 5/6 Response at Week 16 | The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 5/6 response is defined as achieving at least 20% improvement in 5 of 6 domains: PGADA assessed disease activity on a scale of 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], higher score=more disease activity, Pain assessment on a scale of 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain], higher score=more severity), Function (BASFI) assessed participant's level of ability on a scale of 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible], Inflammation (morning stiffness intensity and duration, mean of Q5 and Q6 of BASDAI defined as 6 item questionnaire: measured disease activity on a scale of 0 [none] to 10 [severe], higher score=more disease activity), spinal mobility (lateral spinal flexion) and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)]. | Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Week 16 | The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) assesses physical function in comprising 10 items relating to activities during the past week. Each item ranged from 0 ('Easy') to 10 ('Impossible'). The BASFI is the mean of the 10 scores such that the total score ranges from 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating better physical function. A negative value in BASFI change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline. The higher the negative value the better the improvement. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Spinal Pain Score Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 | Nocturnal spinal pain experienced by ankylosing spondylitis (AS) participants is measured by one question: pain in the spine at night due to AS?. When responding, the participant is to consider the average amount of pain in the preceding week. It is assessed on a numerical scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain) units. A lower score indicates less pain and a negative change represents an improvement. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) Total Score at Week 16 | The Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL), a validated disease-specific 18-item questionnaire, has been developed specifically for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in participants with ankylosing spondylitis and has shown to be responsive in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Each statement on the ASQoL is given a score of 1=Yes or 0=No. A score of "1" was given where the item was affirmed, indicating adverse quality of life. All item scores were summed to generate the total score ranging from 0 to 18 with a higher score indicating worse health-related quality of life. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline in the Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 16 | SF-36 is a 36-item HRQoL instrument with recall period of 4 weeks. Items are grouped into 8 domains: Physical Functioning (10 items), Role Physical (4 items), Bodily Pain (2 items), General Health (5 items), Vitality (4 items), Social Functioning (2 items), Role Emotional (3 items), Mental Health (5 items) and 1 item for Health Transition during last year. PCS and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores are calculated from 8 domains (excluding Health Transition item). Each of SF-36 derived raw scores range from 0 to 100; higher score = better function. PCS score is calculated from 8 domain scores. It is standardized score ranging from 7.3 to 70.1, with a mean of 50 and SD of 10 in general US population, higher values = better function, and positive change reflects improvement. A PCS score mean below 47 indicates impaired physical functioning. Individual respondent's score that falls outside T-score range of 45 to 55 are outside average general US population range. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 16 | The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Metrology Index characterizes the spinal mobility of participants with axial Spondyloarthritis (SpA) and Ankylosing Spondylitis. It is a disease-specific measure consisting of 5 clinical measures to reflect participant axial status: cervical rotation; tragus to wall distance; lateral lumbar flexion; lumbar flexion (modified Schober test); intermalleolar distance. According to the linear definition of the BASMI a score of 0 to 10 was calculated for each item based on the measurement. The mean of the 5 scores provides the total BASMI score (ranging from 0 to 10). The higher the BASMI score, the more severe the participant's limitation of movement due to their axial SpA. A negative value in BASMI change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline. The higher the negative value, the better the improvement. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline in the Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis (MASES) Index in the Subgroup of Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline at Week 16 | The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis is an index that measures the severity (ie, intensity and extent) of enthesitis through the assessment of 13 entheses (bilateral costochondral 1, costochondral 7, anterior superior iliac spine, posterior iliac spine, iliac crest and proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon sites, and the fifth lumbar vertebral body spinous process), each scored as 0 or 1 and then summed for a possible score of 0 to 13. A higher score reflects higher severity and a negative change represents an improvement. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Percentage of Participants With Enthesitis-free State at Week 16 Based on the Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Index in the Subgroup of Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline | The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis is an index that measures the severity (ie, intensity and extent) of enthesitis through the assessment of 13 entheses (bilateral costochondral 1, costochondral 7, anterior superior iliac spine, posterior iliac spine, iliac crest and proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon sites, and the fifth lumbar vertebral body spinous process) each scored as 0 or 1 and then summed for a possible score of 0 to 13. Enthesitis free state is defined as having a MASES score of 0. A higher score reflects higher severity and a negative change represents an improvement. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Study | TEAEs are defined as those AEs that have a start date on or following the first dose of study treatment through the final dose of study treatment + 140 days (covering the 20-week Safety follow up (SFU) period). TEAEs were analyzed and have been reported for Double Blind Treatment Period (Safety set),Maintenance Period (MP) (Maintenance Set) and Overall Period (Safety set) which includes all participants who received BKZ 60 mg Q4W during the study. | From Baseline (Day 1) until Safety-Follow-Up (up to Week 68) |
| Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Study | A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in 1) Death, 2) Life-threatening (Life-threatening does not include a reaction that might have caused death had it occurred in a more severe form.), 3) Significant or persistent disability/incapacity, 4) Congenital anomaly/birth defect (including that occurring in a fetus), 5) Important medical event that, based upon appropriate medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant or participant may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent 1 of the other outcomes listed in the definition of serious (Important medical events may include, but are not limited to, potential Hy's Law [see allergic bronchospasm requiring intensive treatment in an emergency room or at home, blood dyscrasias that do not result in inpatient hospitalization, or the development of drug dependency or drug abuse.)](streamdown:incomplete-link) | From Baseline (Day 1) until Safety-Follow-Up (up to Week 68) |
| Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Withdrawal From Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) During the Study | TEAEs are defined as those AEs that have a start date on or following the first dose of study treatment through the final dose of study treatment + 140 days (covering the 20-week SFU period). | From Baseline (Day 1) until Safety-Follow-Up (up to Week 68) |
| Phoenix |
| Arizona |
| 85032 |
| United States |
| As0011 50058 | Phoenix | Arizona | 85037 | United States |
| As0011 50062 | Sun City | Arizona | 85351 | United States |
| As0011 50060 | Upland | California | 91786 | United States |
| As0011 50056 | Sarasota | Florida | 34239 | United States |
| As0011 50015 | Hagerstown | Maryland | 21740 | United States |
| As0011 50016 | St Louis | Missouri | 63141 | United States |
| As0011 50054 | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73103 | United States |
| As0011 50020 | Duncansville | Pennsylvania | 16635 | United States |
| As0011 50001 | Jackson | Tennessee | 38305 | United States |
| As0011 50012 | Memphis | Tennessee | 38119 | United States |
| As0011 50057 | Dallas | Texas | 75231 | United States |
| As0011 50036 | Mesquite | Texas | 75150 | United States |
| As0011 40004 | Brussels | Belgium |
| As0011 40003 | Genk | Belgium |
| As0011 40001 | Ghent | Belgium |
| As0011 40006 | Plovdiv | Bulgaria |
| As0011 40007 | Plovdiv | Bulgaria |
| As0011 40005 | Sofia | Bulgaria |
| As0011 40008 | Sofia | Bulgaria |
| As0011 20040 | Beijing | China |
| As0011 20021 | Chengdu | China |
| As0011 20019 | Guangzhou | China |
| As0011 20034 | Hefei | China |
| As0011 20024 | Nanjing | China |
| As0011 20018 | Shanghai | China |
| As0011 20020 | Shanghai | China |
| As0011 20026 | Shanghai | China |
| As0011 20025 | Wenzhou | China |
| As0011 40011 | Brno | Czechia |
| As0011 40009 | Pardubice | Czechia |
| As0011 40013 | Prague | Czechia |
| As0011 40014 | Prague | Czechia |
| As0011 40015 | Prague | Czechia |
| As0011 40016 | Prague | Czechia |
| As0011 40010 | Uherské Hradiště | Czechia |
| As0011 40012 | Zlín | Czechia |
| As0011 40018 | Boulogne-Billancourt | France |
| As0011 40022 | Limoges | France |
| As0011 40025 | Berlin | Germany |
| As0011 40028 | Berlin | Germany |
| As0011 40029 | Hamburg | Germany |
| As0011 40024 | Hanover | Germany |
| As0011 40027 | Herne | Germany |
| As0011 40078 | Leipzig | Germany |
| As0011 40026 | Ratingen | Germany |
| As0011 40032 | Debrecen | Hungary |
| As0011 40031 | Szeged | Hungary |
| As0011 40033 | Székesfehérvár | Hungary |
| As0011 40080 | Szombathely | Hungary |
| As0011 20030 | Chūōku | Japan |
| As0011 20047 | Himeji-shi | Japan |
| As0011 20045 | Kita-gun | Japan |
| As0011 20065 | Kitakyushu | Japan |
| As0011 20037 | Osaka | Japan |
| As0011 20084 | Saga | Japan |
| As0011 20048 | Saitama | Japan |
| As0011 20031 | Sapporo | Japan |
| As0011 20042 | Sasebo | Japan |
| As0011 20032 | Suita | Japan |
| As0011 20035 | Tokyo | Japan |
| As0011 40034 | Amsterdam | Netherlands |
| As0011 40038 | Elblag | Poland |
| As0011 40042 | Krakow | Poland |
| As0011 40037 | Lublin | Poland |
| As0011 40044 | Poznan | Poland |
| As0011 40040 | Torun | Poland |
| As0011 40041 | Warsaw | Poland |
| As0011 40039 | Wroclaw | Poland |
| As0011 40043 | Wroclaw | Poland |
| As0011 40045 | A Coruña | Spain |
| As0011 40046 | Córdoba | Spain |
| As0011 40047 | Madrid | Spain |
| As0011 40048 | Santiago de Compostela | Spain |
| As0011 40049 | Seville | Spain |
| As0011 40052 | Ankara | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| As0011 40053 | Ankara | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| As0011 40050 | Istanbul | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| As0011 40057 | Edinburgh | United Kingdom |
| As0011 40056 | Leeds | United Kingdom |
| As0011 40054 | London | United Kingdom |
| As0011 40055 | Norwich | United Kingdom |
| Result |
| Navarro-Compan V, Ramiro S, Deodhar A, Mease PJ, Rudwaleit M, de la Loge C, Fleurinck C, Taieb V, Morup MF, Massow U, Kay J, Magrey M. Association of clinical response criteria and disease activity levels with axial spondyloarthritis core domains: results from two phase 3 randomised studies, BE MOBILE 1 and 2. RMD Open. 2024 Apr 10;10(2):e004040. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-004040. |
| 38834351 | Result | Dubreuil M, Navarro-Compan V, Boonen A, Gaffney K, Gensler LS, de la Loge C, Vaux T, Fleurinck C, Massow U, Taieb V, Morup MF, Deodhar A, Rudwaleit M. Improved physical functioning, sleep, work productivity and overall health-related quality of life with bimekizumab in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from two phase 3 studies. RMD Open. 2024 Jun 4;10(2):e004202. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004202. |
| 41125403 | Result | Ramiro S, Poddubnyy D, Mease PJ, Lopez-Medina C, Kim M, Massow U, Taieb V, Kragstrup TW, McGonagle D. Sustained resolution of enthesitis and peripheral arthritis over 104 weeks with bimekizumab in axial spondyloarthritis. RMD Open. 2025 Oct 22;11(4):e005969. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005969. |
| 42128532 | Derived | Navarro-Compan V, Kiltz U, Mease PJ, Dubreuil M, Gaffney K, Deodhar A, de la Loge C, Prajapati C, Kavanagh S, Marzo-Ortega H. Bimekizumab treatment for sustained improvements in patient symptoms and health-related quality of life to 3 years in axial spondyloarthritis: results from the BE MOBILE studies and their open-label extension. RMD Open. 2026 May 13;12(2):e006670. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006670. |
| 41807031 | Derived | Mease PJ, Merola JF, Magrey M, Nash P, Poddubnyy D, Lebwohl M, Bajracharya R, Ink B, Marten A, Manente M, Peterson L, White K, Gensler LS. Bimekizumab longer-term safety profile in adult patients with axial spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis: an updated analysis of six phase IIb/III clinical studies. RMD Open. 2026 Mar 10;12(1):e006174. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006174. |
| 41314667 | Derived | Marzo-Ortega H, Navarro-Compan V, Dubreuil M, Mease PJ, Magrey M, Rudwaleit M, D'Agostino MA, Gaffney K, Kay J, de la Loge C, Massow U, Taieb V, Vaux T, Deodhar A. Sustained improvements in spinal pain, morning stiffness, fatigue, sleep, physical function and overall health-related quality of life with bimekizumab in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: 2-year results from two phase 3 studies. RMD Open. 2025 Nov 28;11(4):e006013. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006013. |
| 40194794 | Derived | Mease PJ, Gensler LS, Orbai AM, Warren RB, Bajracharya R, Ink B, Marten A, Massow U, Shende V, Manente M, Peterson L, White K, Landewe R, Poddubnyy D. Long-term safety of bimekizumab in adult patients with axial spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis: pooled results from integrated phase IIb/III clinical studies. RMD Open. 2025 Apr 6;11(2):e005026. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-005026. |
| 39406403 | Derived | Navarro-Compan V, Rudwaleit M, Dubreuil M, Magrey M, Marzo-Ortega H, Mease PJ, Walsh JA, Dougados M, de la Loge C, Fleurinck C, Massow U, Vaux T, Taieb V, Deodhar A. Improved Pain, Morning Stiffness, and Fatigue With Bimekizumab in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Results From the Phase III BE MOBILE Studies. J Rheumatol. 2025 Jan 1;52(1):23-32. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2024-0223. |
| 39133438 | Derived | Cella D, de la Loge C, Fofana F, Guo S, Ellis A, Fleurinck C, Massow U, Dougados M, Navarro-Compan V, Walsh JA. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) scale in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: psychometric properties and clinically meaningful thresholds for interpretation. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Aug 12;8(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00769-x. |
| 37793792 | Derived | Baraliakos X, Deodhar A, van der Heijde D, Magrey M, Maksymowych WP, Tomita T, Xu H, Massow U, Fleurinck C, Ellis AM, Vaux T, Shepherd-Smith J, Marten A, Gensler LS. Bimekizumab treatment in patients with active axial spondyloarthritis: 52-week efficacy and safety from the randomised parallel phase 3 BE MOBILE 1 and BE MOBILE 2 studies. Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Jan 11;83(2):199-213. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224803. |
Participants received bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W subcutaneously until Week 16.
| FG002 | Bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W (Week 16 up to Week 52) | At the end of the 16-week Double-Blind Treatment Period, study participants receiving placebo were re-allocated to bimekizumab treatment at Week 16. All Participants received bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W subcutaneously from Week 16 until Week 48. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Maintenance Period: Weeks 16-52 |
|
|
Baseline Characteristics refer to the Safety Set which consisted of all randomized study participants who received at least one dose of the investigational medicinal product (IMP).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo (up to Week 16) | Participants received placebo matched to bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W subcutaneously until Week 16. |
| BG001 | Bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W (up to Week 16) | Participants received bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W subcutaneously until Week 16. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 40% Response Criteria (ASAS40) Response at Week 16 | ASAS40 response was defined as relative improvements of at least 40% and absolute improvement of at least 2 units on a 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 is "not active" and 10 is "very active" in at least 3 of the 4 domains: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) assessed disease activity on a scale of 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], higher score=more disease activity, Pain assessment on a scale of 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain], higher score=more severity, Function (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)) assessed participant's level of ability on a scale of 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible], Inflammation (morning stiffness intensity and duration, mean of Q5 and Q6 of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) defined as 6 item questionnaire: measured disease activity on a scale of 0 [none] to 10 [severe], higher score=more disease activity) and no worsening at all in the remaining domain. | The Randomized Set consisted of all randomized study participants. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 16 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 40% Response Criteria (ASAS40) Response in TNFα Inhibitor-naïve Participants at Week 16 | ASAS40 response was defined as relative improvements of at least 40% and absolute improvement of at least 2 units on a 0 to 10 NRS, where 0 is "not active" and 10 is "very active" in at least 3 of the 4 domains: PGADA assessed disease activity on a scale of 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], higher score=more disease activity, Pain assessment on a scale of 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain], higher score=more severity, Function (BASFI) assessed participant's level of ability on a scale of 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible], Inflammation (morning stiffness intensity and duration, mean of Q5 and Q6 of BASDAI defined as 6 item questionnaire: measured disease activity on a scale of 0 [none] to 10 [severe], higher score=more disease activity) and no worsening at all in the remaining domain. | The Randomized Set consisted of all randomized study participants. Here, Number of Participants Analyzed signifies those who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 16 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 20% Response Criteria (ASAS20) Response at Week 16 | ASAS20 response was defined as relative improvements of at least 20% and absolute improvement of at least 1 unit on a 0 to 10 NRS, where 0 is "not active" and 10 is "very active" in at least 3 of the 4 domains: PGADA assessed disease activity on a scale of 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], higher score=more disease activity, Pain assessment on a scale of 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain], higher score=more severity, Function (BASFI) assessed participant's level of ability on a scale of 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible], Inflammation (morning stiffness intensity and duration, mean of Q5 and Q6 of BASDAI defined as 6 item questionnaire: measured disease activity on a scale of 0 [none] to 10 [severe], higher score=more disease activity) and no worsening at all in the remaining domain. | The Randomized Set consisted of all randomized study participants. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 16 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Total Score at Week 16 | BASDAI is a validated self-reported instrument, which consisted of 6 questions to measure the disease activity of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) from the participant's perspective. It measured the severity of fatigue, spinal and peripheral joint pain and swelling, enthesitis, and morning stiffness (both severity and duration). Each question was rated using a numerical rating scale from 0 (none) to 10 (very severe), higher score=high disease activity. The BASDAI score was calculated by computing the mean of questions 5 and 6 and adding it to the sum of questions 1 to 4. This score was then divided by 5. The total BASDAI score was ranged from 0=none to 10= very severe, where higher score indicated high disease activity. A negative value indicated improvement and a positive value indicated worsening. | The Randomized Set consisted of all randomized study participants. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | scores on a scale | Baseline, Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) Partial Remission (PR) at Week 16 | The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society partial remission was defined as a score of less than or equal to (<=) 2 units (on a scale of 0-10, where 0=no disease activity and 10=high disease activity) in each of the 4 domains. These 4 domains included: PGADA assessed disease activity on a scale of 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], higher score=more disease activity, Pain assessment on a scale of 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain], higher score=more severity, Function (BASFI) assessed participant's level of ability on a scale of 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible], Inflammation (morning stiffness intensity and duration, mean of Q5 and Q6 of BASDAI defined as 6 item questionnaire: measured disease activity on a scale of 0 [none] to 10 [severe], higher score=more disease activity). | The Randomized Set consisted of all randomized study participants. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 16 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score Major Improvement (ASDAS-MI) at Week 16 | ASDAS-MI is achieved when there is a reduction (improvement) of greater than or equal to (>=) 2.0 in the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) relative to Baseline. ASDAS is calculated as the sum of the following components: 1) 0.121 × Total back pain (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Q2 result), 2) 0.058 × Duration of morning stiffness (BASDAI Q6 result), 3) 0.110 × Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA), 4) 0.073 × Peripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI Q3 result), 5) 0.579 × (natural logarithm of the C-reactive protein (CRP) [mg/L] + 1). Total back pain, PGADA, duration of morning stiffness, peripheral pain/swelling and fatigue are all assessed on a numerical scale (0 [no disease activity] to 10 [high disease activity] units). High ASDAS scores mean worse disease. If a participant achieves the ASDAS-MI it indicates a major improvement of their disease. | The Randomized Set consisted of all randomized study participants. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 16 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 5/6 Response at Week 16 | The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 5/6 response is defined as achieving at least 20% improvement in 5 of 6 domains: PGADA assessed disease activity on a scale of 0 [not active] to 10 [very active], higher score=more disease activity, Pain assessment on a scale of 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe pain], higher score=more severity), Function (BASFI) assessed participant's level of ability on a scale of 0 [easy] to 10 [impossible], Inflammation (morning stiffness intensity and duration, mean of Q5 and Q6 of BASDAI defined as 6 item questionnaire: measured disease activity on a scale of 0 [none] to 10 [severe], higher score=more disease activity), spinal mobility (lateral spinal flexion) and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)]. | The Randomized Set consisted of all randomized study participants. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 16 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Week 16 | The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) assesses physical function in comprising 10 items relating to activities during the past week. Each item ranged from 0 ('Easy') to 10 ('Impossible'). The BASFI is the mean of the 10 scores such that the total score ranges from 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating better physical function. A negative value in BASFI change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline. The higher the negative value the better the improvement. | The Randomized Set consisted of all randomized study participants. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | scores on a scale | Baseline, Week 16 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Spinal Pain Score Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16 | Nocturnal spinal pain experienced by ankylosing spondylitis (AS) participants is measured by one question: pain in the spine at night due to AS?. When responding, the participant is to consider the average amount of pain in the preceding week. It is assessed on a numerical scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain) units. A lower score indicates less pain and a negative change represents an improvement. | The Randomized Set consisted of all randomized study participants. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | scores on a scale | Baseline, Week 16 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) Total Score at Week 16 | The Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL), a validated disease-specific 18-item questionnaire, has been developed specifically for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in participants with ankylosing spondylitis and has shown to be responsive in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Each statement on the ASQoL is given a score of 1=Yes or 0=No. A score of "1" was given where the item was affirmed, indicating adverse quality of life. All item scores were summed to generate the total score ranging from 0 to 18 with a higher score indicating worse health-related quality of life. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement. | The Randomized Set consisted of all randomized study participants. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | scores on a scale | Baseline, Week 16 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 16 | SF-36 is a 36-item HRQoL instrument with recall period of 4 weeks. Items are grouped into 8 domains: Physical Functioning (10 items), Role Physical (4 items), Bodily Pain (2 items), General Health (5 items), Vitality (4 items), Social Functioning (2 items), Role Emotional (3 items), Mental Health (5 items) and 1 item for Health Transition during last year. PCS and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores are calculated from 8 domains (excluding Health Transition item). Each of SF-36 derived raw scores range from 0 to 100; higher score = better function. PCS score is calculated from 8 domain scores. It is standardized score ranging from 7.3 to 70.1, with a mean of 50 and SD of 10 in general US population, higher values = better function, and positive change reflects improvement. A PCS score mean below 47 indicates impaired physical functioning. Individual respondent's score that falls outside T-score range of 45 to 55 are outside average general US population range. | The Randomized Set consisted of all randomized study participants. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | T-score | Baseline, Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 16 | The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Metrology Index characterizes the spinal mobility of participants with axial Spondyloarthritis (SpA) and Ankylosing Spondylitis. It is a disease-specific measure consisting of 5 clinical measures to reflect participant axial status: cervical rotation; tragus to wall distance; lateral lumbar flexion; lumbar flexion (modified Schober test); intermalleolar distance. According to the linear definition of the BASMI a score of 0 to 10 was calculated for each item based on the measurement. The mean of the 5 scores provides the total BASMI score (ranging from 0 to 10). The higher the BASMI score, the more severe the participant's limitation of movement due to their axial SpA. A negative value in BASMI change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline. The higher the negative value, the better the improvement. | The Randomized Set consisted of all randomized study participants. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | scores on a scale | Baseline, Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis (MASES) Index in the Subgroup of Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline at Week 16 | The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis is an index that measures the severity (ie, intensity and extent) of enthesitis through the assessment of 13 entheses (bilateral costochondral 1, costochondral 7, anterior superior iliac spine, posterior iliac spine, iliac crest and proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon sites, and the fifth lumbar vertebral body spinous process), each scored as 0 or 1 and then summed for a possible score of 0 to 13. A higher score reflects higher severity and a negative change represents an improvement. | Subset of study participants in Randomized Set with enthesitis at Baseline. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | scores on a scale | Baseline, Week 16 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Enthesitis-free State at Week 16 Based on the Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Index in the Subgroup of Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline | The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis is an index that measures the severity (ie, intensity and extent) of enthesitis through the assessment of 13 entheses (bilateral costochondral 1, costochondral 7, anterior superior iliac spine, posterior iliac spine, iliac crest and proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon sites, and the fifth lumbar vertebral body spinous process) each scored as 0 or 1 and then summed for a possible score of 0 to 13. Enthesitis free state is defined as having a MASES score of 0. A higher score reflects higher severity and a negative change represents an improvement. | Subset of study participants in Randomized Set with enthesitis at Baseline. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Baseline, Week 16 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Study | TEAEs are defined as those AEs that have a start date on or following the first dose of study treatment through the final dose of study treatment + 140 days (covering the 20-week Safety follow up (SFU) period). TEAEs were analyzed and have been reported for Double Blind Treatment Period (Safety set),Maintenance Period (MP) (Maintenance Set) and Overall Period (Safety set) which includes all participants who received BKZ 60 mg Q4W during the study. | The Safety Set consisted of all randomized study participants who received at least one dose of the IMP. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | From Baseline (Day 1) until Safety-Follow-Up (up to Week 68) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Study | A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in 1) Death, 2) Life-threatening (Life-threatening does not include a reaction that might have caused death had it occurred in a more severe form.), 3) Significant or persistent disability/incapacity, 4) Congenital anomaly/birth defect (including that occurring in a fetus), 5) Important medical event that, based upon appropriate medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant or participant may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent 1 of the other outcomes listed in the definition of serious (Important medical events may include, but are not limited to, potential Hy's Law [see allergic bronchospasm requiring intensive treatment in an emergency room or at home, blood dyscrasias that do not result in inpatient hospitalization, or the development of drug dependency or drug abuse.)](streamdown:incomplete-link) | The Safety Set consisted of all randomized study participants who received at least one dose of the IMP. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | From Baseline (Day 1) until Safety-Follow-Up (up to Week 68) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Withdrawal From Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) During the Study | TEAEs are defined as those AEs that have a start date on or following the first dose of study treatment through the final dose of study treatment + 140 days (covering the 20-week SFU period). | The Safety Set consisted of all randomized study participants who received at least one dose of the IMP. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | From Baseline (Day 1) until Safety-Follow-Up (up to Week 68) |
|
From Baseline (Day 1) until Safety-Follow-Up (up to Week 68)
As pre-specified in SAP, Maintenance Period (MP) included adverse events of Safety follow up period for participants who did not enter the open label extension or discontinued early in MP. TEAEs were analyzed and have been reported for Double Blind Treatment Period (Safety set),MP (Maintenance Set) and Overall Period (Safety set) which includes all participants who received BKZ 60 mg Q4W during the study.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Double Blind Treatment Period (up to Week 16): Placebo | Participants received placebo matched to bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W subcutaneously until Week 16. | 0 | 111 | 1 | 111 | 16 | 111 |
| EG001 | Double Blind Treatment Period (up to Week 16): Bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W | Participants received bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W subcutaneously until Week 16. | 0 | 221 | 5 | 221 | 43 | 221 |
| EG002 | Maintenance Period (Week 16 up to Week 52): Bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W | At the end of the 16-week Double-Blind Treatment Period, study participants receiving placebo were re-allocated to bimekizumab treatment at Week 16. All Participants received bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W subcutaneously from Week 16 until Week 48. | 0 | 319 | 15 | 319 | 64 | 319 |
| EG003 | Overall Period (up to Week 48 + 20 Weeks SFU): Bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W | Participants who received bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W subcutaneously from Day 1 and participants who switched from placebo arm at Week 16 to receive bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W subcutaneously were included in this group. | 0 | 330 | 20 | 330 | 95 | 330 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goitre | Endocrine disorders | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colitis ulcerative | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Crohn's disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholelithiasis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatitis A | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Viral infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinus node dysfunction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hiatus hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ileus paralytic | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diverticulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Otitis media | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infectious pleural effusion | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Erysipelas | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Radius fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Superficial spreading melanoma stage I | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Uterine leiomyoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Suicidal ideation | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rhinoplasty | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oral Candidiasis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA v19.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCB | Cares | 001 844 599 2273 | UCBCares@ucb.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Nov 15, 2021 | Aug 29, 2024 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013167 | Spondylitis, Ankylosing |
| D000089183 | Axial Spondyloarthritis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D025242 | Spondylarthropathies |
| D025241 | Spondylarthritis |
| D013166 | Spondylitis |
| D013122 | Spinal Diseases |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D000844 | Ankylosis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D001168 | Arthritis |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000625981 | bimekizumab |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Lack of Efficacy |
|
| Adverse Event |
|
| Adverse event, serious non-fatal |
|
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Black |
|
| White |
|
| Other/Mixed |
|
| Missing |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Missing |
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| OG003 | Overall Period (up to Week 48 + 20 Weeks SFU): Bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W | Participants who received bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W subcutaneously from Day 1 and participants who switched from placebo arm at Week 16 to receive bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W subcutaneously were included in this group. |
|
|
Participants received bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W subcutaneously until Week 16.
| OG002 | Maintenance Period (Week 16 up to Week 52): Bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W | At the end of the 16-week Double-Blind Treatment Period, study participants receiving placebo were re-allocated to bimekizumab treatment at Week 16. All Participants received bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W subcutaneously from Week 16 until Week 48. |
| OG003 | Overall Period (up to Week 48 + 20 Weeks SFU): Bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W | Participants who received bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W subcutaneously from Day 1 and participants who switched from placebo arm at Week 16 to receive bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W subcutaneously were included in this group. |
|
|
| OG003 | Overall Period (up to Week 48 + 20 Weeks SFU): Bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W | Participants who received bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W subcutaneously from Day 1 and participants who switched from placebo arm at Week 16 to receive bimekizumab 160 mg Q4W subcutaneously were included in this group. |
|
|