Participants in this arm will take part in a clinical CPD activity on depression and diabetes. The activity will include considerations of sex and gender, e.g. the different risk factors and impacts of treatment among women and men.

Participants in this arm will take part in a clinical CPD activity on depression and diabetes. The activity will exclude considerations of sex and gender, e.g. the different risk factors and impacts of treatment among women and men.

2 parallel face-to-face onsite workshops on diabetes and depression in primary care given by experts in French (control and experimental) using Powerpoint presentations.

Clinical behavioural intention to integrate considerations of sex and gender into the diagnosis and treatment of depression and diabetes, using the validated CPD-REACTION scale. CPD=continuing professional development, REACTION=a theoRy-basEd instrument to assess the impACT of continuing professional development activities on professional behavIOr chaNge. A 12-item Likert-type scale (i.e., Strongly disagree = 1, Strongly agree = 7; Never = 1, Always = 7, etc.) evaluates 5 constructs: 1) intention; 2) social influence; 3) beliefs about capabilities; 4) moral norms; and 5) beliefs about consequences. Sociodemographic questions are asked on sex, age (10 age ranges), province, rural/urban/semi-rural practice, and language of consultation. Mean, standard deviation, median and frequencies are calculated to summarize participant characteristics and questionnaire item responses. Construct scores are obtained by calculating the mean score for the items.

Evolution of clinical behavioural intention to integrate considerations of sex and gender into the diagnosis and treatment of depression and diabetes, using the validated CPD-REACTION scale, after a 3-month period.

1) Participants rate acceptability of workshop with the following 9 items: organization, clarity, mastery of subject by trainer, exercises and discussion, presentation of sex and gender data, group interaction, overall quality, organization and quality of discussions and presentations, quality of documents distributed (Poor, Acceptable, Good, Very Good, or Excellent); 2) Participants rate the workshop length (too short, just right, too long); 3) Participants rate their confidence in incorporating the notions presented in the workshop in their management of Type 2 Diabetes (with or without depression) (scale of 1-10, 1=very little confidence, 10=very confident) both before and after the workshop; 4) Participants describe what changes they will make in their practice following the workshop; 5) Participants describe what they liked most and 6) least about the workshop; 7) Participants are asked if they thought the presentation was biased (yes/no) and if yes, are asked for details.