Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This phase 3 study is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of lorecivivint injected intra-articularly (IA) into the target knee (most painful) joint of moderately to severely symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) subjects at a single dose of 0.07 mg lorecivivint per 2 mL injection. This study will utilize radiographs and patient reported outcomes (PROs) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lorecivivint.
SM04690-OA-11 was a phase 3, 56-week multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study investigating the safety, tolerability and efficacy of LOR 0.07 mg (compared with PBO) injected into the target knee joint of moderately to severely symptomatic knee OA subjects.
Patient-reported outcomes included Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) [0-10], Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), and Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of knee osteoarthritis. Joint space as measured by a positioner-assisted posterior-anterior x-ray was the radiographic outcome.
The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in target knee Pain NRS at Week 12. Secondary endpoints included change at Week 12 in WOMAC Function and PGA, as well as change in joint space at Week 52.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.07 mg lorecivivint | Experimental | One intra-articular injection of 0.07 mg lorecivivint in 2 ml vehicle |
|
| Vehicle | Placebo Comparator | One intra-articular injection of 0 mg lorecivivint in 2 ml vehicle |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lorecivivint | Drug | Healthcare professional-administered intra-articular injection; performed on Day 1 |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in OA Pain in the Target Knee (Pain NRS) | Evaluate change from baseline OA pain in the target knee as assessed by the weekly averages of daily pain numeric rating scale (NRS). The pain NRS is an 11-point scale [0-10] for subject self-reporting of average knee pain in the last 24 hours; 0 indicates no pain, and 10 represents the worst possible pain. | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in OA Pain in the Target Knee (Pain NRS) | Evaluate change from baseline OA pain in the target knee as assessed by the weekly averages of daily pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The pain NRS is an 11-point scale [0-10] for subject self-reporting of average knee pain in the last 24 hours; 0 indicates no pain, and 10 represents the worst possible pain. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Medial Joint Space Width (mJSW) in the Target Knee | Evaluate change from baseline in mJSW as documented by radiograph of the target knee | Baseline and Week 52 |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Yusuf Yazici, M.D. | Biosplice Therapeutics, Inc. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research Site | Birmingham | Alabama | 35205 | United States | ||
| Research Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39495154 | Derived | Tambiah J, Kennedy S, Swearingen C, McAlindon T, Yazici Y. Impact of structural severity on outcomes in knee osteoarthritis: an analysis of data from phase 2 and phase 3 lorecivivint clinical trials. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 May 1;64(5):2583-2590. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae610. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | 0.07 mg Lorecivivint | One intra-articular injection of 0.07 mg lorecivivint in 2 ml vehicle Lorecivivint: Healthcare professional-administered intra-articular injection; performed on Day 1 |
| FG001 | Vehicle |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Nov 5, 2019 | Jan 8, 2026 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug | Healthcare professional-administered intra-articular injection; performed on Day 1 |
|
|
| Change From Baseline in OA Pain in the Target Knee (Pain NRS) | Evaluate change from baseline OA pain in the target knee as assessed by the weekly averages of daily pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The pain NRS is an 11-point scale [0-10] for subject self-reporting of average knee pain in the last 24 hours; 0 indicates no pain, and 10 represents the worst possible pain. | Baseline and Week 52 |
| Change From Baseline in OA Function in the Target Knee (WOMAC Function) | Evaluate change from baseline OA function in the target knee as assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) physical function subscore (WOMAC Function). The WOMAC is a widely-used, proprietary outcome measurement tool used to evaluate the condition of subjects with OA of the knee and hip, including pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), and physical functioning (17 questions) of the joints. Each question is measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale from 0 (lowest pain/lowest stiffness/highest function) to 10 (highest pain/highest stiffness/lowest function). The WOMAC Function raw subscore ranges from 0 to 170, and is scaled 0 (highest overall function) to 100 (lowest overall function) for analysis and reporting. | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in OA Function in the Target Knee (WOMAC Function) | Evaluate change from baseline OA function in the target knee as assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) physical function subscore (WOMAC Function). The WOMAC is a widely-used, proprietary outcome measurement tool used to evaluate the condition of subjects with OA of the knee and hip, including pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), and physical functioning (17 questions) of the joints. Each question is measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale from 0 (lowest pain/lowest stiffness/highest function) to 10 (highest pain/highest stiffness/lowest function). The WOMAC Function raw subscore ranges from 0 to 170, and is scaled 0 (highest overall function) to 100 (lowest overall function) for analysis and reporting. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in OA Function in the Target Knee (WOMAC Function) | Evaluate change from baseline OA function in the target knee as assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) physical function subscore (WOMAC Function). The WOMAC is a widely-used, proprietary outcome measurement tool used to evaluate the condition of subjects with OA of the knee and hip, including pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), and physical functioning (17 questions) of the joints. Each question is measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale from 0 (lowest pain/lowest stiffness/highest function) to 10 (highest pain/highest stiffness/lowest function). The WOMAC Function raw subscore ranges from 0 to 170, and is scaled 0 (highest overall function) to 100 (lowest overall function) for analysis and reporting. | Baseline and Week 52 |
| Change From Baseline in OA Disease Activity (Patient Global Assessment) | Evaluate change from baseline OA disease activity as assessed by Patient Global Assessment. The Patient Global Assessment is an 11-point [0-10] Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] on which the subjects will rate how they feel their target knee OA is doing, considering all the ways in which their target knee OA may affect them. The NRS is anchored by descriptors at each end ("Very Good" on the left and "Very Bad" on the right). For analysis, Patient Global Assessment scores were scaled to [0-100], where 0 represents "Very Good" and 100 represents "Very Bad". | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in OA Disease Activity (Patient Global Assessment) | Evaluate change from baseline OA disease activity as assessed by Patient Global Assessment. The Patient Global Assessment is an 11-point [0-10] Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] on which the subjects will rate how they feel their target knee OA is doing, considering all the ways in which their target knee OA may affect them. The NRS is anchored by descriptors at each end ("Very Good" on the left and "Very Bad" on the right). For analysis, Patient Global Assessment scores were scaled to [0-100], where 0 represents "Very Good" and 100 represents "Very Bad". | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in OA Disease Activity (Patient Global Assessment) | Evaluate change from baseline OA disease activity as assessed by Patient Global Assessment. The Patient Global Assessment is an 11-point [0-10] Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] on which the subjects will rate how they feel their target knee OA is doing, considering all the ways in which their target knee OA may affect them. The NRS is anchored by descriptors at each end ("Very Good" on the left and "Very Bad" on the right). For analysis, Patient Global Assessment scores were scaled to [0-100], where 0 represents "Very Good" and 100 represents "Very Bad". | Baseline and Week 52 |
| Birmingham |
| Alabama |
| 35215 |
| United States |
| Research Site | Birmingham | Alabama | 35216 | United States |
| Research Site | Peoria | Arizona | 85381 | United States |
| Research Site | Phoenix | Arizona | 85037 | United States |
| Research Site | Tucson | Arizona | 85712 | United States |
| Research Site | Little Rock | Arkansas | 72205 | United States |
| Research Site | Anaheim | California | 92805 | United States |
| Research Site | Garden Grove | California | 92840 | United States |
| Research Site | Norco | California | 92860 | United States |
| Research Site | Pomona | California | 91767 | United States |
| Research Site | San Diego | California | 92103 | United States |
| Research Site | San Marcos | California | 92078 | United States |
| Research Site | Spring Valley | California | 91978 | United States |
| Research Site | Westminster | California | 92683 | United States |
| Research Site | Boulder | Colorado | 80301 | United States |
| Research Site | Colorado Springs | Colorado | 80918 | United States |
| Research Site | Denver | Colorado | 80209 | United States |
| Research Site | Waterbury | Connecticut | 06708 | United States |
| Research Site | Clearwater | Florida | 33761 | United States |
| Research Site | Coral Gables | Florida | 33134 | United States |
| Research Site | Hialeah | Florida | 33016 | United States |
| Research Site | Miami | Florida | 33143 | United States |
| Research Site | Miami Lakes | Florida | 33014 | United States |
| Research Site | Orlando | Florida | 32806 | United States |
| Research Site | Oviedo | Florida | 32765 | United States |
| Research Site | Port Orange | Florida | 32127 | United States |
| Research Site | Sunrise | Florida | 33351 | United States |
| Research Site | West Palm Beach | Florida | 33409 | United States |
| Research Site | Winter Haven | Florida | 33880 | United States |
| Research Site #1 | Winter Park | Florida | 32789 | United States |
| Research Site #2 | Winter Park | Florida | 32789 | United States |
| Research Site | Marietta | Georgia | 30060 | United States |
| Research Site | Newnan | Georgia | 30265 | United States |
| Research Site | Stockbridge | Georgia | 30281 | United States |
| Research Site | Woodstock | Georgia | 30189 | United States |
| Research Site | Boise | Idaho | 83713 | United States |
| Research Site | Meridian | Idaho | 83642 | United States |
| Research Site | Bloomington | Illinois | 61704 | United States |
| Research Site | Gurnee | Illinois | 60031 | United States |
| Research Site | Oak Brook | Illinois | 60523 | United States |
| Research Site | Rockford | Illinois | 61114 | United States |
| Research Site | Anderson | Indiana | 46011 | United States |
| Research Site | Evansville | Indiana | 47714 | United States |
| Research Site | Valparaiso | Indiana | 46383 | United States |
| Research Site | Kansas City | Kansas | 66160 | United States |
| Research Site | Wichita | Kansas | 67205 | United States |
| Research Site | Monroe | Louisiana | 71203 | United States |
| Research Site | New Orleans | Louisiana | 70124 | United States |
| Research Site | Wheaton | Maryland | 20902 | United States |
| Research Site | Boston | Massachusetts | 02111 | United States |
| Research Site | Bay City | Michigan | 48706 | United States |
| Research Site | Troy | Michigan | 48085 | United States |
| Research Site | Hazelwood | Missouri | 63042 | United States |
| Research Site | St Louis | Missouri | 63141 | United States |
| Research Site | La Vista | Nebraska | 68128 | United States |
| Research Site | Lincoln | Nebraska | 68516 | United States |
| Research Site | Omaha | Nebraska | 68114 | United States |
| Research Site | Albuquerque | New Mexico | 87108 | United States |
| Research Site | Great Neck | New York | 11021 | United States |
| Research Site | Hartsdale | New York | 10530 | United States |
| Research Site | New York | New York | 10016 | United States |
| Research Site 1 | New York | New York | 10021 | United States |
| Research Site 2 | New York | New York | 10021 | United States |
| Research Site | Rochester | New York | 14609 | United States |
| Research Site | Williamsville | New York | 14221 | United States |
| Research Site | Charlotte | North Carolina | 28209 | United States |
| Research Site | Leland | North Carolina | 28451 | United States |
| Research Site | Salisbury | North Carolina | 28144 | United States |
| Research Site | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27103 | United States |
| Research Site | Fargo | North Dakota | 58104 | United States |
| Research Site | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45219 | United States |
| Research Site | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45224 | United States |
| Research Site | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45242 | United States |
| Research Site | Columbus | Ohio | 43235 | United States |
| Research Site | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73103 | United States |
| Research Site | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73112 | United States |
| Research Site | Duncansville | Pennsylvania | 16635 | United States |
| Research Site | Fort Mill | South Carolina | 29707 | United States |
| Research Site | Greenville | South Carolina | 29607 | United States |
| Research Site | Greer | South Carolina | 29651 | United States |
| Research Site | Mt. Pleasant | South Carolina | 29464 | United States |
| Research Site | Rapid City | South Dakota | 57702 | United States |
| Research Site | Austin | Texas | 78745 | United States |
| Research Site | Bedford | Texas | 76021 | United States |
| Research Site | Carrollton | Texas | 75007 | United States |
| Research Site | Dallas | Texas | 75231 | United States |
| Research Site | Edinburg | Texas | 78539 | United States |
| Research Site | Houston | Texas | 77029 | United States |
| Research Site | Houston | Texas | 77055 | United States |
| Research Site | Plano | Texas | 75075 | United States |
| Research Site | San Antonio | Texas | 78215 | United States |
| Research Site | San Antonio | Texas | 78229 | United States |
| Research Site | San Antonio | Texas | 78258 | United States |
| Research Site | Draper | Utah | 84020 | United States |
| Research Site | Murray | Utah | 84123 | United States |
| Research Site | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84107 | United States |
| Research Site | Charlottesville | Virginia | 22911 | United States |
| Research Site | Richmond | Virginia | 23219 | United States |
One intra-articular injection of 0 mg lorecivivint in 2 ml vehicle
Placebo: Healthcare professional-administered intra-articular injection; performed on Day 1
| Safety Analysis Set | One participant randomized to Vehicle was mistakenly administered Lorecivivint. Safety analysis set includes all participants who received a study injection analyzed as treated. |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who received a study injection categorized as randomized.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | 0.07 mg Lorecivivint | One intra-articular injection of 0.07 mg lorecivivint in 2 ml vehicle Lorecivivint: Healthcare professional-administered intra-articular injection; performed on Day 1 |
| BG001 | Vehicle | One intra-articular injection of 0 mg lorecivivint in 2 ml vehicle Placebo: Healthcare professional-administered intra-articular injection; performed on Day 1 |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Kellgren-Lawrence Grade | Measure Description: The Kellgren and Lawrence classification system is a common method used in research of classifying the severity of knee osteoarthritis (OA) by radiograph. Kellgren-Lawrence Grade has five categories, with OA deemed present at Grade 2+: 0: definite absence of OA
| Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Osteoarthritis Symptoms Laterality | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Medial Joint Space Width | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in OA Pain in the Target Knee (Pain NRS) | Evaluate change from baseline OA pain in the target knee as assessed by the weekly averages of daily pain numeric rating scale (NRS). The pain NRS is an 11-point scale [0-10] for subject self-reporting of average knee pain in the last 24 hours; 0 indicates no pain, and 10 represents the worst possible pain. | Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized for the FAS without imputation. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline and Week 12 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in OA Pain in the Target Knee (Pain NRS) | Evaluate change from baseline OA pain in the target knee as assessed by the weekly averages of daily pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The pain NRS is an 11-point scale [0-10] for subject self-reporting of average knee pain in the last 24 hours; 0 indicates no pain, and 10 represents the worst possible pain. | Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized for the FAS without imputation. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline and Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in OA Pain in the Target Knee (Pain NRS) | Evaluate change from baseline OA pain in the target knee as assessed by the weekly averages of daily pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The pain NRS is an 11-point scale [0-10] for subject self-reporting of average knee pain in the last 24 hours; 0 indicates no pain, and 10 represents the worst possible pain. | Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized for the FAS without imputation. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline and Week 52 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in OA Function in the Target Knee (WOMAC Function) | Evaluate change from baseline OA function in the target knee as assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) physical function subscore (WOMAC Function). The WOMAC is a widely-used, proprietary outcome measurement tool used to evaluate the condition of subjects with OA of the knee and hip, including pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), and physical functioning (17 questions) of the joints. Each question is measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale from 0 (lowest pain/lowest stiffness/highest function) to 10 (highest pain/highest stiffness/lowest function). The WOMAC Function raw subscore ranges from 0 to 170, and is scaled 0 (highest overall function) to 100 (lowest overall function) for analysis and reporting. | Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized for the FAS without imputation. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline and Week 12 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in OA Function in the Target Knee (WOMAC Function) | Evaluate change from baseline OA function in the target knee as assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) physical function subscore (WOMAC Function). The WOMAC is a widely-used, proprietary outcome measurement tool used to evaluate the condition of subjects with OA of the knee and hip, including pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), and physical functioning (17 questions) of the joints. Each question is measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale from 0 (lowest pain/lowest stiffness/highest function) to 10 (highest pain/highest stiffness/lowest function). The WOMAC Function raw subscore ranges from 0 to 170, and is scaled 0 (highest overall function) to 100 (lowest overall function) for analysis and reporting. | Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized for the FAS without imputation. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline and Week 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in OA Function in the Target Knee (WOMAC Function) | Evaluate change from baseline OA function in the target knee as assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) physical function subscore (WOMAC Function). The WOMAC is a widely-used, proprietary outcome measurement tool used to evaluate the condition of subjects with OA of the knee and hip, including pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions), and physical functioning (17 questions) of the joints. Each question is measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale from 0 (lowest pain/lowest stiffness/highest function) to 10 (highest pain/highest stiffness/lowest function). The WOMAC Function raw subscore ranges from 0 to 170, and is scaled 0 (highest overall function) to 100 (lowest overall function) for analysis and reporting. | Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized for the FAS without imputation. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline and Week 52 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in OA Disease Activity (Patient Global Assessment) | Evaluate change from baseline OA disease activity as assessed by Patient Global Assessment. The Patient Global Assessment is an 11-point [0-10] Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] on which the subjects will rate how they feel their target knee OA is doing, considering all the ways in which their target knee OA may affect them. The NRS is anchored by descriptors at each end ("Very Good" on the left and "Very Bad" on the right). For analysis, Patient Global Assessment scores were scaled to [0-100], where 0 represents "Very Good" and 100 represents "Very Bad". | Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized for the FAS without imputation. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline and Week 12 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in OA Disease Activity (Patient Global Assessment) | Evaluate change from baseline OA disease activity as assessed by Patient Global Assessment. The Patient Global Assessment is an 11-point [0-10] Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] on which the subjects will rate how they feel their target knee OA is doing, considering all the ways in which their target knee OA may affect them. The NRS is anchored by descriptors at each end ("Very Good" on the left and "Very Bad" on the right). For analysis, Patient Global Assessment scores were scaled to [0-100], where 0 represents "Very Good" and 100 represents "Very Bad". | Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized for the FAS without imputation. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline and Week 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in OA Disease Activity (Patient Global Assessment) | Evaluate change from baseline OA disease activity as assessed by Patient Global Assessment. The Patient Global Assessment is an 11-point [0-10] Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] on which the subjects will rate how they feel their target knee OA is doing, considering all the ways in which their target knee OA may affect them. The NRS is anchored by descriptors at each end ("Very Good" on the left and "Very Bad" on the right). For analysis, Patient Global Assessment scores were scaled to [0-100], where 0 represents "Very Good" and 100 represents "Very Bad". | Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized for the FAS without imputation. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline and Week 52 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Change From Baseline in Medial Joint Space Width (mJSW) in the Target Knee | Evaluate change from baseline in mJSW as documented by radiograph of the target knee | Full Analysis Set includes all subjects who received a study injection. Subjects' observed data were analyzed as randomized for the FAS without imputation. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | mm | Baseline and Week 52 |
|
|
AEs were assessed at each in-person and phone visit from the time of study medication injection on Day 1 through Week 56 (EOS) or Early Termination.
Safety Analysis Set includes all subjects who received a study injection categorized as treated. One subject randomized to PLACEBO was mistakenly administered LORECIVIVINT instead, which accounts for the discrepancy of 1 between the treatment group sizes.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | 0.07 mg Lorecivivint | One intra-articular injection of 0.07 mg lorecivivint in 2 ml vehicle Lorecivivint: Healthcare professional-administered intra-articular injection; performed on Day 1 | 1 | 249 | 12 | 249 | 85 | 249 |
| EG001 | Vehicle | One intra-articular injection of 0 mg lorecivivint in 2 ml vehicle Placebo: Healthcare professional-administered intra-articular injection; performed on Day 1 | 0 | 252 | 13 | 252 | 81 | 252 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COVID-19 pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alcoholic pancreatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Clostridium difficile infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colon adenoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colon cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Deep vein thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diverticulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Endocarditis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Salmonellosis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sciatica | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Invasive ductal breast carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rib fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aplastic anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Campylobacter infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Coronary artery occlusion | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Duodenal perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Febrile neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyponatraemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoxia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Influenza | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal chest pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint swelling | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sciatica | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrooesophageal reflux disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Toothache | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ligament sprain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 24.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
This trial was conducted during COVID-19 and its confounding effects on clinical outcomes in knee OA patients based on observational data have been reported (Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2020;28(8):2435-43). Structural progression enrichment, leading to a severely damaged OA population in the OA-11 trial, might have confounded short-term therapeutic pain detection and repeat dosing may be required to demonstrate clinical benefit in severely damaged OA populations.
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher Swearingen, PhD, VP of Biometrics | Biosplice Therapeutics | 858.926.2900 | info@biosplice.com |
| Prot_001.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Oct 8, 2021 | Jan 8, 2026 | SAP_002.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000627701 | lorecivivint |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Grade 3 |
|
| Unilateral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|